lt1 or old school 383 swap (or LS?)
lt1 or old school 383 swap (or LS?)
I picked up a 92 rs a few weeks ago and am finally getting around to making plans. I am looking at getting started on an engine swap to replace the anemic 305. I am looking at two options. Should I go with a fuel injected lt1 or an old school carbed 383. I have a buddy that has a 383 short block that was just put together that I can get for $700. I guess my big question is what is the advantage of an lt1 over a 383. This will be an occasional driver with some light track duty. I love hearing everyone's opinions so fire away.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,354
Likes: 4
From: morrow, ga
Car: 82 S10, 83 280ZX, 84 Z28
Engine: 355 smallblocks..na, 2.8 turbo
Transmission: 85:th350, 84:700R4
Axle/Gears: 85:ford9 4.85, 84:stock 3.24
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap
The 383 should make more power if done right and an easier swap. The LT1 you may have better cold starts.
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap
That is what I was thinking. I am going to check out the 383 short block tomorrow. He has no idea what is in the block except that it has a 501 lift cam. I know where a bare block that has been machined for a 383 setup is also. I can't check on it until tomorrow. If the short block has a steel crank and forged pistons I will get it. If not I will do a full build. If anyone has a 383 that they want to sell and is willing to ship to Va let me know.
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap
Here is what I am thinking.
383 forged internal short block 9.5:1
probably run iron heads Sportsman 2 64cc 2.02/1.65 valves
Edelbrock RPM air gap intake
Probably Holley 750 DP carb
Comp Cams 305h magnum (Will have to use retrofit cam to use hydraulic)
1.6 roller rockers.
Let me know if you have any combo recommendations
383 forged internal short block 9.5:1
probably run iron heads Sportsman 2 64cc 2.02/1.65 valves
Edelbrock RPM air gap intake
Probably Holley 750 DP carb
Comp Cams 305h magnum (Will have to use retrofit cam to use hydraulic)
1.6 roller rockers.
Let me know if you have any combo recommendations
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,906
Likes: 240
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap
I picked up a 92 rs a few weeks ago and am finally getting around to making plans. I am looking at getting started on an engine swap to replace the anemic 305. I am looking at two options. Should I go with a fuel injected lt1 or an old school carbed 383. I have a buddy that has a 383 short block that was just put together that I can get for $700. I guess my big question is what is the advantage of an lt1 over a 383. This will be an occasional driver with some light track duty. I love hearing everyone's opinions so fire away.
If you had to scrimp and put stock heads on the 383 I'd say LT1 all the way. But with a good set of heads the 383 would beat out a stock LT1 all day long.
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap
I have used the iron sportsman 2 heads and had a lot of luck out of them. I may actually go with a set of AFR heads this time. Cam selection will be the toughest challenge for me. I have always used a roller block. The block I am looking at is from the 60's so I would have to use a retrofit cam if I wanted to go hydraulic roller. I will have to educate myself a little on cams for the older blocks.
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,499
Likes: 31
From: Macon, GA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: Vortec headed 355, xe262
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.70
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap
I would go with the LT1 unless you had enough money left over to buy aftermarket heads (that arent pro comps) AND the 383 is a roller cam block. If the 383 is a flat tappet block OR has iron factory heads, I would go LT1 all day long. Theyre just too cheap and you have a very, very good fuel injection system that works at high RPMs and was factory stock so you know it works right. Only issue is the optispark, but for a good EFI system and a roller cam its worth putting up with it.
But if you have enough money for AFR heads ($1500+) then you may want to consider a Gen III+ swap.
Most 383's, like most homebrew SBC's, are NOT done right. They're usually camel hump flat tappet disasters, if you're lucky. Dont get me started on the summit flat tappet + performer intake + smogger 76cc head 383's you see everywhere. There are stock 305's that can run circles around them.
But if you have enough money for AFR heads ($1500+) then you may want to consider a Gen III+ swap.
Most 383's, like most homebrew SBC's, are NOT done right. They're usually camel hump flat tappet disasters, if you're lucky. Dont get me started on the summit flat tappet + performer intake + smogger 76cc head 383's you see everywhere. There are stock 305's that can run circles around them.
Trending Topics
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap
If I do build a 383 it will not be a so called homebrew setup. I do not use so called camel hump or double hump heads. I do like the world products sportsman 2 heads,edelbrock performer rpm intake with a holley 750 dual line carb. I used this setup on my last small block and was making a little over 450hp at 6500 rpm. It looks to me that an lt1 setup would be more costly by the time you buy the engine then machine it and build it. Not including all of the little things you will need to swap it into a throttle body car. I feel that I can build a nice 383 for around $3500-$4000.
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,499
Likes: 31
From: Macon, GA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: Vortec headed 355, xe262
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.70
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap
If I do build a 383 it will not be a so called homebrew setup. I do not use so called camel hump or double hump heads. I do like the world products sportsman 2 heads,edelbrock performer rpm intake with a holley 750 dual line carb. I used this setup on my last small block and was making a little over 450hp at 6500 rpm. It looks to me that an lt1 setup would be more costly by the time you buy the engine then machine it and build it. Not including all of the little things you will need to swap it into a throttle body car. I feel that I can build a nice 383 for around $3500-$4000.
Last edited by InfernalVortex; Jan 20, 2013 at 11:42 PM.
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap
All of the Lt1's that I can find in my area people are asking $1000 plus for them. How much harder will it be to swap the Lt1 into a throttle body car vs a tuned port car?
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Car: 1984 15th Anniversary Trans Am
Engine: 5.7 Goodwrench (for now)
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap
A running LT1 core can be had with all the supporting hardware (serp belts and harness and computer) for $500 or so and you can make 400fwhp with a cc503 cam and supporting bolt ons. They're also compatible with most of the Gen I stuff that we already have in our cars so the swap is very straightforward.
This man is correct. Even when an LS1 swap looks so awesome, an LT1 swap is great on a budget. You still have to do similar work with either swap (electronic fuel pump, crossmember swap, etc) so take that into consideration. Depending on your budget you can search craigslist... I just saw a 5.3 LM7 with all accessories, computer, and harness online for $250 up in New Hampshire. At that cost, you could budget to pickup an LS1 intake, t56, crossmember, spohn mounts and still have some money left over for an LS7 clutch/flywheel from GMPP!
The deals are out there if you're patient.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,354
Likes: 4
From: morrow, ga
Car: 82 S10, 83 280ZX, 84 Z28
Engine: 355 smallblocks..na, 2.8 turbo
Transmission: 85:th350, 84:700R4
Axle/Gears: 85:ford9 4.85, 84:stock 3.24
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap
Is the 383 a small journal block? If so you may get more opinions on using it. I don't know of small journal 3.75" stroke cranks so it would possibly have to be a custom cut crank...Just seems like a lot of metal to be removed from a crank...I may be wrong...
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap
The 383 is just a 350 block with 400 rods and crank. The only machine work is to the block. If I can find an lt1 motor locally I may go that route. If not I am going with the 383. If I can find some other 3rd gen guys in the area that want to help with a swap then I wouldn't mind doing the lt1 or even an ls1 swap. Just to be clear budget is not the issue for me. My enemy is time. I normally work third shift and by the time I get home I get about 4-5 hours of sleep and back off to work. I have to pretty much do everything on the weekends.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,354
Likes: 4
From: morrow, ga
Car: 82 S10, 83 280ZX, 84 Z28
Engine: 355 smallblocks..na, 2.8 turbo
Transmission: 85:th350, 84:700R4
Axle/Gears: 85:ford9 4.85, 84:stock 3.24
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap
Ok, so it's a late 60s medium journal block. Must be from 1968 or 69. Do you know the casting number? What is your area? I have a shop in Macon GA.
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap
I am near Kingsport Tn. Gotta any Lt1's you might ship? Here is the ads for the 383 setups that I was looking at.
http://tricities.craigslist.org/pts/3546513976.html
http://tricities.craigslist.org/pts/3442025387.html
http://tricities.craigslist.org/pts/3546513976.html
http://tricities.craigslist.org/pts/3442025387.html
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap
Well I just bought this from ebay.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/110984035778...84.m1439.l2649
I hope I didn't get burned to bad. What else will I need for the swap? Are the automatic transmissions much better than the 700r4?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/110984035778...84.m1439.l2649
I hope I didn't get burned to bad. What else will I need for the swap? Are the automatic transmissions much better than the 700r4?
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,906
Likes: 240
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap
Well I just bought this from ebay.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/110984035778...84.m1439.l2649
I hope I didn't get burned to bad. What else will I need for the swap? Are the automatic transmissions much better than the 700r4?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/110984035778...84.m1439.l2649
I hope I didn't get burned to bad. What else will I need for the swap? Are the automatic transmissions much better than the 700r4?
My bolt on lt1 got 32mpg highway cruising in 6th gear. Also ran low 13s with the iron heads and small b-body cam.
I have a Lloyd Elliot 226/232 on a 110lsa cam for sale pretty cheap i never installed it because i decided to go bigger on a fresh shortblock. On stock heads you be making 350rwhp or so.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap
As soon as I get the motor I am going to tear it apart get the block checked and probably still do a forged 383 with the LT1 block. Gotta find a good rotating assembly,decide what heads and cam setup that I want to use and look at induction. I also have to decide if I want to go naturally aspirated or possibly forced induction. I know that I will use a water/meth setup from Snow performance. I used these on my mustang and was real happy. Then I will have to decide on what tuner to use. I will have to get the transmission built and find a rear that will handle the power plus strengthen the frame of my rs.
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,906
Likes: 240
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap
As soon as I get the motor I am going to tear it apart get the block checked and probably still do a forged 383 with the LT1 block. Gotta find a good rotating assembly,decide what heads and cam setup that I want to use and look at induction. I also have to decide if I want to go naturally aspirated or possibly forced induction. I know that I will use a water/meth setup from Snow performance. I used these on my mustang and was real happy. Then I will have to decide on what tuner to use. I will have to get the transmission built and find a rear that will handle the power plus strengthen the frame of my rs.
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap
I was in the process of building a 1988 mustang notchback using a 2012 coyote aliminator block custom heads and cams with a 92mm turbo system to make a 1500hp street car. Decided to get back into 3rd gens instead so sold that project to fund this one. Engines are hard to find in this area especially a 6.0. If I could find one I would get it and shelve my LT1 for an s10 project. If you know where I can a 6.0 please let me know.
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,906
Likes: 240
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap
I was in the process of building a 1988 mustang notchback using a 2012 coyote aliminator block custom heads and cams with a 92mm turbo system to make a 1500hp street car. Decided to get back into 3rd gens instead so sold that project to fund this one. Engines are hard to find in this area especially a 6.0. If I could find one I would get it and shelve my LT1 for an s10 project. If you know where I can a 6.0 please let me know.
www.car-part.com
Guaranteed to find one.
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,906
Likes: 240
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,532
Likes: 204
From: NYC / Jersey
Car: 1990 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Turbo 305 w/MS2
Transmission: 700R4
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap
Originally Posted by toxzzic1
I am looking at getting started on an engine swap to replace the anemic 305...

Originally Posted by toxzzic1
I am looking at two options. Should I go with a fuel injected lt1 or an old school carbed 383. I have a buddy that has a 383 short block that was just put together that I can get for $700. I guess my big question is what is the advantage of an lt1 over a 383. This will be an occasional driver with some light track duty. I love hearing everyone's opinions so fire away...
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap
I am looking at the lq4 and lq9 engines online. It looks like I can get them as cheap as the LT1. I just wonder how big of a pain this swap will be? I know that I can do the 383 in a weekend. I don't want this to be a 5 month project. Having the 6.0 sounds great and I do not know anyone in this area that has this setup. I am going to try and do some research on the lq9 vs the lq4 engine and see how long it will take to do the swap.
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,906
Likes: 240
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GM_LS_e...0.93current.29
- 2005–2006 Pontiac GTO
- 2005–2006 Chevrolet SSR
- 2005–2007 Chevrolet Corvette
- 2006–2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer SS
- 2008–2009 Saab 9-7X Aero
- 2006–2007 Cadillac CTS V-Series
Can also look at the 6.2L blocks. L92/LS3/L99. These engines have sigificantly better flowing heads. Example. Stock LS3 heads will flow over 300cfm on the intake as cast.
At that level of power he's talking about spending it makes no sense to go with Gen1 SBC, or Gen 2 SBC. Make the jump to Gen 3/4.
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,906
Likes: 240
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap
Start reading. I haven't done this swap into a 3rd gen, but I have into a 4th gen. Most people do the 6.0L engine, but use Gen 3 harness/pcm stuff.
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,532
Likes: 204
From: NYC / Jersey
Car: 1990 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Turbo 305 w/MS2
Transmission: 700R4
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap
Originally Posted by Thirdgen89GTA
At that level of money he's talking about spending it makes no sense to go with Gen1 SBC, or Gen 2 SBC. Make the jump to Gen 3/4.
Originally Posted by toxzzic1
This will be an occasional driver with some light track duty...
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,906
Likes: 240
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap
You make it sound like the SBC is essentially useless lol, why would you say that it would make no sense? A 383 SBC can get the job done just like any other engine can, hell a V6 can make 600-RWHP without breaking a sweat too for that matter, and besides, that level of money can be invested in a quality turbo charger, wastegate, 321 stainless header system, as well as an XFI unit. Let's also not forget what he states in his very first post...;
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap
All of the lq4's that I am looking are coming out of 2500 series trucks. any difference from these
- 2005–2006 Pontiac GTO
- 2005–2006 Chevrolet SSR
- 2005–2007 Chevrolet Corvette
- 2006–2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer SS
- 2008–2009 Saab 9-7X Aero
- 2006–2007 Cadillac CTS V-Series
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap
Ok my ultimate goal is 600 rwhp. Yes it would be nice to have a unique swap for this area. I know more about the old school pushrod motors than the new generation engines. I am almost 40 years old so the new stuff would be a learning curve. I also have access to alot of sbc performance parts. I get distracted real easy and have a habit of going overboard. I am glad to see different opinions. I would honestly be happy with either swap. the big thing that I need to look at is time to complete. Dropping in a small block requires little effort where a 6.0 would take considerable more work and a lot more parts to complete the swap. Now I am confused on what to do. My gut says old school 383. My adventrous side says 6.0. So if you don't mind can you tell me what I would gain from going with the 6.0 vs the 383??
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,532
Likes: 204
From: NYC / Jersey
Car: 1990 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Turbo 305 w/MS2
Transmission: 700R4
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap
Originally Posted by toxzzic1
Now I am confused on what to do. My gut says old school 383. My adventrous side says 6.0. So if you don't mind can you tell me what I would gain from going with the 6.0 vs the 383??
Member

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Car: 1984 Camaro
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/4.30
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap
- Better rod/stroke ratio
- 6 bolt, deep skirt block
- gun drilled large base circle camshaft raised in block
- lightweight valvetrain
- O Ring type gaskets
- Gerotor type oil pump
- Factory windage tray
- Factory fuel injection/engine management that's tuned by EVERYONE with a dyno
-Intake manifold with no coolant or oil contact
- Leak free. Dry as the Sahara without even trying.
- Coil on plug igntion that doesn't misfire, ever. Even a regular SBC would see gains with this technology.
These cute little LS engines make absurd power when modded.
Member

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Car: 1984 Camaro
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/4.30
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,532
Likes: 204
From: NYC / Jersey
Car: 1990 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Turbo 305 w/MS2
Transmission: 700R4
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap
Originally Posted by UnstableAviator
True. But then again, I never even pulled a valve cover.
Member

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Car: 1984 Camaro
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/4.30
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap
Start running faster than mid-10's and >130mph, it doesn't matter if you're running SBC or LS.
But as always for the average hot-rodder, the LS reigns supreme! But then again, most average hot-rodder's never get a real driveline in place to enjoy the power anyway.
But as always for the average hot-rodder, the LS reigns supreme! But then again, most average hot-rodder's never get a real driveline in place to enjoy the power anyway.
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap
Well I missed out on the 383 short block. I just emailed him and it sold today. So I guess I am going with the 6.0. Now all i need to know is this the engine I should be looking at?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/01-06-Chevy-...1b8fb0&vxp=mtr
If this is it let me know and I will make the purchase!
http://www.ebay.com/itm/01-06-Chevy-...1b8fb0&vxp=mtr
If this is it let me know and I will make the purchase!
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 576
Likes: 4
From: Gobles, Michigan
Car: 92 Ttop Z28
Engine: Cammed 6.0
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: Built 10 bolt-3.90s w/ PBR discs
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap (or LS?)
If you are going forced induction or high HP, stay away from the aluminum ls1 block, the iron truck blocks are more durable in these situations. Lq4 will be cheaper due to slightly lower compression and smaller cam. I *think* the lq4 is 10:1 and lq9 is 11:1. If you are totally going through the engine, I would go lq4, since the parts that make the lq9 more powerful get swapped anyway. If you don't want to redo the shortblock, just buy the one that better suites your needs as far as compression is concerned.
Senior Member

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 702
Likes: 4
From: Texas
Car: 1989 IROC LSX
Engine: Swapped LS6 Forged by LME
Transmission: 4L65E
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap (or LS?)
If you are going forced induction or high HP, stay away from the aluminum ls1 block, the iron truck blocks are more durable in these situations. Lq4 will be cheaper due to slightly lower compression and smaller cam. I *think* the lq4 is 10:1 and lq9 is 11:1. If you are totally going through the engine, I would go lq4, since the parts that make the lq9 more powerful get swapped anyway. If you don't want to redo the shortblock, just buy the one that better suites your needs as far as compression is concerned.
^ Agreed!
Supreme Member



Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,266
Likes: 37
From: Canada,Ont
Car: 1987 TransAm Ttop
Engine: 2005 LQ4
Transmission: Ls1 T56
Axle/Gears: 3:54
Re: lt1 or old school 383 swap (or LS?)
lq4 - 9.5:1
lq9 - 10.2:1
only differences were the pistons..so buy an lq4 since ppl charge an arm/leg for lq9's and it isnt worth the name sake.
lq's loveee boost out of the box with their low comp and 317 heads that are the same as 243 heads with a large chamber.
Look at my sig and you see what power i made on my stock block lq4 with just cam and ls6 intake on stock manifolds and clogged cats if that gives you an idea power wise.
Id buy just the engine and then buy the fbody accessories,oil pan and pickup, intake and fuel rail. This will be the easiest to install on the stock k member and least amount of modding.
If you buy the engine complete intake to pan with harness and ecu make sure it is a drive by cable setup.I dont know what involved with fitment going this route for oil pan clearance,aswell the truck intake sit higher than the hood I believe so you might want to search up on what others have done who kept the truck stuff.
lq9 - 10.2:1
only differences were the pistons..so buy an lq4 since ppl charge an arm/leg for lq9's and it isnt worth the name sake.
lq's loveee boost out of the box with their low comp and 317 heads that are the same as 243 heads with a large chamber.
Look at my sig and you see what power i made on my stock block lq4 with just cam and ls6 intake on stock manifolds and clogged cats if that gives you an idea power wise.
Id buy just the engine and then buy the fbody accessories,oil pan and pickup, intake and fuel rail. This will be the easiest to install on the stock k member and least amount of modding.
If you buy the engine complete intake to pan with harness and ecu make sure it is a drive by cable setup.I dont know what involved with fitment going this route for oil pan clearance,aswell the truck intake sit higher than the hood I believe so you might want to search up on what others have done who kept the truck stuff.





