LTX and LSX Putting LT1s, LS1s, and their variants into Third Gens is becoming more popular. This board is for those who are doing and have done the swaps so they can discuss all of their technical aspects including repairs, swap info, and performance upgrades.

5.3 LS Questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 15, 2013 | 12:24 AM
  #1  
Cars'n'Guitars's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Elkhart, IN
Car: 1985 Camaro Iroc-Z
Engine: Currently Deciding
Transmission: TH350 Built
Axle/Gears: 3.73 POSI
5.3 LS Questions

What kind of power can I make with a 5.3 LS? Also what all would I need to bolt it to a TH350? If I do this I plan on running a carb so what is the best cfm carb for the 5.3 LS motor that is basically stock? Also what is the difference between the LS1, LS2, LS3 and so on?
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2013 | 12:35 AM
  #2  
Cars'n'Guitars's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Elkhart, IN
Car: 1985 Camaro Iroc-Z
Engine: Currently Deciding
Transmission: TH350 Built
Axle/Gears: 3.73 POSI
Re: 5.3 LS Questions

Also can the 4th gen LS headers be used on 3rd gens? Because I don't want to spend $600 on headers from Hawks Camaro, and if not are they're other cheaper solutions?
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2013 | 11:46 PM
  #3  
Cars'n'Guitars's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Elkhart, IN
Car: 1985 Camaro Iroc-Z
Engine: Currently Deciding
Transmission: TH350 Built
Axle/Gears: 3.73 POSI
Re: 5.3 LS Questions

No one knows anything?
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2013 | 05:52 PM
  #4  
roflchard's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Queen Creek
Car: 1991 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 5.0L TBI
Transmission: Automatic :(
Re: 5.3 LS Questions

http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/e...2/viewall.html
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2013 | 09:04 AM
  #5  
cuisinartvette's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 27
From: Sanctuary state
Car: 67 ******mobile
Engine: 385 Solid roller
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.11
Re: 5.3 LS Questions

You can make plenty of power with it responds to head/cam work just like anything else.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2013 | 11:22 AM
  #6  
Cars'n'Guitars's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Elkhart, IN
Car: 1985 Camaro Iroc-Z
Engine: Currently Deciding
Transmission: TH350 Built
Axle/Gears: 3.73 POSI
Re: 5.3 LS Questions

Originally Posted by cuisinartvette
You can make plenty of power with it responds to head/cam work just like anything else.
What kinds of heads and cam are good for it? I'm used to the gen 1 small blocks not LS so I don't know what heads are good for these motors.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2013 | 11:53 AM
  #7  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 46
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Originally Posted by Cars'n'Guitars
No one knows anything?
In the correct forum, we know a LOT.

Moved to the LTx and LSx Engine Swap sub-forum.

Start by reading the LS swap sticky, https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/ltx-...third-gen.html . Pay particular attention to the link about starting with a truck engine in post #5 (all 5.3's were in trucks, except the FWD versions).

With the exception of a few early 6.0's, the LS-series of engines use a crankshaft with an output flange that is .4" shorter (relative to the bell housing face) than the SBCs and BBCs of old. The bell housing also moves one transmission mount bolt from behind the passenger side cylinder bank to the top center. To mount an older GM Chevy pattern transmission, you will be giving up one bell housing bolt, and you will need a .4" spacer between the crank and flexplate, and longer flexplate mount bolts.

In order to recommend heads and cam, more details on what you plan on using the finished product for is in order.

4th gen LS long tube headers will not fit in a 3rd gen chassis unless you cut out the angled subframes under the 3rd gen. Most people choose not to do that. 4th gen shorties made to replace 4th gen stock manifolds will fit in a 3rd gen.

Why in the world anyone would want to put an ancient fuel/air metering chunk of metal in place of a sophisticated electronic feedback system is beyond me, but if you insist, a 650 CFM carb will handle a 5.3 that is streetable.

If you Google "LS1", a Wikipedia link "GM LS engine" will come up that has a good explanation of the different LS variants.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2013 | 01:36 PM
  #8  
88FormulaKiller's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 655
Likes: 2
From: NH
Car: 1967 Firebird P.T.
Engine: LS3 4" Strkr 422ci
Transmission: MN12 6 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73 8.5" 10 Bolt Eaton
Re: 5.3 LS Questions

Originally Posted by five7kid

Why in the world anyone would want to put an ancient fuel/air metering chunk of metal in place of a sophisticated electronic feedback system is beyond me, but if you insist, a 650 CFM carb will handle a 5.3 that is streetable.

.
lol. it's like whippin a dead horse man
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2013 | 08:44 PM
  #9  
novaderrik's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 6
From: Howard Lake, MN
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: 355- hopefully a 5.3 this summer
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: 5.3 LS Questions

Originally Posted by five7kid
Why in the world anyone would want to put an ancient fuel/air metering chunk of metal in place of a sophisticated electronic feedback system is beyond me,
because electrons are finicky, and you can fix a carb with a smack from a screwdriver..
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2013 | 08:55 PM
  #10  
88FormulaKiller's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 655
Likes: 2
From: NH
Car: 1967 Firebird P.T.
Engine: LS3 4" Strkr 422ci
Transmission: MN12 6 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73 8.5" 10 Bolt Eaton
Re: 5.3 LS Questions

Originally Posted by novaderrik
because electrons are finicky, and you can fix a carb with a smack from a screwdriver..
Finicky electrons in ls motors huh? That's a new one to me.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2013 | 03:39 AM
  #11  
Cars'n'Guitars's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Elkhart, IN
Car: 1985 Camaro Iroc-Z
Engine: Currently Deciding
Transmission: TH350 Built
Axle/Gears: 3.73 POSI
Re: 5.3 LS Questions

I know of many people running LS carbed motors making more power and throttle response then any of that electronic crap.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2013 | 04:45 PM
  #12  
25th327RS's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 576
Likes: 4
From: Gobles, Michigan
Car: 92 Ttop Z28
Engine: Cammed 6.0
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: Built 10 bolt-3.90s w/ PBR discs
Re: 5.3 LS Questions

From the most non-biased position I can take:
Old school carb guys will typically stick with what they know. Carbs do work, and can work well for those who are great at tuning them. Problem typically is that only 3 out of every hundred who think they are masters of carbs, actually are. Thise 3 guys have awesome running cars. The other 97 guys...... They get to enjoy hard starts after heat-soak, loadin up in city driving, and less fuel economy, and temperamental street manors and still think its "right". If you like carbs, that's cool and nothing more need be said. Somebody may not have agreed with the carb decision, but its your car, do what you want. Just don't justify going carb by saying EFI is finicky and less responsive. When properly tuned, that is just not at all the case.


Personally: after my first injected ls build project, I'll never go carbed again in a performance street oriented application. I have more power, throttle response, and 4 more MPG than with any of my carbed sbc combinations.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2013 | 12:05 AM
  #13  
Cars'n'Guitars's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Elkhart, IN
Car: 1985 Camaro Iroc-Z
Engine: Currently Deciding
Transmission: TH350 Built
Axle/Gears: 3.73 POSI
Re: 5.3 LS Questions

Originally Posted by 25th327RS
From the most non-biased position I can take:
Old school carb guys will typically stick with what they know. Carbs do work, and can work well for those who are great at tuning them. Problem typically is that only 3 out of every hundred who think they are masters of carbs, actually are. Thise 3 guys have awesome running cars. The other 97 guys...... They get to enjoy hard starts after heat-soak, loadin up in city driving, and less fuel economy, and temperamental street manors and still think its "right". If you like carbs, that's cool and nothing more need be said. Somebody may not have agreed with the carb decision, but its your car, do what you want. Just don't justify going carb by saying EFI is finicky and less responsive. When properly tuned, that is just not at all the case.


Personally: after my first injected ls build project, I'll never go carbed again in a performance street oriented application. I have more power, throttle response, and 4 more MPG than with any of my carbed sbc combinations.
More people on this forum need to be like you.. And I prefer to have the least amount of electronics as possible. I'm buying a Dodge Cummins for my daily driver so my Camaro is becoming my fulltime toy. So I think I'll be doing a full build for this car that will include a 6.0 LS with atleast 1 turbo involved.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2013 | 06:39 PM
  #14  
kcducttaper's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Re: 5.3 LS Questions

That 6.0 is an LS3 motor. I don't think I've ever heard of anyone sticking a carb on them. Personally, I'm not a fan of carbs anymore for the aforementioned reasons, but if you wanna go for it, be sure to keep the rest of us in the loop on how it goes.

With an LS3 motor, cam, turbo, and supporting mods, you're probably looking in the neighborhood of 600-700rwhp. It's 'essentially' what GM did for the Corvette ZR1. It's basically a regular LS3 with a supercharger dropped in there and it's got 640 at the crank.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2013 | 08:31 PM
  #15  
Cars'n'Guitars's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Elkhart, IN
Car: 1985 Camaro Iroc-Z
Engine: Currently Deciding
Transmission: TH350 Built
Axle/Gears: 3.73 POSI
Re: 5.3 LS Questions

Originally Posted by kcducttaper
That 6.0 is an LS3 motor. I don't think I've ever heard of anyone sticking a carb on them. Personally, I'm not a fan of carbs anymore for the aforementioned reasons, but if you wanna go for it, be sure to keep the rest of us in the loop on how it goes.

With an LS3 motor, cam, turbo, and supporting mods, you're probably looking in the neighborhood of 600-700rwhp. It's 'essentially' what GM did for the Corvette ZR1. It's basically a regular LS3 with a supercharger dropped in there and it's got 640 at the crank.
I know a bunch of people who have done it for drag racing. And I know that was my idea for it, I'm not too worried about carb problems because I know a guy who has been building carbs for 40 years and can do my work no problem. And I will keep you guys updated on everything I do with it, thanks everyone.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2013 | 09:25 PM
  #16  
kcducttaper's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Re: 5.3 LS Questions

If you're going all-out drag style with it, you could push close to 1000hp on pump gas with the right setup.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2013 | 10:03 PM
  #17  
Cars'n'Guitars's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Elkhart, IN
Car: 1985 Camaro Iroc-Z
Engine: Currently Deciding
Transmission: TH350 Built
Axle/Gears: 3.73 POSI
Re: 5.3 LS Questions

Originally Posted by kcducttaper
If you're going all-out drag style with it, you could push close to 1000hp on pump gas with the right setup.
Yep haha this is my idea.. I will let you guys know what happens.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2013 | 11:31 PM
  #18  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 46
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
In your original post you said "basically stock" 5.3. Now your idea is 1000 HP.

Yes, do let us know how it turns out.

As for "electronic crap", that's how racing sanctioning bodies keep cars slowed down - forbidding electronics.

BTW, LS3s are 6.2 liters. 6.0s include LS2, LQ4, LQ9, LY6.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2013 | 11:36 PM
  #19  
Cars'n'Guitars's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Elkhart, IN
Car: 1985 Camaro Iroc-Z
Engine: Currently Deciding
Transmission: TH350 Built
Axle/Gears: 3.73 POSI
Re: 5.3 LS Questions

Originally Posted by five7kid
In your original post you said "basically stock" 5.3. Now your idea is 1000 HP.

Yes, do let us know how it turns out.

As for "electronic crap", that's how racing sanctioning bodies keep cars slowed down - forbidding electronics.

BTW, LS3s are 6.2 liters. 6.0s include LS2, LQ4, LQ9, LY6.
Haha yes this was before I was getting a new daily driver. And that's what I thought LS3 didn't seem right to me, not to knock anyone.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2013 | 09:51 PM
  #20  
kcducttaper's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Re: 5.3 LS Questions

Originally Posted by five7kid
BTW, LS3s are 6.2 liters. 6.0s include LS2, LQ4, LQ9, LY6.
Yeah...definitely had a brain fart right there. My bad.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
neilb
Engine Swap
26
Oct 4, 2018 12:36 AM
z28addict8490
Engine Swap
7
Sep 5, 2015 03:56 PM
E Rod
LTX and LSX
5
Aug 28, 2015 05:17 AM
jharrison5
Engine Swap
5
Aug 19, 2015 05:53 PM
redmaroz
LTX and LSX
7
Aug 16, 2015 11:40 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:54 PM.