Organized Drag Racing and Autocross Drag racing and autocross discussions and questions. Techniques, tips, suggestions, and "what will I run?" questions.

Took the car to the track for the first time today, boy did I get beat.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 1, 2003 | 06:23 PM
  #1  
Quick_Trans_Am's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
From: Northwestern Pennsylvania
Car: 1985 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 with stuffs.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.10 Posi
Took the car to the track for the first time today, boy did I get beat.

I'm posting this here because my local strip isn't "official". If I should have posted in the other racing board, would one of the moderators please move it? Thanks.


Hey everyone. Today was the first time I ever went out on the strip. There's a 1/8 mile track about 5 minutes from my house, so I thought I would swing up there and see what the L98 would do.
There's no timeslips or anything there, just a "run for fun" deal.

1st pass: Raced a thirdgen camaro, appeared to be an '85 or so, with about everything removed under the hood except for the water pump and alternator. Exhaust cutouts too. He took me by 2 car lengths.

2nd pass: Raced a 2003 Eclipse, 3.0/5spd, I had a horrible launch, and he took me by half a car length.

3rd pass: Raced the eclipse again, again I had a horrible launch, and he got me off the line, but once I hooked, he didn't make any headway on me.

4th pass: One more time against the eclipse, same results as pass 3, and I realized something.

The firebird was spinning tire clear in to second gear, so when it finally hooked, it was already in second, which slowed me down because I had to downshift.

I learned a couple things today, mainly about the auto transmission, and I need to learn about traction!

Edit: I should have asked this originally, but can anyone offer some tips on launching? That was my biggest problem.

Last edited by Quick_Trans_Am; Jun 2, 2003 at 06:00 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2003 | 09:54 AM
  #2  
MdFormula350's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 11,634
Likes: 3
From: Maryland; USA
i would launch in drive, and just dont wot right away, slowly get on the gas. untill at least it shifts into second then wot. what kinda tires are you running? u maybe might have the wrong pressure.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2003 | 02:03 PM
  #3  
Quick_Trans_Am's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
From: Northwestern Pennsylvania
Car: 1985 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 with stuffs.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.10 Posi
The tires I'm running aren't anything special. They are Kelly Charger 215/65/15, with 35 PSI. At this point, I really can't afford sticky tires, (unless someone here knows of some relatively inexpensive styles?) so I'm just running with those. I was wondering if a 225/70/15 would give me better grip however. Any ideas?
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2003 | 02:43 PM
  #4  
RegaPlanet's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
From: Ontario
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 406
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
take 10lbs of pressure out of your rears at the track. 225/70's will give you less traction(too much sidewall).
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2003 | 02:43 PM
  #5  
JesasaurusRex's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,036
Likes: 0
Id get some 255x60/70what ever u have x 15. Think thats the biggest size you can throw on those 15x7s, thats the size im runnin...or maybe its 265, anywayz im runnin one or the other 255x60x15 on the rears and 225x60x15 on the fronts. I still get no traction but atleast its the biggest tire I can fit on those 15x7" beasts lol. 215s are way 2 small brotha.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2003 | 06:28 PM
  #6  
Ian_F's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: Hillsborough, NJ, USA
Car: 1996 Jeep Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Transmission: 5 speed
I always thought that if you had more sidewall you would get better traction. Shorter sidewalls are more rigid and less yielding. I could be wrong though. You definitly need a bigger tire in the back. 225's are small! I have 275's on my car, but then again, I have 15x8 rims. If you lose traction right off the bat, don't floor it off the line, ease in to it.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2003 | 12:58 AM
  #7  
JesasaurusRex's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,036
Likes: 0
Yes, bigger side wall is more traction, can deflate more and put more rubber on the ground its not really hard 2 figure out.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2003 | 05:55 AM
  #8  
Quick_Trans_Am's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
From: Northwestern Pennsylvania
Car: 1985 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 with stuffs.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.10 Posi
Thanks for the pointers guys. I'm going to try letting the pressure out when I head out there again this Sunday (only day they're open). I'm also looking in to getting some headers and cutouts for the exhaust. The L98 is mostly stock, except for enlarged plenum openings, a K&N filter, and a shift kit. I'm looking in to more things but I really think the traction is a big issue at the moment. I didn't realize you could put a 255 on the rear wheels. I'll be looking for a set of those as well.


edit: I hope this will yield a bit of difference, otherwise I may have to change my screen name to Not_So_Quick_Trans_am
.

Last edited by Quick_Trans_Am; Jun 3, 2003 at 06:01 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2003 | 11:55 AM
  #9  
rx7speed's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by RegaPlanet
take 10lbs of pressure out of your rears at the track. 225/70's will give you less traction(too much sidewall).

nevermind already covered about sidewall and traction
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2003 | 06:02 AM
  #10  
Quick_Trans_Am's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
From: Northwestern Pennsylvania
Car: 1985 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 with stuffs.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.10 Posi
Here's a thought: would traction bars help the wheels, or would that be kind of unnecessary considering the torque arm is there?
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2003 | 10:10 AM
  #11  
JesasaurusRex's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,036
Likes: 0
Ya they would, replace the lower control arms and get some relocation brackets. You'll be amazed at how bad the stock LCAs are.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2003 | 10:15 AM
  #12  
bbtaz97's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
From: Winfield, IL
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350tpi comming soon!
Transmission: fixed the 700r4 again!
i agree with the whole replacing of the LCA's .. man what a world of differance. just wait until you compare the aftermarket LCA's with the stock ones oncer there off , then youll see what you have no traction!
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2003 | 12:27 PM
  #13  
rx7speed's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by Quick_Trans_Am
Here's a thought: would traction bars help the wheels, or would that be kind of unnecessary considering the torque arm is there?
your not talking those things used on a lot of older camaros, novas,chevelles and all firebirds are you?

those things are for leaf springs


LCA on the other hand are different
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2003 | 02:03 PM
  #14  
Quick_Trans_Am's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
From: Northwestern Pennsylvania
Car: 1985 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 with stuffs.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.10 Posi
Yeah I meant LCA's, sorry for any confusion.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2003 | 10:01 PM
  #15  
StealthElephant's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
From: Woodbury, NJ
Car: 87' Iroc
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
The firebird was spinning tire clear in to second gear, so when it finally hooked, it was already in second, which slowed me down because I had to downshift.
so you were letting it shift automatically?

shift manually, start in 1st, rev as high as you can (stock stall doesn't go that high) and roll your foot on the gas thru 1st, then shift into 2nd, mine is REALLY easy to short shift 2nd....

if your spinning tire at launch then your engine is probably reving REALLY fast since there is no load on it, so basically your spinning tire, reving to 5 grand, shifting into 2nd, getting traction, then your not in your powerband and you short shifted 1st....def try to launch in 1st, once you run a good number of times you'll be able to feel when your car stops pulling (normalling around 4500) and then shift into 2nd.....it's rough....it's so loud at the track and everything happens so fast...and pretty much once you start spinning that run is ruined....just gotta get a feel for how fast to roll on the gas
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2003 | 05:27 AM
  #16  
Quick_Trans_Am's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
From: Northwestern Pennsylvania
Car: 1985 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 with stuffs.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.10 Posi
I just had the shifter in "D" and went. I'm going to try the tire trick and keep it manual to see what happens. So you are saying not to put full pressure on the pedal in 1st, and kind of ease in to it? I agree, I was trying to pay so much attention to everything at once, it was kind of hard to keep up lol. But I imagine it all comes with time.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2003 | 01:13 PM
  #17  
Quick_Trans_Am's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
From: Northwestern Pennsylvania
Car: 1985 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 with stuffs.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.10 Posi
Went again today.....

I went today to the track, kind of on short notice, so I didn't get a chance to try letting some pressure off the tires. I did however (thanks to a really nasty speed bump) run without my rear muffler hooked up, and I think that helped for a few HP. I also was only running a 1/4 tank of gas as well. I only had time for 2 passes:

1st pass: Raced a buddy's neon, for fun, and took him by 2 car lengths, with much better traction as well.

2nd pass: Raced a new mustang GT. I had him off the line (for some reason my car was hooking phenomenally well), but that didn't last. At the finish line my front bumper was at his rear bumper, and I was quite surprised at how well the L98 kept up with the mustang, considering I've heard stories about how quick they are.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2003 | 06:47 PM
  #18  
85_ZED28's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 0
From: St Catharines, ON
Car: '85 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.23
what were your times??
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2003 | 07:23 PM
  #19  
Quick_Trans_Am's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
From: Northwestern Pennsylvania
Car: 1985 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 with stuffs.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.10 Posi
no timeslips, sorry. They don't have any at the track. Just race who you want and see who wins. I'm going to have someone stand with a stop watch and clock me next time just to get an idea..... it's only a 1/8 mile track to, but it's local, so I'm not complaining.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ghettobird52
Tech / General Engine
16
Jul 5, 2024 11:18 PM
specialized
TPI
27
Jun 18, 2022 09:26 AM
Azrael91966669
DIY PROM
25
Jun 20, 2017 04:04 AM
ZsTransAm
Electronics
1
Aug 11, 2015 07:30 PM
1nastygta
Firebirds for Sale
2
Aug 8, 2015 07:38 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:13 AM.