Organized Drag Racing and Autocross Drag racing and autocross discussions and questions. Techniques, tips, suggestions, and "what will I run?" questions.

How is he running these times ??????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 10:47 AM
  #1  
D's89IROCZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 1
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L EFI LTR setup
Transmission: T-5 World Class
How is he running these times ??????

I met a gent at the track with a thirdgen a couple of weeks ago ...and i have been trying to understand how the heck he is running a 10.5 with this setup


ZZ4 crate motor
stock .474/.510 ...208/221@.50 112LSA camshaft
stock 113 casteing heads ( 58 cc ) with porting ( he says a little )
10:1 flattop forged pistons
4.56 gears in a moser 12 bolt.....but 30" tall tires
dual plane intake
Holley 750 double pumper

no nitrous , no charger , no turbo

I seen it run .....man it was sweet ......so smooth I could have driven it home . The guy just kept laughing as I burned braincells as to why he was getting these wicked times
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 11:58 AM
  #2  
wingnut's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
From: Rochester Hills, MI
Car: '91 Firebird
Engine: 408 SBC
Transmission: T5
Re: How is he running these times ??????

Originally posted by D's89IROCZ
The guy just kept laughing as I burned braincells as to why he was getting these wicked times
I would bet money on the fact that he is pulling your leg - there's no way that engine will go 10.5's in a third gen.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 12:26 PM
  #3  
D's89IROCZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 1
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L EFI LTR setup
Transmission: T-5 World Class
I seen the outside of it ......... and alll I really could tell about it for sure was ....

it had a dual plain intake ......and it was a smalllblock .....and they were the 113 casteings ( stock ZZ4 heads ) .

and I did see the track times
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 01:05 PM
  #4  
wingnut's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
From: Rochester Hills, MI
Car: '91 Firebird
Engine: 408 SBC
Transmission: T5
How do you know the casting number of his heads? They are located under the valve covers. In any case, it is not physically possible for a stock ZZ4 engine to get a third gen anywhere near 10.50's (naturally aspirated). Sorry, this guy was taking you for a ride.

I believe that the car ran those times. I just don't believe he was telling you the truth about his engine.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 01:07 PM
  #5  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Perhaps a fogger system plumbed under the intake.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 01:13 PM
  #6  
paul_huryk's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 10
From: Ahead of you...
Car: 1984 LG4 Camaro
Engine: 350 Roller Motor
Transmission: Level 10 700R4
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
The car weighs 1500lbs.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 01:21 PM
  #7  
Teenfixing88RS's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: California
Car: 1988 Camaro RS
it might just be me but i get the feeling he's not telling you something..<----
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 01:33 PM
  #8  
unknown_host's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,245
Likes: 1
From: Medford, Oregon
Car: 1989 Iroc Z L98
Originally posted by paul_huryk
The car weighs 1500lbs.
Even if it weighed 1500 lbs, a stock zz4 motor isnt going to make the torque to justify a 30" tall slick, let alone make one spin.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 01:35 PM
  #9  
unknown_host's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,245
Likes: 1
From: Medford, Oregon
Car: 1989 Iroc Z L98
And the zz4 has hyp. pistons, so if it has forged pistons that tells you right there that the engine has been apart. I am guessing it is some crazy stroker motor / nitrous motor.

I would bet it is some crazy stroker motor, and the additional displacement masks the sound of a larger cam.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 02:20 PM
  #10  
D's89IROCZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 1
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L EFI LTR setup
Transmission: T-5 World Class
Originally posted by wingnut
How do you know the casting number of his heads?



Welll ..... he told me ( now I feal really dumb )

but ...... ya I agree that the motor has been apart with ....him saying it has forged pistons ........ but I never seen any solinoids .... extra fuel lines or anything under the hood . It was pretty clean .



I am starting to believe it is some crazy stroker motor . Just think he was selling it for around 18'000 . I wish I would have gotten his number . He says it was a registered NHRA car ...... frig I wish I had a way of looking for a picture of it on the net ...kinda like a mug shot ..... becasue I could pick it out noooo problem . Thanx for the feedback all ....... I just thought there was some nasty seceret to makeing gobs of power ....... I was running his cam ...and same pistons ...same C/R ...... sure my heads ain't aluminum ....but they had work done to them


thanx again
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 04:03 PM
  #11  
unknown_host's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,245
Likes: 1
From: Medford, Oregon
Car: 1989 Iroc Z L98
Originally posted by D's89IROCZ
Welll ..... he told me ( now I feal really dumb )

but ...... ya I agree that the motor has been apart with ....him saying it has forged pistons ........ but I never seen any solinoids .... extra fuel lines or anything under the hood . It was pretty clean .



I am starting to believe it is some crazy stroker motor . Just think he was selling it for around 18'000 . I wish I would have gotten his number . He says it was a registered NHRA car ...... frig I wish I had a way of looking for a picture of it on the net ...kinda like a mug shot ..... becasue I could pick it out noooo problem . Thanx for the feedback all ....... I just thought there was some nasty seceret to makeing gobs of power ....... I was running his cam ...and same pistons ...same C/R ...... sure my heads ain't aluminum ....but they had work done to them


thanx again
Just to show the lengths people will go to build a sleeper motor, a friend of mine is having camel humps machined onto the front of a set of dart 230cc raised runner heads that flow close to 320 cfm on intake .
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 08:10 PM
  #12  
86 IROC's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: FL
I'm not saying his motor was 100% legit... but has anyone ever read up on the crate motor class cars? They disected one in an old issuse of HOT ROD. It was a 1st Gen Camaro w/ a Fast Burn 385 motor... ran in the 10's IIRC. If I can dig up that old isssue - you can bet your *** I will post it.

Another thing to consider is Stock Eliminator cars, they launch like a SOB & ET crazy w/ sub par MPH.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 08:30 PM
  #13  
Slow84Z's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 305 HO
Transmission: Slippin' 700R4
I've seen that article in Hot Rod with that 1st gen running 10's. I don't have it with me (here in college).
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 08:31 PM
  #14  
AlkyIROC's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,269
Likes: 170
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Originally posted by 86 IROC
Another thing to consider is Stock Eliminator cars, they launch like a SOB & ET crazy w/ sub par MPH.
But the specs he quoted are nowhere near a stocker and that's how they make most of their power.

Personally I think he's pulling your leg about what he's got. The car either needs to weigh below 2500 pounds (not likely) or has a hidden NOS system in it or is really a huge SBC 434 etc. They make a cool NOS system now that hides inside the air cleaner. You can also hide it inside the intake manifold.

I could tell everyone my engine is only a 396 and there's no real way anyone can prove it without a teardown.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2003 | 02:42 PM
  #15  
Kwik88's Avatar
Junior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: Palos Hills, IL
Car: 1988 IROC
Engine: 383 SP
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Dana S60 4:10
Swamp land in Florida comes to mind!!!!
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2003 | 12:00 AM
  #16  
mod313's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
From: Hanover, MA
Car: Camaro
Engine: 305-150/254 combo
Transmission: TH350 or T200
Axle/Gears: Srange 12 bolt; 5.14 or 5.38
The suspension, converter, tranny stuff that makes a stocker fly will really make a hotter motor crank. At the just completed Dutch Classic at Maple Grove both Brian Van Poppel and Dave Casey set new national records with their 305 stockers at 10.91 and 10.98 respectively. Put a bigger cam in the same car with a better carb and intake and take a wild guess at how much more they might pick up. And 30" tires aren't the et killer you might think. Last year I ran 4.56's and tried a 30" tall radial slick in place of my bias 28's for couple passes. Barely any et difference at all, keep in mind a radial slick won't grow like a bias one plus they're worth a tenth over bias as well comparing equal size tires.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2003 | 08:45 AM
  #17  
Kwik88's Avatar
Junior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: Palos Hills, IL
Car: 1988 IROC
Engine: 383 SP
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Dana S60 4:10
I agree with having the car set up right, but you still have to have xxx amount of horsepower to get a certin et for a particular weight car. No?
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2003 | 04:53 PM
  #18  
D's89IROCZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 1
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L EFI LTR setup
Transmission: T-5 World Class
I be thinking he was full of it ....thanx all



I just had to know how the heck he got that thing sooooo fast ........like I am sure the HP is through the to run 10's I figured I had a chance if I had this "magic" seceret
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2003 | 09:38 PM
  #19  
mod313's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
From: Hanover, MA
Car: Camaro
Engine: 305-150/254 combo
Transmission: TH350 or T200
Axle/Gears: Srange 12 bolt; 5.14 or 5.38
Think about this. Those guys ran 1.9's with a 305 at just over 3000 lbs. Add 45 cubes, better intake, bigger cam, port work to heads (not allowed in stocker motors), better larger carb, etc and wouldn't you agree the 4 tenths better is vety reasonable if his car is class ready as he states?
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2003 | 11:54 PM
  #20  
383backinblack's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,776
Likes: 8
From: Santa Monica, CA
Car: '91 Camaro RS
Engine: F1R Procharged 383
Transmission: Tremec 600
Axle/Gears: moser 12 bolt, 4.11's 33 spline axl
ya we call that lying around here
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2003 | 01:39 AM
  #21  
unknown_host's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,245
Likes: 1
From: Medford, Oregon
Car: 1989 Iroc Z L98
Originally posted by mod313
Think about this. Those guys ran 1.9's with a 305 at just over 3000 lbs. Add 45 cubes, better intake, bigger cam, port work to heads (not allowed in stocker motors), better larger carb, etc and wouldn't you agree the 4 tenths better is vety reasonable if his car is class ready as he states?
Then it wouldnt be a zz4 engine would it?
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2003 | 08:08 AM
  #22  
mod313's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
From: Hanover, MA
Car: Camaro
Engine: 305-150/254 combo
Transmission: TH350 or T200
Axle/Gears: Srange 12 bolt; 5.14 or 5.38
So you're now saying the ZZ4 350 isn't 45 inches bigger than a 305?!? And the ZZ4 cam isn't bigger than the smaller cam in the 305? And the 750 carb isn't bigger than the 650 cfm q-jet we have to run? And the aftermarket intake isn't better than the stock one we have to run? And you're forgetting the guy was said to have admitted a touch of port work, something we aren't allowed to do at all in Stock. All this stuff adds a bunch to torque output, and like I said, if you couple the better sorted car to this motor you don't believe that 4 tenths is reasonable? And this is assuming he's at equal wt, if he's 100 or 200 lbs less there's a tenth for each 100. Makes the 4 tenths even easier to pick up.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2003 | 02:39 PM
  #23  
unknown_host's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,245
Likes: 1
From: Medford, Oregon
Car: 1989 Iroc Z L98
Originally posted by mod313
So you're now saying the ZZ4 350 isn't 45 inches bigger than a 305?!? And the ZZ4 cam isn't bigger than the smaller cam in the 305? And the 750 carb isn't bigger than the 650 cfm q-jet we have to run? And the aftermarket intake isn't better than the stock one we have to run? And you're forgetting the guy was said to have admitted a touch of port work, something we aren't allowed to do at all in Stock. All this stuff adds a bunch to torque output, and like I said, if you couple the better sorted car to this motor you don't believe that 4 tenths is reasonable? And this is assuming he's at equal wt, if he's 100 or 200 lbs less there's a tenth for each 100. Makes the 4 tenths even easier to pick up.
The way you worded it I thought you meant take a zz4, add 45 cubic inches to it, a bigger cam and port work. My bad.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Vintageracer
Camaros for Sale
12
Jan 10, 2020 05:33 PM
midge54
LTX and LSX
21
Dec 27, 2019 04:14 PM
Azrael91966669
DIY PROM
25
Jun 20, 2017 04:04 AM
justin57
TBI
30
Aug 20, 2015 07:05 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:53 AM.