G-Tech VS. real life track times... how accurate?
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 5.7 TPI L98
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" with 4.11
G-Tech VS. real life track times... how accurate?
I own a G-tech accelerometer (the latest version), as a testing device. It is a consistant baseline i use for all my vehicle('s) mods. I store all my runs and document them. I know the ET's are more accurate than the dyno numbers, but has anyone tested a g-tech against a real life drag-strip??
I do all my test runs on a long flat backroad. I survey the conditions and take an average of 2 runs both ways. I also calibrate it before each session... I haven't tested it yet, but i think the g-tech is a little generous by .1 or .2 seconds against the lights....
Im liking the numbers im seeing
I do all my test runs on a long flat backroad. I survey the conditions and take an average of 2 runs both ways. I also calibrate it before each session... I haven't tested it yet, but i think the g-tech is a little generous by .1 or .2 seconds against the lights....
Im liking the numbers im seeing
Last edited by 2QUIK4U; Apr 28, 2004 at 10:34 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
From: Cypress,Tx
Car: 89 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 carbed now
Transmission: World Class T5
Axle/Gears: Peg Leg w/ 3.73's
Mine was terribly off. I ran like .6 better than the gtech said. Of course my exhaust makes the hole car vibrate when I get on it so I think that has something to do with it. I have had friends that say they were within .3 of there gtech times on the dragstrip though. Guess there is only one way for you to find out.
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 758
Likes: 1
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1988 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L Fuel Injection
Transmission: Automatic 4speed /w OVerdrive
Doesn't the Gtech start counting the moment you launch? That might be what causes the miss calculations.
Originally posted by ThraxXx
Doesn't the Gtech start counting the moment you launch? That might be what causes the miss calculations.
Doesn't the Gtech start counting the moment you launch? That might be what causes the miss calculations.
Just take it with you when you go to the track and compare the slip to the gtech. Just remember it shows the instantaneous speed not the trap speed.
Laters.
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 5.7 TPI L98
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" with 4.11
what i like is the consistancy i get when i run on the same road. I can run it 4 times in a row with very little varience.....
I am going to test it against the real deal in a few weeks. I haven't made it to the track yet.
G-tech works great for testing mods and the difference they make.
I am going to test it against the real deal in a few weeks. I haven't made it to the track yet.
G-tech works great for testing mods and the difference they make.
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: New Boston, MI
Car: 2004 GTP CompG
Engine: L32 SC
G-tech Pro (newer one) does not start from the moment you launch...
http://www.gtechprosupport.com/support/
Scroll down as to why they don't match the track...you can set the rollout on the g-tech (based on staging).
For testing HP, you have to run different than the 1/4 mile..yep its in the manual.
I have one..its 0-60 times are dead even with the ones I get in the moates software....
http://www.gtechprosupport.com/support/
Scroll down as to why they don't match the track...you can set the rollout on the g-tech (based on staging).
For testing HP, you have to run different than the 1/4 mile..yep its in the manual.
I have one..its 0-60 times are dead even with the ones I get in the moates software....
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 2
From: Prince George, BC, Canada
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: 5.7L Supercharged
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 3.70
I took mine to the track once just to see how accurate it was, I did 5 runs with it and this is what I got, this is with the older version.
Track-------------------GTech
14.48 at 96.7mph----14.36 at 101.7mph
14.65 at 96.5----------14.54 at 101.7
14.53 at 96.5----------14.46 at 101.5
14.61 at 96.3----------14.49 at 100.7
14.52 at 96.4----------14.39 at 101.4
A average of 0.12 seconds faster and 5mph more I would say.
Track-------------------GTech
14.48 at 96.7mph----14.36 at 101.7mph
14.65 at 96.5----------14.54 at 101.7
14.53 at 96.5----------14.46 at 101.5
14.61 at 96.3----------14.49 at 100.7
14.52 at 96.4----------14.39 at 101.4
A average of 0.12 seconds faster and 5mph more I would say.
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: Ewing, NJ
Car: 1976 Camaro LT
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH350
i have a tazzo, you can actually use it during a run at the track and then go back and correct all teh increments. it is pretty accurate once you dial it in. with in a tenth.
later
tim
later
tim
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
From: Nashville TN
Car: 1989 Trans Am
Engine: 355 HSR
Transmission: Pro-Built 700r4 w/ 3400 converter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt w/ 3.42 gears
We tested my car w/ it one day w/ the PRO at the track and it was only off by about .1 or .15 each time. MPH was high, but that is b/c of the way that the meter measures the MPH differnetly from the track. Track takes a measurement from 10 feet before, and then at the finish, and depending on how fast you go between those two, your MPH are calculated. The Gtech is what you MPH is at the end approximately supposively.
The reason it is off sometimes by so much is b/c the gtech takes into consideration no wheel spin.
The reason it is off sometimes by so much is b/c the gtech takes into consideration no wheel spin.
Moderator


Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,273
Likes: 171
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
The track measures the time it takes from 66 feet before the finish line, to the finish line. MPH is calculated on the time it takes to break both beams. Many, many years ago the timers were 66 feet before and 66 feet after the finish (132 feet total)(1/4 mile is 1320). The last 66 feet was eliminated since racers are required to slow down after the 1/4 mile. Having to accellerate another 66 feet wasn't productive for the race.
There's no other way a track can take a true mph reading right at the finish line unless a radar gun was used for both lanes. It needs to do a time over distance calculation to determine MPH.
A G-tech is an accellerometer. Since it measures accelleration on a constant input, it can tell how long it takes to do a 1/4 mile and will give a MPH at the 1/4 miel point. G-tech will also do garbage in/garbage out. If proper numbers such as vehicle weight or gear ratios are not used then inaccurate readings will result.
There's no other way a track can take a true mph reading right at the finish line unless a radar gun was used for both lanes. It needs to do a time over distance calculation to determine MPH.
A G-tech is an accellerometer. Since it measures accelleration on a constant input, it can tell how long it takes to do a 1/4 mile and will give a MPH at the 1/4 miel point. G-tech will also do garbage in/garbage out. If proper numbers such as vehicle weight or gear ratios are not used then inaccurate readings will result.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pac J
Tech / General Engine
3
May 17, 2020 10:44 AM





