will this get me below 13.5~ @105~
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
From: upstate new york
Car: 91 camaro rs
Engine: 355, blowthru, 78mm turbo
Transmission: th350, art carr converter
Axle/Gears: stock 7.5, 3.23s, minispool
will this get me below 13.5~ @105~
this is my new combo, --'85 trans am, 3150lbs w/ driver
'72 350 bored .060" over---("desktop dyno'd" 382hp/405ft/lbs...)
58cc 305 H.0. heads ported/polished
edelbrock rpm air gap intake
lunati bracket master 230deg.(292advertised)480" hyd. cam
demon 700dbl. pump 4bbl
edelbrock TES headers
flowmaster 3" american thunder catback, w/ no cat
jegs aluminum radiator
'88 700R-4
master overhaul rebuild
corvette servo
superior shift kit
b&m holeshot 2400 stall converter
'86 drum rear
richmond mini spool
3.42 gears
hoosier quick time 26x9.5x16 slicks on 16x8s-rear
kumho ecsta 712 225/55/16 on 16x8(40psi)-front
Can i get mid 13's at 105ish? Or quicker?!?!?! any advice or thoughts would be appreciated
'72 350 bored .060" over---("desktop dyno'd" 382hp/405ft/lbs...)
58cc 305 H.0. heads ported/polished
edelbrock rpm air gap intake
lunati bracket master 230deg.(292advertised)480" hyd. cam
demon 700dbl. pump 4bbl
edelbrock TES headers
flowmaster 3" american thunder catback, w/ no cat
jegs aluminum radiator
'88 700R-4
master overhaul rebuild
corvette servo
superior shift kit
b&m holeshot 2400 stall converter
'86 drum rear
richmond mini spool
3.42 gears
hoosier quick time 26x9.5x16 slicks on 16x8s-rear
kumho ecsta 712 225/55/16 on 16x8(40psi)-front
Can i get mid 13's at 105ish? Or quicker?!?!?! any advice or thoughts would be appreciated
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,859
Likes: 14
From: Cypress, California
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt
If you can get close to that horsepower and with the weight of your car you should be in the 12's with no problem. Remember you have to get that power to the ground. So you will need good drag tires and proper suspension mods.
I have a car that is around 3800 pounds race ready with me in it and with 354HP at the crank I have turned a 13.30 in the quarter. With the weight alone you would be 6 tenths quicker.
Something else you might want to think about is the B&M governor kit to adjust your shift points. Mine was shifting around the 5000 mark stock with the 700R4. See where your shift points are and adjust accordingly. Allen
I have a car that is around 3800 pounds race ready with me in it and with 354HP at the crank I have turned a 13.30 in the quarter. With the weight alone you would be 6 tenths quicker.
Something else you might want to think about is the B&M governor kit to adjust your shift points. Mine was shifting around the 5000 mark stock with the 700R4. See where your shift points are and adjust accordingly. Allen
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Id hope so, Im right near that race weight with 272 rwhp (maybe 320 flywheel if that) and have gone high 12s on radials and mid 12s on slicks with no suspension mods. I would say you should theoretically be deep 12s with that power and weight so long as its geared right!
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,576
Likes: 30
From: Harford County, MD
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
how are you so light? is the car stripped? ihave all *necessary* street equipment and weigh 3300 w/driver, 3045 w/o.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
From: upstate new york
Car: 91 camaro rs
Engine: 355, blowthru, 78mm turbo
Transmission: th350, art carr converter
Axle/Gears: stock 7.5, 3.23s, minispool
the car has 3.42's now, but will be changing accordingly after i run it and see what im rev'ed at the end of the 1/4... im thinking of a 4.10 with the 26" slick should allow a possible 115 trap speed...(redline is around 6500ish)
and the car's weight reductions is
deleted:
AC and heater off firewall
all AC pump, pulley, belts, condenser, hoses..
A.I.R. pump, bracket, belts,
power steering (for now.)
windsheild wiper resovoir, motor, and wipers,
radio, heater, carpet, door panels, back seat, all plastic trim except dash,
with plastic race seat.
and i weigh 135.
and the car's weight reductions is
deleted:
AC and heater off firewall
all AC pump, pulley, belts, condenser, hoses..
A.I.R. pump, bracket, belts,
power steering (for now.)
windsheild wiper resovoir, motor, and wipers,
radio, heater, carpet, door panels, back seat, all plastic trim except dash,
with plastic race seat.
and i weigh 135.
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,576
Likes: 30
From: Harford County, MD
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
ok, so you have a stripped interior and only weight 30lbs. less than me! my goodness man, put that interior back in the car! it only makes the car less complete! just take the sound deadening material off! i weigh 256lbs, which is why my car seems heavier than yours, but in reality, it's just my big butt that wieghs more than your scrawny self!
Trending Topics
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 46
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
13.5 @ 105 sounds to me like all top end and no launch.
My shoebox hit 12.9's at 102 at 3880 lbs. (de-tuned in an attempt to hit 13-flat) - never dyno'd, but estimate 400 GFWHP, 325 RWHP. Of course, 700 lbs lighter and better aerodynamics should help your MPH, but the lower weight should also help the launch.
For reference, it was hitting 103 mph 2 years earlier with vacuum secondaries, less stall, and open exhaust - but only 13.5's. Going to DP and more stall moved 60 fts from 2.05-ish to 1.75-ish - and took more than a half second off ET with no increase in power.
What a difference a launch makes...
My shoebox hit 12.9's at 102 at 3880 lbs. (de-tuned in an attempt to hit 13-flat) - never dyno'd, but estimate 400 GFWHP, 325 RWHP. Of course, 700 lbs lighter and better aerodynamics should help your MPH, but the lower weight should also help the launch.
For reference, it was hitting 103 mph 2 years earlier with vacuum secondaries, less stall, and open exhaust - but only 13.5's. Going to DP and more stall moved 60 fts from 2.05-ish to 1.75-ish - and took more than a half second off ET with no increase in power.
What a difference a launch makes...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post







