tpi intake and boost
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
From: concord New Hampshire
Car: 87 iroc and 88 k2500 tbi truck
Engine: l98 and lo5
Transmission: 700 r4's babby
tpi intake and boost
i know that in a na setup the stock tpi intake is very restrictive but under boost is it just as bad. i plan on running a set of afr 190's and a set of headers. would the stock l98 cam work i know that some times smog cams work better than a hotter cam under boost do to the fact it dose not get blown out the exhaust. so in all i would like to do heads, headers and push about 8-10 psi of cool boost into it. would this work out what type of power.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
From: In the corner of my mind!
Car: 1989 TTA #1240
Engine: 3.8 SFI turbo
Transmission: 2004r
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Intake plays less of a part in a boosted application. You will see a tremendous amount of tourqe from a blown tpi intake and yes it still will be limited in it's powerband. I would move to a specific blower cam. Som e of the cams in the L98's have tight LSA's and you will benefit from a blower cam (usually 114 lsa or higher)
The TPI intake works great on boosted applications!
I was running 11.0's - 10.90's whith 15lbs of non-intercooled boost. I was also pushing it to 7100rpm, don't believe everything you read about the low rpm limitations of the TPI.
I was running 11.0's - 10.90's whith 15lbs of non-intercooled boost. I was also pushing it to 7100rpm, don't believe everything you read about the low rpm limitations of the TPI.
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
From: concord New Hampshire
Car: 87 iroc and 88 k2500 tbi truck
Engine: l98 and lo5
Transmission: 700 r4's babby
so the stock tpi is good but the cam is not and i should get a set of headers and heads. right
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
From: In the corner of my mind!
Car: 1989 TTA #1240
Engine: 3.8 SFI turbo
Transmission: 2004r
Axle/Gears: 3.27
you will definately need to pen that exhaust up. Although the tpi intake does quite well under boost the exhaust stroke will be a different story. It is a big bottleneck in the power making equation. If you would give some more specifics about your planthe guys here can give you a good list of choices from experiences.
Generally a 114 cam with decent sized runners(ported 195's) and a cleaned up intake will produce a lot of power for the street.
Generally a 114 cam with decent sized runners(ported 195's) and a cleaned up intake will produce a lot of power for the street.
Last edited by PETE; Apr 16, 2006 at 07:39 PM.
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
From: concord New Hampshire
Car: 87 iroc and 88 k2500 tbi truck
Engine: l98 and lo5
Transmission: 700 r4's babby
i was thinking of a set of afr 210's and a set of headers with a blower cam on about 8-10 psi
TGO Supporter


Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 1
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
there may be some on this board who will disagree and to some extent my self I do too, especially for the average power adder street car. but, the performance eseminar I went to a coupla years ago in denver, I think dutweiler and a few others were there they said on a blowthrough boosted application the best flowing heads , intake, TB are as critical here as they are on a normally asperated max effort engine.
Last edited by B4Ctom1; Jan 20, 2003 at 07:38 PM.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
From: concord New Hampshire
Car: 87 iroc and 88 k2500 tbi truck
Engine: l98 and lo5
Transmission: 700 r4's babby
i would just like to be able to stomp the snot out of the stock ls1 4th gens out there
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
From: In the corner of my mind!
Car: 1989 TTA #1240
Engine: 3.8 SFI turbo
Transmission: 2004r
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Build a good 350 and put an F1 on it and then put your money where you're gonna need it(traction anf fuel).
Pete
Pete
Originally posted by B4Ctom1
I think dutweiler and a few others were there they said on a blowthrough boosted application the best flowing heads , intake, TB are as critical here as they are on a normally asperated max effort engine.
I think dutweiler and a few others were there they said on a blowthrough boosted application the best flowing heads , intake, TB are as critical here as they are on a normally asperated max effort engine.

what would you rather have?
20psi and 800hp
or
8psi and 800hp
???
Originally posted by B4Ctom1
there may be some on this board who will disagree and to some extent my self I do too, especially for the average power adder street car. but, the performance eseminar I went to a coupla years ago in denver, I think dutweiler and a few others were there they said on a blowthrough boosted application the best flowing heads , intake, TB are as critical here as they are on a normally asperated max effort engine.
there may be some on this board who will disagree and to some extent my self I do too, especially for the average power adder street car. but, the performance eseminar I went to a coupla years ago in denver, I think dutweiler and a few others were there they said on a blowthrough boosted application the best flowing heads , intake, TB are as critical here as they are on a normally asperated max effort engine.
I do believe the TPI intake can work very well on a forced induction application, and that other more critical components should be changed before you will have to switch intakes. A good set of heads, a decent hyd. roller cam, and a set of 1 3/4" Hooker long tubes. This combination with a good supercharger (t-trim, y/s-trim, d-1sc, f1, f1-r) should give you more than enough power to beat up on most street cars out there!
just my .02
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,024
Likes: 91
From: DC Metro Area
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
Originally posted by c4boom
i would just like to be able to stomp the snot out of the stock ls1 4th gens out there
i would just like to be able to stomp the snot out of the stock ls1 4th gens out there
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,024
Likes: 91
From: DC Metro Area
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
Originally posted by 89ProchargedROC
sure it is...because you'll make more power on less boost and your motor will be more efficient
what would you rather have?
20psi and 800hp
or
8psi and 800hp
???
sure it is...because you'll make more power on less boost and your motor will be more efficient

what would you rather have?
20psi and 800hp
or
8psi and 800hp
???

Being realistic, to get 800hp out of a 350 at 8psi you’d have to be turning some SERIOUS rpm’s, at that point the 20psi version would be more dependable assuming that you’ve got low enough compression or high enough octane that you can tune it right.
To answer a few other things that have been mentioned… the big restriction on the stock setup is the crappy heads, almost anything is an improvement, even a set of LG4 heads, but if you go with something that flows over 200cfm on the intake you’ll need to start modifying the TPI setup to take advantage of that additional flow. I’m not really sure what the point is with going with AFR 210’s or 220’s if you will never get a TPI to flow more then a set of 190’s will flow…
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
From: concord New Hampshire
Car: 87 iroc and 88 k2500 tbi truck
Engine: l98 and lo5
Transmission: 700 r4's babby
i would like to go with the 210's due to the fact that later i would like to upgrade to a HSR
Originally posted by 83 Crossfire TA
Well, if you gave me the 8psi combo I’d turn it up to 20 and shoot for 1100hp
Being realistic, to get 800hp out of a 350 at 8psi you’d have to be turning some SERIOUS rpm’s, at that point the 20psi version would be more dependable assuming that you’ve got low enough compression or high enough octane that you can tune it right.
Well, if you gave me the 8psi combo I’d turn it up to 20 and shoot for 1100hp

Being realistic, to get 800hp out of a 350 at 8psi you’d have to be turning some SERIOUS rpm’s, at that point the 20psi version would be more dependable assuming that you’ve got low enough compression or high enough octane that you can tune it right.
Originally posted by c4boom
i would like to go with the 210's due to the fact that later i would like to upgrade to a HSR
i would like to go with the 210's due to the fact that later i would like to upgrade to a HSR
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
From: concord New Hampshire
Car: 87 iroc and 88 k2500 tbi truck
Engine: l98 and lo5
Transmission: 700 r4's babby
yes that is true but from what i see there is tones of meat there that can be cut on
no, you are wrong. I had it. I didn't want to spend the money to have it fit my track 1 heads
another person and this board had to do a lot of work to get his to fit CORRECTLY. I'm sure you could port the crap out it and get it really thin and eventually watch it crack but then you are into more problems
do a search for him bbhunting he explained how much work he had to do in this forum i believe
another person and this board had to do a lot of work to get his to fit CORRECTLY. I'm sure you could port the crap out it and get it really thin and eventually watch it crack but then you are into more problems
do a search for him bbhunting he explained how much work he had to do in this forum i believe
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
From: concord New Hampshire
Car: 87 iroc and 88 k2500 tbi truck
Engine: l98 and lo5
Transmission: 700 r4's babby
wow its that off hu never did a direct compair. then what should be used with a head that big if the HSR dose not fit a big mouth wont eather right
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,024
Likes: 91
From: DC Metro Area
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
Originally posted by 89ProchargedROC
LOL...i was just giving an example. And actually you can get 800hp out of 8psi on a 350 without turning serious RPMs. I bet with a set of GREAT heads, decent headers, and either twin 60s or twin 62s it'd be possilbe. Or for a single setup a T-80 could do it. You just need some great heads
LOL...i was just giving an example. And actually you can get 800hp out of 8psi on a 350 without turning serious RPMs. I bet with a set of GREAT heads, decent headers, and either twin 60s or twin 62s it'd be possilbe. Or for a single setup a T-80 could do it. You just need some great heads
VE and torque curves have exactly the same shape. Even the best breathing engine will have it’s VE drop off by the hp peak, on purpose built engines often to the 80-90% range (traditional OHV engines drop off to around 65%, so I’m giving a lot of leeway for someone that knows way more then any of us about ram tuning/scavenging under boost if it’s possible at all). So lets say 85% and put the HP peak at 6000rpm (so we’re already building an engine that would probably need to be built rev to 7000-7500 to be able to use the HP it’s making). At 6000rpm, 85% VE a 350 will be pumping 516cfm. No matter what heads you put on it, it will not flow more then that, that is what the engine is capable of moving based on the displacement of the pistons moving up and down (BTW, that could be fed by a port that flows around 200cfm at a lift somewhat short of whatever the lift is on the cam, this is in the range of cleaned up stock heads, and less then a set of vortec heads will flow).
Now lets give it 14.7psig boost with a next to perfect, ice cooled intercooler with an outlet temp of 85* (I use this in most of my examples since it is something that is just about impossible to achieve but makes the math easy (pressure ratio = density ratio) and gives the most optimistic answer). That will double the mass of the air that’s forced into the engine to 1032cfm (I know, I’m giving a volume flow for a mass flow, but you can calculate the mass knowing the density (air temp and pressure) of the air, which is actually 71Lb/min and I’m just converting using the # that we have), which if mixed with just the right amount of fuel and if the ignition is perfect is just about right for 775hp. BTW, doing the same math with 8psi with the next to perfect, no loss intercooler amounts to just under 600hp. And to get 800 HP from that combination you have to move your HP peak to 7700rpm, so you'd probably have to build the engine to spin to at least 1000rpm over that, which is what I call serious rpm where you'd need high $$$ parts to keep the thing from flying apart.
Originally posted by 83 Crossfire TA
Even a great set of heads will not allow you to breath more air then the engine can ingest. Let me throw some real #’s at you so you can see what I’m talking about.
VE and torque curves have exactly the same shape. Even the best breathing engine will have it’s VE drop off by the hp peak, on purpose built engines often to the 80-90% range (traditional OHV engines drop off to around 65%, so I’m giving a lot of leeway for someone that knows way more then any of us about ram tuning/scavenging under boost if it’s possible at all). So lets say 85% and put the HP peak at 6000rpm (so we’re already building an engine that would probably need to be built rev to 7000-7500 to be able to use the HP it’s making). At 6000rpm, 85% VE a 350 will be pumping 516cfm. No matter what heads you put on it, it will not flow more then that, that is what the engine is capable of moving based on the displacement of the pistons moving up and down (BTW, that could be fed by a port that flows around 200cfm at a lift somewhat short of whatever the lift is on the cam, this is in the range of cleaned up stock heads, and less then a set of vortec heads will flow).
Now lets give it 14.7psig boost with a next to perfect, ice cooled intercooler with an outlet temp of 85* (I use this in most of my examples since it is something that is just about impossible to achieve but makes the math easy (pressure ratio = density ratio) and gives the most optimistic answer). That will double the mass of the air that’s forced into the engine to 1032cfm (I know, I’m giving a volume flow for a mass flow, but you can calculate the mass knowing the density (air temp and pressure) of the air, which is actually 71Lb/min and I’m just converting using the # that we have), which if mixed with just the right amount of fuel and if the ignition is perfect is just about right for 775hp. BTW, doing the same math with 8psi with the next to perfect, no loss intercooler amounts to just under 600hp. And to get 800 HP from that combination you have to move your HP peak to 7700rpm, so you'd probably have to build the engine to spin to at least 1000rpm over that, which is what I call serious rpm where you'd need high $$$ parts to keep the thing from flying apart.
Even a great set of heads will not allow you to breath more air then the engine can ingest. Let me throw some real #’s at you so you can see what I’m talking about.
VE and torque curves have exactly the same shape. Even the best breathing engine will have it’s VE drop off by the hp peak, on purpose built engines often to the 80-90% range (traditional OHV engines drop off to around 65%, so I’m giving a lot of leeway for someone that knows way more then any of us about ram tuning/scavenging under boost if it’s possible at all). So lets say 85% and put the HP peak at 6000rpm (so we’re already building an engine that would probably need to be built rev to 7000-7500 to be able to use the HP it’s making). At 6000rpm, 85% VE a 350 will be pumping 516cfm. No matter what heads you put on it, it will not flow more then that, that is what the engine is capable of moving based on the displacement of the pistons moving up and down (BTW, that could be fed by a port that flows around 200cfm at a lift somewhat short of whatever the lift is on the cam, this is in the range of cleaned up stock heads, and less then a set of vortec heads will flow).
Now lets give it 14.7psig boost with a next to perfect, ice cooled intercooler with an outlet temp of 85* (I use this in most of my examples since it is something that is just about impossible to achieve but makes the math easy (pressure ratio = density ratio) and gives the most optimistic answer). That will double the mass of the air that’s forced into the engine to 1032cfm (I know, I’m giving a volume flow for a mass flow, but you can calculate the mass knowing the density (air temp and pressure) of the air, which is actually 71Lb/min and I’m just converting using the # that we have), which if mixed with just the right amount of fuel and if the ignition is perfect is just about right for 775hp. BTW, doing the same math with 8psi with the next to perfect, no loss intercooler amounts to just under 600hp. And to get 800 HP from that combination you have to move your HP peak to 7700rpm, so you'd probably have to build the engine to spin to at least 1000rpm over that, which is what I call serious rpm where you'd need high $$$ parts to keep the thing from flying apart.
Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: Anderson, IN
Car: 86 Cutlass
Engine: 350
Transmission: 200-4R
Re: TOO MUCH BOOST
Originally posted by gtaguy87
Isnt it true if you run more that 9psi of boost in your engine it can mess up the crankshaft or blow it apart.
Isnt it true if you run more that 9psi of boost in your engine it can mess up the crankshaft or blow it apart.
Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Hamburg, NY
Car: 1998 Ram Air Trans am
Engine: Ls1
Transmission: 6 speed manual
I have close to 300 hp now if i were to put a procgarger system on with 9lb of boost how much hp would i get. I have a jasper 305 with only 10k miles on it you think it would be ok?
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,024
Likes: 91
From: DC Metro Area
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
You’re missing the point procharged. Yea, engines often go over 100%VE, I never said that they didn’t. But they do it at their torque peak and they do it through ram tuning and scavenging effects. A lot of which will not work on a turbocharged engine (you will not get scavenging on a turbocharged engine no matter how hard you try, and even a 4% or 7% harmonic tuning increase will not overcome VE loses at the HP peak, it won’t even overcome the pressure losses due to the restriction of the turbine in the exhaust stream.
I agree with you that there is a difference between theoretical and empirical #’s, but the theoretical #’s can usually predict the empirical #’s if you examine the system closely enough. What it comes down to is show me a boosted 350 making 800 hp on 8psi at under 6000rpm. You won’t since no matter which way you look at it you will not have enough air flow to do it. At 100%VE (lets assume that the torque peak is at 6000rpm), you still only have enough air flow for 680hp.
I agree with you that there is a difference between theoretical and empirical #’s, but the theoretical #’s can usually predict the empirical #’s if you examine the system closely enough. What it comes down to is show me a boosted 350 making 800 hp on 8psi at under 6000rpm. You won’t since no matter which way you look at it you will not have enough air flow to do it. At 100%VE (lets assume that the torque peak is at 6000rpm), you still only have enough air flow for 680hp.
TGO Supporter


Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 1
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
Originally posted by c4boom
wow its that off hu never did a direct compair. then what should be used with a head that big if the HSR dose not fit a big mouth wont eather right
wow its that off hu never did a direct compair. then what should be used with a head that big if the HSR dose not fit a big mouth wont eather right
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992rs/ss
NW Indiana and South Chicago Suburb
14
Jan 31, 2025 05:10 PM
LT1Formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
20
Nov 14, 2015 12:02 AM
Sanjay
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Aug 12, 2015 03:41 PM






