Power Adders Getting a Supercharger or Turbocharger? Thinking about using Nitrous? All forced induction and N2O topics discussed here.

Anyone running a blower and 110* LSA?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 20, 2003 | 05:06 PM
  #1  
unknown_host's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,245
Likes: 1
From: Medford, Oregon
Car: 1989 Iroc Z L98
Anyone running a blower and 110* LSA?

Anyone here running a blower with a cam with 110* LSA?
Reply
Old May 21, 2003 | 05:05 PM
  #2  
Damon's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 13
From: Philly, PA
As tight as I've gone was 112* on a mild 216/216 @ .050 Crane cam (non-blower cam). It still pulled like a freight train everywhere compared to the same motor using a N/A dual plane intake. The mild exhaust duration was probably responsible for the fall-off in power as RPMs rose. It bled off a little more boost than I cam with less overlap, I'm sure, but not to the point I had to really spin the pee out of the blower to keep up.

My current cam is 224/230 @ .050 on a 114* LSA and, believe me, it bleeds off a more boost than the smaller cam despite the wider LSA. Whether is consumes it by better breathing or blowing it out the exhaust I don't know for sure but I'd say it's some of each.

General un-educated conclusions- if you're staying with a mild duration cam you can probably go tighter on the LSA without bleeding off too much. On a longer duration cam you better keep the LSA wide or building boost might become a real chore.
Reply
Old May 22, 2003 | 12:46 AM
  #3  
unknown_host's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,245
Likes: 1
From: Medford, Oregon
Car: 1989 Iroc Z L98
Originally posted by Damon
As tight as I've gone was 112* on a mild 216/216 @ .050 Crane cam (non-blower cam). It still pulled like a freight train everywhere compared to the same motor using a N/A dual plane intake. The mild exhaust duration was probably responsible for the fall-off in power as RPMs rose. It bled off a little more boost than I cam with less overlap, I'm sure, but not to the point I had to really spin the pee out of the blower to keep up.

My current cam is 224/230 @ .050 on a 114* LSA and, believe me, it bleeds off a more boost than the smaller cam despite the wider LSA. Whether is consumes it by better breathing or blowing it out the exhaust I don't know for sure but I'd say it's some of each.

General un-educated conclusions- if you're staying with a mild duration cam you can probably go tighter on the LSA without bleeding off too much. On a longer duration cam you better keep the LSA wide or building boost might become a real chore.
Thanks
Reply
Old May 22, 2003 | 09:46 AM
  #4  
a73camaro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
I'm running Crowers "Supercharger 1", 114° LSA, 232° duration at 0.050" and 0.459" lift. I'm also running a Procharger on a 383 that is in a boat.

It idles decent and power is good (at 6 psi). But I need to install a bigger fuel pump and injectors are about maxed out.

When I degreed the cam in, I did have to use a 6° advance offset to get the card's specs and the tail end of the lobes seem to close slowly. The duration measured was a few degrees less then claimed. First blower cam (and blower for that matter), but I would buy from Crower again.

Crower Supercharger 1

Last edited by a73camaro; May 22, 2003 at 09:49 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frozer!!!
Camaros for Sale
35
Jan 19, 2024 04:55 PM
sweet_87_iroc
Exterior Parts for Sale
7
Mar 27, 2016 04:05 PM
mhatfield 14
Electronics
0
Aug 15, 2015 10:47 AM
Street Lethal
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
3
Aug 13, 2015 08:28 PM
85Iroc-Z
Power Adders
18
Aug 13, 2015 01:58 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:35 PM.