D1-SC v F-1 v F-1R
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 203
Likes: 13
From: Phoenix, AZ
Car: 1986 Z28 / 2012 CLS550
Engine: F-1R -> Aluminum block 540
Transmission: T56 Magnum + GForce gears
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" 3.00's + Eaton Truetrac
D1-SC v F-1 v F-1R
Which one can get up to 6-8 psi at the lowest rpm on a 496ci?
Feel free to make any assumptions and recommendations you want about what pullies are used.
The other factor is price:
D-1SC ~2900
F-1 ~3400
F-1R ~3700
The plan is to have the SC generating full boost at the lowest rpm possible (within reason), then waste away any that I don't want to use with my home made boost controller.
Feel free to make any assumptions and recommendations you want about what pullies are used.
The other factor is price:
D-1SC ~2900
F-1 ~3400
F-1R ~3700
The plan is to have the SC generating full boost at the lowest rpm possible (within reason), then waste away any that I don't want to use with my home made boost controller.
TGO Supporter


Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 1
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
it will probably be one of the F's due to the higer internal gearing.
The F-1 fits in the regular P1sc/D1sc kit too I believe so you would have the ease of install and fitment with your brackets.
the F1R I don't know much about fitment.
The F-1 fits in the regular P1sc/D1sc kit too I believe so you would have the ease of install and fitment with your brackets.
the F1R I don't know much about fitment.
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
From: MI
Car: I
Engine: Taunt
Transmission: Mustangs
Re: D1-SC v F-1 v F-1R
Originally posted by Spifz
The plan is to have the SC generating full boost at the lowest rpm possible (within reason), then waste away any that I don't want to use with my home made boost controller.
The plan is to have the SC generating full boost at the lowest rpm possible (within reason), then waste away any that I don't want to use with my home made boost controller.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 203
Likes: 13
From: Phoenix, AZ
Car: 1986 Z28 / 2012 CLS550
Engine: F-1R -> Aluminum block 540
Transmission: T56 Magnum + GForce gears
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" 3.00's + Eaton Truetrac
Some of this thinking may not be right, but here is where I was coming from. Say I wanted a max boost of 8 psi. Then I would get a certain set of pullies. The choice of pullies would be taking into account the compressor map, airflow requirements of the engine, and maybe some rpm figure, such as where I am going to shift. Since the supercharger isn't linear as far as airflow and speed, it won't generate 8psi down at 2000 engine rpm.
Now if I chose pullies that maxed out the supercharger speed at my rev limiter, (5600) then it would probably be producing way more than 8psi at that speed. But with my boost controller, I can waste off the extra flow the supercharger is producing, thus limiting the boost to 8psi. With this choice of pullies, maybe the supercharger will be up to 8psi much sooner.
Technically I won't be gaining anything power wise since I am wasting away energy turning the supercharger faster than it needs to go just to make 8psi. But, the boost controller would let me set the boost anywhere I want without changing pullies. I could have my microcontroller adjust the boost to stop tire spin...
Now if I chose pullies that maxed out the supercharger speed at my rev limiter, (5600) then it would probably be producing way more than 8psi at that speed. But with my boost controller, I can waste off the extra flow the supercharger is producing, thus limiting the boost to 8psi. With this choice of pullies, maybe the supercharger will be up to 8psi much sooner.
Technically I won't be gaining anything power wise since I am wasting away energy turning the supercharger faster than it needs to go just to make 8psi. But, the boost controller would let me set the boost anywhere I want without changing pullies. I could have my microcontroller adjust the boost to stop tire spin...
Supreme Member
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,945
Likes: 1
From: Boosted Land
Car: 92 Z28
Engine: Boosted LSX
Sounds reasonable to do. I'd think something like this would work for you also.
http://innovativeturbo.com/cgi-bin/h...83345196744270
http://innovativeturbo.com/cgi-bin/h...83345196744270
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
From: Palm Bay, FL
Car: 2007 Corvette Z06
Engine: LS7
Transmission: 6 speed
I agree with TPI 383, go turbo if you want to do that or put on a roots style supercharger. I can't see why you would want boost at that low of a RPM with a large engine. Blowing off excess belt driven boost is like riding the brakes to limit wheel spin, there are better ways.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 203
Likes: 13
From: Phoenix, AZ
Car: 1986 Z28 / 2012 CLS550
Engine: F-1R -> Aluminum block 540
Transmission: T56 Magnum + GForce gears
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" 3.00's + Eaton Truetrac
I don't think TPl383 said I should go turbo. The innovative turbo link was for an electronic boost controller I believe. I agree that wasting off boost is exactly that, a waste of power, but if the pulley setup that yields 8psi down low makes 20psi at 5500rpm, I can't use that much. In that case it would be a good idea to waste some volume off to get the pressure down to 8psi where my motor is happy.
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
IndMuscleCar
LTX and LSX
10
Aug 28, 2011 04:33 PM





