Joining the turbo club.
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: ARIZONA
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 92 Trans Am Conv
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Joining the turbo club.
Bought a T70 Turbo. Went with .68 AR to spoil as fast as possible.
Only shooting for 400whp. Considered going smaller turbo but this was cheaper than going smaller. Plan to keep the T5 and 3.08 gears for spool as well. Really want an ultimate street turbo setup with immediate response.
If I can front mount this I'll get it done sooner than later but if I can't work out acceptable piping I'll go rear mount and it'll take a backseat for a while longer.
Now I guess I'll be my own first $8d-T tester.
Soon all three of my cars will be turbo. That's a strange thought.
I'll document the turbo build here as I go along.
/cool story bro.
Only shooting for 400whp. Considered going smaller turbo but this was cheaper than going smaller. Plan to keep the T5 and 3.08 gears for spool as well. Really want an ultimate street turbo setup with immediate response.
If I can front mount this I'll get it done sooner than later but if I can't work out acceptable piping I'll go rear mount and it'll take a backseat for a while longer.
Now I guess I'll be my own first $8d-T tester.
Soon all three of my cars will be turbo. That's a strange thought.
I'll document the turbo build here as I go along.
/cool story bro.
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (20)
Re: Joining the turbo club.
.68 works great on rear mount. It would spool very fast up front. In fact my .96 on the rear mount when i had the cat converter on car, it was seeing boost at 2200 rpm half throttle.
I would consider a .96 up front. It will spool fast up front
I would consider a .96 up front. It will spool fast up front
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: ARIZONA
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 92 Trans Am Conv
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: Joining the turbo club.
I'm really dreaming about a front mount. I don't like a cramped engine bay so cramping it more is unlikely.
I bought with the intention of rearmount in reality.
I don't want the car down for very long and front would take considerably longer to fabricate.
Only reason I don't want rear is for the oil pump. The cost and the reliability worry. Plus call it pointless but I like two exhaust tips. I need symmetry.
I bought with the intention of rearmount in reality.
I don't want the car down for very long and front would take considerably longer to fabricate.
Only reason I don't want rear is for the oil pump. The cost and the reliability worry. Plus call it pointless but I like two exhaust tips. I need symmetry.
#5
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,720
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: Joining the turbo club.
I'm really dreaming about a front mount. I don't like a cramped engine bay so cramping it more is unlikely.
I bought with the intention of rearmount in reality.
I don't want the car down for very long and front would take considerably longer to fabricate.
Only reason I don't want rear is for the oil pump. The cost and the reliability worry. Plus call it pointless but I like two exhaust tips. I need symmetry.
I bought with the intention of rearmount in reality.
I don't want the car down for very long and front would take considerably longer to fabricate.
Only reason I don't want rear is for the oil pump. The cost and the reliability worry. Plus call it pointless but I like two exhaust tips. I need symmetry.
I made a couple different turbo headers that fit the 3rd gen. Do the crossover under the oil pan, not in front.
The Chinese stainless turbo header fits thirdgens just fine, although on some aftermarket heads (like my AFR) the #8 primary is a problem.
Do you need to keep AC ?
-- Joe
#6
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
Re: Joining the turbo club.
There's going to have to be a compromise or sacrifice somewhere, as it is very difficult to run a FMT on a complete LB9/L98 (meaning with functional vapor canister and battery up front) with the serpentine system. The horsepower goal is feasible enough to justify running smaller 2 1/2" intake tubing which will help in squirming its' way through the radiator and front end steel support, just need to motivate it a little. A good compromise would be to switch to a v-belt system, which would require extending the alternator wiring, as well as the AC head unit, but this will at least bring the AC head unit to the drivers side and getting it out of the way. This is how Steve was able to keep most of the factory stuff in the engine bay, because his '87 came with the v-belt system. Hell, his early setup might just be the ticket you're looking for Vanilla, here's a vid below to help you on your way.
As for the preferred dual exhaust tips for a RMT, should be a breeze to make a 4" exhaust for a RMT that splits (Y's) into dual 3" outlets...
As for the preferred dual exhaust tips for a RMT, should be a breeze to make a 4" exhaust for a RMT that splits (Y's) into dual 3" outlets...
#7
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,720
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: Joining the turbo club.
There's going to have to be a compromise or sacrifice somewhere, as it is very difficult to run a FMT on a complete LB9/L98 (meaning with functional vapor canister and battery up front) with the serpentine system. The horsepower goal is feasible enough to justify running smaller 2 1/2" intake tubing which will help in squirming its' way through the radiator and front end steel support, just need to motivate it a little. A good compromise would be to switch to a v-belt system, which would require extending the alternator wiring, as well as the AC head unit, but this will at least bring the AC head unit to the drivers side and getting it out of the way. This is how Steve was able to keep most of the factory stuff in the engine bay, because his '87 came with the v-belt system. Hell, his early setup might just be the ticket you're looking for Vanilla, here's a vid below to help you on your way.
As for the preferred dual exhaust tips for a RMT, should be a breeze to make a 4" exhaust for a RMT that splits (Y's) into dual 3" outlets...
As for the preferred dual exhaust tips for a RMT, should be a breeze to make a 4" exhaust for a RMT that splits (Y's) into dual 3" outlets...
There are ways to make it works. The plumbing almost always sucks.
The BBS header meant for use with AC will work with a T70. He could fabricate one of those fairly easily. The wastegate plumbing is the tough part.
Twin 60s with built in waste gates are doable too, but the driver side sucks a little bit with the brake booster + master in the way.
-- Joe
Trending Topics
#11
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,720
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: Joining the turbo club.
The passenger side has tons of room. I did a couple different downpipe configurations.
The driver side sucks. But fitting a 2.5" pipe shouldn't be terrible if you tuck the manifold on the driver side.
It's harder to make a compact manifold with tubular. Cast manifolds are big money, but they make the fitment a lot easier.
-- Joe
The driver side sucks. But fitting a 2.5" pipe shouldn't be terrible if you tuck the manifold on the driver side.
It's harder to make a compact manifold with tubular. Cast manifolds are big money, but they make the fitment a lot easier.
-- Joe
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: ARIZONA
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 92 Trans Am Conv
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: Joining the turbo club.
This will be a rearmount setup. I may one day convert to front, but it's just so much easier to rear mount.
Yes I can weld, but all that fab work isn't a quick job. I'll just cope with the pump needs.
And I will either center the turbo in the back and Y to two pipes or use the WG for the second exhaust outlet. Again, all depending on ease once I get under there and the cutback out of the way and can do some mockups.
This is all months away still so nothing is set in stone.
Unless somebody wants to make some donations in the form of a pump/lines and piping!
Yes I can weld, but all that fab work isn't a quick job. I'll just cope with the pump needs.
And I will either center the turbo in the back and Y to two pipes or use the WG for the second exhaust outlet. Again, all depending on ease once I get under there and the cutback out of the way and can do some mockups.
This is all months away still so nothing is set in stone.
Unless somebody wants to make some donations in the form of a pump/lines and piping!
#13
Supreme Member
iTrader: (20)
Re: Joining the turbo club.
The passenger side has tons of room. I did a couple different downpipe configurations.
The driver side sucks. But fitting a 2.5" pipe shouldn't be terrible if you tuck the manifold on the driver side.
It's harder to make a compact manifold with tubular. Cast manifolds are big money, but they make the fitment a lot easier.
-- Joe
The driver side sucks. But fitting a 2.5" pipe shouldn't be terrible if you tuck the manifold on the driver side.
It's harder to make a compact manifold with tubular. Cast manifolds are big money, but they make the fitment a lot easier.
-- Joe
Cast is nice when you can get them, else a fabbed log is best bang for buck
#14
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,720
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: Joining the turbo club.
This will be a rearmount setup. I may one day convert to front, but it's just so much easier to rear mount.
Yes I can weld, but all that fab work isn't a quick job. I'll just cope with the pump needs.
And I will either center the turbo in the back and Y to two pipes or use the WG for the second exhaust outlet. Again, all depending on ease once I get under there and the cutback out of the way and can do some mockups.
This is all months away still so nothing is set in stone.
Unless somebody wants to make some donations in the form of a pump/lines and piping!
Yes I can weld, but all that fab work isn't a quick job. I'll just cope with the pump needs.
And I will either center the turbo in the back and Y to two pipes or use the WG for the second exhaust outlet. Again, all depending on ease once I get under there and the cutback out of the way and can do some mockups.
This is all months away still so nothing is set in stone.
Unless somebody wants to make some donations in the form of a pump/lines and piping!
Well, that's not the only problem but that is what kills it for me.
-- Joe
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: ARIZONA
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 92 Trans Am Conv
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: Joining the turbo club.
If anything it allows the charge to cool more prior to hitting the intake.
I was even thinking about adding fins to the pipe to make it a huge heatsink.
#16
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,720
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: Joining the turbo club.
-- Joe
#17
Supreme Member
iTrader: (20)
Re: Joining the turbo club.
It does cool some but i'd still run an intercooler. Now i ran my charge piping up behind the rad fans in front of the accessories and it got heat soaked. 120-130 deg iat's cruising and 150 fairly quickly on just 7 psi. Thats starting to get hot for pump gas for max power
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: ARIZONA
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 92 Trans Am Conv
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: Joining the turbo club.
It does cool some but i'd still run an intercooler. Now i ran my charge piping up behind the rad fans in front of the accessories and it got heat soaked. 120-130 deg iat's cruising and 150 fairly quickly on just 7 psi. Thats starting to get hot for pump gas for max power
Those IATs are normal for cars here in summer.
I also have access to E85. And I'm planning on flex fuel support on my Turbo bin.
Last edited by Vanilla Ice; 05-02-2017 at 01:19 PM.
#19
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
Re: Joining the turbo club.
That's pretty much where I am now with my GTA. Toss up between RMT or F1SC. It's encouraging to see quite a few RMT's by me because the track is so close, so I'll choot the chit over by the local Wawa when I see them filling up. By no means are they dailies though, which is why I hesitate with mine. The length of the intake tubing worries me if/when bottoming out on the street, as well as the length of oil lines. I lean towards F1SC because Joe's setup is very clean and simple, and Justin didn't have his RMT for very long so I wasn't able to really get a feel for it in terms of longevity. Gonna watch this build to see how it goes, I'm not in any rush anymore...
#20
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,720
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: Joining the turbo club.
That's pretty much where I am now with my GTA. Toss up between RMT or F1SC. It's encouraging to see quite a few RMT's by me because the track is so close, so I'll choot the chit over by the local Wawa when I see them filling up. By no means are they dailies though, which is why I hesitate with mine. The length of the intake tubing worries me if/when bottoming out on the street, as well as the length of oil lines. I lean towards F1SC because Joe's setup is very clean and simple, and Justin didn't have his RMT for very long so I wasn't able to really get a feel for it in terms of longevity. Gonna watch this build to see how it goes, I'm not in any rush anymore...
I know they were briefly popular on Corvette forum. (C5 guys)
That company that made them, str or sts or whatever went out of business right?
-- Joe
#21
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Panama City FL
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 87 Iroc
Engine: Turbocharged 5.7 Pro-Fl-XT
Transmission: 700R4 for moment
Axle/Gears: 3.25 9 inch
Re: Joining the turbo club.
FWIW I need to sell that setup from the video. It's just sitting around in my way. A local guy was supposed to buy it but I guess he chickened out and went nitrous. It will get you into the high 7's 1/8 mile.
#22
Supreme Member
iTrader: (20)
Re: Joining the turbo club.
I didnt have mine for long but tell you what, i'd do it again in a heart beat for a mild street car.
Only things i'd change: fab a small drain reservoir under turbo oil drain to collect oil instead of looping rubber line 90 deg to run to pump. It hung tad low for rural PA roads. Friends shop has a steep driveway off the road and i caught the drain line. Ripped off and lost 4 qrts oil before thanfkfully catching glimpse of oil pressure gauge reading near 0 and shutting down to save it
Run cold side above kmembers instead of under for better street clearance. If room around trans tunnel, i'd consider goin over there but def above engine k. In fact i'd buy tube front k for the routing.
Other than that its been fine. I took car 1.25 hrs to a wedding, enjoyed festivities for a few hrs and then drove home in rain. No quirks. I daily drove to work on sunny days cuz i hated having to wash the car.
My bbc deal will likely be mid mounted after some sheet metal work lol or rears depending on how things work. I dig them
Only things i'd change: fab a small drain reservoir under turbo oil drain to collect oil instead of looping rubber line 90 deg to run to pump. It hung tad low for rural PA roads. Friends shop has a steep driveway off the road and i caught the drain line. Ripped off and lost 4 qrts oil before thanfkfully catching glimpse of oil pressure gauge reading near 0 and shutting down to save it
Run cold side above kmembers instead of under for better street clearance. If room around trans tunnel, i'd consider goin over there but def above engine k. In fact i'd buy tube front k for the routing.
Other than that its been fine. I took car 1.25 hrs to a wedding, enjoyed festivities for a few hrs and then drove home in rain. No quirks. I daily drove to work on sunny days cuz i hated having to wash the car.
My bbc deal will likely be mid mounted after some sheet metal work lol or rears depending on how things work. I dig them
#23
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
Re: Joining the turbo club.
Originally Posted by anesthes
How many rear mount turbos are on this site now?
I know they were briefly popular on Corvette forum. (C5 guys)
That company that made them, str or sts or whatever went out of business right?
-- Joe
I know they were briefly popular on Corvette forum. (C5 guys)
That company that made them, str or sts or whatever went out of business right?
-- Joe
Vanilla you should jump on that turbo system while Steve has it available.
#24
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: ARIZONA
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 92 Trans Am Conv
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: Joining the turbo club.
I remember them, that was a quick fly by for STS. Had a lot of complaints from customers, even remember some people having trouble building the right amount of boost with their systems, although I don't blame them, it was probably just newbies complaining like they always do. Aero-Chargers came out soon after, self contained turbo chargers, but they cost way too much for what we are all doing. Aside from Justin, I'm not even sure anyone else played with RMT's on this website. Wasn't Willie running twin RMT's on his 305 at one point?
Vanilla you should jump on that turbo system while Steve has it available.
Vanilla you should jump on that turbo system while Steve has it available.
Steve feel free to PM me. Though I may not be in market.
#25
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
Re: Joining the turbo club.
Originally Posted by Vanilla Ice
Need details and prices. Don't even know what he's got.
Steve feel free to PM me. Though I may not be in market.
Steve feel free to PM me. Though I may not be in market.
#26
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,720
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: Joining the turbo club.
I remember them, that was a quick fly by for STS. Had a lot of complaints from customers, even remember some people having trouble building the right amount of boost with their systems, although I don't blame them, it was probably just newbies complaining like they always do. Aero-Chargers came out soon after, self contained turbo chargers, but they cost way too much for what we are all doing. Aside from Justin, I'm not even sure anyone else played with RMT's on this website. Wasn't Willie running twin RMT's on his 305 at one point?
Vanilla you should jump on that turbo system while Steve has it available.
Vanilla you should jump on that turbo system while Steve has it available.
It would be nice if someone could chime in and be like "I've had an RMT on my Camaro for the past 6 years, here's the pros and cons, lessons learned, etc".
-- Joe
#27
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
Re: Joining the turbo club.
Originally Posted by anesthes
I dunno. RMT's were all the hype on Corvette forum, but not many now.
It would be nice if someone could chime in and be like "I've had an RMT on my Camaro for the past 6 years, here's the pros and cons, lessons learned, etc".
-- Joe
It would be nice if someone could chime in and be like "I've had an RMT on my Camaro for the past 6 years, here's the pros and cons, lessons learned, etc".
-- Joe
- Rob
#28
Supreme Member
iTrader: (20)
Re: Joining the turbo club.
Sts went out of business, so that could be one reason they arent seen much lately. They are easy to build but shops wont do it i dont think cuz of the patents held on the design by STS. Now with them being out of business, not sure if that changes anything
But their kits werent great anyhow. Their oiling systems were not great as that seemed to be the biggest issue. Returning oil and draining oil out of turbo.
The concept is solid tho. But due to heat energy lost you have to be careful on pipe size and turbine size, else there will be lag. Using 2.25" stock exhaust on my car with the small .68 ar hotside worked fantastic. If i had wrapped it it be even better. As shown when i had the cat on the car. 2 psi half throttle up hill 2200 rpm with .96 ar. Gut cat and all response was lost. Gained some back with .68 and test pipe in place of cat to smooth flow out
If you control oil supply and draining/return, there arent any cons imo. Alot more piping weight if a race car chasing weight reduction et. But no cramped engine bay and no heat in engine bay makes it a dream to work on
But their kits werent great anyhow. Their oiling systems were not great as that seemed to be the biggest issue. Returning oil and draining oil out of turbo.
The concept is solid tho. But due to heat energy lost you have to be careful on pipe size and turbine size, else there will be lag. Using 2.25" stock exhaust on my car with the small .68 ar hotside worked fantastic. If i had wrapped it it be even better. As shown when i had the cat on the car. 2 psi half throttle up hill 2200 rpm with .96 ar. Gut cat and all response was lost. Gained some back with .68 and test pipe in place of cat to smooth flow out
If you control oil supply and draining/return, there arent any cons imo. Alot more piping weight if a race car chasing weight reduction et. But no cramped engine bay and no heat in engine bay makes it a dream to work on
#29
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: ARIZONA
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 92 Trans Am Conv
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: Joining the turbo club.
Thinking about an oil sump and fabricating this out of copper pipe soldering it together.
Figure it could act as an oil cooler too.
It would be more compact than this though.
I also wonder if I should just use an actual oil cooler and run it horizontally and affix a vent to that instead.
Any input? Bad idea(s)?
Benefit to my own build is I can tuck it up to the turbo better...
Figure it could act as an oil cooler too.
It would be more compact than this though.
I also wonder if I should just use an actual oil cooler and run it horizontally and affix a vent to that instead.
Any input? Bad idea(s)?
Benefit to my own build is I can tuck it up to the turbo better...
#30
Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Monroe, Michigan
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 4.8l LS
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Joining the turbo club.
Sounds like a cool build, I will keep looking out for updates.
Kinda wanting to join the club and pull the little 3.1l in favor of an L98 I have sitting on a stand. Probably run a GT45 or T70 (seems to be the reccomended size) and fab a front mount.
Goodluck with your build!
Kinda wanting to join the club and pull the little 3.1l in favor of an L98 I have sitting on a stand. Probably run a GT45 or T70 (seems to be the reccomended size) and fab a front mount.
Goodluck with your build!
#31
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,720
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: Joining the turbo club.
Sounds like a cool build, I will keep looking out for updates.
Kinda wanting to join the club and pull the little 3.1l in favor of an L98 I have sitting on a stand. Probably run a GT45 or T70 (seems to be the reccomended size) and fab a front mount.
Goodluck with your build!
Kinda wanting to join the club and pull the little 3.1l in favor of an L98 I have sitting on a stand. Probably run a GT45 or T70 (seems to be the reccomended size) and fab a front mount.
Goodluck with your build!
a t76 on an L98 would probably be just peachy, or a GT45.
My first kit is on my buddies '88 GTA now with a GT45, and a megasquirt.
-- Joe
#32
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: ARIZONA
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 92 Trans Am Conv
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: Joining the turbo club.
Another design, I think is better. I can tuck it up above the bottom of the housings as close to the drain as possible and have the same clearance of almost not having it.