Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Handling wise...which is atcually better? coil over? or stock setup...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 13, 2003 | 05:26 PM
  #1  
REVLIMIT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 1
From: Hawaii
Car: 1984 Chevy Camaro
Engine: Built L98
Transmission: T-56 6 speed
Handling wise...which is atcually better? coil over? or stock setup...

For taking turns which is atcually the better design? From what I heard the reason GM switched to coil on strut design was for ride comfort reasons. Anyone know?

Last edited by REVLIMIT; Jan 13, 2003 at 05:34 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2003 | 09:17 PM
  #2  
AFreaknGoodTme's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Orange,Calif
Coilovers, if and only if the car is designed or custom supported for them, have the advantage of weight reduction- less unsprung weight to push the tire back to the pavement after a bump- less weight traveling upward when you hit a bump that will transfer force into the sprung weight unsettling the chassis.

You also have the benefit of quick change springs rates because you can re-taylor the ride height to the stiffer or softer spring leaving the proper geometry in tack.

Also less bind on the spring movement, springs in cans bind when travel angles change. Springs on coilovers always stay paralell to the shock it surrounds and does not bind.

Last edited by AFreaknGoodTme; Jan 13, 2003 at 09:19 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 02:54 AM
  #3  
REVLIMIT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 1
From: Hawaii
Car: 1984 Chevy Camaro
Engine: Built L98
Transmission: T-56 6 speed
I see I see...well I have the ground control weight jack system for the front. So the height thing and all that I can do also...but I see about the suspension changes and bumps and all that...hmmm...I'm wondering if its really worth it though...
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 05:16 AM
  #4  
paul_huryk's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,755
Likes: 10
From: Ahead of you...
Car: 1984 LG4 Camaro
Engine: 350 Roller Motor
Transmission: Level 10 700R4
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
It is true, GM did switch to coil-over shocks in the 4th gens mostly due to ride considerations. Moving the springs from the 3rd gen pockets to the outer part of the suspension (over the shocks) allows for about a 1/2 decrease in necessary spring rate. Also, the upper/lower control arm combo is a better design ride-wise than other suspension designs that GM could have shose (like a coil-over strut).

As for handling, it may give you more control over a strut/spring becuase the spring can be less stiff, probably holding the road better (I do mean probably). There aren't too many handling applications using a coil-over on a third gen, they are mostly drag racing for weight savings.

I know for a fact that the thrid gen cars at road racing/SCCA events (not autocross) consistently beat 4th gens that have more power and bigger tires. A properly set-up third gen is not to be underestimated, it will hand anything not specifically having a full race chassis its *** on the street (I refer to cars like the McL F1, F50 & F60...).
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 12:03 PM
  #5  
REVLIMIT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 1
From: Hawaii
Car: 1984 Chevy Camaro
Engine: Built L98
Transmission: T-56 6 speed
Thanks guys for your help. I've decided that i dont want to convert to coil over suspension anymore. I'm just gonna buy Ground controls camber/caster plate and tubular a arms instead.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Azrael91966669
DIY PROM
25
Jun 20, 2017 04:04 AM
TheExaminer
Suspension and Chassis
21
Aug 25, 2015 07:34 PM
transamgta1Khp
Electronics
0
Aug 17, 2015 12:18 PM
sreZ28
Engine Swap
4
Aug 14, 2015 07:48 PM
Thirim
LTX and LSX
2
Aug 13, 2015 03:09 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:45 PM.