New magazine article, total suspension swap
#1
TGO Supporter
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: MA, USA
Posts: 3,460
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 83 bird
Engine: 305/383
Transmission: WC T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
New magazine article, total suspension swap
In the Feb 2004 mag of Chevy High Performance there is a 7 page article on how to add all new suspension parts to a 3rd gen, from springs to shocks to torque arms, etc. It is GREAT and wicked informative.
Definately pick it up!
Definately pick it up!
#4
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Arroyo Grande CA
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 IROC - 67 Camaro
Engine: 383 TPI - ZZ4 TPI
Transmission: 700R4 in both cars
Axle/Gears: 3.27 - 3.36 posi in both cars
Aaron: I read the article too. I've been a CHP subscriber for many years. I also have an IROC like you, and they were doing the conversion to an RS. The only part I couldn't figure out is why they only achieved .8 g's. A stock IROC tested back in 1987 achieved .88!!! with our stock suspension. I put Hotchkis front and rear springs in mine but stayed with the GM IROC struts and shocks. Lowered the car 2" and made it handle even better than stock. I'm not a road racer, but I like to push my car thru turns just below the point where it breaks traction. It's amazing how fast IROCS can go thru turns and not loose traction.
#5
TGO Supporter
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: MA, USA
Posts: 3,460
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 83 bird
Engine: 305/383
Transmission: WC T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
I second that. I have the Hotchkis strut tower brace, Hotchkis panhard rod, Energy Suspension torque arm mount, and tranny mount. I can take an off ramp at 60 with no problem! It seems to glue to the road really well; only a few times has it begun to slide out.
Were the lowering springs worth the $?
Were the lowering springs worth the $?
#6
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Arroyo Grande CA
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 IROC - 67 Camaro
Engine: 383 TPI - ZZ4 TPI
Transmission: 700R4 in both cars
Axle/Gears: 3.27 - 3.36 posi in both cars
The front and rear springs weren't that much money, and I instantly noticed a much better, stiffer ride. I don't have the Hotchkis strut tower brace and Hotchkis panhard rod, but I did install all new Energy Suspension front end kit.
Aaron: I am 56 years old and have owned many cars in my life, and my IROC has set all my world records in longitivity. I've never owned or heard about any car living as long as my IROC. After 220,000 miles I finally needed to rebuild the front end suspension. In that amount of miles the front end NEVER got out of adjustment or alignment, a world record!!! At 239,000 miles I took the "still running good" L98 out. The rest of the car is still original (700R4, rearend etc.). And it is not because I am easy on the car!!!!
I don't care what anybody says, the proof is evident to me, the 3rd gens are one of the best cars ever built.
Aaron: I am 56 years old and have owned many cars in my life, and my IROC has set all my world records in longitivity. I've never owned or heard about any car living as long as my IROC. After 220,000 miles I finally needed to rebuild the front end suspension. In that amount of miles the front end NEVER got out of adjustment or alignment, a world record!!! At 239,000 miles I took the "still running good" L98 out. The rest of the car is still original (700R4, rearend etc.). And it is not because I am easy on the car!!!!
I don't care what anybody says, the proof is evident to me, the 3rd gens are one of the best cars ever built.
#7
TGO Supporter
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: MA, USA
Posts: 3,460
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 83 bird
Engine: 305/383
Transmission: WC T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
<wipes a tear from his eye> That was seriously beautiful! I definately agree with that. I have 192000 miles, all original drivetrain, and still kicking! The last owner bought her at around 80k, and drag raced it till I bout it at 170k!!
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 797
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Camaro
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Yeah I was shocked to see a Third gen on the cover! It was great when they said the Camaro ran what an 03' SVT Cobra ran through the one course! I planned on doing all of those mods next spring and almost started a thread asking if anyone had done the whole setup at one time. I already have the 17x9.5's and BFG's now all I need is about $2000 worth of parts. Damn where the hell is Santa when you need him!
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 797
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Camaro
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
If you notice in the photo where they say they rolled the front lip you can see on the tire where it was shaved by the fender a bit. Ask me how I know.
#11
TGO Supporter
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: MA, USA
Posts: 3,460
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 83 bird
Engine: 305/383
Transmission: WC T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Trust me, I know about tires getting shaved from the inner lip there! I got a nice L shape where the tread meets the sidewall
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 797
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Camaro
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
they were waiting for a new set of SFC's from Edelbrock I belive. Supposed to be a new item so they said they would do a test on it later.
#14
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Ahead of you...
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 1984 LG4 Camaro
Engine: 350 Roller Motor
Transmission: Level 10 700R4
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
I am very unhappy with the results they poste - only .80g? an RS can beat that on 15" tires...
Like others mentioned, they skipped a lot of other parts too - subframes especially.
I have an old article from the late 80's with a 1987 TA that had the springs, shocks/struts, and sway bars replaced - it ran .997g on RE71 16" rubber - the CHP should have at least equaled that. What a pity.
Like others mentioned, they skipped a lot of other parts too - subframes especially.
I have an old article from the late 80's with a 1987 TA that had the springs, shocks/struts, and sway bars replaced - it ran .997g on RE71 16" rubber - the CHP should have at least equaled that. What a pity.
#15
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
Originally posted by paul_huryk
I am very unhappy with the results they poste - only .80g? an RS can beat that on 15" tires...
I am very unhappy with the results they poste - only .80g? an RS can beat that on 15" tires...
#16
Senior Member
I read the article, and copied it for my files/future reference. Like someone said from above, they need to install the subframe connectors on this car. They talk about the lack of full frame on the F-body, but don't connect it up. Should be one of the first mods anyone does to it. Yea I know they were waiting for the Edelbrock units to come out....but there several other brands out there.
I was also disappointed with their test results. Also, they didn't break out the cost of each item they added. Something about 3k$ total in susp parts. I think we could do better than that!! CHP has a habit of not giving out the costs of the parts/work they perform.
I am runing SPOHN real LCAs, panhard bar and the lowering mounts. My SFCs are SSM i believe. I would like to get the adjustable torque arm next, then maybe some nice adjustable Koni shocks.
PS I really like Jmiller's story from above!
I was also disappointed with their test results. Also, they didn't break out the cost of each item they added. Something about 3k$ total in susp parts. I think we could do better than that!! CHP has a habit of not giving out the costs of the parts/work they perform.
I am runing SPOHN real LCAs, panhard bar and the lowering mounts. My SFCs are SSM i believe. I would like to get the adjustable torque arm next, then maybe some nice adjustable Koni shocks.
PS I really like Jmiller's story from above!
#17
That was a sad excuse for a third gen suspension upgrade, really pathetic actually. They missed the first upgrade they should have done - SFC's. The didn't get relocating brackets. They used the bulky edelbrock control arms ( i wonder how much unsprung weight they add? They didn't mention anything about alignment. The sportline's seem to be more of a style statement than a performance spring. I would have loved if they got some moog's and cut them down, while posting the number of coilsthey cut. Lastly they decided to go with tokico hp's???? why not illuminas or koni's, for christ sake they are in california!! not new york or new jersey. The numbers sum it up. to think what they spent on bigger rubber and wheels!!
#18
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (2)
That whole article was a crock. My ***... did anybody see the pic of the shocks they took out? They wouldn't even stay up on their own, yet when they kept the stock wheels/tires, their skidpad numbers went DOWN after the new suspension. What that tells me is that there was something SERIOUSLY wrong with that car. The only thing that helped it get .8 was the bigger rubber. That car was pathetic.
In 85, every magazine that tested the 85 IROC got .90 skidpad numbers with Goodyear Gatorback tires! The same car with those Eibach springs and modern rubber should easily pull .90 or even higher with an otherwise stock suspension. Even with the smaller sway bars, that RS should have been able to pull nearly .90 with the big rubber and the eibach springs.
I think the first thing they should have done was gone through the entire suspension and replaced any worn items. I have to guess that the front suspension on that car is completely shot.
In 85, every magazine that tested the 85 IROC got .90 skidpad numbers with Goodyear Gatorback tires! The same car with those Eibach springs and modern rubber should easily pull .90 or even higher with an otherwise stock suspension. Even with the smaller sway bars, that RS should have been able to pull nearly .90 with the big rubber and the eibach springs.
I think the first thing they should have done was gone through the entire suspension and replaced any worn items. I have to guess that the front suspension on that car is completely shot.
#19
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: pacific NW
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 1LE A.K.A The blue rocket
Engine: Blown 383
Transmission: Full manual 700R4
I think they should have run differant tires, dont get me wrong BFG makes a good tire but most are soft. I personally run Yokohama Decibels (275/40/17) they have awsome treadwear. I have tested a few differant tires, BFG's included, Toyos, cooper cobra.... nothing can touch the performnece of the Decibals. Just my .02 cents.
#21
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Originally posted by MYBLUZ
I think they should have run differant tires, dont get me wrong BFG makes a good tire but most are soft. I personally run Yokohama Decibels (275/40/17) they have awsome treadwear. I have tested a few differant tires, BFG's included, Toyos, cooper cobra.... nothing can touch the performnece of the Decibals. Just my .02 cents.
I think they should have run differant tires, dont get me wrong BFG makes a good tire but most are soft. I personally run Yokohama Decibels (275/40/17) they have awsome treadwear. I have tested a few differant tires, BFG's included, Toyos, cooper cobra.... nothing can touch the performnece of the Decibals. Just my .02 cents.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post