Better handling car
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
If only I could hire you. At this point, I am trying to figure out how to pay rent and bills, and am thinking of going to college to become and ME (the computer gig is getting old.)
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
From: Ga
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by vsixtoy
Here's what I'd do to the rear of my car if I didn't value my rear seat- I have a kid that needs to sit there once in a while.
The rear brace would be done from the top side with the rear seat removed- Then again I would just cage the car if it weren't used as a street family car once or twice a week to go to dinner or grandma's house.
The front tunnel brace I have (custom made)
The rear dotted line is the one I would add from one side to the other bending up over the driveshaft tunnel inside the cockpit. It would be weled to the tunnel area also as it bends over the top.
Here's what I'd do to the rear of my car if I didn't value my rear seat- I have a kid that needs to sit there once in a while.
The rear brace would be done from the top side with the rear seat removed- Then again I would just cage the car if it weren't used as a street family car once or twice a week to go to dinner or grandma's house.
The front tunnel brace I have (custom made)
The rear dotted line is the one I would add from one side to the other bending up over the driveshaft tunnel inside the cockpit. It would be weled to the tunnel area also as it bends over the top.
Car is daily driver right now so roll cage/bar is out. But I already have some bracing done and dont have a rear seat. What were your thoughts on the rear brace that you refered to above. Where would it mount?
And could you give a better description of the front tunnel brace. I cannot tell much from the photos.
Thanks DM
Banned
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
From: Orange, Calif
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
Best pic I have. This area of the car has no lateral support. The unibody is basically an upside down "U" shape from one side to the other. Under hard cornering, the points of the "U" will close gap and cause distortion of the unibody thus contributing to frontend camber change.
The same flexing appies to the rear of the car from the pressure of the panhard rod. The only braces in the back of the car trying to prevent the driveshaft to rear of the car upsidedown "U" void (area that allows for driveshaft, Tqarm, exhaust, and gas tank cavities) is the flimsy panhard rod brace and the rear bumper impact bar. There is no way (at least for me due to no ground clearance form car being lowered) to run a bar laterally under the driveshaft and Tqarm. A tube bender would be need to fab such a brace on the top side of the driveshaft arching in some sort of manner from the floor areas of each side of the unibody just above or next to the front mount on the rear LCA's (just under the rear seat in the cavity area. This bar could not be stright across because it would involve cutting out the driveshaft tunnel to do so, so it need to arch up over the tunnel but laying onto it close enough to be welded there also. Mtter of fact, I jsut thought of a design that I could possibly make that would allow the seat to stay intact and be completely hidden. I'll have to check this out further-I just may make and sell these
The same flexing appies to the rear of the car from the pressure of the panhard rod. The only braces in the back of the car trying to prevent the driveshaft to rear of the car upsidedown "U" void (area that allows for driveshaft, Tqarm, exhaust, and gas tank cavities) is the flimsy panhard rod brace and the rear bumper impact bar. There is no way (at least for me due to no ground clearance form car being lowered) to run a bar laterally under the driveshaft and Tqarm. A tube bender would be need to fab such a brace on the top side of the driveshaft arching in some sort of manner from the floor areas of each side of the unibody just above or next to the front mount on the rear LCA's (just under the rear seat in the cavity area. This bar could not be stright across because it would involve cutting out the driveshaft tunnel to do so, so it need to arch up over the tunnel but laying onto it close enough to be welded there also. Mtter of fact, I jsut thought of a design that I could possibly make that would allow the seat to stay intact and be completely hidden. I'll have to check this out further-I just may make and sell these
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
From: Ga
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Thanks for the photo vsixtoy....I think I can see now how it attachs.
You welded plates on the front subframes to attach the rodends to?
On the rear braces what you decribed sounds like what I already had thought about.
Add an x-brace connected by all four corners to make a triangulated box over that area. This is just basicly the bottom half of a roll bar attached with door bars to the front and rear of the subframe connectors with bars running from the top corners at the seatback brace to the shock/coilspring area. Kind of like the harness bar/chassis braces sold for Vettes that I seen a thread about on here in the past.
You also got me thinking about the front brace inside the eng compartment. Hmm.......won't work with a V8 huh?
Later DM
You welded plates on the front subframes to attach the rodends to?
On the rear braces what you decribed sounds like what I already had thought about.
Add an x-brace connected by all four corners to make a triangulated box over that area. This is just basicly the bottom half of a roll bar attached with door bars to the front and rear of the subframe connectors with bars running from the top corners at the seatback brace to the shock/coilspring area. Kind of like the harness bar/chassis braces sold for Vettes that I seen a thread about on here in the past.
You also got me thinking about the front brace inside the eng compartment. Hmm.......won't work with a V8 huh?
Later DM
Originally posted by vsixtoy
Your first quote challanging me- Just a reminder for you. I state "Facts" above and you came back to slam me.
Spohn's design allows for the rails to be welded to the unibody along there length of tubing because they are designed to make contact directly to the unibody structure. This way you CAN sheer weld them in increments along the SFC's just as Spohn designed them to.
The S&W SFC's are not as long as the Spohn SFC's. Spohns design extended about 1 1/2 feet longer to the front firewall along the outer edge from where the useless S&W torsional bar bolts across to the outer rail lip of the unibody- It goes nowhere near a support area and is relying on the flimsy floorpan for helping to prevent torque twist. These S7W SFC's are only slightly better than the Alston designs for launching the car, and serve no purpose in bracing the unibody struture for cornering as well as launch- Spohn's does. See my example picture below
Blue is the major bracing structure in the unibody
red is Spohns design
Yellow is S&W's design
Green is well Spohns are "SHEAR (I got the spelling right this time
)" welded to the unibody.
Your first quote challanging me- Just a reminder for you. I state "Facts" above and you came back to slam me.
Spohn's design allows for the rails to be welded to the unibody along there length of tubing because they are designed to make contact directly to the unibody structure. This way you CAN sheer weld them in increments along the SFC's just as Spohn designed them to.
The S&W SFC's are not as long as the Spohn SFC's. Spohns design extended about 1 1/2 feet longer to the front firewall along the outer edge from where the useless S&W torsional bar bolts across to the outer rail lip of the unibody- It goes nowhere near a support area and is relying on the flimsy floorpan for helping to prevent torque twist. These S7W SFC's are only slightly better than the Alston designs for launching the car, and serve no purpose in bracing the unibody struture for cornering as well as launch- Spohn's does. See my example picture below
Blue is the major bracing structure in the unibody
red is Spohns design
Yellow is S&W's design
Green is well Spohns are "SHEAR (I got the spelling right this time
)" welded to the unibody. Originally posted by vsixtoy
Best pic I have. This area of the car has no lateral support. The unibody is basically an upside down "U" shape from one side to the other. Under hard cornering, the points of the "U" will close gap and cause distortion of the unibody thus contributing to frontend camber change.
The same flexing appies to the rear of the car from the pressure of the panhard rod. The only braces in the back of the car trying to prevent the driveshaft to rear of the car upsidedown "U" void (area that allows for driveshaft, Tqarm, exhaust, and gas tank cavities) is the flimsy panhard rod brace and the rear bumper impact bar. There is no way (at least for me due to no ground clearance form car being lowered) to run a bar laterally under the driveshaft and Tqarm. A tube bender would be need to fab such a brace on the top side of the driveshaft arching in some sort of manner from the floor areas of each side of the unibody just above or next to the front mount on the rear LCA's (just under the rear seat in the cavity area. This bar could not be stright across because it would involve cutting out the driveshaft tunnel to do so, so it need to arch up over the tunnel but laying onto it close enough to be welded there also. Mtter of fact, I jsut thought of a design that I could possibly make that would allow the seat to stay intact and be completely hidden. I'll have to check this out further-I just may make and sell these
Best pic I have. This area of the car has no lateral support. The unibody is basically an upside down "U" shape from one side to the other. Under hard cornering, the points of the "U" will close gap and cause distortion of the unibody thus contributing to frontend camber change.
The same flexing appies to the rear of the car from the pressure of the panhard rod. The only braces in the back of the car trying to prevent the driveshaft to rear of the car upsidedown "U" void (area that allows for driveshaft, Tqarm, exhaust, and gas tank cavities) is the flimsy panhard rod brace and the rear bumper impact bar. There is no way (at least for me due to no ground clearance form car being lowered) to run a bar laterally under the driveshaft and Tqarm. A tube bender would be need to fab such a brace on the top side of the driveshaft arching in some sort of manner from the floor areas of each side of the unibody just above or next to the front mount on the rear LCA's (just under the rear seat in the cavity area. This bar could not be stright across because it would involve cutting out the driveshaft tunnel to do so, so it need to arch up over the tunnel but laying onto it close enough to be welded there also. Mtter of fact, I jsut thought of a design that I could possibly make that would allow the seat to stay intact and be completely hidden. I'll have to check this out further-I just may make and sell these
Banned
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
From: Orange, Calif
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
Dywynter, No hard feelings here, I don't take this personal. What I do hear is is try to keep to facts and try to always back what I believe and say. I come here strickly for fun and to keep myself sharp by using what knowledge I have gained over years.
I have a V6 of course, and this is the factory routing of the exhaust. I do not have ground clearance to run a y-pipe below the convertor shield or under the oilpan. I would wipe that out on the first road bump. The bolts of my brace barely clear the ground on driveways- if they were more rcentered rearward in the car they would scrap.
Please respect that I will always challange a statement on here that I feel is misinformation. I just know if I were looking for advice and ready to spend my hard earned money, I'd what factual info myself to base my decission- alot around is are partisan towards what they have on their own car. I will personally tell you something is crap, even if I own it (ex. Powerslot brake rotors)
Dean.
I have a V6 of course, and this is the factory routing of the exhaust. I do not have ground clearance to run a y-pipe below the convertor shield or under the oilpan. I would wipe that out on the first road bump. The bolts of my brace barely clear the ground on driveways- if they were more rcentered rearward in the car they would scrap.
Please respect that I will always challange a statement on here that I feel is misinformation. I just know if I were looking for advice and ready to spend my hard earned money, I'd what factual info myself to base my decission- alot around is are partisan towards what they have on their own car. I will personally tell you something is crap, even if I own it (ex. Powerslot brake rotors)
Dean.
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: Great Lakes State
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
my 12,000 cents on the situation
little servey that I thought might help further settle this...
post a reply to this message, and state if you would like to some how get rid of your excess money...
a hypothetical example: get a fistful of $10 bills and simply flushing them down your nearest local public toilets (they tend to flush much stronger than your average home toilets)
and just to fit this situation, lets hypothetically say that the unit "1 fistful" = 12 seperate bills.
So your shooting down the crapper, in total: $120
Would anyone here like to attempt this?
I was doing a search on Subframe Connectors (specifically Spohn's). I saw this thread and I was emediately caught at attention when I read that spohn's SFC might not be good. I read the thread through and came to this conclusion:
Regardless of which brand wins (although I think its clear that Spohn makes the better SFC) S&W's SFC cost an additional $120 (counting spohn's powder coating).
Say we gave S&W's "unoffical sales guy" the benefit of the doubt and said his SFC were just a lil lil bit bettah. (now, with me make a small tiny space between your thumb and index fingers)
look at that tiny space long and hard... doesn't it command you to just whip out your bill fold and hand over $120?
my guess would be noooo...
but at this point if your thinking, "hell yeah! that 120 is as good as gone!" I want to know if your really gonna flush it, and I wanna know who you are because maybe I could have it instead.
just maybe that $120 dollars could be put to a bit better use... shocks, LCA, panhard rod, generally anything chassis or suspension whise that might help your 3rdgens handling. Maybe even a new dash pad to replace the present cracked and busted one you have now.
but then again... thats just my 12,000 cents
This is just what I was thinking while reading this thread since nobody mentioned the issue of $.
post a reply to this message, and state if you would like to some how get rid of your excess money...
a hypothetical example: get a fistful of $10 bills and simply flushing them down your nearest local public toilets (they tend to flush much stronger than your average home toilets)
and just to fit this situation, lets hypothetically say that the unit "1 fistful" = 12 seperate bills.
So your shooting down the crapper, in total: $120
Would anyone here like to attempt this?
I was doing a search on Subframe Connectors (specifically Spohn's). I saw this thread and I was emediately caught at attention when I read that spohn's SFC might not be good. I read the thread through and came to this conclusion:
Regardless of which brand wins (although I think its clear that Spohn makes the better SFC) S&W's SFC cost an additional $120 (counting spohn's powder coating).
Say we gave S&W's "unoffical sales guy" the benefit of the doubt and said his SFC were just a lil lil bit bettah. (now, with me make a small tiny space between your thumb and index fingers)
look at that tiny space long and hard... doesn't it command you to just whip out your bill fold and hand over $120?
my guess would be noooo...
but at this point if your thinking, "hell yeah! that 120 is as good as gone!" I want to know if your really gonna flush it, and I wanna know who you are because maybe I could have it instead.
just maybe that $120 dollars could be put to a bit better use... shocks, LCA, panhard rod, generally anything chassis or suspension whise that might help your 3rdgens handling. Maybe even a new dash pad to replace the present cracked and busted one you have now.
but then again... thats just my 12,000 cents
This is just what I was thinking while reading this thread since nobody mentioned the issue of $.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
Re: my 12,000 cents on the situation
Originally posted by merlot-fro
This is just what I was thinking while reading this thread since nobody mentioned the issue of $.
This is just what I was thinking while reading this thread since nobody mentioned the issue of $.
I will try to go get pictures of my car, Every once in a while, i will park somewhere, and have 1 tire off the ground. it keeps the car that stiff.
i for one would like to see that ... it would be impressive indeed ... tao
i for one would like to see that ... it would be impressive indeed ... tao
Banned
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
From: Orange, Calif
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
Originally posted by taonindo
i for one would like to see that ... it would be impressive indeed ... tao
i for one would like to see that ... it would be impressive indeed ... tao
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
Originally posted by taonindo
i for one would like to see that ... it would be impressive indeed ... tao
i for one would like to see that ... it would be impressive indeed ... tao
Supreme Member
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,945
Likes: 1
From: Boosted Land
Car: 92 Z28
Engine: Boosted LSX
Those would be some cool pic's. My car is just as stiff. and I have hotchkic sfc's and lca's
I bought em befor sphon was around and big as he is now...
now that I added a roll bar Its even stiffer. even with the targa top out.
I bought em befor sphon was around and big as he is now...
now that I added a roll bar Its even stiffer. even with the targa top out.
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
I have sphons on my car. What I did notice is that the doors closed easier, rear hatch rattled less. Going thru my storage unit, the right rear will chirp now going over the bumps, where before it wouldnt. That shows the chassis is twisting less!
As for the orginal question. Shocks, I do occasional auto-x, and I have kybs on my car. They are tad stiffer then stock, and IMO do just fine for daily use.
As for the orginal question. Shocks, I do occasional auto-x, and I have kybs on my car. They are tad stiffer then stock, and IMO do just fine for daily use.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,838
Likes: 4
From: Another world, some other time
Car: 86 LG4 & 92 TBI Firebird
Engine: The Mighty 305!
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Originally posted by vsixtoy
4)Custom tunnel brace, supports the rear A-arm region of the subframe from flexing inward towards eachother in hard corners
4)Custom tunnel brace, supports the rear A-arm region of the subframe from flexing inward towards eachother in hard corners
Banned
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
From: Orange, Calif
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
Originally posted by Justins86bird
Do you remember the length of the bar you used? I am probably going to make one similar to yours, I'd like to have a length to compare with what I come up with when measuring. I'd PM you but since its turned off...
Do you remember the length of the bar you used? I am probably going to make one similar to yours, I'd like to have a length to compare with what I come up with when measuring. I'd PM you but since its turned off...
Yoou need to order part # RP-127-195 (The 195 is 19.5")
http://www.colemanracing.com/section/index.htp?id=12
Last edited by vsixtoy; Sep 25, 2004 at 10:05 AM.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,838
Likes: 4
From: Another world, some other time
Car: 86 LG4 & 92 TBI Firebird
Engine: The Mighty 305!
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Originally posted by vsixtoy
They are Coleman aluminum tierods- they come pre-threaded. I used a 19.5" for the rear brace and 5/8" rodends.
Yoou need to order part # RP-127-195 (The 195 is 19.5")
http://www.colemanracing.com/section/index.htp?id=12
They are Coleman aluminum tierods- they come pre-threaded. I used a 19.5" for the rear brace and 5/8" rodends.
Yoou need to order part # RP-127-195 (The 195 is 19.5")
http://www.colemanracing.com/section/index.htp?id=12
Banned
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
From: Orange, Calif
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
It did need just a little persuation of my neighbor lightly holding the RF fender down to lift it enough to see it off the ground 2" for the picture. When he lets it go, the back is off only about 1"(hard to see unless i sit the camera on the ground) and the front is just barely touching(enough off the ground to be able to spin the wheel by hand, but with resistence from rubbing the ground. The sway bushings are getting worn, it used to do it much more about 1 1/2 years ago when the bushings were new.
Sorry about the bad angle of the sun, bad time of day to do this.
Sorry about the bad angle of the sun, bad time of day to do this.
Last edited by vsixtoy; Sep 26, 2004 at 07:55 PM.
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: Great Lakes State
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
kudos
nice work man... hopefully my car will do that too when I get my spohn SFCs put in.
your next goal should be to get all four wheels off the ground
your next goal should be to get all four wheels off the ground
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
Re: kudos
Originally posted by merlot-fro
your next goal should be to get all four wheels off the ground
your next goal should be to get all four wheels off the ground
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NBrehm
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Aug 25, 2015 11:49 PM
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
40
Aug 21, 2015 02:12 PM




