Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Edelbrock Panhard Bar

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 02:38 PM
  #1  
IROCZ89TTTPI's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Stow, OH (About 10min from the Tallmadge Summit Racing)
Car: 1989 IROCZ
Engine: 305 TPI(Building 383Twin Turbo)
Transmission: TH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 (Under construction)
Edelbrock Panhard Bar

I was just wondering if anyone has one or has used one, and also if they liked it or not. Just ordered one, and was kinda indifferent about it because my buddy broke his Edelbrock Torque Arm and it was on a mildly built 350.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 02:45 PM
  #2  
JamesC's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 19,282
Likes: 103
From: Lawrence, KS
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
Spohn, a board sponsor, is highly recommened.

JamesC
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 04:21 PM
  #3  
Souseless's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 89 WS6
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt T2R w/ 3:23
The PHB does not undergo the kind of stress that a TA does. Basicly if you compare the material from one piece to the next and they are the same; the pieces have a similar strength.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 05:00 PM
  #4  
IROCZ89TTTPI's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Stow, OH (About 10min from the Tallmadge Summit Racing)
Car: 1989 IROCZ
Engine: 305 TPI(Building 383Twin Turbo)
Transmission: TH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 (Under construction)
I understand that, I was just wondering about the stength and longevity of the product. But thank you for your input.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 05:36 PM
  #5  
Don 79 TA's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
From: Long Island NY
Car: Hers: 88 Formula 350
Engine: TPI
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt Posi
UMI has some nice pricing on EBAY
i got it for 65 shipped
not bad
and it looks really nice too
poly bushings and all
i didn't get the adjustable, didn't need it
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 05:59 PM
  #6  
Souseless's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 89 WS6
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt T2R w/ 3:23
Let me try this again. Look at the links. Edelbrock.com - Suspension - Suspension Components

Edelbrock Performance Products

Spohn Performance, Inc.

Spohn Performance, Inc.

Spohn Performance, Inc.

I do not like poly ends so of the above choices I only like one of them. The two adjustables with poly have a threaded adjuster in the middle of the tube which is a bad location for the weak point. The non adjustable poly versions well , lack adjustment.

Look at the design and look at the materials and your answer should become obvious. By the way the rodends do not add noticable harshness or road noise on a PHB. My choice is rodends but there are cheaper comparable products out there.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 08:28 PM
  #7  
Crusin' 1980's's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 708
Likes: 0
From: Upstate New York
Car: 1988 SC Camaro
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700-R4
I have the spohn SFC and it seems to work just fine. I think they give you a choice between black and red.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 10:25 PM
  #8  
IROCZ89TTTPI's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Stow, OH (About 10min from the Tallmadge Summit Racing)
Car: 1989 IROCZ
Engine: 305 TPI(Building 383Twin Turbo)
Transmission: TH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 (Under construction)
Well what about the solid Edelbrock PHB, thats the one I ordered. Its stock ride height so I dont think Im really gonna need an adjustable one.

Last edited by IROCZ89TTTPI; Apr 5, 2006 at 10:57 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 11:55 AM
  #9  
Crusin' 1980's's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 708
Likes: 0
From: Upstate New York
Car: 1988 SC Camaro
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700-R4
ya, i think if you're not lowering your car, then a non-adjustable one will be fine. My Spohn is a solid (non-adjustable) bar and i have no regrets at all about buying that instead of an adjustable. (Although i have no plans for lowering my car, they already ride low from the factory!)
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 12:24 PM
  #10  
Souseless's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 89 WS6
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt T2R w/ 3:23
The Spohn part is stronger and has grease fittings. When it comes to strength the outside diameter is more important than the wall thickness. The Edelbrock should be fine though. You really want one with the grease fittings if you are using poly and I was not sure from the picture on the website if they were there.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 09:17 PM
  #11  
IROCZ89TTTPI's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Stow, OH (About 10min from the Tallmadge Summit Racing)
Car: 1989 IROCZ
Engine: 305 TPI(Building 383Twin Turbo)
Transmission: TH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 (Under construction)
Well I got it today, it seems great. It also has grease fittings. Thanks everyone.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2006 | 06:11 PM
  #12  
pre's Avatar
pre
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo
Car: 87 Firebird
Engine: 305 LG4
Transmission: THM700R4
I have had the edelbrock piece for 3 years now and the car seemed to stick to the ground better. No strength problems either.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BrianChevy
Wheels and Tires
10
Aug 8, 2019 02:16 PM
armybyrd
Carburetors
3
Oct 20, 2015 03:57 AM
BrianChevy
Wheels and Tires
5
Oct 13, 2015 12:33 PM
darwinprice
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
17
Oct 11, 2015 11:51 PM
meeklay812
Camaros for Sale
1
Oct 1, 2015 03:46 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:01 AM.