Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

boxed or tubular LCAs?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 17, 2001 | 05:06 PM
  #1  
cort351w's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Worth, TX
boxed or tubular LCAs?

Which kind are better for street driving?
If tubular, should I get mild steel or chrome-moly? At a difference of only $20, I'll get the better product. I want to make my suspension as good as I can (within reason as far as $$ goes). Spohn doesn't even have a boxed version, but several other companies do. What do you make of this?

------------------
91 formula WS6 305 tpi, T-5, 20,xxx actual miles, Moroso Blue Max wires, filtercharged

[This message has been edited by cort351w (edited November 17, 2001).]
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2001 | 05:18 PM
  #2  
Tas's Avatar
Tas
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 4,310
Likes: 1
no differance between boxed or tubular in the non adjustable versions. Jegs has Lakewood LCAs for $80

------------------
-Tas
'89 Formula WS-6

305, TBI, 700R4, P.A.W. 14x3 open element with K&N, Milodon 160* thermo, functional Formula hood, cross-flow Flowmaster, '99z28 rear pipes and tips, Hooker 1-5/8" 50 state legal headers, Dynomax 3" I pipe (PN 44063 and 43248)
Super GRK_Taz World
F-Body Dual Exaust
EFI & Intake Options
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2001 | 05:35 PM
  #3  
cort351w's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Worth, TX
lol, I don't want lakewood . I am either getting spohn or bmr, depending on where I can get a better price.

I was just wondering about what kind/material.

Thanks, tas.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2001 | 03:02 AM
  #4  
IROCKZ4me's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 727
Likes: 1
From: Charleston, WV, USA
Car: '86 IROC-Z + Misc. project cars.
Engine: Supercharged + Nitrous TPI 355 CID
Transmission: Art Carr built Th700r4
There isn't a huge difference flexwise between square or round tubing but square is slightly stiffer (=good) given the same wall thickness, but there is more material there which means they are slightly heavier (=bad).
Chromoly is stronger so you can use thinner wall tubing and get the same or better strength than mild steel with less weight (=good).
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2001 | 07:47 PM
  #5  
mrr23's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 4
From: orlando, fl usa
Car: 1986 pontiac TA
Engine: 360 HSR
Transmission: 700r4 3300 yank converter
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 bolt
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by cort351w:
lol, I don't want lakewood . I am either getting spohn or bmr, depending on where I can get a better price.

I was just wondering about what kind/material.

Thanks, tas.
</font>
what's wrong with them? i use them and the adjustable panhard rod on my car. you can't beat the price compare to the others. i couldn't see paying $175.00 for the edelbrock/hotchkis arms when they are the same. lakewood was the only one at the time that i could find that had an adjustable panhard rod.

Reply
Old Nov 21, 2001 | 06:54 PM
  #6  
DartByU's Avatar
Senior Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 841
Likes: 3
From: Silverhill,Al
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: T-5
I have the Spohn chrome-moly non-adjustable LCA's and Panhard bar and they are great and you cant beat the workmanship.

------------------

92 Camaro RS 5.0 5-Speed (Quasar Blue)
T-Tops
14" Open Air Cleaner
3.08 Posi-trac
Edelbrock TBI Intake
Crane cam
Ported & polished stock heads 3 angle valve job
HyperTech Chip
UltraFlo cat-back exhaust

74 Dodge Dart Sport 360 (11.2 1/4 mile)

2000 Dodge 1500 Ram Sport
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
$750 L98
LTX and LSX
10
Feb 1, 2025 02:25 PM
InfernalVortex
Electronics
10
Apr 20, 2021 11:31 AM
Ed1LE
Suspension and Chassis
8
Sep 30, 2018 09:14 AM
92rsvortec350
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
19
Oct 9, 2015 09:39 AM
loud91rs
Camaros for Sale
7
Oct 5, 2015 10:05 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:28 AM.