Another lowering question. Advice??
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Graham, WA
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: L98 350 TPI
Transmission: 700r4 B&M shift kit
Axle/Gears: stock, G4 posi
Another lowering question. Advice??
So I've read through tons of threads on lowering. So I'm coming to final conclusions on getting this right. Trying to get my gta as low as possible with the exspense of air ride. I've already installed eibach sportlines. And I'm looking into dropped spindles for the front. But what about the back? Aside from cutting coils off, the only tip or idea I've read is to remove the rubber on top of the rear spring and wrap it in garden hose? Has anyone actually tried this? Or are there any new ideas I haven't seen? Any and all help will be great! Thanks!
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 8
From: Everett, WA
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Another lowering question. Advice??
So I've read through tons of threads on lowering. So I'm coming to final conclusions on getting this right. Trying to get my gta as low as possible with the exspense of air ride. I've already installed eibach sportlines. And I'm looking into dropped spindles for the front. But what about the back? Aside from cutting coils off, the only tip or idea I've read is to remove the rubber on top of the rear spring and wrap it in garden hose? Has anyone actually tried this? Or are there any new ideas I haven't seen? Any and all help will be great! Thanks!
If you are just looking for shorter rear springs, you can find them here.
http://www.pagedezigner.com/bluecoil/2009/pig-tail.htm
How low are you trying to go? I would imagine the sportlines are probably to low of a rate to run that low.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Graham, WA
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: L98 350 TPI
Transmission: 700r4 B&M shift kit
Axle/Gears: stock, G4 posi
Re: Another lowering question. Advice??
im just trying to eliminate all the wheel gap, so another 1.5 or 2 inches would be plenty
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 2
From: Scottsdale, AZ
Car: 89 GTA/93 S13/91 Si
Engine: 5.7 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Another lowering question. Advice??
i bought the 756# MOOG springs and cut a coil and a half in the front..in the rear i have 200# BMR Springs with the rubber on the top taken out..i dont have any hose on front or rear and its not a problem
some pics for reference


exhaust clearance. lol



exhaust clearance. lol

Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Graham, WA
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: L98 350 TPI
Transmission: 700r4 B&M shift kit
Axle/Gears: stock, G4 posi
Re: Another lowering question. Advice??
Thanks! I'm def gonna pull that rubber out 
Love your car by the way, hella clean.

Love your car by the way, hella clean.
Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 101
Likes: 1
From: Tacoma, Wa
Car: 1987 Sport Coupe
Engine: Carbeurated 5.7
Transmission: NWC T-5
Axle/Gears: Non-posi 2.73
Re: Another lowering question. Advice??
what's the ride quality like? I want to do this same thing but I'm afraid of ruining $200 springs
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,214
Likes: 1,140
From: Il
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: Another lowering question. Advice??
The pix of the car real low makes my kidneys HURT!
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,615
Likes: 5
From: PA
Car: 1996 Camaro, 1985 Camaro
Engine: 3.8, 3.4
Transmission: WC T5, 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.23(?), 3.42
Re: Another lowering question. Advice??
If you want it to still handle right, you have to do drop spindles in the front to lower that end(without any lowering springs) and on the rear you have to use lowering springs, and put LCARBs on it with adjustable panhard(I think), I am certain about the LCARBs, just can't remember for 100% sure that the adjustable piece needs to be the panhard, but I am pretty sure that was the one that needed to be adjustable.
If you do it any other way you will alter the suspension geometry.(bad for handling, unless you are deliberately altering it to improve it, which lowering springs don't do)
If you do it any other way you will alter the suspension geometry.(bad for handling, unless you are deliberately altering it to improve it, which lowering springs don't do)
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Graham, WA
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: L98 350 TPI
Transmission: 700r4 B&M shift kit
Axle/Gears: stock, G4 posi
Re: Another lowering question. Advice??
Lcarbs? Explain please? And with the sportlines the ride quality isn't terrible. But if you want the lowered look, you obviously have to lose ride comfort. Just depends if you think it's worth it or not.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,615
Likes: 5
From: PA
Car: 1996 Camaro, 1985 Camaro
Engine: 3.8, 3.4
Transmission: WC T5, 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.23(?), 3.42
Re: Another lowering question. Advice??
lower control arm relocation brackets, they bring the geometry back into line when you put lowering springs on the rear.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 8
From: Everett, WA
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Another lowering question. Advice??
If you want it to still handle right, you have to do drop spindles in the front to lower that end(without any lowering springs) and on the rear you have to use lowering springs, and put LCARBs on it with adjustable panhard(I think), I am certain about the LCARBs, just can't remember for 100% sure that the adjustable piece needs to be the panhard, but I am pretty sure that was the one that needed to be adjustable.
If you do it any other way you will alter the suspension geometry.(bad for handling, unless you are deliberately altering it to improve it, which lowering springs don't do)
If you do it any other way you will alter the suspension geometry.(bad for handling, unless you are deliberately altering it to improve it, which lowering springs don't do)
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,615
Likes: 5
From: PA
Car: 1996 Camaro, 1985 Camaro
Engine: 3.8, 3.4
Transmission: WC T5, 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.23(?), 3.42
Re: Another lowering question. Advice??
They aren't "ideal" they are the "correct" way to do it, imo unless you are doing it for looks and don't much care for performance drop spindles are the only option.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 8
From: Everett, WA
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Another lowering question. Advice??
Maybe you should tell the 996 911 TT driver that my suspension isn't correct. After all he couldn't keep up with me at Pacific Raceways, except for the main straight.
Please, I would be happy to see evidence that the drop spindles are SOOOO much better than stock.
Member

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 395
Likes: 3
From: San Antonio TX.
Car: Currently have 3 cars and 1 truck.
Engine: 1970&92 Cams,both BBC's
Transmission: LS1 T-56 & PG w/vendor's
Axle/Gears: Built 10 bolt& 9inch w/spool
Re: Another lowering question. Advice??
Coil-overs front and rear are an option of another "correct" way of lowering.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 8
From: Everett, WA
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Another lowering question. Advice??
Second of all they reduce the maximum tire width you can run.
Third, I have not heard of a single person review them on a car that was built to handle. So I would be hesitant to agree without any evidence.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,615
Likes: 5
From: PA
Car: 1996 Camaro, 1985 Camaro
Engine: 3.8, 3.4
Transmission: WC T5, 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.23(?), 3.42
Re: Another lowering question. Advice??
That still alters the geometry, on the rear there is no way to get around it, which is why there are LCARBs out there to compensate and bring it back to where it should be.
And lets get something straight here, its pretty asinine of you to assume that just because I have no handling mods on my car, that I don't know anything, I never said drop spindles are "better than stock" the difference is they ARE the better option for lowering the front, as opposed to lowering springs, other than lowering, they provide no direct improvement, the only point I made was that by putting lowering springs on the front of the car you alter suspension geometry, try and argue that all you want, but its a cold hard fact, regardless of how it "feels" at the track.
If vetruck/dean were around he would back me up that drop spindles are the correct way to lower the front, also coilovers up front aren't better than non coils imo, coilovers up front put more sprung weight on the spindle, that I agree with.
And lets get something straight here, its pretty asinine of you to assume that just because I have no handling mods on my car, that I don't know anything, I never said drop spindles are "better than stock" the difference is they ARE the better option for lowering the front, as opposed to lowering springs, other than lowering, they provide no direct improvement, the only point I made was that by putting lowering springs on the front of the car you alter suspension geometry, try and argue that all you want, but its a cold hard fact, regardless of how it "feels" at the track.
If vetruck/dean were around he would back me up that drop spindles are the correct way to lower the front, also coilovers up front aren't better than non coils imo, coilovers up front put more sprung weight on the spindle, that I agree with.
Last edited by Project 3.4 Camaro; Aug 5, 2011 at 11:57 AM.
Member

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 395
Likes: 3
From: San Antonio TX.
Car: Currently have 3 cars and 1 truck.
Engine: 1970&92 Cams,both BBC's
Transmission: LS1 T-56 & PG w/vendor's
Axle/Gears: Built 10 bolt& 9inch w/spool
Re: Another lowering question. Advice??
Well that is highly debatable. First of all the coilovers put the weight of the car on an area that was never designed to hold the weight. Will it cause a problem? Who knows, but there are rare reports of bent up fenders and strut towers from running coilovers. The rear shock mount is already a weak spot, now you are going to add all the rear weight to that spot.
Second of all they reduce the maximum tire width you can run.
Third, I have not heard of a single person review them on a car that was built to handle. So I would be hesitant to agree without any evidence.
Second of all they reduce the maximum tire width you can run.
Third, I have not heard of a single person review them on a car that was built to handle. So I would be hesitant to agree without any evidence.
Last edited by 92 BBC Z; Aug 5, 2011 at 12:05 PM. Reason: added info
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 8
From: Everett, WA
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Another lowering question. Advice??
That still alters the geometry, on the rear there is no way to get around it, which is why there are LCARBs out there to compensate and bring it back to where it should be.
And lets get something straight here, its pretty asinine of you to assume that just because I have no handling mods on my car, that I don't know anything, I never said drop spindles are "better than stock" the difference is they ARE the better option for lowering the front, as opposed to lowering springs, other than lowering, they provide no direct improvement, the only point I made was that by putting lowering springs on the front of the car you alter suspension geometry, try and argue that all you want, but its a cold hard fact, regardless of how it "feels" at the track.
If vetruck/dean were around he would back me up that drop spindles are the correct way to lower the front, also coilovers up front aren't better than non coils imo, coilovers up front put more sprung weight on the spindle, that I agree with.
And lets get something straight here, its pretty asinine of you to assume that just because I have no handling mods on my car, that I don't know anything, I never said drop spindles are "better than stock" the difference is they ARE the better option for lowering the front, as opposed to lowering springs, other than lowering, they provide no direct improvement, the only point I made was that by putting lowering springs on the front of the car you alter suspension geometry, try and argue that all you want, but its a cold hard fact, regardless of how it "feels" at the track.
If vetruck/dean were around he would back me up that drop spindles are the correct way to lower the front, also coilovers up front aren't better than non coils imo, coilovers up front put more sprung weight on the spindle, that I agree with.
These cars are full of compromises. IMO there are much bigger fish to fry than the spindles.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,615
Likes: 5
From: PA
Car: 1996 Camaro, 1985 Camaro
Engine: 3.8, 3.4
Transmission: WC T5, 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.23(?), 3.42
Re: Another lowering question. Advice??
There are other issues yes, I guess to me it just doesn't make sense to add to them, If I do a mod like that I want to do it right, I mean I don't see it being all that much more costly or complicated than lowering springs, unless you need new springs, I mean, like I said, if you are doing it for handling, drop spindles, if you just want the look, lowering springs.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 8
From: Everett, WA
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Another lowering question. Advice??
I have not done any measuring myself. But based on typical wheel/strut clearance, you would probably lose 3/4" of backspace. So with coilovers I would bet you would not want to go much more than 5" of backspace. Keeping the wheels tucked inside the fenders would limit you to about a 9" wide wheel. Again there are a lot of assumptions in that calculation though.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 8
From: Everett, WA
Car: 87' IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Re: Another lowering question. Advice??
There are other issues yes, I guess to me it just doesn't make sense to add to them, If I do a mod like that I want to do it right, I mean I don't see it being all that much more costly or complicated than lowering springs, unless you need new springs, I mean, like I said, if you are doing it for handling, drop spindles, if you just want the look, lowering springs.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
IROCZDAVE (88-L98)
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
Sep 2, 2015 08:49 AM








