Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Alignment suggestions...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 10, 2013 | 11:49 PM
  #1  
actarnoff's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Car: 1991 RS/B4C clone
Engine: 355 TPI
Transmission: Probuilt Street/Strip 700r4
Axle/Gears: 7.625 axle with 3.23 gears/TrueTrac
Alignment suggestions...

So I just started autocrossing my car. I've gotten larger wheels and tires (R15s), my suspension is new (stock, but 1LE "spec"), etc.

I finally broke and got Founder's Caster Camber plates. I want to get a nice alignment that cuts right down the middle for street driving and autox. I am aware I'll be chewing up front tires, but I just want to know from people who've done it with these cars what's the best setting that compromises between the two? Currently I'm right at -3/8 camber and that's the most any shop can get out of it... which is why I got the plates.


Suggestions?
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2013 | 09:26 AM
  #2  
Ozz1967's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,795
Likes: 15
From: St. Cloud, MN
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: LS1383 in work
Transmission: Magnum F - to be installed
Axle/Gears: Zexel Torsen 3.73, 28-spline mosers
Re: Alignment suggestions...

Originally Posted by actarnoff
So I just started autocrossing my car. I've gotten larger wheels and tires (R15s), my suspension is new (stock, but 1LE "spec"), etc.

I finally broke and got Founder's Caster Camber plates. I want to get a nice alignment that cuts right down the middle for street driving and autox. I am aware I'll be chewing up front tires, but I just want to know from people who've done it with these cars what's the best setting that compromises between the two? Currently I'm right at -3/8 camber and that's the most any shop can get out of it... which is why I got the plates.


Suggestions?
Search is your friend!

From another poster here on the boards. It should be stickied!

Originally Posted by Reid Fleming
The following settings have already been mentioned. But I find this chart to be easiest to read. I would encourage anybody who is going to go in for an alignment to print out the picture and take it to the shop.



It's been mentioned before, but the red and green colors are flat out wrong. You really want to get a "red" alignment. Because that's the only way you'll get
a) a performance alignment
b) good tire wear

CAMBER: I don't know of any reason to ever want a positive number. A positive number means you're wearing out the outside edge of your tire even when you're driving in a straight line. Now what happens when you turn a corner? You really wear out your outside edge of your tire. Think of how a motorcycle tire turns in a corner. That's extreme negative camber.

CASTER: SlickTrackGod has already mentioned the benefits of higher Caster settings. The stock number in my manual for my year (1989) says 4.7° caster. Basically you want to max out the right front tire with as much caster as you can get. And then set the front driver side for half a degree less. So your caster numbers could look like one of these.

Left....Right
5.0.....5.5
4.8.....5.3
4.5.....5.0
4.1.....4.6

You want to set the front right tire first because then you won't have to go back later and adjust it again...... Let's say instead you set the left side at 4.0 first, but you could only get 4.2 on the right. Then you'd have to go back and adjust the left side again to get 3.7

Unfortunately you can't just look at the chart at the top of my post and say you want those exact numbers. Because ride heights will effect the range you can get. As will stock strut mounts vs aftermarket solid bearing mounts. Lowered cars will always have an easier time achieving higher caster numbers.

Last edited by Ozz1967; Oct 11, 2013 at 09:29 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2013 | 04:55 PM
  #3  
RavageTheRoad's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: Levittown/DelcoPA
Car: 1991 RS
Engine: L69?
Transmission: 700r4
Re: Alignment suggestions...

^ that's the post I used, much better than stock, and I have no irregular wear on my new tires after about 8k or so. Points I found most interesting:

Caster. Have it maxed on both sides, seems to have helped with wandering on the highway.

Camber. I believe I went .75 on both sides. I don't drive aggressively often, but I can definitely feel it when I do.

Toe. I can't give much of a first hand experience with that one, since mine was so far out before I got it aligned (like a full 2+ out of range very scary driving in rain there) but after using these settings everything just felt much tighter and more responsive. I also hear the stock setting actually cause slight inner tread wear due to people complaining about low speed turns when the cars were new so they tweaked the camber settings and ended up having it wear the insides on wider tires than 215's or so.

As always, do what you think is best, but that write up helped me greatly and you should save it and maybe bring a printout of the suggested specs to your shop so you can talk with your mechanic if you aren't comfortable picking them yourself.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2013 | 08:18 PM
  #4  
Reid Fleming's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,118
Likes: 15
From: Houston, TX
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: SuperRam 350
Transmission: Pro Built S/S TH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Alignment suggestions...

The stock +0.3 camber setting guarantees outer tire wear on normal driving and even worse tire wear in performance driving. Getting the car to -0.3 camber should balance things out. -0.5 will have zero trouble with tire wear with good performance. -0.7 gives good performance driving.........Now if you go for -1.0 camber, you'll start to get inner tire wear if you do a lot of highway driving.

The caster settings are a trade off. Higher numbers give better high speed driving. Lower numbers give better parking lot manors. The half a degree difference between left and right means the car won't pull to the right due to road drainage towards the sidewalk.

Keep the toe at the recommended 3/32 (or 0.09).....The reason being that once you set the toe, the car will automatically try to center the front wheels due to the force of the car pushing forwards. If you set the toe at 0, you'll get a straight running car. But it will want to dart sideways on you with the smallest road imperfection. In other words, you'll be driving on edge all the time and using two hands on the wheel. Running the toe outwards instead of inwards is great for autocross and ONLY great for autocross. Yes, the car will turn very quickly when you turn the steering wheel. But it will wear out your tires in very short order.



Look at the picture above. What happens when you're driving is that the car wants to go forwards, but the tires don't want to go. The tires have friction and drag on the road. The car has none. So if you have toe in, the car will go forwards and drag your tires more towards a straight line (imagine the tires are crazy glued to the road, but you're moving the front axle forwards, the tires will straighten out)......But if you have toe out (autocross setting only), the car will still go forwards, but it will want to drag the tires to even more toe out.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2014 | 11:01 PM
  #5  
DynoDave43's Avatar
Supreme Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 4,809
Likes: 906
From: MICHIGAN
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 2.73 Open
Re: Alignment suggestions...

Ahhh, the SEARCH feature. I knew I'd find the alignment specs I needed.

I just bought an '88 T/A with WS6, all stock, 53k miles. It has what appear to be brand new Michelin Pilot Sport A/S Plus tires all around. The car does not pull, but the wheel is off center a good amount. If I'm lucky, a few turns of the tie rods will straighten this up. But I want the alignment checked, just to be sure. Those tires are $800+ a set, and I don't want to tear them up.

I spoke with the alignment shop I intend to use, told them I'd be bringing these specs...no problem. I want to add a wonder bar for sure, and maybe a strut tower brace, and would like to do these before the alignment. He agreed this would be smart.

Looking under the hood of my T/A today, I noticed that the stock strut mount is about 100% at the end of their travel (max - camber) on the driver side, and about 95% on the passenger side (there may be a little more slot than can be seen hiding under the shoulder of those nuts). Without knowing the current alignment numbers, should I contemplate replacing the strut mounts (with aftermarket parts that offer mor adjustment) to make sure I can reach the specs in the table above (street use), or will that likely NOT be necessary?
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2014 | 11:07 PM
  #6  
plum92_camaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 4
From: Iowa
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 10bolt w3.42 Torsen
Re: Alignment suggestions...

I used Reid's spec chart. Its really spot on. I strongly recommend not going toe out on the street. It was kind of a pain to drive. Do the 3/32 toe in, it will drive much better. the hard street use setting is an excellent street/track set up to start with. I now adjust between two alignments for track and street.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2014 | 12:23 AM
  #7  
DynoDave43's Avatar
Supreme Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 4,809
Likes: 906
From: MICHIGAN
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 2.73 Open
Re: Alignment suggestions...

plum92,

Were you able to get those numbers using stock strut mounts?
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2014 | 06:29 AM
  #8  
plum92_camaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 4
From: Iowa
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 10bolt w3.42 Torsen
Re: Alignment suggestions...

Originally Posted by DynoDave43
plum92,

Were you able to get those numbers using stock strut mounts?
I have caster camber plates. But you should get close with oem strut mounts. IIRC being lowered will give you a few more degrees of adjustment.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ed1LE
Suspension and Chassis
8
Sep 30, 2018 09:14 AM
Cam-aro
Camaros Wanted
2
Nov 12, 2015 03:35 PM
meeklay812
Camaros for Sale
1
Oct 1, 2015 03:46 PM
evilstuie
Tech / General Engine
2
Sep 24, 2015 02:31 AM
89 formula TPI
Suspension and Chassis
1
Sep 20, 2015 10:54 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:17 AM.