UMI Vs. Spohn
Thread Starter
Member



Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 119
Likes: 7
From: upstate NY
Car: 1989 Firebird
Engine: 2001 5.7 LS1
UMI Vs. Spohn
I am looking at going with one company for items for a LS Engine swap like frame connectors, K-member, transmission cross member for 4L70E and lower A-arms.
is this a good idea going with one company, i am thinking that this option could possible help with ease of installation ?
Also would UMI or Spohn be the better option
Thanks Rich
is this a good idea going with one company, i am thinking that this option could possible help with ease of installation ?
Also would UMI or Spohn be the better option
Thanks Rich
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 196
From: Jackson NJ
Car: 1984 T/A
Engine: LQ4
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Ford 8.8 4.10 gears
Re: UMI Vs. Spohn
I personally do not like the spohn A-arm design. They newer design created a hell of a time installing the spring. The older design which they went away from for some reason was a lot better but harder to come by. I would go with the UMI a arm. As for the trans crossmember you should look into the holley/hooker as it has the torque arm mount integrated into it. Makes room for great exhaust clearance.
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 512
From: Rochester NY
Car: 1984 TA (1 stock / 1 custom)
Engine: LG4 / turbo LQ4
Transmission: 700R4 / 4L80E
Axle/Gears: Stock / 3:50 Moser 9"
Re: UMI Vs. Spohn
I had issues with the Spohn LS engine mounts. They made my engine sit crooked.
I switched to UMI LS mounts and those worked much better.
I switched to UMI LS mounts and those worked much better.
Thread Starter
Member



Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 119
Likes: 7
From: upstate NY
Car: 1989 Firebird
Engine: 2001 5.7 LS1
Re: UMI Vs. Spohn
Thank you i will check out the holly/hooker crossmember
most of the posts that i find are from 5 plus years ago and i would think that there have been some good upgrades. Every time that i look at the UMI pictures i think that the parts look very nicely made
most of the posts that i find are from 5 plus years ago and i would think that there have been some good upgrades. Every time that i look at the UMI pictures i think that the parts look very nicely made
Supreme Member

Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 341
From: CT
Car: 82 TA
Engine: Zz430 clone w a torquestorm blower
Transmission: Magnum f
Axle/Gears: Ford 9 w 4.11
Re: UMI Vs. Spohn
I have a bunch of UMI and spohn parts. They're both well made. I feel like UMI has more stuff at this point. I haven't had any issues with either. I also have some founders parts. To be honest, I've been happy w all of them. There really isn't a wrong way to go. My spohn crossmember needed a little grinding to fit. My UMI weight jacks needed some grinding to fit. That's how it goes sometimes.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post






