Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

UMI Vs. Spohn

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 2, 2023 | 06:58 PM
  #1  
upstateRich's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 119
Likes: 7
From: upstate NY
Car: 1989 Firebird
Engine: 2001 5.7 LS1
UMI Vs. Spohn

I am looking at going with one company for items for a LS Engine swap like frame connectors, K-member, transmission cross member for 4L70E and lower A-arms.
is this a good idea going with one company, i am thinking that this option could possible help with ease of installation ?
Also would UMI or Spohn be the better option
Thanks Rich
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2023 | 07:33 PM
  #2  
punkmaster98's Avatar
Supreme Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 196
From: Jackson NJ
Car: 1984 T/A
Engine: LQ4
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Ford 8.8 4.10 gears
Re: UMI Vs. Spohn

I personally do not like the spohn A-arm design. They newer design created a hell of a time installing the spring. The older design which they went away from for some reason was a lot better but harder to come by. I would go with the UMI a arm. As for the trans crossmember you should look into the holley/hooker as it has the torque arm mount integrated into it. Makes room for great exhaust clearance.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2023 | 08:34 PM
  #3  
battmann's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 512
From: Rochester NY
Car: 1984 TA (1 stock / 1 custom)
Engine: LG4 / turbo LQ4
Transmission: 700R4 / 4L80E
Axle/Gears: Stock / 3:50 Moser 9"
Re: UMI Vs. Spohn

I had issues with the Spohn LS engine mounts. They made my engine sit crooked.
I switched to UMI LS mounts and those worked much better.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2023 | 08:45 PM
  #4  
upstateRich's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 119
Likes: 7
From: upstate NY
Car: 1989 Firebird
Engine: 2001 5.7 LS1
Re: UMI Vs. Spohn

Thank you i will check out the holly/hooker crossmember
most of the posts that i find are from 5 plus years ago and i would think that there have been some good upgrades. Every time that i look at the UMI pictures i think that the parts look very nicely made
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2023 | 09:02 PM
  #5  
Firechicken82's Avatar
Supreme Member
Liked
 
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 341
From: CT
Car: 82 TA
Engine: Zz430 clone w a torquestorm blower
Transmission: Magnum f
Axle/Gears: Ford 9 w 4.11
Re: UMI Vs. Spohn

I have a bunch of UMI and spohn parts. They're both well made. I feel like UMI has more stuff at this point. I haven't had any issues with either. I also have some founders parts. To be honest, I've been happy w all of them. There really isn't a wrong way to go. My spohn crossmember needed a little grinding to fit. My UMI weight jacks needed some grinding to fit. That's how it goes sometimes.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oxrabidus
Suspension and Chassis
27
Nov 3, 2009 01:17 AM
Gecz28
Suspension and Chassis
3
Jul 30, 2004 12:30 PM
CamaroEFI
Suspension and Chassis
3
Apr 20, 2004 01:55 AM
Nixon1
Suspension and Chassis
6
Dec 24, 2002 10:55 AM
My90Iroc
Suspension and Chassis
19
Jun 1, 2002 12:44 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:30 PM.