1/4 times... ewwww.
1/4 times... ewwww.
Okay here are my 1/4 mile times at the LV Motor Speedway.
Ran 2x....
R/T - 1.019 / 1.342
60' - 2.423 / 2.721
330 - 6.990 / 7.165
1/8 - 10.839 / 10.914
MPH - 64.33 / 64.19
1000 - 14.277 / 14.278
1/4 - 17.220 / 17.168
MPH - 76.38 / 77.94
I know I was spinning....
Anyway, those are the times I was running. I do have a 2.73 open rear... Now I KNOW I can get to speed with lower gears! I hate these highway gears.
And maybe I'll finally get those headers on.
Yicch. Oh yeah, the car was pinging on the 1st run....
So there are issues with heat too.
Ran 2x....
R/T - 1.019 / 1.342
60' - 2.423 / 2.721
330 - 6.990 / 7.165
1/8 - 10.839 / 10.914
MPH - 64.33 / 64.19
1000 - 14.277 / 14.278
1/4 - 17.220 / 17.168
MPH - 76.38 / 77.94
I know I was spinning....
Anyway, those are the times I was running. I do have a 2.73 open rear... Now I KNOW I can get to speed with lower gears! I hate these highway gears.
And maybe I'll finally get those headers on.
Yicch. Oh yeah, the car was pinging on the 1st run....
So there are issues with heat too.
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
From: Paragould AR
Car: 89 Camaro RS
Engine: 355 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Re: 1/4 times... ewwww.
Originally posted by Snowdog 91 Formula
Okay here are my 1/4 mile times at the LV Motor Speedway.
Ran 2x....
R/T - 1.019 / 1.342
60' - 2.423 / 2.721
330 - 6.990 / 7.165
1/8 - 10.839 / 10.914
MPH - 64.33 / 64.19
1000 - 14.277 / 14.278
1/4 - 17.220 / 17.168
MPH - 76.38 / 77.94
I know I was spinning....
Anyway, those are the times I was running. I do have a 2.73 open rear... Now I KNOW I can get to speed with lower gears! I hate these highway gears.
And maybe I'll finally get those headers on.
Yicch. Oh yeah, the car was pinging on the 1st run....
So there are issues with heat too.
Okay here are my 1/4 mile times at the LV Motor Speedway.
Ran 2x....
R/T - 1.019 / 1.342
60' - 2.423 / 2.721
330 - 6.990 / 7.165
1/8 - 10.839 / 10.914
MPH - 64.33 / 64.19
1000 - 14.277 / 14.278
1/4 - 17.220 / 17.168
MPH - 76.38 / 77.94
I know I was spinning....
Anyway, those are the times I was running. I do have a 2.73 open rear... Now I KNOW I can get to speed with lower gears! I hate these highway gears.
And maybe I'll finally get those headers on.
Yicch. Oh yeah, the car was pinging on the 1st run....
So there are issues with heat too.
How the heck are you running that slow with all stuff you got done to your car. With a list like that you should be running 13' in the 1/4. So what is the deal
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
From: Lee's Summit, MO, USA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS, Teal
Engine: 305 TBI, Soon to be 383 HSR
Transmission: Pro-Built 700R4
Dude, you should be running a LOT better than that. I only have a drop base (I know) open element and headers and catback and I'm running 16 flat consistently. Something ain't right. are you running stock exhaust?
Could be that the computer needs to be tuned better to the motor too. I am just using the stock chip. I'm sure if the computer were tuned to the motor, I'd see better numbers.
That's another guess.
That's another guess.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,463
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
Car: A Camaro
Engine: Weak
Transmission: Weaker
Try and leave on the third yellow light as well, by the time you see green it's too late. Is it a manual or automatic? A little tire spin seems to work better for me than ***** footing it or bogging it, I'm sure with gears you'll do much better. What tire pressure are you running? Are you burning out? You should have a much higher MPH than that, make sure you don't roll too far into the staging lights, that might help it a little. What water temp do you run at? What is the elevation? I don't know how people on this board are running 15's with what little mods they have, I guess it's just keep tuning until you can't anymore, then tune it some more.
Originally posted by Snowdog 91 Formula
Could be that the computer needs to be tuned better to the motor too. I am just using the stock chip. I'm sure if the computer were tuned to the motor, I'd see better numbers.
That's another guess.
Could be that the computer needs to be tuned better to the motor too. I am just using the stock chip. I'm sure if the computer were tuned to the motor, I'd see better numbers.
That's another guess.
Thanks Tony...
Normal temperature running is around 175-180 degrees.
It's an automatic. I was mashing wayyy too hard on the gas and spinning... My tires were around 25 PSI.... I think my passenger side was less. I should have been around 30 for both, I think.
My temperature at the lights was around 230ish.... The line was super long and the car was heating up waiting for my turn...
When the car gets hot, it PINGS bad, my SES light comes on, and the car loses power. It is a shame. The elevation (I think) is around 2900. (Guess)
I think the car definitely needs some fine tuning too. I may be running on 7 cylinders too. It was not running well at the track at all.
I'm gonna check the distributor and ESC module, replace the knock sensor, replace the spark plugs and O2 sensor.
Maybe have a mechanic check the oil leak I have too. That has me more concerned than anything else. It's not too bad, but leaves drops everywhere I go.
I'm very disappointed with the results I have. It should have been a lot better. Oh well, live and learn.
Normal temperature running is around 175-180 degrees.
It's an automatic. I was mashing wayyy too hard on the gas and spinning... My tires were around 25 PSI.... I think my passenger side was less. I should have been around 30 for both, I think.
My temperature at the lights was around 230ish.... The line was super long and the car was heating up waiting for my turn...
When the car gets hot, it PINGS bad, my SES light comes on, and the car loses power. It is a shame. The elevation (I think) is around 2900. (Guess)
I think the car definitely needs some fine tuning too. I may be running on 7 cylinders too. It was not running well at the track at all.
I'm gonna check the distributor and ESC module, replace the knock sensor, replace the spark plugs and O2 sensor.
Maybe have a mechanic check the oil leak I have too. That has me more concerned than anything else. It's not too bad, but leaves drops everywhere I go.
I'm very disappointed with the results I have. It should have been a lot better. Oh well, live and learn.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 5
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
i second that... even if you have alot of spin you should have a decent trap speed. My friend has a l98 vette powered monte and he still manages to get a trap speed of 98 mph or so even though he only runs high 14's and low 15's
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,463
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
Car: A Camaro
Engine: Weak
Transmission: Weaker
Ok, so the elevation factor does come into play then. Try keeping your car turned off in the lanes and just pushing it. Do you build up RPMs on the convertor when you leave the line (probably not if your spinning bad as it is)?
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Wow, if you're getting an SES light it's most likely because you're running too retarded, not advanced. What happens is rather simple. The ecm does a WOT ping test and if it can't ping the car the 2nd time you go WOT it'll retard the timing a LOT and through an SES light. This was a problem I was having when I used the stock eprom. I had to run a lot of initial timing just so the timing would come "in" faster (helped with backfire through intake).
Does the car feel like serious CRAP when the SES light comes on? If so, move that dissy and it isn't knock you're hearing, it's just not running enough timing.
With a relatively stock eprom from the caprice I ran a 13.8 at 102, I expect more once my fuel pump problem is solved (nothing like watching FP drop when you shift into 3rd gear under WOT).
Power enrichment spark doesn't become active UNTIL the ping under WOT test is completed twice.
e-mail me, I lost your e-mail when I formated my computer.
Does the car feel like serious CRAP when the SES light comes on? If so, move that dissy and it isn't knock you're hearing, it's just not running enough timing.
With a relatively stock eprom from the caprice I ran a 13.8 at 102, I expect more once my fuel pump problem is solved (nothing like watching FP drop when you shift into 3rd gear under WOT).
Power enrichment spark doesn't become active UNTIL the ping under WOT test is completed twice.
e-mail me, I lost your e-mail when I formated my computer.
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
From: Solomons Island Maryland
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 4 bbl 305
Transmission: 700R4
sounds like you got some tuning issues dude my lo3 ran 16.7s and 16.8s all day long bone stock with 215/65/15 tires and the terd 2.73 open rear end something is not right with your car man
Originally posted by JPrevost
e-mail me, I lost your e-mail when I formated my computer.
e-mail me, I lost your e-mail when I formated my computer.
ET can only tell you so much about the car, I car run anywhere b/w 15.4 to 17.1 ETs all day depending on the level of traction I've got.
On the other hand the one thing that varies very little is my trap speeds. I run anywhere from 89.5-91.5 MPH no matter what. Lower mph usually leads to better times for me since power is transferred to the ground instead of building up mph.
It's the MPH that tells you the power condition of your car at the end of the 1/4 mile.
Elevation plays a part in power, that's true, but even with severe changes (3000 ft) you usually only see a 5 mph+- difference usually in trap speeds.
77 mph trap speeds is not right for a 350 with a mild cam. Even with the log headers, you should still be pulling into the 90's in mph.
SES light, its not pinging the ECM checks for its KNOCK. Now if an SES pops up first figure out what code it is.
I have my suspicions, but at high elevation and with a holley 670 TBI, I'm thinking a rich condition at O2 is detected is one of them.
Get us your SES codes and then we'll have a better idea of why you ran like you did.
On the other hand the one thing that varies very little is my trap speeds. I run anywhere from 89.5-91.5 MPH no matter what. Lower mph usually leads to better times for me since power is transferred to the ground instead of building up mph.
It's the MPH that tells you the power condition of your car at the end of the 1/4 mile.
Elevation plays a part in power, that's true, but even with severe changes (3000 ft) you usually only see a 5 mph+- difference usually in trap speeds.
77 mph trap speeds is not right for a 350 with a mild cam. Even with the log headers, you should still be pulling into the 90's in mph.
SES light, its not pinging the ECM checks for its KNOCK. Now if an SES pops up first figure out what code it is.
I have my suspicions, but at high elevation and with a holley 670 TBI, I'm thinking a rich condition at O2 is detected is one of them.
Get us your SES codes and then we'll have a better idea of why you ran like you did.
Actually code 43 tells us a lot and I think I can sum up your problems to it.
Code 43 Electronic Spark Control, Knock Sensor Failure
The ECM regularly checks for knock by backing off timing till it gets some knock counts and figures where its base timing thru ecm should be.
If the sensor is not functioning, it can't determine when or if knock is occurring so it defaults to a safe timing mode (really retarded usually) and gives a code.
With the initial timing off, no matter what you set base too, you will always be at the mercy of the ecm's safe mode hence the low mph when running. That's why even though the ses light goes off, the timing control just ins't working and its running the wrong timing all the time hence the pinging here and the low mph.
The good news is its an easy fix, get a new 350 knock sensor. If you have the old 305 sensor there, its overly sensitive or if you had a 350 sensor, its just plain busted.
Code 43 Electronic Spark Control, Knock Sensor Failure
The ECM regularly checks for knock by backing off timing till it gets some knock counts and figures where its base timing thru ecm should be.
If the sensor is not functioning, it can't determine when or if knock is occurring so it defaults to a safe timing mode (really retarded usually) and gives a code.
With the initial timing off, no matter what you set base too, you will always be at the mercy of the ecm's safe mode hence the low mph when running. That's why even though the ses light goes off, the timing control just ins't working and its running the wrong timing all the time hence the pinging here and the low mph.
The good news is its an easy fix, get a new 350 knock sensor. If you have the old 305 sensor there, its overly sensitive or if you had a 350 sensor, its just plain busted.
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 234
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by Snowdog 91 Formula
I'm just getting 43.
That is the only code I'm getting.... and I have no other clue.
After my tune up on Friday, maybe things will improve.
I'm just getting 43.
That is the only code I'm getting.... and I have no other clue.
After my tune up on Friday, maybe things will improve.
Problem solved.
RBob.
If only I had a prom burner. Until then, I am at the mercy of what I have. I'll be getting a new knock sensor and hooking it up and hopefully those problems will go away.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RedLeader289
Tech / General Engine
10
May 28, 2019 01:47 PM







