TBI Throttle Body Injection discussion and questions. L03/CFI tech and other performance enhancements.

What octane gas do you use?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 10, 2003 | 08:14 PM
  #1  
CamaroRS91x's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
What octane gas do you use?

I was just wondering what gas everyone uses. And the pro's and con's of that gas. Thanks!
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2003 | 12:42 AM
  #2  
FreeLoader's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton, FL
Car: 1997 Camaro z28
Engine: 350 LT1 built to LT4
Transmission: a
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi
i use 91 on my stock 88 lo3, i ran it with 93 for a while until gas prices went through the roof, and i noticed instead of there being no difference, the car actually ran a little better with the 91 octane, so I've stuck with that. I wouldn't even try normal, 87-89(depending on gas station) just seems too low for the 9.3 compression imo.

Also, the gas stations seem to very in quality as well, so shop around gas stations...I personally prefer Shell, I've always had good gas from them, though they tend to cost 1-2 cents more per gallon, its worth it to me.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2003 | 12:53 AM
  #3  
25THRSS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,740
Likes: 3
From: Glen Allen, VA
I use 93 Amoco simply because it is the cleanest gas you can buy period. On a stock L03 with the timing at 0 degrees you would prolly be better of with 89 octane. If you advance the timing you want to run premium all the time to keep it from pinging.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2003 | 01:21 AM
  #4  
quick 'lil TBI's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: oak lawn, IL
Shell 93 baby!!!
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2003 | 06:11 AM
  #5  
Dewey316's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
87 shell or chevron

i run what is cheap, and adjust my timing to so i have no knock.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2003 | 08:39 AM
  #6  
CamaroRS91x's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Is premium worth the money? hehe
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2003 | 08:54 AM
  #7  
Dewey316's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
it depends, the way octane works....

higher octane, is less 'explosive' it burns slower, that is why it works on high compresion engines without having to take out timing. the lower octane is more explosive, and that is why you typical have knock on high performance engines.

with our LO3s in factory form i never had a problem runnign 87, because we are pretty low compresion with conservative timing. in run 4* all the time on 87 and i never have knock according to winaldl.

with gas the bigger number isn't always best, you 'should' make as much or more power on low octane then you do on high octane, since low octane burns faster.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2003 | 12:07 PM
  #8  
Gladstoneiroc's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 1
From: Gladstone, Missouri
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0L TBI (ebl inside)
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 lsd 10 bolt
Its all about saving the money here. 87 octane rating so I can change those saved pennies to help my intake and exhust.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2003 | 04:08 PM
  #9  
Frik92RS's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach, FL
Car: Camaro RS
Engine: L03 305
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
I run Sunoco 93. I tried out 89 and didn't notice a difference however I've got my timing advanced 4* and I like the piece of mind form running the 93.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2003 | 05:39 PM
  #10  
vjo90RS8's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Car: 2002 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23
91 chevron or shell, cant get 93 here in CA
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2003 | 07:31 PM
  #11  
JokerRS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 542
Likes: 1
From: Alburnett,Iowa,USA
Car: 92RS
Engine: 357
Transmission: 700R4
I never have trouble with 89.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2003 | 10:10 PM
  #12  
SSBlueOx's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Car: Camaro RS
Engine: 305ci TBI
Transmission: TH-700R4
Shell/Mobil 93 octane! I have noticed a small diff in 87 to 93 not much but when i bump my compression up to around 9.5-10.1 i should feel the diff

SSBO
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2003 | 12:52 AM
  #13  
twobirds's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 804
Likes: 1
From: Thornton, CO
Car: 1987 GTA 350
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4/2400 stall
Axle/Gears: B/W 3:27 posi disc
I run 91. Never lower than that.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2003 | 06:13 AM
  #14  
DartByU's Avatar
Senior Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 841
Likes: 3
From: Silverhill,Al
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: T-5
Looks like lots of folks just like throwing money away, my car has NEVER needed more than 87 even after putting in a cam, heads and headers, I tried higher octane a few times with the same or increased timing at the track and didn't pick up anything.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2003 | 06:15 AM
  #15  
Dewey316's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
Originally posted by DartByU
I tried higher octane a few times with the same or increased timing at the track and didn't pick up anything.
exactly, read my explanation above, the most power you are going to make is on the lowest octane you can run without detonation. the only time you need higher octane, is if you detonate, and the computer starts pulling timing out.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2003 | 06:19 AM
  #16  
ctandc's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Yup...guess I'm cheap too...

87 Octane CITGO or AMOCO....I normally use the same station.

that's a iron header L98 w/ some mods, 9.3:1 compression and timing is set at 10 degree BTDC initial. No knock, no rattle...and 20 mph AVERAGE to boot
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2003 | 06:25 AM
  #17  
89_305TransAm's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Car: '89 Firebird Trans Am WS6
Engine: 305 TBI (L03)
Transmission: 700r4
93 Exxon

Or if im feeling adventerous 94 at sunoco
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2003 | 10:41 AM
  #18  
Dragons91RS's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: South Texas, RGV
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 LO3
Transmission: 700-R4
Exxon 93 since the day I got the car
I wish there was a Sunoco so I could try 94
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2003 | 08:02 PM
  #19  
Justins86bird's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,838
Likes: 4
From: Another world, some other time
Car: 86 LG4 & 92 TBI Firebird
Engine: The Mighty 305!
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
87 Octane. As long as they didn't put water in it, I'm happy.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2003 | 11:48 AM
  #20  
vrooom305's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
From: Washington State
but the question is...

"is a stock 305 with a TBI considered a high performance engine?"

I don't think it is...
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2003 | 01:06 PM
  #21  
copperhead110's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
My owners manual says use premium and I have a 88 LO3.

And it pings badly w/ the lowest octane. I buy the highest octane I can get for Texaco, 76, or Shell. The highest here in WA is 92 or 91. I forget.

If your car will let you, use lower octane.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2003 | 04:05 PM
  #22  
SSBlueOx's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Car: Camaro RS
Engine: 305ci TBI
Transmission: TH-700R4
Originally posted by copperhead110
My owners manual says use premium and I have a 88 LO3.

And it pings badly w/ the lowest octane. I buy the highest octane I can get for Texaco, 76, or Shell. The highest here in WA is 92 or 91. I forget.

If your car will let you, use lower octane.
Yeah the other thing u guys arnt looking at is that higher octane burns cooler then lower octane and with higher compression, higher octane IS needed.

SSBO
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2003 | 05:17 PM
  #23  
tbfirebird's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
From: waukesha,WI
Car: Black 89 Formula
Engine: ??????????
Transmission: ??????????
i run 92 from speedway when i first got the car it was running on 87 but once in a while i would notice a very very slight ping so i added that bottle of the injector cleaner the one with the flame horse and it went away and i only use 92 all the time and maybe 89 when i cant dish out the money for 92.

it seems when i put in 93 it seems to take of slower.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2003 | 01:18 AM
  #24  
Beast5spdGTA's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
From: Palm Bay, FL
Car: 2007 Corvette Z06
Engine: LS7
Transmission: 6 speed
93 octane, but I have added tons of timing. Probably mostly piece of mind, but sometimes the engine doesn't like it with 87 at WOT, which I assume is the ECM pulling timing. 25-26 mpg on the highway last trip, that's with 3.73 gears, AC, @ 70-80 mph and mid 14s in the 1/4.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2003 | 10:16 PM
  #25  
SC2camaro's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From: Randleman,nc
Car: 87 BUICK GN
Engine: 3.8 TURBO
Transmission: 200R4
RE:octane

hey guys


my maro doesn't like 87 it tends to ping @ 8* with the a/c on so i try to run 89. Also thinking about what you were saying about the car not improving over the higher octane gas i can understand that. i just filled up with 89 amocco and i was wondering why it felt more spunky down low. so i keep the 89 in it all the time and not waste money.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2003 | 09:19 AM
  #26  
Patrick 92's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
dewey is right....definately run the lowest you can without significant pinging or detonation, which should not be a problem on these tbi motors. i also have a volvo 850 running 12.5:1 compression....now that needs higher octane gas. my family has a history of working for exxon and designing cheaper ways to get gasoline transported.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2003 | 07:46 PM
  #27  
FLYNLOW92rs's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,169
Likes: 0
87 Octane Gas

I have a 305 TBI......
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2003 | 08:09 PM
  #28  
kevm14's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 708
Likes: 0
From: RI
Car: 93 Caprice 9C1
Engine: L05
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Originally posted by copperhead110
My owners manual says use premium and I have a 88 LO3.

And it pings badly w/ the lowest octane. I buy the highest octane I can get for Texaco, 76, or Shell. The highest here in WA is 92 or 91. I forget.

If your car will let you, use lower octane.
I don't see why the owner's manual would say to use premium. It's an L03. It was put in caprices and trucks. If you can't run 87 with the stock timing, then you have a case of carbon buildup and should find a shop with MotorVac and have the service done. Or you can continue to waste money...
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2003 | 09:56 PM
  #29  
25THRSS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,740
Likes: 3
From: Glen Allen, VA
Whats MotorVac?
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2003 | 11:57 PM
  #30  
91FB305TBI's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: St. Paul, MN
I have a 91 305 TBI, 5-speed manual Firebird with the timing set at 0° and it would ocasionally ping in 1st or 2nd gear around 1500 RPM according to WINADL (and my ear) when using 87 octane. I have since switched to 91 octane and the pinging seems to have stopped. The owners manual says to use 87 octane, but that was 150,000 miles ago.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2003 | 01:07 AM
  #31  
kevm14's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 708
Likes: 0
From: RI
Car: 93 Caprice 9C1
Engine: L05
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Originally posted by 25THRSS
Whats MotorVac?
Gentlemen, I present you with The MotorVac Thread

http://www.impalassforum.com/cgi-bin...33&t=002148&p=

There are 7 pages. Basically, keep reading until your skepticism goes away. Then, optionally, you may continue reading if your curiosity prevails (as it did me).

Enjoy.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2003 | 01:41 AM
  #32  
25THRSS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,740
Likes: 3
From: Glen Allen, VA
Thanks for the info. Seems like some good stuff.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GeneralIesrussi
Carburetors
6
Jun 20, 2024 07:21 PM
KCG
TPI
7
Jun 24, 2020 04:33 AM
86maro_252
Tech / General Engine
6
Oct 10, 2015 06:52 PM
kx3g
Body
13
Sep 28, 2015 08:14 AM
reactor60
Tech / General Engine
8
Sep 22, 2015 01:44 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:19 AM.