As Promised.............................................
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,257
Likes: 5
Car: Turbo Buick
Engine: 3.8 V6
As Promised.............................................

(quickest et)

best mph
nuff said
stay tuned for improved times next saturday.
Last edited by Pablo; Oct 5, 2003 at 01:37 AM.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,257
Likes: 5
Car: Turbo Buick
Engine: 3.8 V6
If i was trying to lie to you do you think I would be dumb enough to put up timeslips from ten years ago, when i was 14 years old and lived on the east coast?
Those were from today, carlsbad raceway in southern california. I dont know why the dates are wrong but they are, the track isnt the tightest ship out there, pretty much the only thing paved is the track (if you can call it that) and the return road. If you really dont believe they are real then maybe look into the timing system they use. Ill bet it wasnt around in 1993. I would also bet that they would have had atleast ONE drag event between february and november (see top of slip where it says next event nov. 30)
Those were from today, carlsbad raceway in southern california. I dont know why the dates are wrong but they are, the track isnt the tightest ship out there, pretty much the only thing paved is the track (if you can call it that) and the return road. If you really dont believe they are real then maybe look into the timing system they use. Ill bet it wasnt around in 1993. I would also bet that they would have had atleast ONE drag event between february and november (see top of slip where it says next event nov. 30)
Last edited by Pablo; Oct 5, 2003 at 12:45 AM.
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Car: 90 454SS
Engine: 454 TBI
Transmission: TH400
Good times.
Last time I went to the strip, the timeslips said it was Novemeber, and it was August.
Apparently that stuff happens all the time, especially on a T&T day!
Bill
Last time I went to the strip, the timeslips said it was Novemeber, and it was August.
Apparently that stuff happens all the time, especially on a T&T day!
Bill
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,257
Likes: 5
Car: Turbo Buick
Engine: 3.8 V6
i estimate about 3270 with driver.. maybe less
(i weighed it back when i was near stock and have weighed the items that i have changed or replaced for lighter ones individually.. still need to get it weighed alltogether)
(i weighed it back when i was near stock and have weighed the items that i have changed or replaced for lighter ones individually.. still need to get it weighed alltogether)
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
From: institute, wv
Car: 91 RS
Engine: LO3
Transmission: T-5
Originally posted by dimented24x7
good.... now lets see how well it does with the tbi back on it.
good.... now lets see how well it does with the tbi back on it.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
13's with a 305 should be easily doable.
really to run a 13.99 doesn't take all that much HP and let me tell you weight reduction and suspension mods make up for lack of HP very easily.
i'm really hopeing my TBI combo is 13sec rance, even with my heavy car
its all in choosing parts that work together, and not just throwing parts on.
really to run a 13.99 doesn't take all that much HP and let me tell you weight reduction and suspension mods make up for lack of HP very easily.
i'm really hopeing my TBI combo is 13sec rance, even with my heavy car
its all in choosing parts that work together, and not just throwing parts on. Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,257
Likes: 5
Car: Turbo Buick
Engine: 3.8 V6
basically top to bottom its
89 firebird
305 .030 over, unknown mileage, big cheap dished pistons.
SSI flat tappet camshaft 214/224 w/ 1.6 summit brand roller rockers .474/.498
K motion valve springs
416 cyl heads with stock valves, 3 angle valve job, back cut valves. Full porting by myself.
heads milled .020-.030? dont know for sure, head chamber CC is 51 cc's
felpro 1094 .015 steel shim head gasket
about 10:1 compression
Milodon crankshaft wiper
Edelbrock Torker II single plane intake
Edelbrock 1405 600cfm carburetor with choke removed, lighter secondary air valve.
7747 computer running the spark, cheap *** accel ignition coil
Edelbrock headers for L98, full 3" edelbrock exhaust
non WC T5 tranny
3.42 rear with powertrax locker
solid mount torque arm ala Tom400cfi
Spohn LCA lowering brackets
Comp engineering aluminum lca bushings
Air Ride Air bags
Nitto Drag Radials
No front sway bar
battery relocation to the rear
no front crash beam
no rear seats
no AC
alot more No's that ill spare you
I actually believe the car will be running low 13s with a few changes. Namely gearing and a good launch. The car hooks hard but the carburetor is lacking in pump shot volume which is a simple fix accomplished with a drill bit. This is the big reason my 60 foots are terrible. It would hook and then if i stomped on it it would bog big time (major lean condition on my WBo2 sensor)
its also causing me to go a bit lean on the gear shifts when i lay into the gas after the clutch.
The gearing is also way off, with 3.42s im crossing the line at way too high of an rpm but its not quite enough distance to shift into fourth gear. 4.10s would probably be about perfect but it would kill the cars driveability. Its my driver (i dont drive to work though so not daily) so Id ideally need a t56 tranny to run the 4.10s id like.
with both of those issues adjusted for I dont think low 13s are out of the question. Heck, GMHTP ran like a 13.0 at about 100 mph and I am near 103.. easily 103+ if i wasnt just coasting across the line at 6300 rpm.
89 firebird
305 .030 over, unknown mileage, big cheap dished pistons.
SSI flat tappet camshaft 214/224 w/ 1.6 summit brand roller rockers .474/.498
K motion valve springs
416 cyl heads with stock valves, 3 angle valve job, back cut valves. Full porting by myself.
heads milled .020-.030? dont know for sure, head chamber CC is 51 cc's
felpro 1094 .015 steel shim head gasket
about 10:1 compression
Milodon crankshaft wiper
Edelbrock Torker II single plane intake
Edelbrock 1405 600cfm carburetor with choke removed, lighter secondary air valve.
7747 computer running the spark, cheap *** accel ignition coil
Edelbrock headers for L98, full 3" edelbrock exhaust
non WC T5 tranny
3.42 rear with powertrax locker
solid mount torque arm ala Tom400cfi
Spohn LCA lowering brackets
Comp engineering aluminum lca bushings
Air Ride Air bags
Nitto Drag Radials
No front sway bar
battery relocation to the rear
no front crash beam
no rear seats
no AC
alot more No's that ill spare you
I actually believe the car will be running low 13s with a few changes. Namely gearing and a good launch. The car hooks hard but the carburetor is lacking in pump shot volume which is a simple fix accomplished with a drill bit. This is the big reason my 60 foots are terrible. It would hook and then if i stomped on it it would bog big time (major lean condition on my WBo2 sensor)
its also causing me to go a bit lean on the gear shifts when i lay into the gas after the clutch.
The gearing is also way off, with 3.42s im crossing the line at way too high of an rpm but its not quite enough distance to shift into fourth gear. 4.10s would probably be about perfect but it would kill the cars driveability. Its my driver (i dont drive to work though so not daily) so Id ideally need a t56 tranny to run the 4.10s id like.
with both of those issues adjusted for I dont think low 13s are out of the question. Heck, GMHTP ran like a 13.0 at about 100 mph and I am near 103.. easily 103+ if i wasnt just coasting across the line at 6300 rpm.
Last edited by Pablo; Oct 6, 2003 at 01:58 PM.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,257
Likes: 5
Car: Turbo Buick
Engine: 3.8 V6
btw isnt it odd that when i posted some Gtech times everyone and their brother was out in force to talk smack on me and my combo yet when I back it up with timeslips no one says a thing? lol
Supreme Member




Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,176
Likes: 787
From: Park City, UT
Car: '92 Corvette, '89 1/2-a-'Vette
Engine: LT1, L400
Transmission: ZF6, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.45, 3.31
Nice times!
I like your torque arm mod too! Good job w/the 305 though. It's nice to see those results.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 5
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Originally posted by Pablo
non WC T5 tranny
non WC T5 tranny
I want a manual trans... My car would be so much faster with a manual that didnt take two friggin seconds to complete a shift like my auto does. I should probably take a hint from my 9-bolt, though. Spent years in a 1LE L98 car getting the crap beat out of it and it still runs wisper quiet. Stick it in my car and after about 20 mins. of my driving the backlash opens up and it starts to whine.
Id probably blow a WC to pieces in a matter of seconds. your best 60 was a high 2.2 with drag radials? You need to work on that launch and I agree you need better gearing too. I think if you got that 60 down below the 2's, which shouldn't be hard with drag radials and a set of gears you could pull a mid to low 13 with some really good weather, but before you do any of that, you need to put the tbi back on.
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 233
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by Pablo
. . . It would hook and then if i stomped on it it would bog big time (major lean condition on my WBo2 sensor)
its also causing me to go a bit lean on the gear shifts when i lay into the gas after the clutch. . .
. . . It would hook and then if i stomped on it it would bog big time (major lean condition on my WBo2 sensor)
its also causing me to go a bit lean on the gear shifts when i lay into the gas after the clutch. . .

RBob.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,257
Likes: 5
Car: Turbo Buick
Engine: 3.8 V6
Hehehe, I would do that but im pretty sure if i tried that it would be followed by a loud BOOM as my 1983 T5 blew apart all over the track 
and like i said 25thrss, its not a traction issue.. the car hooks like a sumbitch, it just needs more pump shot volume. It will book the first thirty feet and then just die as i completely lay into it.
As a little update to the tbi issue, im having the shaft machined down opposite of the flat side by .050, possibly more away from the screw holes, Im also countersinking the holes for the blade screws .040 (the blade is .091 thick) im also going to knife edge it. This should help out with the flow some but its still going to be weak guys. Probably still shy of 500 cfm at 1.5inhg. Im almost wondering if i should waste my time with it.

and like i said 25thrss, its not a traction issue.. the car hooks like a sumbitch, it just needs more pump shot volume. It will book the first thirty feet and then just die as i completely lay into it.
As a little update to the tbi issue, im having the shaft machined down opposite of the flat side by .050, possibly more away from the screw holes, Im also countersinking the holes for the blade screws .040 (the blade is .091 thick) im also going to knife edge it. This should help out with the flow some but its still going to be weak guys. Probably still shy of 500 cfm at 1.5inhg. Im almost wondering if i should waste my time with it.
Supreme Member

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 2
From: CC, TX
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
Good time, good times...
TOO BAD THEY'RE FAKE!!!
lol, j/k
Man i wish my car was running and i could go to the track
TOO BAD THEY'RE FAKE!!!
lol, j/k
Man i wish my car was running and i could go to the track
Supreme Member

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 2
From: CC, TX
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
Originally posted by Pablo
naysayers be damned! and whats up with your car brody...
naysayers be damned! and whats up with your car brody...
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
at least the spring didn't break, that would have been disasterous.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,257
Likes: 5
Car: Turbo Buick
Engine: 3.8 V6
That was the story of my life before i got the heads properly machined. I would change springs and pushrods like you change oil. When i broke a rocker arm I finally decided to pull the head and fix it
Supreme Member


Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 14
From: Dayton, O.
Car: 91 Camaro Z28
Engine: LS7
Transmission: M12/T56
Axle/Gears: 3.79
My car bogs real bad though about 40 feet also resulting in ~2.3 60's with perfect traction, well at least the last time at the track. Finally got some fuel going into it now but its too bunk to drive now. Always something aint it?
It'll be interesting to see what efi does on your car again.
It'll be interesting to see what efi does on your car again.
Supreme Member

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 2
From: CC, TX
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
Originally posted by Pablo
That was the story of my life before i got the heads properly machined. I would change springs and pushrods like you change oil. When i broke a rocker arm I finally decided to pull the head and fix it
That was the story of my life before i got the heads properly machined. I would change springs and pushrods like you change oil. When i broke a rocker arm I finally decided to pull the head and fix it
Supreme Member

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 2
From: CC, TX
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
Being a certified crack-*****...
Naw LOL, just "speed contest" AKA street racing. Got caught in the end of August right before the stricter racing laws went in to effect September 1.
Naw LOL, just "speed contest" AKA street racing. Got caught in the end of August right before the stricter racing laws went in to effect September 1.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,257
Likes: 5
Car: Turbo Buick
Engine: 3.8 V6
Originally posted by brodyscamaro
Being a certified crack-*****...
Naw LOL, just "speed contest" AKA street racing. Got caught in the end of August right before the stricter racing laws went in to effect September 1.
Being a certified crack-*****...
Naw LOL, just "speed contest" AKA street racing. Got caught in the end of August right before the stricter racing laws went in to effect September 1.
hahah thats awesome dude, we could probably hang out. Only difference is I havent been caught yet
A few close ones and one REAL close one but we wont get into detail about that here lol. Ive mellowed out as of late though.As for your nut coming loose, you might want to check into a pair of briefs. More supportive
heheactually I dont know about your particular situation but i noticed on my car that the threads had like a tighter fit as the nut on the stud went further down the way.
Originally the stock nuts worked fine on my stamped rockers. Then i installed my roller rockers and the trunion is much thicker so the nut barely goes on and its real loose almost can be turned with a finger. Luckily my rockers were locking so i locked them down but not before I realized just how quickly they could get loose without locking them down all the way. THey got loose as i set the valve lash!
Ill bet the rockers you have are thicker than stock and you are on the loose part of the threads or maybe your studs are just all loose. Id invest in some locknuts if i were you.
Supreme Member

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 2
From: CC, TX
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
Originally posted by Pablo
Ive mellowed out as of late though.
Ive mellowed out as of late though.
Originally posted by Pablo
As for your nut coming loose, you might want to check into a pair of briefs. More supportive
hehe
As for your nut coming loose, you might want to check into a pair of briefs. More supportive
hehe
LMFAO Originally posted by Pablo
actually I dont know about your particular situation but i noticed on my car that the threads had like a tighter fit as the nut on the stud went further down the way.
Originally the stock nuts worked fine on my stamped rockers. Then i installed my roller rockers and the trunion is much thicker so the nut barely goes on and its real loose almost can be turned with a finger. Luckily my rockers were locking so i locked them down but not before I realized just how quickly they could get loose without locking them down all the way. THey got loose as i set the valve lash!
Ill bet the rockers you have are thicker than stock and you are on the loose part of the threads or maybe your studs are just all loose. Id invest in some locknuts if i were you.
actually I dont know about your particular situation but i noticed on my car that the threads had like a tighter fit as the nut on the stud went further down the way.
Originally the stock nuts worked fine on my stamped rockers. Then i installed my roller rockers and the trunion is much thicker so the nut barely goes on and its real loose almost can be turned with a finger. Luckily my rockers were locking so i locked them down but not before I realized just how quickly they could get loose without locking them down all the way. THey got loose as i set the valve lash!
Ill bet the rockers you have are thicker than stock and you are on the loose part of the threads or maybe your studs are just all loose. Id invest in some locknuts if i were you.
Originally posted by Rancid87
Why are you posting this in the TBI forum if you are running a carb?
Why are you posting this in the TBI forum if you are running a carb?
Search a couple of his last threads on this board.
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 344
Likes: 3
From: Panama City, Fl
Car: '89 Formula, '97 Z28, '88 Formula 350
Engine: 305 TBI(LO3)
Transmission: TH700R4(MD8)
Tap the taperperd end of the nut with a hammer a few(2 maybe 3) times. It will restore the selflocking. I do it every time I take one off. Best to get the double locking type though(with the allen head in the middle). Just a quick fix, Bobby
Supreme Member

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 2
From: CC, TX
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
Originally posted by chevypower
Tap the taperperd end of the nut with a hammer a few(2 maybe 3) times. It will restore the selflocking. I do it every time I take one off. Best to get the double locking type though(with the allen head in the middle). Just a quick fix, Bobby
Tap the taperperd end of the nut with a hammer a few(2 maybe 3) times. It will restore the selflocking. I do it every time I take one off. Best to get the double locking type though(with the allen head in the middle). Just a quick fix, Bobby
Supreme Member




Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,176
Likes: 787
From: Park City, UT
Car: '92 Corvette, '89 1/2-a-'Vette
Engine: LT1, L400
Transmission: ZF6, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.45, 3.31
Cause he's running a 305, he's granny shifting, and his 60' time is terrible.
Witha good launch, he'd be at ~13.4 Throw in some powershifting, and he'd be solidly in the LOW 13's. Oh, and he's spent very little. It's not earth shattering, but he's doing better 99% of the people on this board.
Witha good launch, he'd be at ~13.4 Throw in some powershifting, and he'd be solidly in the LOW 13's. Oh, and he's spent very little. It's not earth shattering, but he's doing better 99% of the people on this board.
Ya need to get caught up, and I don't feel like explaining it sorry....
Cause he's running a 305, he's granny shifting, and his 60' time is terrible.
Witha good launch, he'd be at ~13.4 Throw in some powershifting, and he'd be solidly in the LOW 13's. Oh, and he's spent very little. It's not earth shattering, but he's doing better 99% of the people on this board.
Witha good launch, he'd be at ~13.4 Throw in some powershifting, and he'd be solidly in the LOW 13's. Oh, and he's spent very little. It's not earth shattering, but he's doing better 99% of the people on this board.
ok, WHY is this in the TBI forum again?
Last edited by Rancid87; Oct 9, 2003 at 11:55 AM.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,257
Likes: 5
Car: Turbo Buick
Engine: 3.8 V6
Ill bet rancid doesnt like me from some previous incident 
oh and btw when i wrote locknuts above i meant "double locking" (little allen head in the center)
btw thanks tom for the compliment and for the torque arm idea

oh and btw when i wrote locknuts above i meant "double locking" (little allen head in the center)
btw thanks tom for the compliment and for the torque arm idea
Last edited by Pablo; Oct 9, 2003 at 01:50 PM.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,257
Likes: 5
Car: Turbo Buick
Engine: 3.8 V6
If thats what I think it is, that was way back and you are someone that used to go by a different name but for some resaon needs to hide his identity
Gee i wonder who?! lol actually I dont give a rats ***, probably just another message board filler that knocked my combo back in the day.
Gee i wonder who?! lol actually I dont give a rats ***, probably just another message board filler that knocked my combo back in the day. Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,463
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
Car: A Camaro
Engine: Weak
Transmission: Weaker
Carb or TBI aside, it's nice to finally see some times on this board rather than 30 posts saying "What do you think I'd run with ___" and people answering with "In theory _____" rather than factual evidence. We need to move forward as a community and lately that hasn't been happening, so seeing what actually can be done with a 305 is nice to see. If/When Pablo swaps back to TBI, we can actually see what the E/T / Power difference is between the two. Factual evidence is good
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
From: Fresno, CA
Car: 87 Z28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T-56
Good job Pablo, I haven't seen you post in a long time, good to see you back.. and if you been back for a while sorry I haven't been browsing much until recently
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,257
Likes: 5
Car: Turbo Buick
Engine: 3.8 V6
Originally posted by Rancid87
Your engine combo still leaves much to be desired but at least you've realized it was time to finally give up on TBI.
You will still see my tailights though. That much is for sure.
Good luck catching up!
Your engine combo still leaves much to be desired but at least you've realized it was time to finally give up on TBI.
You will still see my tailights though. That much is for sure.
Good luck catching up!
bwahaha name some N/A 305s with faster trap speeds you ****ing ignoramous... you are nothing but just another little bitch who's predictions were proven rediculously wrong. I guess its time for more research there billy ray! Head back to wallmart and pick up some magazines lol. As for seeing your taillights, congrats, your medal is in the mail! I say we just cut to the chase and compare savings accounts or dick size lol
as for tbi thirdgen content, Im not sure ill be heading out to the track tomorrow. I just got done working a 13 hour day solid and was just told that I was gonna have to come in tomorrow too. I might just take this weekend as an opportunity to tune in the throttle body setup if i can get my logging equiptment set up.
Last edited by Pablo; Oct 10, 2003 at 09:43 PM.
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
From: institute, wv
Car: 91 RS
Engine: LO3
Transmission: T-5
i can only wish that my car will run 13s someday. with the exception of not running his tbi, what exactly is his combo lacking? being a 305/310 and all. it obviously makes good power, so what is lacking? while PABLO and i have a slightly checkered past, i myself cannot say anything bad about his work. the man obviously knows what hes doing. wait, i know whats its lacking- a holley carb instead of that damn edelbrock. lol im half kidding



