TPS = .60@Close Good?>
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Car: 89 S-10 Blazer
Engine: 4.3 V6
Transmission: 700R4
TPS = .60@Close Good?>
I checked my TPS today, at closed its sitting at .60 - > is that enough to cause it run off? Or is that close enough to be ok? I check the curve and it tops out around 4.6ish and is quite steady.
TIA!
TIA!
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
its a hair high, ideal is .54 i don't think i would worry about that too much.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Car: 89 S-10 Blazer
Engine: 4.3 V6
Transmission: 700R4
I'm still surging a bit at idle and running a bit rich. Likely the IAC not handling the new cam I think. But now that its not 20* retarded its waay better lol. Amazing that!
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
amazing eh 
what cam are you running, if you still have the stock chip, you are likely going to run rich at idle no matter what.
what did you set your timing to? i would guess that somwhere between 4* and 6* advanced with the ESC disconnected, is going to give you the best results.

what cam are you running, if you still have the stock chip, you are likely going to run rich at idle no matter what.
what did you set your timing to? i would guess that somwhere between 4* and 6* advanced with the ESC disconnected, is going to give you the best results.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Car: 89 S-10 Blazer
Engine: 4.3 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by Dewey316
amazing eh
what cam are you running, if you still have the stock chip, you are likely going to run rich at idle no matter what.
what did you set your timing to? i would guess that somwhere between 4* and 6* advanced with the ESC disconnected, is going to give you the best results.
amazing eh

what cam are you running, if you still have the stock chip, you are likely going to run rich at idle no matter what.
what did you set your timing to? i would guess that somwhere between 4* and 6* advanced with the ESC disconnected, is going to give you the best results.
Gross lift .500/.500 gross
Duration 266/270 advertised - 210/215@0.50
Lobe Seperation 112*
yeah timing is about 5* Advanced now.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
well, that isnt' all that big for a 4.3, since it basicly a 350, minus a couple of cyls.
i would say 5* is about where you should be set, you really should look into prom burning, really that motor is never going to run as good as it could, without you tuning it right.
i would say 5* is about where you should be set, you really should look into prom burning, really that motor is never going to run as good as it could, without you tuning it right.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Car: 89 S-10 Blazer
Engine: 4.3 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by Dewey316
well, that isnt' all that big for a 4.3, since it basicly a 350, minus a couple of cyls.
i would say 5* is about where you should be set, you really should look into prom burning, really that motor is never going to run as good as it could, without you tuning it right.
well, that isnt' all that big for a 4.3, since it basicly a 350, minus a couple of cyls.
i would say 5* is about where you should be set, you really should look into prom burning, really that motor is never going to run as good as it could, without you tuning it right.
Also looking into scooping an ALDL cable off ebay to do some datalogging and see whats going on.
I believe the gross lift on the stock cam is about .357 as opposed to .500 for the comp so its a bit of a difference
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
yeah, just knowing the spec diffrences, i can tell you it is going to need less fuel, and more timing at idle, and alot more fuel up high. without a chip there is no real good way to do that.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Car: 89 S-10 Blazer
Engine: 4.3 V6
Transmission: 700R4
With the logger what kind of values should I be looking at to see if my a/f mixture is good all the way through the run to WOT? I dont need it leaning out at higher RPMS.. I think the Holley 670 should help out with that.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
no it will not help out, because the computer contorls how much fuel is added. if anything, it will make it worse, since more air will be going into the engine.
read the tunning intros. basicly, start at idle and part throttle, look at the BLM data. once you have BLMs sorted out, the work your way up to WOT runs, once you go into PE mode, you will only have the o2 values to go off of, shoot for around 900mv here, but the stock o2 is VERY inacurate. once you get them all around 900mv, i would try to get on a dyno with a wideband, and then you can really tune WOT.
there is alot involved, and a very steep learning curve, i would suggest reading all you can in the DIY-PROM board, read all the tuning intro's at the top of the page.
read the tunning intros. basicly, start at idle and part throttle, look at the BLM data. once you have BLMs sorted out, the work your way up to WOT runs, once you go into PE mode, you will only have the o2 values to go off of, shoot for around 900mv here, but the stock o2 is VERY inacurate. once you get them all around 900mv, i would try to get on a dyno with a wideband, and then you can really tune WOT.
there is alot involved, and a very steep learning curve, i would suggest reading all you can in the DIY-PROM board, read all the tuning intro's at the top of the page.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Car: 89 S-10 Blazer
Engine: 4.3 V6
Transmission: 700R4
thanks, I've been doing some reading on the DIY Eproms, very complicated stuff lol. But I'm willing to learn. Man this internal modding is fun stuff
when my fuel curves were in line(data logged/burned 20 chips) the WOT or PE was spot on at WB02/dyno run. commanded 12/1 and dyno run showed 11.9/1 and 12.1/1. i might add i disabled PE (not recommended) to get higher rpms in line(fuel table) and ones that did not populate i kinda guessed and enrichened on safe side. also i swapped out injectors and went to the biggest 90's. started tuning 6/2003.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mdtoren
Tech / General Engine
0
Aug 16, 2015 05:45 PM






