TBI Throttle Body Injection discussion and questions. L03/CFI tech and other performance enhancements.

The proof is in the puddin'! (track times)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 11, 2004 | 03:16 AM
  #51  
90RS305's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
From: Tempe, Arizona
Car: 96 Silverado/99 Suburban
Engine: 700 cubic inches of 'Muican Awesome
Transmission: 4L80/4L60
Axle/Gears: Chunky/Clunky
Or in other words, your computer is telling them to pulsate, and all they can do is just dump fuel...
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2004 | 04:19 AM
  #52  
azvolfan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,308
Likes: 0
From: Avondale, AZ
Car: currently thirdgenless!!!
And having the injector open the whole time is a bad thing, right?
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2004 | 09:42 AM
  #53  
Vader's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 19,653
Likes: 309
If you want to push it even more, you may need to take a real look at the control system. Others have already alluded to that.

TPI? Yes, it was a pretty cool indution system - Back in 1984.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2004 | 09:50 AM
  #54  
BMmonteSS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 9
From: Buckhannon, WV
Car: 84' Monte
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: ferd 9" posi 3.50 gears
I think he's a long way off from maxing out TBI if thats what you mean.

Your just out of fuel. Crack open that bin and post it for all of us to see. I bet we'll be able to find out some pretty interesting things from it. If anyone has an ecm bench we should be able to find out exactly where your running out of fuel.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2004 | 10:06 PM
  #55  
iroc22's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 2
From: Surrey, BC
Re: Re: The proof is in the puddin'! (track times)

Originally posted by 88 WS6 TransAm GTA
And just think, after all that, your ALMOST in stock l98 territory! Only about a second to go... good job!
well.... he does lack 45 cubes....
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2004 | 07:55 AM
  #56  
Red Devil's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 0
From: E.B.F. TN
Car: Tree Huggers
Engine: Do Not
Transmission: Appreciate Me.
Re: Re: Re: The proof is in the puddin'! (track times)

Originally posted by iroc22
well.... he does lack 45 cubes....
You're kidding right? My taurus lacks about 97 cubes (or about 142 from the 350) and ran about what he's running when it was stock.

He's not making excuses, and you shouldn't try making them for him. I think it takes away from what he really posted for. His tune is seriously in question and is what he should be looking at right now. JP has hit on probably what he has to do, namely get into the prom.

It's also not like it's a surprise to anyone here that TBI is not a performance platform, as we've pointed out while having some fun and as Vader succinctly put it, but you work with what you got (until you get fed up or score cash) and there have been some fun tbi cars built. :shrug:
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2004 | 10:03 AM
  #57  
BronYrAur's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 2
From: Chicago, IL
Car: 91 Camaro RS Convertible
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42
It's not the TBI in any way that's holding that motor back. TBI is a speed density system and just like every single other speed density system it needs to be tuned extensively after changing so much on the engine. That tune is set up for the volumetric efficiency of an LO3 and it is definitely not an LO3 anymore, everything has been shifted around with the cam and the flow characteristics are completely different with the heads. If tuned right it will run right with any other for of induction. TBI won't become a limiting factor on that setup for a while.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2004 | 02:26 PM
  #58  
Red Devil's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 0
From: E.B.F. TN
Car: Tree Huggers
Engine: Do Not
Transmission: Appreciate Me.
Where exactly did you get that out of my post? The part where I said he had to get into the prom or are you extrapolating from the TBI not being a performance platform? Both statements are true, don't lie to yourself. The prom work will help a whole lot but... Most don't even consider TPI worthy of calling it a 'performance' platform.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2004 | 02:41 PM
  #59  
BronYrAur's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 2
From: Chicago, IL
Car: 91 Camaro RS Convertible
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42
I'm just pointing out that too often a bulid like this happens and TBI is blamed for the lack of performance. It definitely isn't a performance platform but properly tuned it has potential to support some decent power.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2004 | 07:27 PM
  #60  
Red Devil's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 0
From: E.B.F. TN
Car: Tree Huggers
Engine: Do Not
Transmission: Appreciate Me.
Ah. Ok. Mis-read it since it followed my post.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2004 | 12:56 PM
  #61  
iroc22's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 2
From: Surrey, BC
Re: Re: Re: Re: The proof is in the puddin'! (track times)

Originally posted by Red Devil
You're kidding right? My taurus lacks about 97 cubes (or about 142 from the 350) and ran about what he's running when it was stock.

He's not making excuses, and you shouldn't try making them for him. I think it takes away from what he really posted for. His tune is seriously in question and is what he should be looking at right now. JP has hit on probably what he has to do, namely get into the prom.

It's also not like it's a surprise to anyone here that TBI is not a performance platform, as we've pointed out while having some fun and as Vader succinctly put it, but you work with what you got (until you get fed up or score cash) and there have been some fun tbi cars built. :shrug:
Id assume your Taurus is a SHO of the 3.4 V8 variety from your cubes reference. If that's the case, you already started out with 32V, DOHC, SFI and 6300-6500 (?) redline to help you out. Your 90's technology is better than his 80's technology; could you imagine if you had an extra 45 cubes? You already started with 60 more hp than he did. What was the trap and what elevation? What was the elevation of azvolfan's times?
No Im not making up excuses for him. I was merely pointing out an obvious distinction between two completely different engines to someone else in the thread. And yes, I agree he should look into the PROM because there's something seriously wrong. With those mods he should be able to reach low 90's traps and 14 second 1/4 times.

Last edited by iroc22; Dec 13, 2004 at 12:59 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2004 | 05:41 PM
  #62  
Red Devil's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 0
From: E.B.F. TN
Car: Tree Huggers
Engine: Do Not
Transmission: Appreciate Me.
The cu. in. comment is always lame and that was the point behind my comment. We can all read. The SHO wasn't exactly state of the art 90's tech either. I'm more impressed with the second gen sho than the third gen in that regard. :shrug:

If you want to compare '80's' tech than I can point you to some nice 302 set-ups as well as 350, and 351 set-ups. Yes that would be Ford and Chevy, my only prejudice is speed.

There is too much in common with the 305 and 350 for you to say that "I was merely pointing out an obvious distinction between two completely different engines to someone else in the thread." (in reference to your 'lack of 45 cu. in. comment.').

And again, IMNSHO it was taking away from what he was attempting. Sort of like saying 'Dude, why bother, just yank it and pop in the 350 now'. That is by far not his current problem.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2004 | 11:50 PM
  #63  
90RS305's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
From: Tempe, Arizona
Car: 96 Silverado/99 Suburban
Engine: 700 cubic inches of 'Muican Awesome
Transmission: 4L80/4L60
Axle/Gears: Chunky/Clunky
Ok, not to rain on anyones parade, but the argument needs to end now. This has NO impact/tech value what-so-ever for what we are trying to accomplish, so if anyone needs to continue, please take it to PM's. Thanks, and if anyone has any problems, you can take it up with me. (Again, in PM's ) Thanks...

Bruce (90RS305)
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2004 | 12:26 AM
  #64  
iroc22's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 2
From: Surrey, BC
Originally posted by Red Devil
The cu. in. comment is always lame and that was the point behind my comment. We can all read. The SHO wasn't exactly state of the art 90's tech either. I'm more impressed with the second gen sho than the third gen in that regard. :shrug:
I read it several times and it sure seemed to be the point behind your comment. You ran the same times as him with 97 less cubes so your engine is better than his.


There is too much in common with the 305 and 350 for you to say that "I was merely pointing out an obvious distinction between two completely different engines to someone else in the thread." (in reference to your 'lack of 45 cu. in. comment.').
Ummmm the only thing in common between the L98 and L03 I can think of off hand is the distributor and ignition components (minus ESC), thermostat and valvetrain assembly (minus cam and valves).


And again, IMNSHO it was taking away from what he was attempting. Sort of like saying 'Dude, why bother, just yank it and pop in the 350 now'. That is by far not his current problem.
I think you misread my directed statement. I was not stating it to azvolfan in any shape or form and nor was I alluding to him yanking out his 305. If you re-read clearly what I quoted and what I said, it is not me who is telling him to yank the 305 rather the quoted person.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2004 | 10:58 AM
  #65  
BMmonteSS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 9
From: Buckhannon, WV
Car: 84' Monte
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: ferd 9" posi 3.50 gears
This was turning into a good thread on how tuning can be worth alot of power. Now we have about 6 pages of "dude" it's blah blah blah. Is there any way we can edit that crap out? I see alot of people skipping over this post because of the garbage.

Back to tech. Make sure you get that bin posted as soon as possible. I can't wait to see bad your injectors are going static. I went through this with my BBC TB and injectors. I had problems with the car just hitting a brick wall when the injectors went static. It seems like the smaller 305 injectors don't do this, they just seem to just quit moving any more fuel so you don't know when you run out of fuel, othe than the car quits making power.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2004 | 08:56 PM
  #66  
Red Devil's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 0
From: E.B.F. TN
Car: Tree Huggers
Engine: Do Not
Transmission: Appreciate Me.
iroc22 you didn't get it, it's ok though because those I wanted to did.



BM... we got ya already.
Originally posted by JPrevost

Originally posted by azvolfan
I should put my chip on a chip reader and see what they did.
Originally posted by Red Devil
His tune is seriously in question and is what he should be looking at right now. JP has hit on probably what he has to do, namely get into the prom.

Reply
Old Dec 15, 2004 | 03:21 AM
  #67  
iroc22's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 2
From: Surrey, BC
Originally posted by Red Devil
iroc22 you didn't get it, it's ok though because those I wanted to did.
Ditto.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Azrael91966669
DIY PROM
25
Jun 20, 2017 04:04 AM
69 Six Pack
Camaros for Sale
13
Oct 5, 2015 07:51 PM
86White_T/A305
LTX and LSX
0
Aug 17, 2015 12:16 AM
Feffman
Mid-West Region
0
Aug 13, 2015 07:12 AM
Feffman
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
0
Aug 13, 2015 07:11 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:02 PM.