Would this top end be worth looking in to?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 bored .30 over
Axle/Gears: Posi 342
Would this top end be worth looking in to?
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/EDL-2097/?rtype=10
Hey guys, above is a link of a Edelbrock top end kit I am wondering if would help out on my car and if its worth purchasing.
I have a 1991 Camaro RS with a rebuilt TBI 350. If I were to do that kit... I would also be getting the Holley TBI upgrade which I believe is 670 cfm. I would also get the Holley adapter plate to fit the carb intake. I plan on leaving the bottom end untouched with an exception of timing chain and of course the cam. I have a new MSD distributer for the car already and the rear gears are a 342 posi I believe.
I had a blown headgasket and ripped it down and no way will be putting all the stock crap back on. Please let me know what you all think or if you have any better ideas.
I am really wondering if that cam would be too much for TBI?
Also, when I do this I will have to get my chip tunned, does anyoneknow of a good place to do this?
Thanks.
Hey guys, above is a link of a Edelbrock top end kit I am wondering if would help out on my car and if its worth purchasing.
I have a 1991 Camaro RS with a rebuilt TBI 350. If I were to do that kit... I would also be getting the Holley TBI upgrade which I believe is 670 cfm. I would also get the Holley adapter plate to fit the carb intake. I plan on leaving the bottom end untouched with an exception of timing chain and of course the cam. I have a new MSD distributer for the car already and the rear gears are a 342 posi I believe.
I had a blown headgasket and ripped it down and no way will be putting all the stock crap back on. Please let me know what you all think or if you have any better ideas.
I am really wondering if that cam would be too much for TBI?
Also, when I do this I will have to get my chip tunned, does anyoneknow of a good place to do this?
Thanks.
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Manteca,California. Nor Cal.
Posts: 7,260
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: SOLD IT. Mopar guy only now.
Engine: gone
Transmission: gone
Axle/Gears: gone
Re: Would this top end be worth looking in to?
From what I know. That cam size will be a major pain in the **** to tune. And I have also read that you do not want to runner a RPM air gap with TBI. because something about fuel puddling up and also being a major pain to tune. I am sure someone with more knowledge will come chime in
#3
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 bored .30 over
Axle/Gears: Posi 342
Re: Would this top end be worth looking in to?
Ya, I really have no idea what a good combo would be... thats why I was looking at that. But yes, I did realize the cam was pretty big, and thought it would probably mess with my power brakes an all too.
If anyone knows of a good combo to put together please let me know.
What would be a good head choice as well.
I am not looking for crazy power... over all over time I want like 400 or so. Nothing major. I just want her to run and not just be all looks.
If anyone knows of a good combo to put together please let me know.
What would be a good head choice as well.
I am not looking for crazy power... over all over time I want like 400 or so. Nothing major. I just want her to run and not just be all looks.
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Manteca,California. Nor Cal.
Posts: 7,260
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: SOLD IT. Mopar guy only now.
Engine: gone
Transmission: gone
Axle/Gears: gone
Re: Would this top end be worth looking in to?
180cc AFRs if you want an aluminum head. IMO.
#5
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: any clime or place...
Posts: 2,779
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro SC, 1999 Z28
Engine: GMPP 350HO, LS1
Transmission: Built 700r4/EDGE 3200, T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton 7.625, 3.42 Zexel Torsen
Re: Would this top end be worth looking in to?
... and don't forget the FAST EZ EFI retro kit. solves your tuning problem!
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/FST-302000/
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/FST-302000/
#6
Supreme Member
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Manteca,California. Nor Cal.
Posts: 7,260
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: SOLD IT. Mopar guy only now.
Engine: gone
Transmission: gone
Axle/Gears: gone
Re: Would this top end be worth looking in to?
... and don't forget the FAST EZ EFI retro kit. solves your tuning problem!
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/FST-302000/
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/FST-302000/
#7
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: West-Central
Posts: 2,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Trans am
Engine: built 360 TBI
Transmission: built 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10bolt/3.23
Re: Would this top end be worth looking in to?
This will give you a good guideline.
Tuning would be plug and play with EBL flash http://dynamicefi.com/
Trending Topics
#8
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 bored .30 over
Axle/Gears: Posi 342
Re: Would this top end be worth looking in to?
I would use a dyno simulator http://www.summitracing.com/search/?...no%20sim&dds=1 and run 180-210cfm cnc AFR, TFS and similar heads, with cams around .500 in lift 220 duration 112-114 LSA.
This will give you a good guideline.
Tuning would be plug and play with EBL flash http://dynamicefi.com/
This will give you a good guideline.
Tuning would be plug and play with EBL flash http://dynamicefi.com/
#9
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: West-Central
Posts: 2,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Trans am
Engine: built 360 TBI
Transmission: built 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10bolt/3.23
Re: Would this top end be worth looking in to?
Yes computer = computer friendly cam is required.
With camquest6 you can chose lopy idle sounding cam's.
If you are good at tuning you could try a 110 LSA.
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/post...43-post11.html
http://www.camaroz28.com/forums/arch.../t-509897.html
With camquest6 you can chose lopy idle sounding cam's.
If you are good at tuning you could try a 110 LSA.
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/post...43-post11.html
http://www.camaroz28.com/forums/arch.../t-509897.html
#10
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 bored .30 over
Axle/Gears: Posi 342
Re: Would this top end be worth looking in to?
Ya, I don't have any idea on the tunning aspect, I figured Iw ould have to take it somewhere to get that all figured out. Thanks for the posts. I will keep looking for a cam, then I guess go from there. I see Comp cams has quite a few computer controlled cams....
#11
Supreme Member
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Manteca,California. Nor Cal.
Posts: 7,260
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: SOLD IT. Mopar guy only now.
Engine: gone
Transmission: gone
Axle/Gears: gone
Re: Would this top end be worth looking in to?
Yeah ive been looking into comp's cam's for computer controlled too. I am going back to roller with my next setup I ditched it when I rebuilt my engine.
#12
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 bored .30 over
Axle/Gears: Posi 342
Re: Would this top end be worth looking in to?
Ya, the seem to have the best selection.
I was also wondering. My car shold have a flat tappet am I right? I guess I will find out once I pull the cam and look at the lobes.
I was also wondering. My car shold have a flat tappet am I right? I guess I will find out once I pull the cam and look at the lobes.
#13
Supreme Member
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Manteca,California. Nor Cal.
Posts: 7,260
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: SOLD IT. Mopar guy only now.
Engine: gone
Transmission: gone
Axle/Gears: gone
Re: Would this top end be worth looking in to?
well the stock L03's have a hydraulic roller cam stock. now I changed mine (I am an idiot) to a flat tappet style. So your motor is a 350 so I am not entirely sure what it would have. If it is a truck engine from 87-95 it will be a flat tappet. If its older than that it'd be a flat tappet. what did the engine come out of?
#14
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: West-Central
Posts: 2,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Trans am
Engine: built 360 TBI
Transmission: built 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10bolt/3.23
Re: Would this top end be worth looking in to?
Some later 350's that came with flat tapped are machined for roller, just need spider, dogbones, roller lifters and retainig plate for a roller upgrade.
Last edited by thomas1976; 03-23-2011 at 05:02 PM.
#15
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 bored .30 over
Axle/Gears: Posi 342
Re: Would this top end be worth looking in to?
Ya, I was told to believe the motor was from a 1991 caprice police car.
How do I tell by pulling the intake off. Do you look at the lifters?
How do I tell by pulling the intake off. Do you look at the lifters?
#16
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
Re: Would this top end be worth looking in to?
E Tec heads are very very good.
Cam choice is doable but maybe not for a beginner tuner.
Intake being air gap might work for a hot climate but terrible when temps are <60dF. Intake would need to be heat soaked to function regardless of intake choice.
I would use a single plane weiand low profile with a adapter plate and a 7.4L GM TBI with 75-80 lb injectors and VAFPR with TPI pump. Add a WB sensor/controller.
Second thought I personally would do none of above cept cam and heads choice and run port fueling with EBL-ECU. For what you are investing "port fuel" is way to go.
Cam choice is doable but maybe not for a beginner tuner.
Intake being air gap might work for a hot climate but terrible when temps are <60dF. Intake would need to be heat soaked to function regardless of intake choice.
I would use a single plane weiand low profile with a adapter plate and a 7.4L GM TBI with 75-80 lb injectors and VAFPR with TPI pump. Add a WB sensor/controller.
Second thought I personally would do none of above cept cam and heads choice and run port fueling with EBL-ECU. For what you are investing "port fuel" is way to go.
#17
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: West-Central
Posts: 2,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Trans am
Engine: built 360 TBI
Transmission: built 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10bolt/3.23
Re: Would this top end be worth looking in to?
Flat tapped https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/post...705-post7.html
Caprice LO5 have roller cam.
#18
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 bored .30 over
Axle/Gears: Posi 342
Re: Would this top end be worth looking in to?
Roller https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/post...90-post12.html
Flat tapped https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/post...705-post7.html
Caprice LO5 have roller cam.
Flat tapped https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/post...705-post7.html
Caprice LO5 have roller cam.
I am looking for a cam now. I found one that would be close to what people have recommended.
It is a 210 duration, little under .500 lift, and 114 LSA. Would that still sound good and a bit lopey, or will it be really mild sounding?
#19
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 bored .30 over
Axle/Gears: Posi 342
Re: Would this top end be worth looking in to?
I did the Comp Camquest 6 app and one of the cams that came up were close to the recommendation on here except for the lift.
COMP Cams 12-466-8
The cam is a 218 duration, .570intake, .565exh., with 113 duration.
What should really be my aim for lift?
Would this cam work for me as well?
COMP Cams 12-466-8
The cam is a 218 duration, .570intake, .565exh., with 113 duration.
What should really be my aim for lift?
Would this cam work for me as well?
#20
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: West-Central
Posts: 2,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Trans am
Engine: built 360 TBI
Transmission: built 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10bolt/3.23
Re: Would this top end be worth looking in to?
Supposing CNC TFS 195 and /or similar, what comes out comparing that 8-466-8 to something like 8-502-8 or 8-503-8 ?
With the right intake this could be someting around a 400rwhp build.
I would aim for the lowest lift and greatest hp.
With the right intake this could be someting around a 400rwhp build.
I would aim for the lowest lift and greatest hp.
#21
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
Re: Would this top end be worth looking in to?
It is a 210 duration, little under .500 lift, and 114 LSA. Would that still sound good and a bit lopey, or will it be really mild sounding?
My current cam is 224/230 114 LSA. and is a bit too much for my 3.07 gears/manual.
#22
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 bored .30 over
Axle/Gears: Posi 342
Re: Would this top end be worth looking in to?
I thought it may be mild.
I do believe I found a couple things.
The cam I am looking at getting I think is a Comp cam 8-302-8
210/220 duration, .480/.480 left, and 112 LSA
I think it would be a better sound as well.
The heads I was looking at and please let me know if these would work well...
Trick Flow TFS30300001
The have a 56cc Cumbustion Chamber, 175cc intake, and a 67cc exhuast. I will be honest, I am not sure what good numbers are for these, I see these are pretty low comparred to other heads, and the lift on these matchs the cam lift.
If these would be a good match, I am on to checking out intakes and also wondering if I would need a dif. size pushrods than I already have.
I appreciate everyones input on this so for.
I do believe I found a couple things.
The cam I am looking at getting I think is a Comp cam 8-302-8
210/220 duration, .480/.480 left, and 112 LSA
I think it would be a better sound as well.
The heads I was looking at and please let me know if these would work well...
Trick Flow TFS30300001
The have a 56cc Cumbustion Chamber, 175cc intake, and a 67cc exhuast. I will be honest, I am not sure what good numbers are for these, I see these are pretty low comparred to other heads, and the lift on these matchs the cam lift.
If these would be a good match, I am on to checking out intakes and also wondering if I would need a dif. size pushrods than I already have.
I appreciate everyones input on this so for.
Last edited by XxGeinNothingxX; 03-28-2011 at 04:52 PM.
#23
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: West-Central
Posts: 2,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Trans am
Engine: built 360 TBI
Transmission: built 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10bolt/3.23
Re: Would this top end be worth looking in to?
Any particular reson for choosing that 305 head?
If your engine is alredy built post all # you need to fill out http://www.kb-silvolite.com/calc.php?action=comp this will help find the desired combustion chamber cc, for a decent CR.
If your engine is alredy built post all # you need to fill out http://www.kb-silvolite.com/calc.php?action=comp this will help find the desired combustion chamber cc, for a decent CR.
#24
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 1982 Z-28
Engine: 5.7L Crossfire
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: GM Posi, 3.73
Re: Would this top end be worth looking in to?
Sorry, but this build is not going to be 400 RWHP - that would be close to 500 flywheel horsepower. To get 500 HP out of a 350 requires a thoughtful build from scratch. Additionally, it is not easy to build a streetable 350 that makes close to 500 flywheel HP - you need high flow heads and a radical cam, something in the 230-240 degree duration range. And you are wanting to use TBI for induction.
I'm not beating on you, but just saying don't spend a bunch of money expecting that power level and then be disappointed you didn't get it. 300-350 RWHP is a much more realistic goal (350-400 flywheel HP) and I think the comments here are on track for something in that range.
#25
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: West-Central
Posts: 2,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Trans am
Engine: built 360 TBI
Transmission: built 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10bolt/3.23
Re: Would this top end be worth looking in to?
Yes true, around 350rwhp seems more realistic with 11:1 CR, CNC TFS 195, 8-503-8 and matching intake. Using desktop dyno5.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Street Lethal
Power Adders
634
04-30-2019 12:14 PM
ambainb
Camaros for Sale
11
04-25-2016 09:21 PM