what was so special about the hemi?
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
From: Peoria, IL
Car: 1985 Z-28
Engine: a big one
Transmission: 4 spd auto soon to be a 6 speed
what was so special about the hemi?
last night at my college Bob Lee, the guy at the head of the new hemi project gave a talk about the new engine.
first off, this engine from my perspective has alot of possiblilities. the intake and exhaust runners are really really nice and straight.
also he claims that the engine will not leak anything. it was designed not to. so we will see about this. and in all of their tests it shoudn't leak.
according to him in all of their test the new hemi will last 150,000 miles for 95% of units produced.
anyway, in his talk he referenced the old 426 hemi in the design of the new one. he said that the old hemi, while good had alot of problems with size and combustion chamber.
he stated that the sound of the idle of the 426 was due to poor flame propagation. and from a technical drawing i can see why.
the pistons were big and heavy, and the intake and exhaust runners were of poor design.
Now mind you this is what a Dodge engineer was saying. and i am sure he has the test equipment to back his claim.
now why was the hemi so popular if such a poor design? why do the dragsters use it extensively?? if you were to take and lower the compression do these heads just flow insane ammounts of air?
other than the nostalga of the engine, what was so good about it?
later
andrew
first off, this engine from my perspective has alot of possiblilities. the intake and exhaust runners are really really nice and straight.
also he claims that the engine will not leak anything. it was designed not to. so we will see about this. and in all of their tests it shoudn't leak.
according to him in all of their test the new hemi will last 150,000 miles for 95% of units produced.
anyway, in his talk he referenced the old 426 hemi in the design of the new one. he said that the old hemi, while good had alot of problems with size and combustion chamber.
he stated that the sound of the idle of the 426 was due to poor flame propagation. and from a technical drawing i can see why.
the pistons were big and heavy, and the intake and exhaust runners were of poor design.
Now mind you this is what a Dodge engineer was saying. and i am sure he has the test equipment to back his claim.
now why was the hemi so popular if such a poor design? why do the dragsters use it extensively?? if you were to take and lower the compression do these heads just flow insane ammounts of air?
other than the nostalga of the engine, what was so good about it?
later
andrew
Two main reasons:
1. Spark plug location.
2. Also, because the chamber is hemispherically shaped, you can fit larger valves without having the shrouding problem common with conventional style chambers - better flow
1. Spark plug location.
2. Also, because the chamber is hemispherically shaped, you can fit larger valves without having the shrouding problem common with conventional style chambers - better flow
Yep. Ideal plug location (power and detonation resistance), good flow. The intake and exhaust are just about opposite eachother in the combustion area so it's almost a straight shot flowing air through the motor, with a piston in the middle!
It's a GREAT design for racing. Flow = Winning Races. Top fuel cars still use a design that can be traced back directly to the 426 Hemi.
FOr a street motor that lives most of it's life at part throttle and moderate RPMs, not so great. It's kind of a "drity" motor, emissions-wise, too.
I'm sure there are others who know a lot more about the Hemi than I do and will post.
It's a GREAT design for racing. Flow = Winning Races. Top fuel cars still use a design that can be traced back directly to the 426 Hemi.
FOr a street motor that lives most of it's life at part throttle and moderate RPMs, not so great. It's kind of a "drity" motor, emissions-wise, too.
I'm sure there are others who know a lot more about the Hemi than I do and will post.
Moderator

Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,262
Likes: 168
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Chrysler wasn't the only one to produce a hemi. Many import engines use a hemi design with the spark plug at the top of the cylinder. Ford produced a hemi. Harley Davidson finally went away from the hemi in 1984 when they produced the first Evolution engine.
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 5.0 TBI
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Also, doesn't the hemi- heads reflect all of the explosion energy of the combusted fuels parallel to the cylinder wall, making a more efficient power stroke? I would think this is the case since the combustion would be completely directed perpendicular to the piston head.
Trending Topics
Originally posted by Stephen 87 IROC
Many import engines use a hemi design with the spark plug at the top of the cylinder.
Many import engines use a hemi design with the spark plug at the top of the cylinder.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
The thing about the hemi design is flow... it's a nearly straight shot through the cylinder. It has nothing to do with "reflecting the energy", since the thing that produces power isn't an explosion, it's a smooth controlled burn that increases the pressure in the cylinder. In fact, "explosion" is considered undesirable, it's usually referred to as "detonation", and is avoided since it causes parts death. This type of engine is a "heat" engine, not an "explosion" engine.
Nearly all of the multi-valve motors have some degree of hemi design to them. DOHC lends itself to that, since the 2 cams have to be in different places anyway; one for the intakes and one for the exhausts, with the cylinder roughly hemispherical in shape and the spark plug right in the middle at the top, is the simplest way to design one.
Nearly all of the multi-valve motors have some degree of hemi design to them. DOHC lends itself to that, since the 2 cams have to be in different places anyway; one for the intakes and one for the exhausts, with the cylinder roughly hemispherical in shape and the spark plug right in the middle at the top, is the simplest way to design one.
Supreme Member

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Car: 2003 Porsche C4S
Engine: 3.6L
Transmission: 6-speed Manual
the chamber design, hemisphere, has the largest volume with the smallest surface area. So the heat is forced to move the piston more than be lost through exposed surface area. Plus the design allows for more optimal placement of the valves and sparkplug.
I'm sure one day the flathead will make a comeback as well
I'm sure one day the flathead will make a comeback as well
Last edited by james_85Z28; Oct 13, 2002 at 07:55 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,238
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, Alberta, Republic of Western Canada
Car: 1986 Sport Coupé
Engine: 305-4v
Transmission: 700R4 and TransGo2
Originally posted by Stephen 87 IROC
The "new" hemi is only a 5.7L engine also. Not much in common to the old 426.
The "new" hemi is only a 5.7L engine also. Not much in common to the old 426.
If they would come out with a new 'Cuda or Challenger with these 350 Hemis, I think a lot of folks would be lining up to grab one
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
From: Parsippany,New Jersey
Car: '86 Trans Am
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH700R-4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.73
Well I never thought I'd hear any mention of the hemi on this board.
I'm an AMC lover at heart and big mother mopar is my other love.
Listen all the hemi is is an R/B block which for those of you who don't know what that is that is the raised deck platform that the 440 was built on.
The 426 just has relocated coolant passages and reinforced four bolt mains. of course there are some other little variations like different motor mount locations but that's irrelevant.
The hemi made so much sense considering it's a straight shot from the intake to the exaust valve.
The new hemi I can't say much about due to the fact I have no experience with it but one thing I can say is that it's gonna be real sweet.
I'm an AMC lover at heart and big mother mopar is my other love.
Listen all the hemi is is an R/B block which for those of you who don't know what that is that is the raised deck platform that the 440 was built on.
The 426 just has relocated coolant passages and reinforced four bolt mains. of course there are some other little variations like different motor mount locations but that's irrelevant.
The hemi made so much sense considering it's a straight shot from the intake to the exaust valve.
The new hemi I can't say much about due to the fact I have no experience with it but one thing I can say is that it's gonna be real sweet.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
From: Peoria, IL
Car: 1985 Z-28
Engine: a big one
Transmission: 4 spd auto soon to be a 6 speed
yes the new design really has almost nothing in common with the old hemi other than the concept and the name.
angles are different and stuff. i really want to see how good this engine lasts. it looks to be a VERY VERY excelent design, at least on paper.
as far as i know it is a true hemi.
angles are different and stuff. i really want to see how good this engine lasts. it looks to be a VERY VERY excelent design, at least on paper.
as far as i know it is a true hemi.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,552
Likes: 5
From: New Jersey
Car: 86 Corvette, 89 IROC, 1999 TA
Engine: 350, 350, LS1
Transmission: 700r4, 700r4, T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.07, 373, 4.10
the 426 hemi despite being somewhat sloppy of an engine produced rediculous horsepower.. thats why people like em... although advertised as 425-430 horsepower range if you were to take an actual 426 hemi and put it on a engine dyno you will yield results much much higher.. upwards of mid to high 600's in some cases.......
Popularity
For your original question, the reason they became so popular was in the early 60's the first three hemi engines won the first race they were ever entered in. The three cars took first, second, and third--a clean sweep--and the legend was born.
A couple years later the hemi made it onto the streets with a similar setup (they were lighter and made more durable for everyday use), but still had more power than anything else. The 66-69 Hemi Cuda 440 engine is still one of the top 5 stock engines ever on street w/o any mods. That is why they still are on the strips today, some nostalga, mostly performance.
Jm
A couple years later the hemi made it onto the streets with a similar setup (they were lighter and made more durable for everyday use), but still had more power than anything else. The 66-69 Hemi Cuda 440 engine is still one of the top 5 stock engines ever on street w/o any mods. That is why they still are on the strips today, some nostalga, mostly performance.
Jm
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,552
Likes: 5
From: New Jersey
Car: 86 Corvette, 89 IROC, 1999 TA
Engine: 350, 350, LS1
Transmission: 700r4, 700r4, T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.07, 373, 4.10
nah 426 made more hp and torque...440 was a later engine.. just more cubic inches with less compression and heads that didnt flow quite as well...like a quarter the size of the 426 heads too hehe
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,552
Likes: 5
From: New Jersey
Car: 86 Corvette, 89 IROC, 1999 TA
Engine: 350, 350, LS1
Transmission: 700r4, 700r4, T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.07, 373, 4.10
oh and by the way.. look out in 2006, hemi dodge chargers are comin back.. lil hemi tho.. only a 6.1 hehe
Supreme Member



Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,306
Likes: 77
From: Fl
Car: 5.3L turbo 2800lbs RWD
Engine: Prefer 3L Iron & 5.3L Aluminum
Transmission: 4l80e
Axle/Gears: 3.512
I was told by an engineering teacher the 426's Hemi's ability to make useable power was reflected in the shape of the combustion chamber itself. he said that an "ideal" combusiton chamber would be the shape of a triangle, with the plug at the very top in a direct point. obviouselly, for parts durability reasons, a piston with a sharp point on the top isnt the best idea... But the Hemi apparently comes close.
I don't remember the whole conversation, but I DO remember somthing about cramming more fuel/air into a smaller area, easier, etc. etc... then useing it more efficiently etc etc...
I don't remember the whole conversation, but I DO remember somthing about cramming more fuel/air into a smaller area, easier, etc. etc... then useing it more efficiently etc etc...
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Jonesboro,IN
Car: 1980 Camaro Berlinetta
Engine: soon to be 383
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: GM 10 bolt 8.5 3.23
Spark plug location....valve size....engine cubes and the extirior look of it,and they have really crazy looking rocker arm set ups!
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
From: Memphis, Tn
Car: 92' RS
Engine: 357
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 4.10
I just bought a car about 3 months ago and had it 3 day before the motor threw a rod (i got screwed) but to the point it was a Ford "Hemi". Most dont realize but the 2nd body style Taurus SHO has Yamaha Aluminum Hemi heads and they make some great power. My 95' SHO 5speed would outrun my LB9 GTA A4. But as a typicall ford it didnt last. But the spark plug location made for an almost complete a/f mixture burn in return made great power on the SHO.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
Hey, heres a little tidbit I bet most of you don't know... Chevy almost released a "Hemi 302" for the Z/28 in 1969! It had aluminum heads (hemi obviously) with rediculously large valves. Wasn't put in production though... cost way too much to make them, as it required really complex head designs and a modified block so the pushrods could be routed differently, and used a different exhaust manifold design IIRC.
The Hemi really is only a better engine than say, a 440 or a BBC, above 4500 rpm. Thats because the combustion chamber design had a very good surface area to volume ratio, and with the rediculously large valves (2.25"int / 1.9"exh I beleive) it could breathe MUCH much better than a more conventionally shaped chamber. Also, the shape of the chamber forced more of the power from combustion straight down onto the piston, instead of letting it dissipate in all directions, like the normal designs of the time.
At low rpm, however, it was a very dirty running engine. It was far worse than something like a 440 or a 454. It was not really because of the cam or anything like that (although they were pretty wild), but because, IIRC, there was just too much breathing capacity for the engine at low rpm... the valves were gigantic, the ports were almost big enough to walk into, and it had two 650 cfm 4bbl carbs sitting on top.
Before all the new laws were intorduced, there was even plans for a 426 Hemi engine in the '71+ R/T cars with a 6-Pack manifold. It was basically a slightly modified 440 6-Pack manifold, made to work on the Hemi.
This is why it was shut down mid way through 1971. Mopar was too proud of this engine to let the government strangle it with new emmitions laws (which is why it kept its 10.25 CR when others dropped to around 9:1 or less) and the engine was just way too 'dirty' to pass for legal with any of the new laws. Even in 1970, the 426 Hemi did ALOT worse for emitions performance than even the LS6 (454ci/450hp) or the Boss 429.
Oh yea, just remembered... thats also why the Boss 429 Hemi was discontinued as well... it did almost 2X worse than the regular Boss 429 for emitions performance.
I gotta agree though... those Mopar Hemis really look hairy... and this thing is about as hairy as it gets... :hail:
The Hemi really is only a better engine than say, a 440 or a BBC, above 4500 rpm. Thats because the combustion chamber design had a very good surface area to volume ratio, and with the rediculously large valves (2.25"int / 1.9"exh I beleive) it could breathe MUCH much better than a more conventionally shaped chamber. Also, the shape of the chamber forced more of the power from combustion straight down onto the piston, instead of letting it dissipate in all directions, like the normal designs of the time.
At low rpm, however, it was a very dirty running engine. It was far worse than something like a 440 or a 454. It was not really because of the cam or anything like that (although they were pretty wild), but because, IIRC, there was just too much breathing capacity for the engine at low rpm... the valves were gigantic, the ports were almost big enough to walk into, and it had two 650 cfm 4bbl carbs sitting on top.
Before all the new laws were intorduced, there was even plans for a 426 Hemi engine in the '71+ R/T cars with a 6-Pack manifold. It was basically a slightly modified 440 6-Pack manifold, made to work on the Hemi.
This is why it was shut down mid way through 1971. Mopar was too proud of this engine to let the government strangle it with new emmitions laws (which is why it kept its 10.25 CR when others dropped to around 9:1 or less) and the engine was just way too 'dirty' to pass for legal with any of the new laws. Even in 1970, the 426 Hemi did ALOT worse for emitions performance than even the LS6 (454ci/450hp) or the Boss 429.
Oh yea, just remembered... thats also why the Boss 429 Hemi was discontinued as well... it did almost 2X worse than the regular Boss 429 for emitions performance.
I gotta agree though... those Mopar Hemis really look hairy... and this thing is about as hairy as it gets... :hail:
Last edited by Air_Adam; Sep 27, 2003 at 02:27 AM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
From: Palm Bay, Florida, USA
Car: 95 E-150 & 07 Kawasaki ZX-6R
Engine: A slow one & a fast one
Transmission: A bad one & a good one
Axle/Gears: A weak one & a chained one
Just to comment on that....yeah, Chrysler engineering sucks! I never thought about it, but I couldn't COUNT how many Chryslers I've seen running around barreling smoke. My friend's mom had a LeBaron with maybe 60,000 miles or so on it and it never ran right. Leaked oil out of every seal you could think of..started burning it....ran like crap. Was in for servicing a dizzying amount of times. At least the car got a fast and respectable death (collision).
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
From: Palm Bay, Florida, USA
Car: 95 E-150 & 07 Kawasaki ZX-6R
Engine: A slow one & a fast one
Transmission: A bad one & a good one
Axle/Gears: A weak one & a chained one
That is blasphemy! Bastardization of a third gen is strictly prohibited!
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 729
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Car: Right now 93 Lumina
Engine: 3.4 DOHC
Transmission: 4T60-E
Originally posted by Nixon1
That is blasphemy! Bastardization of a third gen is strictly prohibited!
That is blasphemy! Bastardization of a third gen is strictly prohibited!
V8 is V8 it doesnt matter who makes it. Mopar is a respectible DOMESTIC company. Its not like i'm asking if anyone dropped in a VTech ford V4
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
From: Palm Bay, Florida, USA
Car: 95 E-150 & 07 Kawasaki ZX-6R
Engine: A slow one & a fast one
Transmission: A bad one & a good one
Axle/Gears: A weak one & a chained one
Point noted...still though, for simplicity's sake, I dont see why you would. Except to be a showoff or have something very very cool.
Mopars are too expensive to build anyways... SBC's are the best because they're cheap as hell. Even cheaper than Ford smallblocks. I know, I own a Ford smallblock!
Mopars are too expensive to build anyways... SBC's are the best because they're cheap as hell. Even cheaper than Ford smallblocks. I know, I own a Ford smallblock! Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
From: Palm Bay, Florida, USA
Car: 95 E-150 & 07 Kawasaki ZX-6R
Engine: A slow one & a fast one
Transmission: A bad one & a good one
Axle/Gears: A weak one & a chained one
I started with a V6. I always wanted to say "I have a V8." Then I had a 302, and I wanted to be able to say "I have a V8 with heads and a cam." Now I have a V8 with heads and a cam, and I want to be able to say "I have a 347 stroker". Then I'll get a 347 and I'll want to be able to say "I have a nitrous-injected 347 that runs 9's in the 1/4".... The cycle never ends. It's vicious. Get out while you still can!!
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 729
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Car: Right now 93 Lumina
Engine: 3.4 DOHC
Transmission: 4T60-E
Originally posted by Nixon1
I started with a V6. I always wanted to say "I have a V8." Then I had a 302, and I wanted to be able to say "I have a V8 with heads and a cam." Now I have a V8 with heads and a cam, and I want to be able to say "I have a 347 stroker". Then I'll get a 347 and I'll want to be able to say "I have a nitrous-injected 347 that runs 9's in the 1/4".... The cycle never ends. It's vicious. Get out while you still can!!
I started with a V6. I always wanted to say "I have a V8." Then I had a 302, and I wanted to be able to say "I have a V8 with heads and a cam." Now I have a V8 with heads and a cam, and I want to be able to say "I have a 347 stroker". Then I'll get a 347 and I'll want to be able to say "I have a nitrous-injected 347 that runs 9's in the 1/4".... The cycle never ends. It's vicious. Get out while you still can!!
302?? you have a FORD V8 in your car????? (or did you mean 305?) Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
From: Palm Bay, Florida, USA
Car: 95 E-150 & 07 Kawasaki ZX-6R
Engine: A slow one & a fast one
Transmission: A bad one & a good one
Axle/Gears: A weak one & a chained one
Hey, that's not bastardization, that's just being a traitor. Get it straight.
Hey, you should've seen my face when I started the car for the first time. Running headers, X pipe, Flowmasters. No cats, with dumped exhaust. I deafen bystanders and set off car alarms. Would you really turn that down for $3000? I couldn't. Wish I didn't have to sell my Camaro to keep it, but...that's the way it goes. I also wish I would've known that that $3000 pony I bought had a bent connecting rod...hence, the crate motor. Still, it ran 14.5 at 95 with a bent rod and burning 3 quarts per oil change. Can't beat that with a stick.
Hey, you should've seen my face when I started the car for the first time. Running headers, X pipe, Flowmasters. No cats, with dumped exhaust. I deafen bystanders and set off car alarms. Would you really turn that down for $3000? I couldn't. Wish I didn't have to sell my Camaro to keep it, but...that's the way it goes. I also wish I would've known that that $3000 pony I bought had a bent connecting rod...hence, the crate motor. Still, it ran 14.5 at 95 with a bent rod and burning 3 quarts per oil change. Can't beat that with a stick. I don't knock the mustangs either, I used to own one, I had fun with it like I do the T/A now. And don't forget, if it weren't for the mustang the f-bodys wouldn't exist. The rivalry makes both camps better.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
From: Palm Bay, Florida, USA
Car: 95 E-150 & 07 Kawasaki ZX-6R
Engine: A slow one & a fast one
Transmission: A bad one & a good one
Axle/Gears: A weak one & a chained one
Well, the rivalry DID help.
Chevy needs to come out with another pony car. And not the SSR, because....no. That's no help.
Chevy needs to come out with another pony car. And not the SSR, because....no. That's no help. Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 729
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Car: Right now 93 Lumina
Engine: 3.4 DOHC
Transmission: 4T60-E
i was putting some real thought into this and i was thinking could i buy a normal v8 maybe off a dodge durango and then when i have fit everything and cleaned and rebuilt the block i could slap on does hemi heads? does anyone know if that will work i'm not exactly an expert on mopar
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post






