Cam???
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: Bush, Louisiana, USA
Car: 1986 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: LG4 305
Transmission: 700R4
Cam???
What's the biggest cam I can use with factory heads on an LG4??? I'm gonna put an Edelbrock Performer Intake on and some Headers.
Thanks
Thanks
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
The Performer isn't much better than stock, get the RPM. And a Comp 262XE 462/469 lift and power 1300-5600 rpms.
Then again, maybe the Performer would be better to suit that cam, if so, just stick with the stock intake, I believe someone on here, I think five7kid says they're decent intakes..
Then again, maybe the Performer would be better to suit that cam, if so, just stick with the stock intake, I believe someone on here, I think five7kid says they're decent intakes..
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,111
Likes: 53
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
Re: Cam???
Originally posted by 86TransAMsbc305
What's the biggest cam I can use with factory heads on an LG4??? I'm gonna put an Edelbrock Performer Intake on and some Headers.
Thanks
What's the biggest cam I can use with factory heads on an LG4??? I'm gonna put an Edelbrock Performer Intake on and some Headers.
Thanks
If you have stock rear gearing and a low stall converter, there are definiate limits on how far you should go before low end torque goes away.
The stock LG4 cam is about 185 deg@.050"
The Stock 305HO cam is about 203@.050"
The stock HO cam likes higher compression and higher rear gearing. 3.73"s
If I was stuck with say 2.73's I'd keep the camshaft duration
at or less than this. Your low cr 305 will benefit from raised compression
if you go for a larger cam.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,238
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, Alberta, Republic of Western Canada
Car: 1986 Sport Coupé
Engine: 305-4v
Transmission: 700R4 and TransGo2
Originally posted by 86TransAMsbc305
So what are you saying?? I don't understand.
So what are you saying?? I don't understand.
If you have a 305 and 2.73 rear gears, this will definitely be felt as a loss of low rpm, or off the line, power. This is because you are basically working a trade off: as you increase cam duration and lift you are taking power from the low rpm part of the hp and torque curve and moving it to the higher rpm part of the curve, say 3500 rpm and higher.
That's the reason a "peanut cam" (.350 intake lift and .385 exhaust lift) makes good low rpm power but runs out at 4000 rpm. To gain power up to say 5500 rpm, you must increase the lift and duration.
A 2.73/1 rear gear ratio DEMANDS an engine with lots of torque, just to get moving because it will keep the engine from getting into the higher rpm regions as fast as a set of 3.42/1 gears.
So you would need to do a balancing act in that situation. You can do better than the peanut cam but can't go too far or the bottom end power will be worse than a six cylinder Camaro. And that makes for a less than fun to drive car, doesn't it?
Here's a handful of good hydraulic flatt tappet choices for the 305 and 2.73 combo.
Comp XE 250 or 256.
Crane PowerMax 260 or 266.
Move up to 3.23 or 3.42 gears, too. That's like adding 40 more hp and really gets you off the line faster--and still lets you go on the highway
Last edited by Sitting Bull; Nov 25, 2002 at 02:06 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




