Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Spark Plug gap vs flatter torque curve

Old Nov 25, 2002 | 07:09 PM
  #1  
Slade1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
From: Brampton, Ontario
Spark Plug gap vs flatter torque curve

Anyone have results of the relation between spark plug gap and ability to maintain torque into the midrange rpm band.

I was thinking that provided your ignition system is up to task, a larger gap would give you better ability to ensure a good burn at midrange rpm since there is more spark essentially.

Any downsides to running larger gap?

Stock 35 to say 45?
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2002 | 08:01 PM
  #2  
Apeiron's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
You might gain 0.002% more HP by opening up the gap, as long as it can still fire reliably.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2002 | 08:26 PM
  #3  
IHI's Avatar
IHI
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,671
Likes: 1
From: Waterloo, Iowa
Car: 86 firebird with 98 firebird interi
Engine: pump gas 427sbc Dart Lil M 13.5:1
Transmission: Oldani TH400 w/ BTE 9" convertor
Axle/Gears: 31 spline Moser/full spool/4.11Rich
With the HEI's the minimum gap I'd have is .045, I got a little better than stock and run mine at .060 w/ no problem. HEI's got zing and can handle the wider gap w/ no problem.

Last edited by IHI; Nov 25, 2002 at 08:29 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2002 | 08:39 PM
  #4  
Slade1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
From: Brampton, Ontario
It's not HP that I'm after, its keep the torque curve as flat as possible till I hit other restrictions that prevent this from being possible.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2002 | 09:50 PM
  #5  
Apeiron's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
I doubt you'd notice any difference.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2002 | 10:10 PM
  #6  
Slade1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
From: Brampton, Ontario
I'm wondering if I should go through the trouble of it because there are quite a few people now I've talked to that have re gapped theirs to say 45 or 55 and have said that their midrange improved somewhat.

I wouldn't have thought much about it till I saw a dyno result of a 45 gap tpi vs a 35 gap tpi and the curve was more noticibly flatter. The slope of the drop off after peak torque was significantly less. The ignition system was a jacob's 65000 V so I wasn't really sure though how much that comes into play or not...
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2002 | 11:24 PM
  #7  
dimented24x7's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 5
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
i doubt youll genuinly gain much if its already properly gapped. The differences would probably be too small to conclusivly see with a stock, or near stock setup.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
evilstuie
Exhaust
24
Feb 28, 2016 03:33 PM
LittleFranks
Camaros for Sale
7
Sep 17, 2015 12:22 PM
tricky1
Exhaust
4
Aug 23, 2015 01:17 PM
g.l.mos
Camaros for Sale
0
Aug 22, 2015 12:02 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:38 PM.