Should I switch over to a single plane intake?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
From: Kona, Hawaii / Redlands, CA
Car: 91' RS
Engine: Built 355
Transmission: Probuilt 700r4
Should I switch over to a single plane intake?
Right now I have a regular old crappy perfromer intake, EGR. I have the EGR blocked off, and the engine runs out of steam right at 5,500 rpm.
I think I want a lower single plane intake like an older TM1 edelbrock or a weiand x-cellerator. I figure that since I have 3.73's in the rear and the car is a manual....the low end torque is no big deal. I need more Horsepower, I think the motor is fine on torque. Everyone says to use a higher rise dual plane so you can keep the low end torque but between a Regular performer and a Weiand X-cellerator, how much low end torque are we talking about? Since the Perfromer is such a crappy intake I figure it's only like 5 lb feet at the most.
What do you guys think. I'll be getting an intake in the next few days.
I think I want a lower single plane intake like an older TM1 edelbrock or a weiand x-cellerator. I figure that since I have 3.73's in the rear and the car is a manual....the low end torque is no big deal. I need more Horsepower, I think the motor is fine on torque. Everyone says to use a higher rise dual plane so you can keep the low end torque but between a Regular performer and a Weiand X-cellerator, how much low end torque are we talking about? Since the Perfromer is such a crappy intake I figure it's only like 5 lb feet at the most.
What do you guys think. I'll be getting an intake in the next few days.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
From: Kona, Hawaii / Redlands, CA
Car: 91' RS
Engine: Built 355
Transmission: Probuilt 700r4
Oh yeah...
Ther are two types off weiand x-celloraters, I can get the one that looks like an edelbrock torker for cheap, and I was also considering a Torker actually.
Anybody have anything to say about torker manifolds?
Anybody have anything to say about torker manifolds?
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
From: Rio Rico, AZ 85648
Car: 1989 IROC-1
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700r4
There is actually an article in one of the car mags from last month (don't remember which one) but they did a build up of a SBC and ended up comparing an RPM-AirGap and a single plane manifold.
At extremely high RPM there were 6 or 7 more ponies, but through the rest of the power band there was more horsepower and torque with the high rise dual plane. At appx. 4500 rpm here were 18 or so more horsepower with the dual plane.
Peak numbers don't always give you an accurate description of how fast the car will be. On that application in particular the engine with the lower horsepower (dual plane) would've been faster than with the single plane manifold.
So I would stick with a high rise dual plane manifold, depending on your set up.
I recently purchased a Holley Street Dominator intake and I'm pleased with it so far. It was reasonably priced too, about $40.00 cheaper than the edelbrock RPM Air-Gap and both are pretty much the same thing.
EDIT: After reading your engine set up in your sig, I'd guess that you'd want to stay away from the single plane.
At extremely high RPM there were 6 or 7 more ponies, but through the rest of the power band there was more horsepower and torque with the high rise dual plane. At appx. 4500 rpm here were 18 or so more horsepower with the dual plane.
Peak numbers don't always give you an accurate description of how fast the car will be. On that application in particular the engine with the lower horsepower (dual plane) would've been faster than with the single plane manifold.
So I would stick with a high rise dual plane manifold, depending on your set up.
I recently purchased a Holley Street Dominator intake and I'm pleased with it so far. It was reasonably priced too, about $40.00 cheaper than the edelbrock RPM Air-Gap and both are pretty much the same thing.
EDIT: After reading your engine set up in your sig, I'd guess that you'd want to stay away from the single plane.
Last edited by gruveb; Mar 31, 2003 at 10:05 AM.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,852
Likes: 1
From: Valley of the Sun
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: Al LT1 headed LG4 305
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi with spacer
BTW the performer is just a stock replacemnet manifold, about the same as a LG4 intake. I would suggest a Weiand Stealth.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,346
Likes: 2
From: Monticello, IN USA
Car: 1991 Z-28
Engine: 350
Transmission: T-5 (gonna buy the farm)
B/c you have Vortec heads, your options are limited, but I would ditch the Performer, and get the RPM. Air gap, or not, it will be better than what you have.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
From: Pueblo Co
Car: 1989 C4
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 307
Never put a single plain on a (carbed) 305, you can get away with one setup on a TBI but not a carb. Your options are very limited with the vortec heads, the performance manifold GM makes would be your best bet, #12366573.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
From: Kona, Hawaii / Redlands, CA
Car: 91' RS
Engine: Built 355
Transmission: Probuilt 700r4
Hey guys...
This intake will be for my 84' not the 91'. So I have stock heads on this setup. I know that I would get the very best performance from something like a Air Gap, But I don't have the money, I'm getting something off of ebay. I just want something that does not have egr provisions and will give me better performance than my performer intake, especially at high rpm.
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Re: Should I switch over to a single plane intake?
Originally posted by 330hp_91RS
Right now I have a regular old crappy perfromer intake, EGR. I have the EGR blocked off, and the engine runs out of steam right at 5,500 rpm.
Right now I have a regular old crappy perfromer intake, EGR. I have the EGR blocked off, and the engine runs out of steam right at 5,500 rpm.
204/214* of cam timing I noticed
couldn't that be part of the reason your car is running out or breath?
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Right now, your combination is matched. The cam and intake are running out of steam at the same time.
Put a Stealth or RPM on there, it will still run out of steam at 5500, and you'll lose low-end torque. End result? You'll be slower.
Put a Stealth or RPM on there, it will still run out of steam at 5500, and you'll lose low-end torque. End result? You'll be slower.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA, US of A
Car: 94 Z28
Engine: LT1 w/ headers, catback, CAI, tune
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23s
BS. That cam is plenty big to benefit from a better intake. Just buy an RPM intake off Ebay, you can get them for cheap. You'll pick up some power up top.
Check out this article scan on my site : www.inter-scape.com/ray/305buildup.htm
Even the LG4 with the peanut cam picked up 15+ hp with the RPM over the regular Performer. I would say you would pick up at least a slight bit more having a hotter cam in there... Notice that the torque peak remained the same, the RPM was only behind at just off idle, it quickly matched and beat the performer throughout most of the power curve.
I'd look into getting a Vortec Performer RPM for your HO too. I don't have the mag scans but a recent Hotrod did a buildup and found another 15+ hp and torque with it over the GM Vortec intake as well...
Check out this article scan on my site : www.inter-scape.com/ray/305buildup.htm
Even the LG4 with the peanut cam picked up 15+ hp with the RPM over the regular Performer. I would say you would pick up at least a slight bit more having a hotter cam in there... Notice that the torque peak remained the same, the RPM was only behind at just off idle, it quickly matched and beat the performer throughout most of the power curve.
I'd look into getting a Vortec Performer RPM for your HO too. I don't have the mag scans but a recent Hotrod did a buildup and found another 15+ hp and torque with it over the GM Vortec intake as well...
Last edited by Ray87Z; Mar 31, 2003 at 06:55 PM.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
From: Kona, Hawaii / Redlands, CA
Car: 91' RS
Engine: Built 355
Transmission: Probuilt 700r4
Anyone heard of one of these?
OK, I've decided on a dual plane high-rise. I just talked to a guy who will sell me a Holley "Contender" intake, This is the same as the newer "Street Dominator" that has the idle -7200 rpm powerband. His S-10 with a 350 ran low 12's with it.
I would assume that this intake is very similiar to the weiand Stealth considering they have the same powerband and are made by the same company. The new part # is 300-36.
What do you guys think? I think if he ran low 12's with it, it will be perfect for my 305 and I can expand my setup without having to change the intake again.
BTW- There is no way in hell my setup is matched now. This intake I have sucks. I will be putting 1.6 rockers on it soon to, so I'll have higher lift and more duration coming shortly.
I would assume that this intake is very similiar to the weiand Stealth considering they have the same powerband and are made by the same company. The new part # is 300-36.
What do you guys think? I think if he ran low 12's with it, it will be perfect for my 305 and I can expand my setup without having to change the intake again.
BTW- There is no way in hell my setup is matched now. This intake I have sucks. I will be putting 1.6 rockers on it soon to, so I'll have higher lift and more duration coming shortly.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
From: Kona, Hawaii / Redlands, CA
Car: 91' RS
Engine: Built 355
Transmission: Probuilt 700r4
I don't want to.
Originally posted by BadSS
A buddy of mine ran low 12's with a mildly ported and notched (divider) 2101 Performer. With no more engine than you have now, I'd do that before buying another one.
A buddy of mine ran low 12's with a mildly ported and notched (divider) 2101 Performer. With no more engine than you have now, I'd do that before buying another one.
AS FAR AS HEADS: This is my daily driver. Heads cost a lot more than an intake and are much harder to install. I'm going to do this first. The Heads will be last.
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,111
Likes: 53
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
I agree with the above posters. The intake is not holding you back seriously. Not compared to the heads.
Putting a single plane intake on that motor will really kill the midrange torque and mileage will be in the toilet.
The motor will feel flat. (no torque).
The little TBI heads are costing you a lot of power and rpm.
A performer intake can make 390/400 hp. Just need to bolt it
onto a 400 hp motor.
If you're hell bent on trying a single plane intake, then put a cam in that matches it. Something between 222 and 230 @.050
will do it. You'll have lots of top end.
HardCore HotRods
Putting a single plane intake on that motor will really kill the midrange torque and mileage will be in the toilet.
The motor will feel flat. (no torque).
The little TBI heads are costing you a lot of power and rpm.
A performer intake can make 390/400 hp. Just need to bolt it
onto a 400 hp motor.
If you're hell bent on trying a single plane intake, then put a cam in that matches it. Something between 222 and 230 @.050
will do it. You'll have lots of top end.
HardCore HotRods
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
From: Kona, Hawaii / Redlands, CA
Car: 91' RS
Engine: Built 355
Transmission: Probuilt 700r4
What?
[HITHERE]Originally posted by F-BIRD'88 [/HITHERE]
HITHERE agree with the above posters. The intake is not holding you back seriously. Not compared to the heads.
Putting HITHERE single plane intake on that motor will really kill the midrange torque and mileage will be in the toilet.
The motor will feel flat. (no torque).
The little TBI heads are costing you HITHERE lot of power and rpm.
HITHERE performer intake can make 390/400 hp. Just need to bolt it
onto HITHERE 400 hp motor.
If you're hell bent on trying HITHERE single plane intake, then put HITHERE cam in that matches it. Something between 222 and 230 @.050
will do it. You'll have lots of top end.
HardCore HotRods
HITHERE agree with the above posters. The intake is not holding you back seriously. Not compared to the heads.
Putting HITHERE single plane intake on that motor will really kill the midrange torque and mileage will be in the toilet.
The motor will feel flat. (no torque).
The little TBI heads are costing you HITHERE lot of power and rpm.
HITHERE performer intake can make 390/400 hp. Just need to bolt it
onto HITHERE 400 hp motor.
If you're hell bent on trying HITHERE single plane intake, then put HITHERE cam in that matches it. Something between 222 and 230 @.050
will do it. You'll have lots of top end.
HardCore HotRods
HITHERE 400hp motor with HITHERE regular performer intake is HITHERE 425 horsepower motor with HITHERE mathcehd intake.
HITHERE never said HITHERE was set on HITHERE single plane, HITHERE said HITHERE'm going to get HITHERE high rise dual plane.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
From: Kona, Hawaii / Redlands, CA
Car: 91' RS
Engine: Built 355
Transmission: Probuilt 700r4
...
Well fellas, I'm getting a Holley "Contender" intake for a reasonable price. This intake is .75 inches taller than the weiand stealth and has a powerband from idle-7200. The Weiand stealth has a powerband on the Holley website of idle-6800 rpm, not that I really care. The port size is a bit larger on the Contender one so I guess that is why it flows a bit better.
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Car: 89 IROC
Engine: 350 Carbed
Transmission: WC T5
Originally posted by F-BIRD'88
I agree with the above posters. The intake is not holding you back seriously. Not compared to the heads.
Putting a single plane intake on that motor will really kill the midrange torque and mileage will be in the toilet.
The motor will feel flat. (no torque).
The little TBI heads are costing you a lot of power and rpm.
A performer intake can make 390/400 hp. Just need to bolt it
onto a 400 hp motor.
If you're hell bent on trying a single plane intake, then put a cam in that matches it. Something between 222 and 230 @.050
will do it. You'll have lots of top end.
HardCore HotRods
I agree with the above posters. The intake is not holding you back seriously. Not compared to the heads.
Putting a single plane intake on that motor will really kill the midrange torque and mileage will be in the toilet.
The motor will feel flat. (no torque).
The little TBI heads are costing you a lot of power and rpm.
A performer intake can make 390/400 hp. Just need to bolt it
onto a 400 hp motor.
If you're hell bent on trying a single plane intake, then put a cam in that matches it. Something between 222 and 230 @.050
will do it. You'll have lots of top end.
HardCore HotRods
I agree with FBIRD-88. Cam and heads will be the limiting factor with a single plane.
BC
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992 Trans Am
History / Originality
27
May 10, 2023 07:19 PM
LT1Formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
20
Nov 14, 2015 12:02 AM
Dialed_In
Firebirds for Sale
2
Aug 20, 2015 01:45 PM
86IROC112
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
4
Aug 17, 2015 02:00 PM






