Milage, Cost, Performance
Milage, Cost, Performance
Hey guys, I've been searching around and finding some usefull stuff here and there, but I'm still unsure on what course of action i should take.
The Situation
I have an 84 Z28, completely stripped down, ready for bodywork, electrical, suspension, I plan to build this one right.
I have 2 305's out of car, one may be an HO(how could i tell?), both run pretty well.
I have the tools, time, and knoledge (or access to relatives with the knoledge, as well as the ability to fail my way to success) to do all the work myself
As far as suspension and engines go. The car will be driven daily. I want performance it to be focussed on road racing and autocrossing (to me this means cornering, braking, and acceleration, however, i wouldn't mind some bragworthy power numbers). Plans currently include adding SFC's, a cage, better springs shocks tires and brakes, and a bunch of custom bodywork (for those who have been waiting for pictures, My house went into renovations shortly after i started, and my car has been on hold, nothing to show for so far)
Anyways
All in all, i believe i will have roughly 2000 CDN left over for the engine.
Questions.
1. Will a 305 be welll suited to a car of this nature? Would i be happier with a 350 in the end?
2. If some self controll is excersised with a 350, would fuel milage be competitive to that of the 305?
3. My father thinks a good aproach would be to build the 305 to spin up higher rpms, and to find power up there instead of swapping to a 350, saving weight, and making the car more unique. Is this reasonable given the 2000$ cap on my wallet? And more importantly, is it a good idea?
4. I have a T5 right now. Are they really as weak as i've heard? If I don't abuse it, should it hold out if i can't get a replacement at first?
Thanks in advance for anything you can tell me
The Situation
I have an 84 Z28, completely stripped down, ready for bodywork, electrical, suspension, I plan to build this one right.
I have 2 305's out of car, one may be an HO(how could i tell?), both run pretty well.
I have the tools, time, and knoledge (or access to relatives with the knoledge, as well as the ability to fail my way to success) to do all the work myself
As far as suspension and engines go. The car will be driven daily. I want performance it to be focussed on road racing and autocrossing (to me this means cornering, braking, and acceleration, however, i wouldn't mind some bragworthy power numbers). Plans currently include adding SFC's, a cage, better springs shocks tires and brakes, and a bunch of custom bodywork (for those who have been waiting for pictures, My house went into renovations shortly after i started, and my car has been on hold, nothing to show for so far)
Anyways
All in all, i believe i will have roughly 2000 CDN left over for the engine.
Questions.
1. Will a 305 be welll suited to a car of this nature? Would i be happier with a 350 in the end?
2. If some self controll is excersised with a 350, would fuel milage be competitive to that of the 305?
3. My father thinks a good aproach would be to build the 305 to spin up higher rpms, and to find power up there instead of swapping to a 350, saving weight, and making the car more unique. Is this reasonable given the 2000$ cap on my wallet? And more importantly, is it a good idea?
4. I have a T5 right now. Are they really as weak as i've heard? If I don't abuse it, should it hold out if i can't get a replacement at first?
Thanks in advance for anything you can tell me
if you're going to use it in any sort of competition firstthing i'd do is get a rule book.
milage and preformance usually don't go together but basically eityher will diliver abouit same milage
it's going be a lot harder to make a 305 run at higher rpm than a 350
for autocrossing i'd be looking at a differant transmission
milage and preformance usually don't go together but basically eityher will diliver abouit same milage
it's going be a lot harder to make a 305 run at higher rpm than a 350
for autocrossing i'd be looking at a differant transmission
I was thinking t56, the trick would be finding one for cheap 
I was under the impression (based on another thread) that the smaller bore, pistons,etc of a 305 made it safer/easier to run the engine up higher. What makes the 350 easier to build in that way? Is it simply parts availability?

I was under the impression (based on another thread) that the smaller bore, pistons,etc of a 305 made it safer/easier to run the engine up higher. What makes the 350 easier to build in that way? Is it simply parts availability?
H.O.A.M.,
Generally speaking (and very generally, at that), a shorter-stroke, larger bore engine is "safer" to run at higher RPMs than a smaller bore/stroke ratio engine combination. The centrifugal forces of a longer throw crankshaft and rotating assembly at higher RPM can easily overcome the ability of the moelcules to hold together. That's mostly why the older 283 and 302 SBCs can wind up to 7,200 RPM and live to doi it again, while a 305 with only a couple more cubic inches would likely ventilate the sump at those RPMs.
If you want a tigher power band at higher RPM, you might want a larger bore/stroke ratio. If you want enough torque to pull the heavy car out of turns and engine brake better going in, you should retain some stroke in excess of 3". The 350 compares favorably on both counts to the 305. Of course, parts availability for the 350 is greater. And fuel economy at cruising speeds should be identical to the 305. It will have a greater thirst in stop/start traffic, and at the track, but that extra fuel at the track should be a direct result of greater power.
As has been mentioned, the case is the cheapest part of any engine build. The parts and labor you pour into it are far more costly, and comprise the greatest percentage of the total cost. Part-for-part, the 350 will be cheaper to build. Labor is identical regardless of the displacement. It's your call.
BTW - Good luck finding a "cheap" T-56 that isn't broken.
Generally speaking (and very generally, at that), a shorter-stroke, larger bore engine is "safer" to run at higher RPMs than a smaller bore/stroke ratio engine combination. The centrifugal forces of a longer throw crankshaft and rotating assembly at higher RPM can easily overcome the ability of the moelcules to hold together. That's mostly why the older 283 and 302 SBCs can wind up to 7,200 RPM and live to doi it again, while a 305 with only a couple more cubic inches would likely ventilate the sump at those RPMs.
If you want a tigher power band at higher RPM, you might want a larger bore/stroke ratio. If you want enough torque to pull the heavy car out of turns and engine brake better going in, you should retain some stroke in excess of 3". The 350 compares favorably on both counts to the 305. Of course, parts availability for the 350 is greater. And fuel economy at cruising speeds should be identical to the 305. It will have a greater thirst in stop/start traffic, and at the track, but that extra fuel at the track should be a direct result of greater power.
As has been mentioned, the case is the cheapest part of any engine build. The parts and labor you pour into it are far more costly, and comprise the greatest percentage of the total cost. Part-for-part, the 350 will be cheaper to build. Labor is identical regardless of the displacement. It's your call.
BTW - Good luck finding a "cheap" T-56 that isn't broken.
Supreme Member




Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,167
Likes: 781
From: Park City, UT
Car: '92 Corvette, '89 1/2-a-'Vette
Engine: LT1, L400
Transmission: ZF6, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.45, 3.31
Re: Milage, Cost, Performance
Originally posted by HamsterOnaMission
Questions.
1. Will a 305 be welll suited to a car of this nature? Would i be happier with a 350 in the end?
Questions.
1. Will a 305 be welll suited to a car of this nature? Would i be happier with a 350 in the end?
Originally posted by HamsterOnaMission
2. If some self controll is excersised with a 350, would fuel milage be competitive to that of the 305?
2. If some self controll is excersised with a 350, would fuel milage be competitive to that of the 305?
Originally posted by HamsterOnaMission
3. My father thinks a good aproach would be to build the 305 to spin up higher rpms, and to find power up there instead of swapping to a 350, saving weight, and making the car more unique. Is this reasonable given the 2000$ cap on my wallet? And more importantly, is it a good idea?
3. My father thinks a good aproach would be to build the 305 to spin up higher rpms, and to find power up there instead of swapping to a 350, saving weight, and making the car more unique. Is this reasonable given the 2000$ cap on my wallet? And more importantly, is it a good idea?
Originally posted by HamsterOnaMission
4. I have a T5 right now. Are they really as weak as i've heard? If I don't abuse it, should it hold out if i can't get a replacement at first?
4. I have a T5 right now. Are they really as weak as i've heard? If I don't abuse it, should it hold out if i can't get a replacement at first?
As for durability ingeneral between the two, the T-56 is fairly indestructable for the power you're talking about. But the T-5 will hold up fine for you too, if NOT BEATEN. I have run a T-5 in my car for the last couple years behind the sbc 400 in my sig. with only one problem. I broke a shift fork. I replaced it in less than two hours, and it cost a whopping $12.00 bucks. Now for a little history. For the last couple years, I have been drag racing the car every other Friday night, all summer long, plus daily driving, autocrossing, and road trips -it gets used hard. At the strip, I full-throttle powershift, every gear, everypass, and it never let me down, except for the one shift fork -which broke because I was powershifting with the stock shifter. I think it'll hold just fine for you. Just keep the fluid changed, get a shifter w/adjustable shift stops, and don't do hole shots all the time just for yuks.
I have run BOTH a t-56 and T-5's in my car. I like both -I like the T-56 better, but under the constraints of real life (a budget), the T-5 will deilver for you.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,238
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, Alberta, Republic of Western Canada
Car: 1986 Sport Coupé
Engine: 305-4v
Transmission: 700R4 and TransGo2
If you DO use one of your 305s make sure it is the HO version. The rods are better and will let you rev higher safely.
Trending Topics
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 5
From: Albuquerque, NM
Car: 1966 El Camino Custom
Engine: 350
Transmission: 200R4
Axle/Gears: 3:73 12 bolt with Brute Strength
Increase the strength of the T5
Check out rebuild kits from Hanlon Motorsports to increase the torque capacity of your T5. http://www.HANLONMOTORSPORTS.com
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
or g-force
the g-force trannies look to be fairly stout, and pretty easy on the pocket book (relative, tranny work is always a bit of $$$)
the g-force trannies look to be fairly stout, and pretty easy on the pocket book (relative, tranny work is always a bit of $$$)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
UltRoadWarrior9
Tech / General Engine
336
Apr 28, 2020 10:39 PM
tonys91rs
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
3
Oct 10, 2015 03:31 PM
83 Crossfire TA
Suspension and Chassis
6
Sep 18, 2015 12:01 PM






