Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

How off base are these numbers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 30, 2003 | 05:24 PM
  #1  
Cronic3rd's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
From: Sharonville OH
Car: 98 Z28 vert
Engine: LS1
Transmission: automagic
Axle/Gears: 2.73 - boo racing yay MPG
How off base are these numbers?

Attached is a screen from DD2000. I know DD is hardly accurate but how wrong are these numbers? Even if they are 50 - 60 hp/ftlbs off those are still impressive for a bolt on 305.

If anyone cares the valves are smaller on the heads to simulate 5l vortec heads.

Any anyone who is gonna tell me to give up on a 305 can come over with a 350 bottom end and install it for me.
Attached Thumbnails How off base are these numbers?-dd2000croped.jpg  
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2003 | 11:57 AM
  #2  
rustybluebird's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Car: 87 Firebird
Engine: 350, 416's, 230/230 cam, torkerII, q-jet
Transmission: T5
desktop dyno can be decieving as far as actual hp peaks but can be useful for seeing differences in cams, carb cfm, etc.
find a couple of proven, dyno'd engine combos and then enter them into dd2000. the difference is usually 50-60hp becuase of the difference between theroetical optimimum hp and the real world hp. I found by choosing hp manifolds and mufflers tends to make the numbers more believable.
you dont gain 50-60 horse going from cast manifolds to open headers like dd200 thinks.
also what you would have to do the heads and valvetrain to take that cam would be fairly costly.

Last edited by rustybluebird; Jul 1, 2003 at 11:59 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2003 | 05:24 PM
  #3  
Twilightoptics's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, Washington
Car: '87 IROC-Z/'82 RX7
Engine: SBC 355/1.1L Rotary
Transmission: T56/5 Speed
Axle/Gears: 4.33/3.93
I use DD for fun, and to see what kind of gain this cam vs this cam does. I don't look at the peak numbers.

For instance, I ran a setup I had in my '67 C10 pickup. Used the block from my '85 TPI camaro.... and stuck a carb ontop.

Everything I could tell DD I told it.

Said I'd make about 170HP.... Dynoed the truck, made 198RWHP.... DD is only flywheel.

How's that for off?
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2003 | 12:11 AM
  #4  
jfreeman74's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
From: Flowery Branch, GA
Car: 1985 Iroc-Z
Engine: 1 BA 305 TPI
Transmission: Probuilt 700R4 - 2800 Stall Midwest
Axle/Gears: 3.42
If you want accuracy, use Engine Analyzer 3.0.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2003 | 11:29 AM
  #5  
AJ_92RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: yy wife, crazy.
Engine: 350, Vortecs, 650DP
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: 8.5", 3.42
Originally posted by jfreeman74
If you want accuracy, use Engine Analyzer 3.0.
If you want to take out a second mortgage, get Engine Analyzer.

I have DD2000 and it's actually pretty accurate IF you know how to operate it.

First mistake you made, Cronic, is not reading the instructions. Change the cam selection from roller to hyd. The "Roller Solid or Hyd. Lifters" option should only be used with solid rollers cams, or REALLY aggressive hyd. roller cams.

A good way to get a feel for DD2000 is go to a site like www.chevyhiperformance.com and look at some of the engine combos they've put together. They spend HOURS fine tuning the engine to get the best HP/TQ output they can because it makes them look like they know what they're doing.

By them doing so, it comes closer to "optimum" conditions, which is how DD2000 is set up.

There are many engines they've done that I simulated using DD2000 and was always within 10 HP. I just had to learn how to use the program better.

It won't take you long. The flaws with DD2000 are consistant at least. :sillylol:
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2003 | 01:43 PM
  #6  
jfreeman74's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
From: Flowery Branch, GA
Car: 1985 Iroc-Z
Engine: 1 BA 305 TPI
Transmission: Probuilt 700R4 - 2800 Stall Midwest
Axle/Gears: 3.42
If you want to take out a second mortgage, get Engine Analyzer.
What are you talking about? It's FREE from www.themustangshop.com .
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2003 | 02:52 PM
  #7  
Air_Adam's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
That looks like the numbers you'd see with open headers (as it says in the pic)

With pipes and mufflers, it would be at least 20hp lower.

Those are nice numbers for a 305 though.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2003 | 03:54 PM
  #8  
AJ_92RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: yy wife, crazy.
Engine: 350, Vortecs, 650DP
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: 8.5", 3.42
Originally posted by jfreeman74
What are you talking about? It's FREE from www.themustangshop.com .
I must have be thinking of another program.

I'm downloading it now. I let you know how the two compare with the same input.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2003 | 05:44 PM
  #9  
AJ_92RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: yy wife, crazy.
Engine: 350, Vortecs, 650DP
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: 8.5", 3.42
I compared my engine in my '72 Camaro on both programs.

Keeping it apples-to-apples, they came out similar.

DD2000 seemed to favor the low RPMs a little more.

EA is cool because you can enter what losses you'll get from PS pump, water pump, and cooling fan.

Plus you can enter primary diam and length, plus muffler CFM, intake runner length and diam, etc. It's much more thorough.

I'd have to agree that it gives more realistic numbers simply because you can input all that extra info. Plus it's less "hopefull"

Here's a pic of both (DD2000) on the right.
Attached Thumbnails How off base are these numbers?-ea-.jpg  
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2003 | 10:45 PM
  #10  
robertg's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 0
From: northeast ohio
Car: 2000 astro
Engine: 4.3
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 7.5 with 3.42 gears
i just downloaded engine analyzer.

all i can say is.... damn.

i like it a hell of a lot better than dd2000 already! and i haven't had much of a chance to experiment with it. here's a thought, does anyone have the manual for this program, or know where i'd be able to find it?
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2003 | 11:03 PM
  #11  
Cronic3rd's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
From: Sharonville OH
Car: 98 Z28 vert
Engine: LS1
Transmission: automagic
Axle/Gears: 2.73 - boo racing yay MPG
I downloaded EA3 and the numbers look much more believeable that DD2000. I still think my car is gonna look like that when I get my cash flow going but it is nice to have a more realistic estimation.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2003 | 09:42 AM
  #12  
jfreeman74's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
From: Flowery Branch, GA
Car: 1985 Iroc-Z
Engine: 1 BA 305 TPI
Transmission: Probuilt 700R4 - 2800 Stall Midwest
Axle/Gears: 3.42
AJ, from looking at your EA scan, you need a new intake or something to get that thing some air. It is smothering at high RPMs.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2003 | 10:14 AM
  #13  
AJ_92RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: yy wife, crazy.
Engine: 350, Vortecs, 650DP
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: 8.5", 3.42
Originally posted by jfreeman74
AJ, from looking at your EA scan, you need a new intake or something to get that thing some air. It is smothering at high RPMs.
LAY OFF MAN!!!!!

Just kidding. :sillylol:

I came to the conclusion (with RB's help) that it has either a Magnum 268 or XE268 cam. I don't know yet. I just bought the car last week. It's coming out anyway.

It pulls strong all the way to just under 6000 (not before I tuned it ), so I dunno. It has Vortec heads with a lame Performer (not RPM) intake and 650 DP. It's not really built for upper RPMs anywho.

The worse part is the guy put Rhoads lifters in it. Nasty low RPM tick, and unless you have a healty cam, you actually LOOSE upper RPM power and don't gain much in low RPM torque. Advancing the cam 2-3* would give better results (according to David Vizard).

I'm not going to do anything radical with the car anyway. I live ~20 miles from any civilization, so it'll see the highway a lot. I'd like to be able to make it there and back on one tank-full.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2003 | 10:31 AM
  #14  
AJ_92RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: yy wife, crazy.
Engine: 350, Vortecs, 650DP
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: 8.5", 3.42
Here.

I redid the cam specs. They were off BIG TIME!!

This is with 1-5/8" headers, open exhaust, & no accessories.

So i.e., GROSS HP

BTW, the first pic was with mufflers (650 CFM total flow).
Attached Thumbnails How off base are these numbers?-ea-.jpg  

Last edited by AJ_92RS; Jul 3, 2003 at 10:40 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wigmobile
Electronics
5
Feb 26, 2025 02:56 PM
BOOT77
TPI
6
Oct 17, 2015 12:09 PM
87v6Bird
Brakes
9
Oct 4, 2015 07:37 AM
mrestrictrplate
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Wanted
3
Sep 21, 2015 11:24 AM
Springster
Tech / General Engine
2
Sep 13, 2015 01:38 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:41 AM.