Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Oxygen sensor NOT READY

Old Jul 13, 2003 | 11:48 AM
  #1  
jo88gta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach, FL
Car: 88 GTA
Engine: 355 TPI
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: 370 BW
Oxygen sensor NOT READY

My AutoXray scanner keeps reading that he oxygen sensor is "NOT READY" and at the same time it tells me that I'm running in "OPEN LOOP". Even though, I get voltage reading from the oxygen sensor (via the scanner). Every so often a tap on the gas pedal will kick it into "CLOSED LOOP" and tell me the oxygen sensor is "READY". Typically pops back "OPEN" within a few seconds.

Will one cause the other to read this way (i.e. bad oxygen sensor keeps ECM in open loop)? Do I need to be looking somewhere else?

Other readings show the the system running "LEAN" most of the time.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2003 | 12:38 PM
  #2  
8Mike9's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,183
Likes: 42
From: Oakdale, Ca
Car: 89 IrocZ
Engine: L98-ish
Transmission: 700R4
Seems like a lazy 02 sensor...but is is normal at idle for it to fall under 450mv and stay...putting the the ECM into open loop.

Pressing the accelerator increases the exhaust flow, heting the O2 sensor up, and allows it to begin working normally again.

Couple questions..

Do you have headers?

How long has it been since you changed the O2?

When it's ruinning lean, is this only at idle, or on the highway as well?
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2003 | 12:39 PM
  #3  
8Mike9's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,183
Likes: 42
From: Oakdale, Ca
Car: 89 IrocZ
Engine: L98-ish
Transmission: 700R4
Saw your sig...you do have headers...might be time to upgarde to a heated O2 sensor when you change it.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2003 | 01:13 PM
  #4  
jo88gta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach, FL
Car: 88 GTA
Engine: 355 TPI
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: 370 BW
Mike, the sensor is about a year old and has about 10k miles on it. Yes, I have shorty headers.

I just performed a test that Vader had written - using a propane torch and checking the mV. It check out fine. I know that doesn't show accuracy, just if it's working or not.

Running Lean occurs at different times. Earlier today I held it at partial throttle (about 2800) for about 60 seconds and watched my scanner readings. Said that it was in open loop and the oxygen sensor was not ready, plus it was lean the entire 60 seconds.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2003 | 01:15 PM
  #5  
jo88gta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach, FL
Car: 88 GTA
Engine: 355 TPI
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: 370 BW
Let me add that the coolant temperature was about 180* during that test.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2003 | 01:47 PM
  #6  
8Mike9's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,183
Likes: 42
From: Oakdale, Ca
Car: 89 IrocZ
Engine: L98-ish
Transmission: 700R4
You may in fact be running lean for some reason. RPMs at 2800...should show consistant o2 crosscounts.

See, the o2 sensor is a conduit for open/closed loop... ECM won't go into closed loop until O2 sensor begins generating crosscounts (above and belkow 450mv bias to ECM).

So, either 02 sensor is at fault...not likely at 10k miles, or you are running lean, keeping 02 sensor under 450mvs...which ECM thinks it's not "warmed" enough to generate crosscounts.

Now, the trick is to find out wether you are actually lean, or too rich and saturating the o2 sensor, which gives a false lean code.

Do a search for "code 44"...save me a lot of typing Do the search on the TPI board too.

How';s the exhaust smell? Normal, or sticky...like too much fuel?
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2003 | 02:21 PM
  #7  
jo88gta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach, FL
Car: 88 GTA
Engine: 355 TPI
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: 370 BW
Mike, good stuff!

No, crosscounts while scanning for 30 seconds, 8 hits when I let off the gas pedal.

No error codes at all.

O2 mV stayed in the 200s until I let off the gas, peaked at 360mV
BLM - 128
INT - 128
Idle Air Meter - 160
You're on to something, that has to be why I'm staying in open loop. :hail:

How can I richen it up. Running about 48lbs of fuel pressure with vacuum off? :hail:
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2003 | 02:22 PM
  #8  
jo88gta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach, FL
Car: 88 GTA
Engine: 355 TPI
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: 370 BW
BTW - Actually smells rich - checked the plugs the other day and they looked good - kind of tan color.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2003 | 02:54 PM
  #9  
8Mike9's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,183
Likes: 42
From: Oakdale, Ca
Car: 89 IrocZ
Engine: L98-ish
Transmission: 700R4
Forget about fuel pressure..other than at WOT...ECM 'should" compensate for inj pulse width.

If it smells a bit stinky, like rich exhaust, try disconnecting MAF electrical connector (under side of MAF), see if lean reading goes away.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2003 | 03:29 PM
  #10  
jo88gta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach, FL
Car: 88 GTA
Engine: 355 TPI
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: 370 BW
Ok, with MAF disconnected I start getting crosscounts, goes from Rich to Lean - back and forth. Still wants to be in open loop, but now seems to jump from open to closed more often.

idle air mtr - stays up around 160.

Does this tell you anything?
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2003 | 03:44 PM
  #11  
8Mike9's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,183
Likes: 42
From: Oakdale, Ca
Car: 89 IrocZ
Engine: L98-ish
Transmission: 700R4
Hmmn...

IAC at 160...is this with MAF connected? or disconnected? never looked at IAC with MAF disconnected...should think it would be the same...but not sure.

Crosscounts happening with MAF disconnected..indicates MAF may be at fault...causing too much fuel into engine (saturating o2 sensor) causing false lean condition. (from your descrpription of smelling rich)

Did you search on code 44 (I know you have no codes, but the search is relavant to your problem) ?
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2003 | 03:46 PM
  #12  
8Mike9's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,183
Likes: 42
From: Oakdale, Ca
Car: 89 IrocZ
Engine: L98-ish
Transmission: 700R4
Another thing about IAC..160 means IAC is near (if not) fully retracted, trying to let in as much air as possible.
This issue may be as simple as buying a 10 dollar TB gasket kit, and pulliung the TB, taking it apart and cleaning al;l areas, including the passages with a pipe cleaner/toothbrush and carb cleaner.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2003 | 03:54 PM
  #13  
jo88gta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach, FL
Car: 88 GTA
Engine: 355 TPI
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: 370 BW
Inside is spotless, all new Edelbrock high flow, ported, polished and cleaned. Unfortunately, It's taken apart fairly often and recleaned everytime.

Yes, searched on code 44 and other related MAF posts. By the looks of the data in my scanner, the MAF seems to be functioning. Been searching on MAF Burnoff relay to see if that could be a problem. Not sure what the symptoms would be if it failed.

Thanks for your time and attention. If you think of anything else, let me know. I'll keep at it from here.

:rockon:
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2003 | 04:16 PM
  #14  
8Mike9's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,183
Likes: 42
From: Oakdale, Ca
Car: 89 IrocZ
Engine: L98-ish
Transmission: 700R4
Why you need to look at the unusual suspects, is because....


IAC at 160...this means ECM is trying tro allow more air into engine...while at the same time you are running lean (via scanner readings)

This means something is fubar.

Since TB is clean, obviously rule this out.

Also (on my short sightedness) it could be ruled out since issue happens above idle.


If MAF burnoff is the undelying issue, then yes, check for burnoff, but realize that the wires in the MAF need to be cleaned,,which lead back to the MAF being at fault.....in one out of 99 chances, you're able to descreen the MAF, clean the wires, and not mess anything up.



Your problem, really seems like the MAF is going south... I happen to be part of the "code 44 team" from years back...you're probably okay to run as-is...keep an eye on things, if car begins to suffer badly, watch the O2's...if they dive to the low mv's and a lean code 44 is present, and you have unburnt fuel stinking up the garage....and it all goes away when you disconnect the MAF....you've identified the problem.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
92firebirdguy
TBI
59
Sep 1, 2016 07:53 AM
86IROC112
TPI
13
Nov 27, 2015 09:54 AM
sreZ28
Carburetors
24
Sep 21, 2015 04:54 PM
89-91fun
South West Region
5
Sep 12, 2015 03:06 PM
earlpote
TPI
9
Sep 12, 2015 11:55 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:28 PM.