Estimated HP??
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Cali
Car: '85 Camaro
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Estimated HP??
I know you guys are probably tired of always looking at peoples posting and guessing there horsepower. Well this is my 1st time and my engine is almost done and just wanted to know an estimate of HP, maybe someone has a desktop dyno and can help out 
anyways here is what i have:
350 4 bolt main .040 over and block decked and everything balanced
crank turned .010
Keith Black dish top pistons (9.5:1 with 64cc)
HP cam with .465int/.488exht .050 dur .224int .234exh
Port & polish Vortec heads 64cc with 2.02/1.60 valves
Edelbrock RPM air gap intake
Edelbrock 800cfm carb
msd ignition
double roller timing chain
custom burn chip
holley headers with "true dual" 3" exhaust
well thats about as much i can think of right now. ill keep you guys posted if i get anything else. thanks for your guys help!

anyways here is what i have:
350 4 bolt main .040 over and block decked and everything balanced
crank turned .010
Keith Black dish top pistons (9.5:1 with 64cc)
HP cam with .465int/.488exht .050 dur .224int .234exh
Port & polish Vortec heads 64cc with 2.02/1.60 valves
Edelbrock RPM air gap intake
Edelbrock 800cfm carb
msd ignition
double roller timing chain
custom burn chip
holley headers with "true dual" 3" exhaust
well thats about as much i can think of right now. ill keep you guys posted if i get anything else. thanks for your guys help!
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Cali
Car: '85 Camaro
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
cam spec
its an elgin pro stock performance cam
also, here is a couple things i forgot about:
springs good to .550 lift
magnum 1.6 rockers
posi rear with 3.73 (i know that really doesnt matter)
also, here is a couple things i forgot about:
springs good to .550 lift
magnum 1.6 rockers
posi rear with 3.73 (i know that really doesnt matter)
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Cali
Car: '85 Camaro
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
that sounds good i guess, i would like to make from 375-400hp
what do you think are the best way to go to get around there and what stuff do you think i need? i was thinking about returning the vortec and get the pro topline or the dart iron eagle heads. anyways i just wanted to know what i can do to get to that goal. thanks!!
what do you think are the best way to go to get around there and what stuff do you think i need? i was thinking about returning the vortec and get the pro topline or the dart iron eagle heads. anyways i just wanted to know what i can do to get to that goal. thanks!!
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: South Bend, In.
Car: 1992 gta
Engine: 406 cid
Transmission: th400
alright this guyhas almost the exact same set up as my 406 , except his is a 350 and mine was a 400 block..how much dif does the 50 inches make?...i got iron eagle dart heads too, 215cc/64cc.
engine not in car yet..winter work in progress.
engine not in car yet..winter work in progress.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,111
Likes: 53
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
Well I hit 375 honest flywheel hp with the same combo and little smaller cam (214/224 .442/.465")
stock unported vortecs
Haveing modded 2.02 vortecs my self now and haveing used that cam in other simular motors I'd say 400/410 hp is not out of the question.
No need to ditch the vortecs They will perform for ya.
easy 12 sec quarters with a bit of a converter and some sticky S/S tires.
Mine ran 13flat @104.5.
You may want to experiment with the cam installed position
in the motor to maximize the power curve (advance)
But other than that it should perform to your expectations.
I'm real curious about how the custom chip fit in to this too.
stock unported vortecs
Haveing modded 2.02 vortecs my self now and haveing used that cam in other simular motors I'd say 400/410 hp is not out of the question.
No need to ditch the vortecs They will perform for ya.
easy 12 sec quarters with a bit of a converter and some sticky S/S tires.
Mine ran 13flat @104.5.
You may want to experiment with the cam installed position
in the motor to maximize the power curve (advance)
But other than that it should perform to your expectations.
I'm real curious about how the custom chip fit in to this too.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
You can get a whole lot more power out of it with a better cam. That old thing is far from the best choice out there. It's akso teh Edelbrock RPM cam, if you didn't know that; it's one of those generic grinds that's been around forever.
People top 400 HP with those heads, essentially unmolested; flat top pistons; and a Comp XE268. If I was building your motor, I'd go more that direction. That will give about 10.3:1 CR with normal head gaskets that seal, not steel shim. If you want to bump it down a couple of tenths, use the Fel-Pro 1044 gasket instead of 1014.
I'd recommend not trying to do "true duals", if this is a street-driven car..... too much maze with too little cheese at the end. There's virtually no way to keep it from scraping or otherwise simply not fitting the car properly, unless you're willing to spend hourse trial-fitting bends. The negligible performance improvement, if any, and the "bragging privilege", isn't worth the hassle.
You don't need a chip. Nothing in that combo for a computer to control. You will however need a non-computer distributor.
I'd also suggest using a performance carb instead of the Edelbrock/Carter. A Holley or a Demon will work better.
People top 400 HP with those heads, essentially unmolested; flat top pistons; and a Comp XE268. If I was building your motor, I'd go more that direction. That will give about 10.3:1 CR with normal head gaskets that seal, not steel shim. If you want to bump it down a couple of tenths, use the Fel-Pro 1044 gasket instead of 1014.
I'd recommend not trying to do "true duals", if this is a street-driven car..... too much maze with too little cheese at the end. There's virtually no way to keep it from scraping or otherwise simply not fitting the car properly, unless you're willing to spend hourse trial-fitting bends. The negligible performance improvement, if any, and the "bragging privilege", isn't worth the hassle.
You don't need a chip. Nothing in that combo for a computer to control. You will however need a non-computer distributor.
I'd also suggest using a performance carb instead of the Edelbrock/Carter. A Holley or a Demon will work better.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





