Convert old heads to LS1 valvetrain
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Fairview Heights Illinois
Car: 89 Irocz
Engine: 350TPI $6E
Transmission: 700R4
Convert old heads to LS1 valvetrain
My friend ODB did this conversion to a set of 305 heads for me to use on my engine. He said it was okay to share this information. He got the stock LS1 valves for free (take offs) and paid $40 for the 1.7 ratio roller rockers. It cost approx $200 to get new 8mm guides pressed in and the seats re-cut for the bigger valves. He says my cam will give me .570"+ lift with LS1 rockers and the valve-train will be very much lighter.
I put up some pictures of the conversion on my site.
I can't wait to see how these run!
My SITE
I put up some pictures of the conversion on my site.
I can't wait to see how these run!
My SITE
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 784
Likes: 1
From: New Mexico
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28 5.7 G92
Engine: L98 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: TH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Posi G80
Thats a cool idea that I've never seen before. What it lacks though is the technology in the Gen 3 Vortec/LS1 heads. It will probably run just like 305 heads with aftermarket rockers and valve springs, it was probably a bit cheaper though. As for being light, that will make your engine rev smoother but the small bore of a 305 and TPI is going to keep you from taking advantage of this light valvetrain at high rpm's. It's hard to build a good valvetrain for that price, I'd say it's a good call. Aren't the stock LS1 valves too big for the 305 combustion chamber?2.00 Intake,1.55 Exhuast?
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
From: The State of Hockey
Car: 1987 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Miniram'd 383, 24X LS1 PCM
Transmission: TH700R4, 4200 stall
Axle/Gears: 9", 4.33:1
Interesting.... Are you going to do some porting on the heads as well?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Fairview Heights Illinois
Car: 89 Irocz
Engine: 350TPI $6E
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by Matt87GTA
Interesting.... Are you going to do some porting on the heads as well?
Interesting.... Are you going to do some porting on the heads as well?
I would think the 1.7 ratio would require larger valve covers, and the 1.7 rr's are a tad expensive arent they? Very good idea, but it might be cheaper just to go with 1.6 ratio for regular gen I small blocks, but 10 thumbs up for the enginuity of it!
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by bigals87z28
I would think the 1.7 ratio would require larger valve covers, and the 1.7 rr's are a tad expensive arent they? Very good idea, but it might be cheaper just to go with 1.6 ratio for regular gen I small blocks, but 10 thumbs up for the enginuity of it!
I would think the 1.7 ratio would require larger valve covers, and the 1.7 rr's are a tad expensive arent they? Very good idea, but it might be cheaper just to go with 1.6 ratio for regular gen I small blocks, but 10 thumbs up for the enginuity of it!
some guy swapps valves or rockers in his LS1, and his old ones are cheap...
or the part new from GM may be cheaper then a aftermarket one.... in this case i donno if thats true, but its possible.
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: kentucky
Car: 1990 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: manual/t56
That looks like a awesome conversion, I didn't think anything from an ls1 would swap over to a gen 1 smallblock. One question though, on your site it says you have a 5.7, wouldn't those 305 heads put your compression ratio through the roof? Or is that what you're going for?
Trending Topics
Originally posted by slayer2000
That looks like a awesome conversion, I didn't think anything from an ls1 would swap over to a gen 1 smallblock. One question though, on your site it says you have a 5.7, wouldn't those 305 heads put your compression ratio through the roof? Or is that what you're going for?
That looks like a awesome conversion, I didn't think anything from an ls1 would swap over to a gen 1 smallblock. One question though, on your site it says you have a 5.7, wouldn't those 305 heads put your compression ratio through the roof? Or is that what you're going for?
Originally posted by slayer2000
True but vette heads are aluminum aren't they? I don't think you could run that much compression with cast iron.
True but vette heads are aluminum aren't they? I don't think you could run that much compression with cast iron.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Fairview Heights Illinois
Car: 89 Irocz
Engine: 350TPI $6E
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by slayer2000
That looks like a awesome conversion, I didn't think anything from an ls1 would swap over to a gen 1 smallblock. One question though, on your site it says you have a 5.7, wouldn't those 305 heads put your compression ratio through the roof? Or is that what you're going for?
That looks like a awesome conversion, I didn't think anything from an ls1 would swap over to a gen 1 smallblock. One question though, on your site it says you have a 5.7, wouldn't those 305 heads put your compression ratio through the roof? Or is that what you're going for?
Last edited by TPIgirl; Oct 11, 2003 at 08:41 PM.
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 3,544
Likes: 19
From: WI,USA
Car: 89 FORMULA 350, 91 Z28 Convertible
Engine: ls1, LB9
Transmission: t56, Auto
Axle/Gears: S60/ 3.73
yes, 305 heads are fine. there are a few guys on here who keep saying otherwise but, fact is they are ok, on a 350. you just need to run 93 oct. and have a good con. cooling system nothing special. I ran 305 heads on my old 350 l98 still have the 350 and there are no problems with it the 400 was just a deal I could not pass on
Originally posted by N8MAN1068
nice on the 1.7 rr's...
i'm still working on mating a ls1 intake to gen 1 heads....
nice on the 1.7 rr's...
i'm still working on mating a ls1 intake to gen 1 heads....
TGO Supporter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
Originally posted by 25THRSS
Why would you wanna do that? The intake is the single most restrictive part on an LS1.
Why would you wanna do that? The intake is the single most restrictive part on an LS1.

Thats a great idea, putting the 1.7 rockers on there... but how well do the valve covers fit over? I know that if you put BBC rockers (also 1.7) on a sbc head, you have to beat out the stamped abc valve covers so the rockers don't hit them.
Do normal sbc valve covers fit well with those rockers?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Fairview Heights Illinois
Car: 89 Irocz
Engine: 350TPI $6E
Transmission: 700R4
It's not running yet because the heads are still getting worked on. Today the EGR holes in the exhaust ports got welded up and more porting has to be done. I tried a stock valvecover on one today and it fits fine. These 305 heads are older and can't use the centerbolt covers that my 89 came with, so I'm not using the 89 covers.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Fairview Heights Illinois
Car: 89 Irocz
Engine: 350TPI $6E
Transmission: 700R4
Here's a picture of the filled EGR holes. I'm happy with how they came out. Now they just have to be re-ported and some holes epoxied in and I can run them.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
From: Nashville TN
Car: 1989 Trans Am
Engine: 355 HSR
Transmission: Pro-Built 700r4 w/ 3400 converter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt w/ 3.42 gears
Originally posted by 25THRSS
Why would you wanna do that? The intake is the single most restrictive part on an LS1.
Why would you wanna do that? The intake is the single most restrictive part on an LS1.
but while yes the LS1 intake might be the most restrictive part of an LS1 intake... that restriction still is at around 260 cfm!!!
Originally posted by Chris89GTA
yeah i think he was being sarcastic too...
but while yes the LS1 intake might be the most restrictive part of an LS1 intake... that restriction still is at around 260 cfm!!!
yeah i think he was being sarcastic too...
but while yes the LS1 intake might be the most restrictive part of an LS1 intake... that restriction still is at around 260 cfm!!!
Last edited by 25THRSS; Oct 19, 2003 at 08:16 PM.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
From: Nashville TN
Car: 1989 Trans Am
Engine: 355 HSR
Transmission: Pro-Built 700r4 w/ 3400 converter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt w/ 3.42 gears
LS6 manifolds flow about 275 cfm and that is the intake alone... i haven't seen any studies of people flowing the intake when matched to the heads... but a lot of those cars are running just fine w/ heads flowing 300 and an intake that flow 275...
Originally posted by Chris89GTA
LS6 manifolds flow about 275 cfm and that is the intake alone... i haven't seen any studies of people flowing the intake when matched to the heads... but a lot of those cars are running just fine w/ heads flowing 300 and an intake that flow 275...
LS6 manifolds flow about 275 cfm and that is the intake alone... i haven't seen any studies of people flowing the intake when matched to the heads... but a lot of those cars are running just fine w/ heads flowing 300 and an intake that flow 275...
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
From: Nashville TN
Car: 1989 Trans Am
Engine: 355 HSR
Transmission: Pro-Built 700r4 w/ 3400 converter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt w/ 3.42 gears
i am not disagreeing w/ you on the whole LS1 intake restriction. yes they desperately need to come up w/ an itake that will flow for the LS1s that isn't on a "race only" level. i know there are guys making the sheet metal intakes and that is great, and worth about 40 hp up near 7K rpm, and that is great but that is absolutely worthless on a street car.
i also agree that it would be better to get a set of the full roller rockers for the Gen 1s than just using the stocker LS1 rockers...
i also agree that it would be better to get a set of the full roller rockers for the Gen 1s than just using the stocker LS1 rockers...
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Fairview Heights Illinois
Car: 89 Irocz
Engine: 350TPI $6E
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by D M N
how much money have you spent on this??
how much money have you spent on this??
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 729
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Car: Right now 93 Lumina
Engine: 3.4 DOHC
Transmission: 4T60-E
Originally posted by TPIgirl
I think it's around $500 in parts. It would've been cheaper but my cam has .503 lift and .570 lift with 1.7 rockers, so I had to buy new springs to keep them from binding and still have enough seat pressure.
I think it's around $500 in parts. It would've been cheaper but my cam has .503 lift and .570 lift with 1.7 rockers, so I had to buy new springs to keep them from binding and still have enough seat pressure.

thats amazing
Supreme Member
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,945
Likes: 1
From: Boosted Land
Car: 92 Z28
Engine: Boosted LSX
Verry interesting. 2thumbs up for doing somethign Diff.
not to get off topic but did you ever get the injectors problems fixed befor the tear down?
not to get off topic but did you ever get the injectors problems fixed befor the tear down?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Fairview Heights Illinois
Car: 89 Irocz
Engine: 350TPI $6E
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by TPl383
Verry interesting. 2thumbs up for doing somethign Diff.
not to get off topic but did you ever get the injectors problems fixed befor the tear down?
Verry interesting. 2thumbs up for doing somethign Diff.
not to get off topic but did you ever get the injectors problems fixed befor the tear down?
and NO I didn't, but I've ordered a new set from SLP. I think they are supposed to be 25 lb for LS1 cars.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 0
From: SW Chicago 'burbs
Car: American Iron Firebird
Engine: The little 305 that could.
Transmission: Richmond T-10
Axle/Gears: Floater 9" - 3.64 gears
So the 1.7 ratio roller rockers are from an LS1?
Since you're using guide plates, I'm guessing these rockers are non-self aligning, is that true?
Anyone have an idea if these would be fine for a stock cam in a '91 GTA if I replaced the springs or would I have to pull the head to check clearances?
Since you're using guide plates, I'm guessing these rockers are non-self aligning, is that true?
Anyone have an idea if these would be fine for a stock cam in a '91 GTA if I replaced the springs or would I have to pull the head to check clearances?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ambainb
Camaros for Sale
11
Apr 25, 2016 09:21 PM
smokingss
LSX and LTX Parts
2
Mar 3, 2016 07:40 PM








