Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Convert old heads to LS1 valvetrain

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 12:05 AM
  #1  
TPIgirl's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Fairview Heights Illinois
Car: 89 Irocz
Engine: 350TPI $6E
Transmission: 700R4
Convert old heads to LS1 valvetrain

My friend ODB did this conversion to a set of 305 heads for me to use on my engine. He said it was okay to share this information. He got the stock LS1 valves for free (take offs) and paid $40 for the 1.7 ratio roller rockers. It cost approx $200 to get new 8mm guides pressed in and the seats re-cut for the bigger valves. He says my cam will give me .570"+ lift with LS1 rockers and the valve-train will be very much lighter.
I put up some pictures of the conversion on my site.
I can't wait to see how these run!

My SITE

Reply
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 01:42 AM
  #2  
GASGZLR's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 784
Likes: 1
From: New Mexico
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28 5.7 G92
Engine: L98 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: TH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Posi G80
Thats a cool idea that I've never seen before. What it lacks though is the technology in the Gen 3 Vortec/LS1 heads. It will probably run just like 305 heads with aftermarket rockers and valve springs, it was probably a bit cheaper though. As for being light, that will make your engine rev smoother but the small bore of a 305 and TPI is going to keep you from taking advantage of this light valvetrain at high rpm's. It's hard to build a good valvetrain for that price, I'd say it's a good call. Aren't the stock LS1 valves too big for the 305 combustion chamber?2.00 Intake,1.55 Exhuast?
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 01:32 PM
  #3  
Matt87GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
From: The State of Hockey
Car: 1987 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Miniram'd 383, 24X LS1 PCM
Transmission: TH700R4, 4200 stall
Axle/Gears: 9", 4.33:1
Interesting.... Are you going to do some porting on the heads as well?
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 07:34 PM
  #4  
TPIgirl's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Fairview Heights Illinois
Car: 89 Irocz
Engine: 350TPI $6E
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by Matt87GTA
Interesting.... Are you going to do some porting on the heads as well?
These heads have been ported twice already and are in process of getting ported a 3rd time to match the bigger valves. Yes the valves fit just fine with no problem at all.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2003 | 03:09 PM
  #5  
bigals87z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,456
Likes: 3
From: Ocean, NJ
Car: Check The Sig
I would think the 1.7 ratio would require larger valve covers, and the 1.7 rr's are a tad expensive arent they? Very good idea, but it might be cheaper just to go with 1.6 ratio for regular gen I small blocks, but 10 thumbs up for the enginuity of it!
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2003 | 04:28 PM
  #6  
MrDude_1's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by bigals87z28
I would think the 1.7 ratio would require larger valve covers, and the 1.7 rr's are a tad expensive arent they? Very good idea, but it might be cheaper just to go with 1.6 ratio for regular gen I small blocks, but 10 thumbs up for the enginuity of it!
thats the beauty of take offs.

some guy swapps valves or rockers in his LS1, and his old ones are cheap...


or the part new from GM may be cheaper then a aftermarket one.... in this case i donno if thats true, but its possible.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2003 | 07:13 PM
  #7  
slayer2000's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: kentucky
Car: 1990 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: manual/t56
That looks like a awesome conversion, I didn't think anything from an ls1 would swap over to a gen 1 smallblock. One question though, on your site it says you have a 5.7, wouldn't those 305 heads put your compression ratio through the roof? Or is that what you're going for?
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2003 | 07:28 PM
  #8  
bigals87z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,456
Likes: 3
From: Ocean, NJ
Car: Check The Sig
Originally posted by slayer2000
That looks like a awesome conversion, I didn't think anything from an ls1 would swap over to a gen 1 smallblock. One question though, on your site it says you have a 5.7, wouldn't those 305 heads put your compression ratio through the roof? Or is that what you're going for?
Not really.... the corvette uses aluminum heads that have the same 58cc chamber as teh LB9 heads have. It would be a cheap way of making more power.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2003 | 08:11 PM
  #9  
slayer2000's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: kentucky
Car: 1990 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: manual/t56
True but vette heads are aluminum aren't they? I don't think you could run that much compression with cast iron.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2003 | 08:15 PM
  #10  
bigals87z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,456
Likes: 3
From: Ocean, NJ
Car: Check The Sig
Originally posted by slayer2000
True but vette heads are aluminum aren't they? I don't think you could run that much compression with cast iron.
The aluminum will disapate heat better, and will alow for a higher compresion ratio... but I dont think the CR is high enuff to worry about knock.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2003 | 08:35 PM
  #11  
TPIgirl's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Fairview Heights Illinois
Car: 89 Irocz
Engine: 350TPI $6E
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by slayer2000
That looks like a awesome conversion, I didn't think anything from an ls1 would swap over to a gen 1 smallblock. One question though, on your site it says you have a 5.7, wouldn't those 305 heads put your compression ratio through the roof? Or is that what you're going for?
I'm told that my compression will be around 10.5 and some minor modifications to the engine cooling system will be needed to run it on pump gas. So yes that's what I'm going for right now until I can get me a set of aluminum canfield heads and build another engine.

Last edited by TPIgirl; Oct 11, 2003 at 08:41 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2003 | 02:57 PM
  #12  
D M N's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 729
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Car: Right now 93 Lumina
Engine: 3.4 DOHC
Transmission: 4T60-E
thats cool i never thought of that (both the 305 heads and the ls1 valvestrain) i wish i would thought of that
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2003 | 04:42 PM
  #13  
N8MAN1068's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: fredericksburg, va
Car: 85 ta ws6 KITT
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: th350
nice on the 1.7 rr's...

i'm still working on mating a ls1 intake to gen 1 heads....
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2003 | 07:03 PM
  #14  
88 350 tpi formula's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 3,544
Likes: 19
From: WI,USA
Car: 89 FORMULA 350, 91 Z28 Convertible
Engine: ls1, LB9
Transmission: t56, Auto
Axle/Gears: S60/ 3.73
yes, 305 heads are fine. there are a few guys on here who keep saying otherwise but, fact is they are ok, on a 350. you just need to run 93 oct. and have a good con. cooling system nothing special. I ran 305 heads on my old 350 l98 still have the 350 and there are no problems with it the 400 was just a deal I could not pass on
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2003 | 09:14 PM
  #15  
25THRSS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,740
Likes: 3
From: Glen Allen, VA
Originally posted by N8MAN1068
nice on the 1.7 rr's...

i'm still working on mating a ls1 intake to gen 1 heads....
Why would you wanna do that? The intake is the single most restrictive part on an LS1.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2003 | 10:00 PM
  #16  
Air_Adam's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
Originally posted by 25THRSS
Why would you wanna do that? The intake is the single most restrictive part on an LS1.
I think he was being sarcastic

Thats a great idea, putting the 1.7 rockers on there... but how well do the valve covers fit over? I know that if you put BBC rockers (also 1.7) on a sbc head, you have to beat out the stamped abc valve covers so the rockers don't hit them.

Do normal sbc valve covers fit well with those rockers?
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2003 | 10:41 PM
  #17  
Greasemonkey's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: Anderson, IN
Car: 86 Cutlass
Engine: 350
Transmission: 200-4R
Pretty cool. Have you actually ran that yet? Be interesting what kind of gains it gives. ODB eh....surprised this hasn't started a flame war.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2003 | 11:45 PM
  #18  
TPIgirl's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Fairview Heights Illinois
Car: 89 Irocz
Engine: 350TPI $6E
Transmission: 700R4
It's not running yet because the heads are still getting worked on. Today the EGR holes in the exhaust ports got welded up and more porting has to be done. I tried a stock valvecover on one today and it fits fine. These 305 heads are older and can't use the centerbolt covers that my 89 came with, so I'm not using the 89 covers.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2003 | 10:37 PM
  #19  
TPIgirl's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Fairview Heights Illinois
Car: 89 Irocz
Engine: 350TPI $6E
Transmission: 700R4
Here's a picture of the filled EGR holes. I'm happy with how they came out. Now they just have to be re-ported and some holes epoxied in and I can run them.

Reply
Old Oct 19, 2003 | 02:53 PM
  #20  
D M N's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 729
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Car: Right now 93 Lumina
Engine: 3.4 DOHC
Transmission: 4T60-E
how much money have you spent on this??
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2003 | 07:31 PM
  #21  
Chris89GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
From: Nashville TN
Car: 1989 Trans Am
Engine: 355 HSR
Transmission: Pro-Built 700r4 w/ 3400 converter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt w/ 3.42 gears
Originally posted by 25THRSS
Why would you wanna do that? The intake is the single most restrictive part on an LS1.
yeah i think he was being sarcastic too...

but while yes the LS1 intake might be the most restrictive part of an LS1 intake... that restriction still is at around 260 cfm!!!
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2003 | 08:13 PM
  #22  
25THRSS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,740
Likes: 3
From: Glen Allen, VA
Originally posted by Chris89GTA
yeah i think he was being sarcastic too...

but while yes the LS1 intake might be the most restrictive part of an LS1 intake... that restriction still is at around 260 cfm!!!
260 cfm might be a lot, but it's horrible when my heads flow very close to 300 cfm. I still don't see why you would go through all that trouble to put on ls1 rockers when they don't even have roller tips. Why not just get a set of fuller roller comps or similar?

Last edited by 25THRSS; Oct 19, 2003 at 08:16 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2003 | 08:48 PM
  #23  
Chris89GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
From: Nashville TN
Car: 1989 Trans Am
Engine: 355 HSR
Transmission: Pro-Built 700r4 w/ 3400 converter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt w/ 3.42 gears
LS6 manifolds flow about 275 cfm and that is the intake alone... i haven't seen any studies of people flowing the intake when matched to the heads... but a lot of those cars are running just fine w/ heads flowing 300 and an intake that flow 275...
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2003 | 08:51 PM
  #24  
25THRSS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,740
Likes: 3
From: Glen Allen, VA
Originally posted by Chris89GTA
LS6 manifolds flow about 275 cfm and that is the intake alone... i haven't seen any studies of people flowing the intake when matched to the heads... but a lot of those cars are running just fine w/ heads flowing 300 and an intake that flow 275...
No doubt, and my heads/cam LS1 is one of them, but would it run even better with a better intake manifold? Yes. Does it run better with my yella terras? Yes. It would have been a whole lot easier and you would get more performance out of a set of fuller roller rockers made for the gen 1 block. Just my opinion, what do I know.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2003 | 08:57 PM
  #25  
Chris89GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
From: Nashville TN
Car: 1989 Trans Am
Engine: 355 HSR
Transmission: Pro-Built 700r4 w/ 3400 converter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt w/ 3.42 gears
i am not disagreeing w/ you on the whole LS1 intake restriction. yes they desperately need to come up w/ an itake that will flow for the LS1s that isn't on a "race only" level. i know there are guys making the sheet metal intakes and that is great, and worth about 40 hp up near 7K rpm, and that is great but that is absolutely worthless on a street car.

i also agree that it would be better to get a set of the full roller rockers for the Gen 1s than just using the stocker LS1 rockers...
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 01:44 PM
  #26  
TPIgirl's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Fairview Heights Illinois
Car: 89 Irocz
Engine: 350TPI $6E
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by D M N
how much money have you spent on this??
I think it's around $500 in parts. It would've been cheaper but my cam has .503 lift and .570 lift with 1.7 rockers, so I had to buy new springs to keep them from binding and still have enough seat pressure.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 03:21 PM
  #27  
D M N's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 729
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Car: Right now 93 Lumina
Engine: 3.4 DOHC
Transmission: 4T60-E
Originally posted by TPIgirl
I think it's around $500 in parts. It would've been cheaper but my cam has .503 lift and .570 lift with 1.7 rockers, so I had to buy new springs to keep them from binding and still have enough seat pressure.

thats amazing
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 03:23 PM
  #28  
FSTFBDY's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,945
Likes: 1
From: Boosted Land
Car: 92 Z28
Engine: Boosted LSX
Verry interesting. 2thumbs up for doing somethign Diff.

not to get off topic but did you ever get the injectors problems fixed befor the tear down?
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 10:20 PM
  #29  
TPIgirl's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Fairview Heights Illinois
Car: 89 Irocz
Engine: 350TPI $6E
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by TPl383
Verry interesting. 2thumbs up for doing somethign Diff.

not to get off topic but did you ever get the injectors problems fixed befor the tear down?
Thanks
and NO I didn't, but I've ordered a new set from SLP. I think they are supposed to be 25 lb for LS1 cars.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2003 | 02:23 AM
  #30  
nape's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 0
From: SW Chicago 'burbs
Car: American Iron Firebird
Engine: The little 305 that could.
Transmission: Richmond T-10
Axle/Gears: Floater 9" - 3.64 gears
So the 1.7 ratio roller rockers are from an LS1?

Since you're using guide plates, I'm guessing these rockers are non-self aligning, is that true?

Anyone have an idea if these would be fine for a stock cam in a '91 GTA if I replaced the springs or would I have to pull the head to check clearances?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
smokingss
LSX and LTX Parts
2
Mar 3, 2016 07:40 PM
sweet_87_iroc
Camaros for Sale
5
Sep 25, 2015 10:01 PM
hayesaw0210
Camaros for Sale
0
Aug 23, 2015 11:15 PM
86White_T/A305
LTX and LSX
0
Aug 17, 2015 12:16 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:06 AM.