Does anyone know??
#3
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: IN, USA
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
how did you come up with that? and if that is right the would the compression ratio of my engine be 11.3:1. The motor is 350 .030 over the deck height is .030 the gasket is .041 and the heads are 67cc. I hope that I caculated wrong or I'm going to have to change heads because that will never run on pump gas. Thanks
[This message has been edited by mustangs killer (edited March 10, 2001).]
[This message has been edited by mustangs killer (edited March 10, 2001).]
#4
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Belleville, IL USA
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well I did the math the best I could. If you don't count valve reliefs or ring land area or spark plug, then I come up with 11.54:1 compression.
Even with the tricks I know, that is still too high for iron heads. You would have to add 10cc to get down to 10.0:1
The best way I could think of is to just get some flattop pistons.
ODB
Even with the tricks I know, that is still too high for iron heads. You would have to add 10cc to get down to 10.0:1
The best way I could think of is to just get some flattop pistons.
ODB
#5
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Posts: 17,120
Likes: 0
Received 123 Likes
on
104 Posts
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Ahh. Finally a cc for the dome. My calculations for your engine specs now put it at 11.544:1 compression. Way too high for any pump gas. If you put on some large 76cc smog heads such as 993's you can lower the compression ratio down to a reasonable 10.327. 92 pump gas may just get by with that.
#6
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: IN, USA
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That can't be right. the compression should only be about 10.3 - 10.5:1. The valve reliefs in these pistons are deep. That should lower the compression,right? Anyways the company rated the piston at 10.23 with a 68cc head so mine should only be a little higher, or am I wrong. these are the specs. on the piston.
Sterling Pistons
Compression height: 1.560 in.
Compression ratio: 11.57:1 (58cc heads), 11.20:1 (60.5cc heads), 10.72:1 (64cc heads) , 10.23:1 (68cc heads), 9.78:1 (72cc heads), 9.38:1 (76cc heads)
Head type: .125 in. dome
Oversize: .030 in.
Ring size: (2) 5/64 in., (1) 3/16 in.
Weight: 596 grams
Sterling Pistons
Compression height: 1.560 in.
Compression ratio: 11.57:1 (58cc heads), 11.20:1 (60.5cc heads), 10.72:1 (64cc heads) , 10.23:1 (68cc heads), 9.78:1 (72cc heads), 9.38:1 (76cc heads)
Head type: .125 in. dome
Oversize: .030 in.
Ring size: (2) 5/64 in., (1) 3/16 in.
Weight: 596 grams
#7
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Stephen 87 IROC:
My calculations for your engine specs now put it at 11.544:1 compression. Way too high for any pump gas... </font>
My calculations for your engine specs now put it at 11.544:1 compression. Way too high for any pump gas... </font>
(TRW MR4019-B, 12.9 cc of dome in 74cc heads. I calculate that the recess volumes of the 2.10/1.65 valves reduce the static ratio to 11.03:1, but that's close enough for argument.)
If you wnat a calculator, try this:
Engine Calculator.xls
------------------
Later,
Vader
------------------
"I'm'a do Things My Way - It's My way or the Highway."
Adobe Acrobat Reader
Trending Topics
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
Using the information you gave above (are you sure about the pistons being .030 below the deck?) and the compression ratios and head cc's given by the manufacturer and assuming .022 below the deck from the compression height of the pistons, I came up with the pistons having a 2.3cc dome overall. That leaves your compression ratio at 10.16:1 given the .030 below the deck and .041 head gasket.
I have a catalog here, though its not Sterling, that lists a .100 dome piston and it has 1.2cc so the 2.3 is probably correct. To get up to a 12cc dome you are looking at around a .250+ dome... alot more than what you have.
I have a catalog here, though its not Sterling, that lists a .100 dome piston and it has 1.2cc so the 2.3 is probably correct. To get up to a 12cc dome you are looking at around a .250+ dome... alot more than what you have.
#9
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Posts: 17,120
Likes: 0
Received 123 Likes
on
104 Posts
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
OK Vader. I looked at your .xls sheet. Very nice however on the "typical values" sheet your combustion chamber sizes for big blocks is very wrong. You list them as low as 54 and as high as 76. One of the smallest combustion chambers offered was 98.4cc in cast iron closed chamber while most of the open chamber heads are 119 and the largest being 124.
#10
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: IN, USA
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No i'm not sure about the deck height. My calipers are off a little. the read .022 but I bumped it up to .030 beacuse I know stock deck height is .035 so I just guessed somewhere in the middle. Thanks for all your help. I should have any probs. with that comression set at around 32-34 degrees total timing I shouldn't have any problems should I. Thanks again for everyones help.