Sho/ho?
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
From: Grand Terrace, CA
Car: 88 Camaro
Engine: 310 LG4
Transmission: 700R4 w/2200 stall
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Sho/ho?
Well, I got my 305 to the engine shop, and i'll get it back as a short block soon. They said it looks like a better 305 than most because of the SHO version? What is SHO and HO i've seen it around the boards befgore but dont know what it means.
Thanks.
Thanks.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,552
Likes: 5
From: New Jersey
Car: 86 Corvette, 89 IROC, 1999 TA
Engine: 350, 350, LS1
Transmission: 700r4, 700r4, T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.07, 373, 4.10
never heard of an SHO engine unless your talking about a ford taurus.. H.O. stand for High Output.. it was the L69 305 the main differences between the standard LG4 305 and the L69 were the pistons and the cam.. the L69 came with flattop's instead of dished pistons and it came with a more aggressive cam.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
From: Grand Terrace, CA
Car: 88 Camaro
Engine: 310 LG4
Transmission: 700R4 w/2200 stall
Axle/Gears: 3.42
interesting. I looked for SHO on google, and only found SHO. Maybe he meant HO? I dont know about that though, cause it didnt have flat top pistons, they had "notches" cut in them on the surface.
Thanks.
Thanks.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,852
Likes: 1
From: Valley of the Sun
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: Al LT1 headed LG4 305
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi with spacer
Thats what flat tops are, they have small valve relief measuring about 6cc's. The only thing that is a SHO is a taurus. H.O. is what came in some Camaros. If you have an L69 you have a H.O.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
From: Grand Terrace, CA
Car: 88 Camaro
Engine: 310 LG4
Transmission: 700R4 w/2200 stall
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Originally posted by Vader
An '85 Z-28 could have had either a LB9 305 TPI, or the L69 305 Quadrajet engine - buyers' choice.
An '85 Z-28 could have had either a LB9 305 TPI, or the L69 305 Quadrajet engine - buyers' choice.
Trending Topics
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 45
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
I don't think so. The LG4 was also available in Z28's.
I also think he's blowing smoke. There is absolutely nothing about HO vs. non-HO in '85 that would make the long block "better".
Because...
... the '85 LG4 should have had flat tops with 4 valve reliefs, just like the L69. If it didn't, it may have been rebuilt before already (like the '87 LB9 that I picked up that was supposed to be "original" but had dished .040"-over pistons in it). That may be why it looked "better" to the machine shop.
What made the HO was the cam and what was bolted onto the long-block (exhaust, air cleaner, etc.).
I also think he's blowing smoke. There is absolutely nothing about HO vs. non-HO in '85 that would make the long block "better".
Because...
... the '85 LG4 should have had flat tops with 4 valve reliefs, just like the L69. If it didn't, it may have been rebuilt before already (like the '87 LB9 that I picked up that was supposed to be "original" but had dished .040"-over pistons in it). That may be why it looked "better" to the machine shop.
What made the HO was the cam and what was bolted onto the long-block (exhaust, air cleaner, etc.).
Supreme Member

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
From: Pueblo Co
Car: 1989 C4
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 307
Guess it really doesent matter, a turd in gift wrap is still a turd.
Nothing special except the pistons were better and the rods were stronger but then Ive seen more L69 rods take a peek at the underside of the car then LG4 rods.
Ive still not seen any exh manifold difference just the larger Y pipe EM outlets apear to be the same size.

Nothing special except the pistons were better and the rods were stronger but then Ive seen more L69 rods take a peek at the underside of the car then LG4 rods.
Ive still not seen any exh manifold difference just the larger Y pipe EM outlets apear to be the same size.
Last edited by SSC; Jun 1, 2004 at 07:05 PM.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 45
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Hmmm, forgot about the rods. Supposedly L69's got better rods, but again I'd guess only in '83 & '84. In '85, the longblocks became identical (except the cam), and production beancounters hate differences between similar product lines.
But, maybe L69's did always get the better rods. It's been almost 20 years since they made one, proving it one way or the other would be difficult now.
However (and there's always a "however" in life);
You're only talking about a little higher strength in high-RPM situations. Since LG4's don't do high RPMs, at least not on their own (you can over down-shift and get them to do high RPMs), no biggie. Besides, it's more often the rod bolts rather than the rod itself that lets go.
Mine haven't cut loose yet after several excursions to 6300 RPMs.
But, maybe L69's did always get the better rods. It's been almost 20 years since they made one, proving it one way or the other would be difficult now.
However (and there's always a "however" in life);
You're only talking about a little higher strength in high-RPM situations. Since LG4's don't do high RPMs, at least not on their own (you can over down-shift and get them to do high RPMs), no biggie. Besides, it's more often the rod bolts rather than the rod itself that lets go.
Mine haven't cut loose yet after several excursions to 6300 RPMs.







