Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

edelbrock torquer?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 3, 2004 | 07:51 PM
  #1  
MIG-29's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Car: 1987 Camaro
Engine: 1986 350
Transmission: T-5 NWC
edelbrock torquer?

hi guys, its been a while
a friend of mine has a manifold edelbrock torquer for sale, he's using it on his pre-86 block (actually 327) carburated.
i'm thinking to upgrade my 350 from stock aluminium manifold to that torquer manifold, i'd like your oppinion about that manifold, is it better than my stock manifold? would you recomend it?
thanks to all.
Fernando.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2004 | 08:12 PM
  #2  
ME Leigh's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,852
Likes: 1
From: Valley of the Sun
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: Al LT1 headed LG4 305
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi with spacer
It is really old technology, it's not really worth putting it on. It will probably hurt performance, and gain maybe a little above 5000rpm.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2004 | 09:56 PM
  #3  
Stekman's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,803
Likes: 2
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Car: Z28
Engine: Sb2.2 406
Transmission: Jerico 4 speed
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" 3.60
Keep in mind that that the Torquer is a single plane intake. With the cam that you listed in your sig, a standard Performer would mst likely be better suited for your engine.

As to the actual quality of the intake itself, some will say its a crappy intake, others (a select few) will say its not that bad. As ME Leigh stated, its an older design. Since its time, runner design has come a long way. Its not even the best in terms of single planes. Like other single planes, it will give a tad on the top end, at the expense of low end torque. It ranks up there with the Weiand X-Celerator intake. Match the intakes 'suggested' RPM to the cam. And the cam in your sig doesnt look anything like a single plane intake-type cam. I'd pass on it.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2004 | 10:25 PM
  #4  
Air_Adam's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
If you got a cam that will work with its 2500-6500 rpm range and a square-bore (Holley, etc) carb, then its a really nice, streetable single plane. My dad had one on his '73 Z28 and he loved it

Its now waiting to be installed in my '83 when I have a carb for it.

Last edited by Air_Adam; Jun 3, 2004 at 10:27 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2004 | 07:14 AM
  #5  
MIG-29's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Car: 1987 Camaro
Engine: 1986 350
Transmission: T-5 NWC
thanks guys

then...
the desition is taken, i will not get it, that's it
i'll try the performer or performer RPM (for my cam i think better just performer)
thanks a million guys.
Fernando.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2004 | 11:50 AM
  #6  
ME Leigh's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,852
Likes: 1
From: Valley of the Sun
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: Al LT1 headed LG4 305
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi with spacer
I'd get a performer RPM. It will work fine for now and you will have room for improvement latter.

FYI the performer is a stock replacement intake manifold.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pac J
Tech / General Engine
3
May 17, 2020 10:44 AM
armybyrd
Carburetors
3
Oct 20, 2015 03:57 AM
efiguy
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
Sep 27, 2015 01:30 PM
Night rider327
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
Sep 25, 2015 04:47 AM
TexasMaro
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
2
Sep 15, 2015 06:50 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:48 AM.