Cam question
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Southern Maryland
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 350
Transmission: Bowtie Overdrives 700R4
Cam question
Hi everyone, I've been reading for a long time but this is my first post. I have a question about a cam that I found in the back of the garage. It is a Comp Cams Xtreme energy cam, part # 12-246-3. Here are the specs from the website...
Intake Exhaust
Valve Adjustment 0 0
Gross Valve Lift 0.487 0.49
Duration At 0.006 Tappet Lift 274 286
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Valve Timing At 0.006
Open Close
Intake 31 63
Exhaust 77 29
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
These Specs Are For The Cam Installed At 106 Intake CL
Intake Exhaust
Duration At 0.05 230 236
Lobe Lift 0.325 0.327
Lobe Separation 110
I am wondering how compatible this cam is with TPI? I am also looking into an LT1 intake conversion, would this cam work with an LT1 intake? I guess I should mention that I have Sportsman II heads and headers.
Intake Exhaust
Valve Adjustment 0 0
Gross Valve Lift 0.487 0.49
Duration At 0.006 Tappet Lift 274 286
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Valve Timing At 0.006
Open Close
Intake 31 63
Exhaust 77 29
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
These Specs Are For The Cam Installed At 106 Intake CL
Intake Exhaust
Duration At 0.05 230 236
Lobe Lift 0.325 0.327
Lobe Separation 110
I am wondering how compatible this cam is with TPI? I am also looking into an LT1 intake conversion, would this cam work with an LT1 intake? I guess I should mention that I have Sportsman II heads and headers.
Last edited by 357T/A; Jul 7, 2004 at 04:10 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
It is not even remotely dimly slightly compatible with TPI. It is altogether too much cam to begine with, because it moves the power band up beyond that of the intake; and it is fuel injection hostile besides, because of the low and unsteady vacuum that it will produce.
It runs like a scalded dog in the right motor though. I had it in a 400 with a good set of heads and a big Holley carb on it, it was excellent.
For TPI, you don't want any more than about 220° of intake duration; and if you have that much intake duration, the lobe separation needs to be at least 114°.
If this is for a 350 with a flat tappet cam, look at the XE262-14. Not the regular XE262 which is on 110° lobe separation, but the -14, which is on 114°.
The XE274 would work a whole lot better with the LT1 intake, which doesn't have the acoustic tuning effect and the 3600 RPM peak torque and nothing beyond 4500 that the TPI design forces; although, getting the right engine tune would be a chore. But at WOT it should scream.
It runs like a scalded dog in the right motor though. I had it in a 400 with a good set of heads and a big Holley carb on it, it was excellent.
For TPI, you don't want any more than about 220° of intake duration; and if you have that much intake duration, the lobe separation needs to be at least 114°.
If this is for a 350 with a flat tappet cam, look at the XE262-14. Not the regular XE262 which is on 110° lobe separation, but the -14, which is on 114°.
The XE274 would work a whole lot better with the LT1 intake, which doesn't have the acoustic tuning effect and the 3600 RPM peak torque and nothing beyond 4500 that the TPI design forces; although, getting the right engine tune would be a chore. But at WOT it should scream.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





