Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Is there a 5.8L Camaro?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 7, 2004 | 06:51 PM
  #1  
surfschepp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Is there a 5.8L Camaro?

He owns a 88 Sport Coupe that came with a 305 and decided to swap it out for something a little bigger. Here's the info. I got from him:
i just put a GM 5.8 in it......not ford 5.8, not GM 5.7, a GM 5.8L.........i cannot find ANY info on this engine.....all i know is it is all cast iron, 2 bolt main and has a Q jet on it (but no reason to assume it came with a Q jet), i got it from an 87 Z28 in a junkyard, but again no reason to think it is a facotyr motor because the only 350 available in an 87 Z was an L98

If you guys got any info on this motor or anything else please let me know. Or if you know of any links to this motor.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2004 | 06:53 PM
  #2  
surfschepp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Here's a picture:
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2004 | 06:56 PM
  #3  
TraviZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 3
From: Woodland, CA
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
typo? :P
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2004 | 06:56 PM
  #4  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Exactly what that "GM 5.8 LG" means, I can't say I know.

There should be a full casting number nearby that. Post a pic of that.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2004 | 06:57 PM
  #5  
surfschepp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
That's kind of our think if it was some production error. Never heard of a factory 5.8L that wasn't Ford.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2004 | 07:13 PM
  #6  
89RsPower!'s Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,552
Likes: 5
From: New Jersey
Car: 86 Corvette, 89 IROC, 1999 TA
Engine: 350, 350, LS1
Transmission: 700r4, 700r4, T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.07, 373, 4.10
wow can't say I've ever heard of a 5.8 made by chevy... intresting.. whats the casting number??? How about the partial vin and suffix code off the lil ledge in front of the pass side head by the corner of the water pump?
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2004 | 07:13 PM
  #7  
surfschepp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Originally posted by five7kid
Exactly what that "GM 5.8 LG" means, I can't say I know.

There should be a full casting number nearby that. Post a pic of that.
It is 14093627 which is the 5.0 if I am correct but that doesn't explain it clearly saying 5.8L
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2004 | 07:30 PM
  #8  
88GTAbandit's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Lemont, IL
Car: 1988 pontiac Trans Am GTA
Engine: DFI,Single Plane,200cc Dart I.E,355
Transmission: Th400 PTC converter
Axle/Gears: Stock Ausie 9 bolt w/3.45 gears
could it be a 355 ci like the older camaros cam with...donno if 5.8 is that or not..just a guess
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2004 | 07:51 PM
  #9  
SSC's Avatar
SSC
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
From: Pueblo Co
Car: 1989 C4
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 307
Thats a casting fubar its a 5.0, the stamp is just a tad sloppy. You can inhance in PS and clearly see the mistake in the mark. BTW Ive actually seen them jacked up like that in real life.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2004 | 08:03 PM
  #10  
TraviZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 3
From: Woodland, CA
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
shot down!

what was thought to be a 350+ turns out to be a 305
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2004 | 12:52 AM
  #11  
DuronClocker's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 2
From: Elgin, IL
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
Yeah, if you look at how the "8" is, you can clearly see it is but a "0". It takes a second to look at it for you to realize it, but it is in fact a 5.0L. The sides of the numbers should be as straight at that L is next to it, and if you look for straight lines on the sides of the "8", you can see them and then see them meet at the top to form a zero. Sorry bud.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2004 | 09:09 AM
  #12  
ljnowell's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,935
Likes: 0
could it be a 355 ci like the older camaros cam with...donno if 5.8 is that or not..just a guess
A 355 is a 350 .30 over. No camaro came with a rebuilt 350, just new ones.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2004 | 09:12 AM
  #13  
RB83L69's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
Older Camaros didn't come with a "355". There basically is no such thing. There are .030" over-bored 350s, which happen to have about 355 CI; but they're not "355"s, they're .030" over 350s. And cars don't come with over-bored motors anyway, and never have. So if a Camaro, or any other Chevy, came with a 350, then it was a 350 when it was new; 4.000" bore x 3.48" stroke.

That "5.8" number is mostly meaningless. Seems like more often than not, 305s happen to have "5.0" on them, and 350s happen to have "5.7", but not always. It cannot be used as a reliable indicator of engine displacement. Ignore it, it is of no consequence.

Always use the casting number to determine a block's bore.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2004 | 09:26 AM
  #14  
Mr_Metal's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From: Cheyenne, WY
Car: '89 Camaro RS
Engine: LB8 V6 MFI
Transmission: T-5 5-speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Originally posted by RB83L69
Older Camaros didn't come with a "355". There basically is no such thing. There are .030" over-bored 350s, which happen to have about 355 CI; but they're not "355"s, they're .030" over 350s. And cars don't come with over-bored motors anyway, and never have. So if a Camaro, or any other Chevy, came with a 350, then it was a 350 when it was new; 4.000" bore x 3.48" stroke.

That "5.8" number is mostly meaningless. Seems like more often than not, 305s happen to have "5.0" on them, and 350s happen to have "5.7", but not always. It cannot be used as a reliable indicator of engine displacement. Ignore it, it is of no consequence.

Always use the casting number to determine a block's bore.

What he said !!

To the bonus round...
In which year(s) did Chevrolet manufacture the 302 cid engine for the Camaro ?
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2004 | 09:37 AM
  #15  
RB83L69's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
67-69
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2004 | 10:16 AM
  #16  
Mr_Metal's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From: Cheyenne, WY
Car: '89 Camaro RS
Engine: LB8 V6 MFI
Transmission: T-5 5-speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
*ding* *ding* *ding*... We have a winner !!

Yessir, the 302 was created by installing a short-stroke 283cid crank in a 327cid block, resulting in 302ci... only '67-'69 Z28s got the 302.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2004 | 10:38 AM
  #17  
Airpak's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Camaro Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt auburn posi 3.73
whats the easiest way to check the casting number on an engine thats still in the car? and where exactly will it be on the engine?

uh nvm.. got it

Last edited by Airpak; Jul 8, 2004 at 10:51 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2004 | 11:15 AM
  #18  
ljnowell's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,935
Likes: 0
Yessir, the 302 was created by installing a short-stroke 283cid crank in a 327cid block, resulting in 302ci... only '67-'69 Z28s got the 302.
or it could be in a 350 block
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2004 | 11:25 AM
  #19  
ede's Avatar
ede
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 14,811
Likes: 1
From: Jackson County
Originally posted by ljnowell
or it could be in a 350 block
there was no 350 block the 350 and 302 came from the 327 block wich all came from the 265 block
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2004 | 11:32 AM
  #20  
ljnowell's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,935
Likes: 0
Thats exactly the point that I was trying to make, ede. When it was stated a 327 block with a 283 crank, i thought I would point out that the block is shared amongst other displacements.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2004 | 02:50 PM
  #21  
jmd's Avatar
jmd
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,519
Likes: 91
From: Aridzona
Car: `86 SS / `87 SS
Engine: L69 w/ TPI on top / 305 4bbl
Transmission: `95 T56 \ `88 200-4R
Originally posted by five7kid
Exactly what that "GM 5.8 LG" means, I can't say I know.
It would be for 5.8 Liters Gasoline. Well, 5.0 Liters Gasoline in this case.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frozer!!!
Camaros for Sale
35
Jan 19, 2024 04:55 PM
Vintageracer
Camaros for Sale
12
Jan 10, 2020 05:33 PM
84z96L31vortec
Tech / General Engine
7
Aug 20, 2017 12:16 AM
BADNBLK
Auto Detailing and Appearance
15
Nov 16, 2016 09:12 AM
porkenstein
Convertibles
15
Aug 31, 2015 12:54 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:30 PM.