Is there a 5.8L Camaro?
Is there a 5.8L Camaro?
He owns a 88 Sport Coupe that came with a 305 and decided to swap it out for something a little bigger. Here's the info. I got from him:
i just put a GM 5.8 in it......not ford 5.8, not GM 5.7, a GM 5.8L.........i cannot find ANY info on this engine.....all i know is it is all cast iron, 2 bolt main and has a Q jet on it (but no reason to assume it came with a Q jet), i got it from an 87 Z28 in a junkyard, but again no reason to think it is a facotyr motor because the only 350 available in an 87 Z was an L98
If you guys got any info on this motor or anything else please let me know. Or if you know of any links to this motor.
i just put a GM 5.8 in it......not ford 5.8, not GM 5.7, a GM 5.8L.........i cannot find ANY info on this engine.....all i know is it is all cast iron, 2 bolt main and has a Q jet on it (but no reason to assume it came with a Q jet), i got it from an 87 Z28 in a junkyard, but again no reason to think it is a facotyr motor because the only 350 available in an 87 Z was an L98
If you guys got any info on this motor or anything else please let me know. Or if you know of any links to this motor.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Exactly what that "GM 5.8 LG" means, I can't say I know.
There should be a full casting number nearby that. Post a pic of that.
There should be a full casting number nearby that. Post a pic of that.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,552
Likes: 5
From: New Jersey
Car: 86 Corvette, 89 IROC, 1999 TA
Engine: 350, 350, LS1
Transmission: 700r4, 700r4, T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.07, 373, 4.10
wow can't say I've ever heard of a 5.8 made by chevy... intresting.. whats the casting number??? How about the partial vin and suffix code off the lil ledge in front of the pass side head by the corner of the water pump?
Originally posted by five7kid
Exactly what that "GM 5.8 LG" means, I can't say I know.
There should be a full casting number nearby that. Post a pic of that.
Exactly what that "GM 5.8 LG" means, I can't say I know.
There should be a full casting number nearby that. Post a pic of that.
Trending Topics
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Lemont, IL
Car: 1988 pontiac Trans Am GTA
Engine: DFI,Single Plane,200cc Dart I.E,355
Transmission: Th400 PTC converter
Axle/Gears: Stock Ausie 9 bolt w/3.45 gears
could it be a 355 ci like the older camaros cam with...donno if 5.8 is that or not..just a guess
Supreme Member

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
From: Pueblo Co
Car: 1989 C4
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 307
Thats a casting fubar its a 5.0, the stamp is just a tad sloppy. You can inhance in PS and clearly see the mistake in the mark. BTW Ive actually seen them jacked up like that in real life.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 2
From: Elgin, IL
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
Yeah, if you look at how the "8" is, you can clearly see it is but a "0". It takes a second to look at it for you to realize it, but it is in fact a 5.0L. The sides of the numbers should be as straight at that L is next to it, and if you look for straight lines on the sides of the "8", you can see them and then see them meet at the top to form a zero. Sorry bud.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
Older Camaros didn't come with a "355". There basically is no such thing. There are .030" over-bored 350s, which happen to have about 355 CI; but they're not "355"s, they're .030" over 350s. And cars don't come with over-bored motors anyway, and never have. So if a Camaro, or any other Chevy, came with a 350, then it was a 350 when it was new; 4.000" bore x 3.48" stroke.
That "5.8" number is mostly meaningless. Seems like more often than not, 305s happen to have "5.0" on them, and 350s happen to have "5.7", but not always. It cannot be used as a reliable indicator of engine displacement. Ignore it, it is of no consequence.
Always use the casting number to determine a block's bore.
That "5.8" number is mostly meaningless. Seems like more often than not, 305s happen to have "5.0" on them, and 350s happen to have "5.7", but not always. It cannot be used as a reliable indicator of engine displacement. Ignore it, it is of no consequence.
Always use the casting number to determine a block's bore.
Member

Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From: Cheyenne, WY
Car: '89 Camaro RS
Engine: LB8 V6 MFI
Transmission: T-5 5-speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Originally posted by RB83L69
Older Camaros didn't come with a "355". There basically is no such thing. There are .030" over-bored 350s, which happen to have about 355 CI; but they're not "355"s, they're .030" over 350s. And cars don't come with over-bored motors anyway, and never have. So if a Camaro, or any other Chevy, came with a 350, then it was a 350 when it was new; 4.000" bore x 3.48" stroke.
That "5.8" number is mostly meaningless. Seems like more often than not, 305s happen to have "5.0" on them, and 350s happen to have "5.7", but not always. It cannot be used as a reliable indicator of engine displacement. Ignore it, it is of no consequence.
Always use the casting number to determine a block's bore.
Older Camaros didn't come with a "355". There basically is no such thing. There are .030" over-bored 350s, which happen to have about 355 CI; but they're not "355"s, they're .030" over 350s. And cars don't come with over-bored motors anyway, and never have. So if a Camaro, or any other Chevy, came with a 350, then it was a 350 when it was new; 4.000" bore x 3.48" stroke.
That "5.8" number is mostly meaningless. Seems like more often than not, 305s happen to have "5.0" on them, and 350s happen to have "5.7", but not always. It cannot be used as a reliable indicator of engine displacement. Ignore it, it is of no consequence.
Always use the casting number to determine a block's bore.
What he said !!
To the bonus round...
In which year(s) did Chevrolet manufacture the 302 cid engine for the Camaro ?
Member

Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From: Cheyenne, WY
Car: '89 Camaro RS
Engine: LB8 V6 MFI
Transmission: T-5 5-speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
*ding* *ding* *ding*... We have a winner !!
Yessir, the 302 was created by installing a short-stroke 283cid crank in a 327cid block, resulting in 302ci... only '67-'69 Z28s got the 302.
Yessir, the 302 was created by installing a short-stroke 283cid crank in a 327cid block, resulting in 302ci... only '67-'69 Z28s got the 302.
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Camaro Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt auburn posi 3.73
whats the easiest way to check the casting number on an engine thats still in the car? and where exactly will it be on the engine?
uh nvm.. got it
uh nvm.. got it
Last edited by Airpak; Jul 8, 2004 at 10:51 AM.
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,519
Likes: 91
From: Aridzona
Car: `86 SS / `87 SS
Engine: L69 w/ TPI on top / 305 4bbl
Transmission: `95 T56 \ `88 200-4R
Originally posted by five7kid
Exactly what that "GM 5.8 LG" means, I can't say I know.
Exactly what that "GM 5.8 LG" means, I can't say I know.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
84z96L31vortec
Tech / General Engine
7
Aug 20, 2017 12:16 AM









