420 cid tpi ?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Covington, WA
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L
Transmission: 700R4
420 cid tpi ?
O.k. I'm new to this site and I was hoping that I could get some feed back from all the people here. I'm currently building a 420 cid sbc for my 89 IROC-Z and the thing is I want it to look as stock as possible. I like the look of the factory TPI and was hoping that maybe with SLP runners that are fully siamesed and a good base manifold that I could have an engine that'll run realy strong on the street and still look near stock. I think that the LTR TPI set up will choke the engine to much so the other option is a HSR and I just wanted to know what every one elses opinion is. Thanks alot guys!
#2
Supreme Member
Welcome to thirdgen.org!!!
Forget the looks of a TPI if you wanty to feed the beast. You'l have to consider aftermarket intakes...you have a lot of cubes to work with, and the stock looking setups will just choke ya out.
Do you have to stay CARB legal or not?
Forget the looks of a TPI if you wanty to feed the beast. You'l have to consider aftermarket intakes...you have a lot of cubes to work with, and the stock looking setups will just choke ya out.
Do you have to stay CARB legal or not?
#3
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Renton, WA
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1985 Camaro, 1986 Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L carbed and 5.0L TPI
Transmission: TH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 and 3.27 posi
Originally posted by 8Mike9
Do you have to stay CARB legal or not?
Do you have to stay CARB legal or not?
BTW Idle, check out the link in my sig to hook up with other NW 3rdgen fanatics.
#4
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Valley of the Sun
Posts: 3,852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: Al LT1 headed LG4 305
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi with spacer
Yeah you don't want tpi, that will kill all the potential of your cubes. If i were you i would seriously consider converting to carburetor. Your not gonna make any power at all with something that looks stock.
#6
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Covington, WA
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L
Transmission: 700R4
yeah I thought that the TPI would choke the motor quite a bit, I want to try and keep my power band around 5500 rpm for a good street motor. Money isn't really a concern, so I was thinking of going with the SR, but I think if I went with a HSR on that big of a motor that I could pull of 6000 rpm at my hp peak. The motor will sit in front of a 700r4 and I want to try to keep the power band around were the transmission will operate. I've seen the LPE 420's dyno numbers with the SR and both of the motors are near ideal for what I want.
#7
The motor will sit in front of a 700r4 and I want to try to keep the power band around were the transmission will operate
Trending Topics
#8
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Covington, WA
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L
Transmission: 700R4
no, what I meant about having a automatic, is that the auto when in drive shifts right around 5000 rpm at WOT and 4700 rpm under normal exceleration. I want the power band of the motor to match where the trany likes to shift.
#9
Supreme Member
Originally posted by Idle_wild
no, what I meant about having a automatic, is that the auto when in drive shifts right around 5000 rpm at WOT and 4700 rpm under normal exceleration. I want the power band of the motor to match where the trany likes to shift.
no, what I meant about having a automatic, is that the auto when in drive shifts right around 5000 rpm at WOT and 4700 rpm under normal exceleration. I want the power band of the motor to match where the trany likes to shift.
#10
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
Yes, TPI would be a mistake to put on something that big IMO. It just can't feed that many inches. TPI shouldn't have even been used on the 350 I think, because even on that its pretty restrictive.
On the plus side though, you'd make enough torque with a 420 TPI setup to pull your house outta the ground
On the plus side though, you'd make enough torque with a 420 TPI setup to pull your house outta the ground
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hectre13
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
6
09-08-2015 03:38 PM
Sanjay
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
08-12-2015 03:41 PM