Max Compression I Should Run
Max Compression I Should Run
K well ill be getting some afr 210s probably, might be 220s but anywayz. Also gonna get a solid roller cam with these specs
Operating Range: 4500-7500 RPM
Duration Advertised: 313° Intake / 322° Exhaust
Duration @ .050'' Lift: 276° Intake / 284° Exhaust
Valve Lift w/1.5 Rockers: .660'' Intake / .630'' Exhaust
Valve Setting: .026'' Intake / .028'' Exhaust
Lobe Separation Angle: 106°
Going into a 400 sbc. Now I wanted to know whats pretty much the highest (while still leaving slight room for error) amount of compression I should run with out fear of detonatation. Needs to be 91 octane proof since thats the highest in dumb ol Cali. But ya. Quench will HOPEFULLY around .040 but might be around .060 depending on head gasket size. Um pistons will be some forged flat tops well c what in the future. But anywayz wanted to know what you guys think i should run max compression with out fear of detonation on 91 octane. THanks. Oh also just by curiousity what do you think is the lowest I should go if i some how just feel in the distant future I should want to throw a blower/turbo on it. Thanks guys appreciate it.
Operating Range: 4500-7500 RPM
Duration Advertised: 313° Intake / 322° Exhaust
Duration @ .050'' Lift: 276° Intake / 284° Exhaust
Valve Lift w/1.5 Rockers: .660'' Intake / .630'' Exhaust
Valve Setting: .026'' Intake / .028'' Exhaust
Lobe Separation Angle: 106°
Going into a 400 sbc. Now I wanted to know whats pretty much the highest (while still leaving slight room for error) amount of compression I should run with out fear of detonatation. Needs to be 91 octane proof since thats the highest in dumb ol Cali. But ya. Quench will HOPEFULLY around .040 but might be around .060 depending on head gasket size. Um pistons will be some forged flat tops well c what in the future. But anywayz wanted to know what you guys think i should run max compression with out fear of detonation on 91 octane. THanks. Oh also just by curiousity what do you think is the lowest I should go if i some how just feel in the distant future I should want to throw a blower/turbo on it. Thanks guys appreciate it.
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 818
Likes: 0
From: Dixon IL
Car: 2013 Challenger RT
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 6 spd
Axle/Gears: 3:92
You need to keep the quench as close to .040 as possible to reduce ping I am told.
That is quite a radical cam for CA, you just racing it? Or is it a cruiser too? I would think that at least 10:1 would be OK with that cam, 91 octain, and an octain booster. I wouldn't think that cam would want much less.
Just my opinion though.
That is quite a radical cam for CA, you just racing it? Or is it a cruiser too? I would think that at least 10:1 would be OK with that cam, 91 octain, and an octain booster. I wouldn't think that cam would want much less.
Just my opinion though.
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 818
Likes: 0
From: Dixon IL
Car: 2013 Challenger RT
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 6 spd
Axle/Gears: 3:92
IMO it would be 10:1.
A friend of mine explained to me that 10:1 will work on pump gas as long as quench is at optimal point, which he stated was .039. He has a 10:1 406 that is a cruiser and runs on pump gas just fine. However another friend of mine built a 9.5 to one 350 without paying attention to what the quench was, we figured it was around .060, and his was a daily driver. He had problems with the motor pinging. Who knows, it was 2 different motors, and two different gas pumps, with two different drivers.
But 10:1 can be fine on 91 octain.
A friend of mine explained to me that 10:1 will work on pump gas as long as quench is at optimal point, which he stated was .039. He has a 10:1 406 that is a cruiser and runs on pump gas just fine. However another friend of mine built a 9.5 to one 350 without paying attention to what the quench was, we figured it was around .060, and his was a daily driver. He had problems with the motor pinging. Who knows, it was 2 different motors, and two different gas pumps, with two different drivers.
But 10:1 can be fine on 91 octain.
I would not go too low on compression. That cam will bleed off some cylinder pressure. With those parts you are packing, and your not concerned with cruising, only racing, I would forget the 91 octane, go with higher compression, and give that animal some REAL FUEL! IMO, that cam is not big for a 400. My 434 has a "small" solid roller, 236/242@.050, and thats with 11.2 compression, EFI, and aluminum heads. It runs on pump gas. You plan on running aluminum heads, that alone will allow you to run one point higher C/R than steel heads. If you are serious about the turbo/blower mod., then go with some 8:1 blower pistons,and cam with a wider LSA, that would be forced induction friendly. Nows the time to decide all these mods. Sounds like a great combination you want to build there. Good luck..
Trending Topics
Originally posted by my3rdgen
IMO it would be 10:1.
A friend of mine explained to me that 10:1 will work on pump gas as long as quench is at optimal point, which he stated was .039. He has a 10:1 406 that is a cruiser and runs on pump gas just fine. However another friend of mine built a 9.5 to one 350 without paying attention to what the quench was, we figured it was around .060, and his was a daily driver. He had problems with the motor pinging. Who knows, it was 2 different motors, and two different gas pumps, with two different drivers.
But 10:1 can be fine on 91 octain.
IMO it would be 10:1.
A friend of mine explained to me that 10:1 will work on pump gas as long as quench is at optimal point, which he stated was .039. He has a 10:1 406 that is a cruiser and runs on pump gas just fine. However another friend of mine built a 9.5 to one 350 without paying attention to what the quench was, we figured it was around .060, and his was a daily driver. He had problems with the motor pinging. Who knows, it was 2 different motors, and two different gas pumps, with two different drivers.
But 10:1 can be fine on 91 octain.
Originally posted by brutalform
I would not go too low on compression. That cam will bleed off some cylinder pressure. With those parts you are packing, and your not concerned with cruising, only racing, I would forget the 91 octane, go with higher compression, and give that animal some REAL FUEL! IMO, that cam is not big for a 400. My 434 has a "small" solid roller, 236/242@.050, and thats with 11.2 compression, EFI, and aluminum heads. It runs on pump gas. You plan on running aluminum heads, that alone will allow you to run one point higher C/R than steel heads. If you are serious about the turbo/blower mod., then go with some 8:1 blower pistons,and cam with a wider LSA, that would be forced induction friendly. Nows the time to decide all these mods. Sounds like a great combination you want to build there. Good luck..
I would not go too low on compression. That cam will bleed off some cylinder pressure. With those parts you are packing, and your not concerned with cruising, only racing, I would forget the 91 octane, go with higher compression, and give that animal some REAL FUEL! IMO, that cam is not big for a 400. My 434 has a "small" solid roller, 236/242@.050, and thats with 11.2 compression, EFI, and aluminum heads. It runs on pump gas. You plan on running aluminum heads, that alone will allow you to run one point higher C/R than steel heads. If you are serious about the turbo/blower mod., then go with some 8:1 blower pistons,and cam with a wider LSA, that would be forced induction friendly. Nows the time to decide all these mods. Sounds like a great combination you want to build there. Good luck..
so you think 12:1 is do able? The blower/turbo thing would be nice but i really dont have the cash to be doing all these things. I already have the bottle so i might as well just squeeze for now. Maybe if i get some more cash in the future ill change pistons out and get a blower. So 12:1 a go?
Originally posted by brutalform
BTW, I noticed in your profile you are a marine. Hats off to you my friend!!!
BTW, I noticed in your profile you are a marine. Hats off to you my friend!!!
Now just to get my math down ... damn ... i shoulda paid more attention in HS. So anybody got a forumla for me. I did it before on the last motor but I cant remember any more lolol. So lets say the pistons are 10:1 with 64cc chambers how do i figure out what it is with 76cc chambers. Also how do i calculate deck height and head gasket thickness in. Sorry
example; bore 4.125
stroke 3.75
piston reliefs 3.4
deck clearance, lets say a zero deck.
gasket comp. vol. 8.8cc
chambers, 64-68cc
(bore/bore)(bore/bore)x3.1416(or pi) xstrokex16.39(converts cid to cc) =833.38
833.38+3.4+0+8.8+68/3.4+0+8.8+68=913.58/80.2=11.39:1 C/R.
yours will be a little lower, because your chambers are larger. This is an example, just fudge your figures in . Also this did not figure in an overbore. If your engine is bored , lets say 0.30, your bore would be 4.155, in my case .040 over, so 4.165. I used standard 400 bore for the example.
stroke 3.75
piston reliefs 3.4
deck clearance, lets say a zero deck.
gasket comp. vol. 8.8cc
chambers, 64-68cc
(bore/bore)(bore/bore)x3.1416(or pi) xstrokex16.39(converts cid to cc) =833.38
833.38+3.4+0+8.8+68/3.4+0+8.8+68=913.58/80.2=11.39:1 C/R.
yours will be a little lower, because your chambers are larger. This is an example, just fudge your figures in . Also this did not figure in an overbore. If your engine is bored , lets say 0.30, your bore would be 4.155, in my case .040 over, so 4.165. I used standard 400 bore for the example.
Last edited by brutalform; Jan 7, 2005 at 03:08 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 1
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
Originally posted by brutalform
I would go for 11.1 if it were my engine.
I would go for 11.1 if it were my engine.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,852
Likes: 1
From: Valley of the Sun
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: Al LT1 headed LG4 305
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi with spacer
Get a dynamic compression ratio calculator, that cam is gonna need a huge static compression ratio or it will barely run, along with those AL heads. Your gonna need more then 11.5:1 atleast, more like 11.8:1.
I'd research it myself and ask some real engine builders what they would do, not believe some monkey spank of the internet if i was me.
I'd research it myself and ask some real engine builders what they would do, not believe some monkey spank of the internet if i was me.
Originally posted by ME Leigh
Its a good idea to align hone if your installing new caps of mixed them up, but if they are good, they are good. Now if you were building a high horspower endurance motor with the best components then yes not align honing is just stupid. But for a very cheap budget build it is totally unnecessary.
And of course your machinest recommends its, it more money for him.
Its a good idea to align hone if your installing new caps of mixed them up, but if they are good, they are good. Now if you were building a high horspower endurance motor with the best components then yes not align honing is just stupid. But for a very cheap budget build it is totally unnecessary.
And of course your machinest recommends its, it more money for him.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,852
Likes: 1
From: Valley of the Sun
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: Al LT1 headed LG4 305
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi with spacer
I machinist is much different then a race engine builder, come on!
This is a not compression ratio calculation.
Whats your problem? To much monkey spank?
This is a not compression ratio calculation.
Whats your problem? To much monkey spank?
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 1
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
I've seen cams that big streetable in a 400. Thats actually a moderate cam for that many cubes, what the hell are you smoking? This thing ain't going in a 350.-
Originally posted by pasky
I've seen cams that big streetable in a 400. Thats actually a moderate cam for that many cubes, what the hell are you smoking? This thing ain't going in a 350.-
I've seen cams that big streetable in a 400. Thats actually a moderate cam for that many cubes, what the hell are you smoking? This thing ain't going in a 350.-
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,852
Likes: 1
From: Valley of the Sun
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: Al LT1 headed LG4 305
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi with spacer
By "real engine builders" i mean race motor building guys, not your average engine builder, but actually people that build real race motors. There are only a handful of them in the US.
Everybody on here is just guessing (monkey spank) some people say 10:1 some 11:1 some 12:1. Nobody knows that is why you need a dynamic compression ratio calculator and somebody that deals with these kind of motors everday, not just a bunch of backyard mechanics, such as myself and everyone else on here.
Everybody on here is just guessing (monkey spank) some people say 10:1 some 11:1 some 12:1. Nobody knows that is why you need a dynamic compression ratio calculator and somebody that deals with these kind of motors everday, not just a bunch of backyard mechanics, such as myself and everyone else on here.
Last edited by ME Leigh; Jan 7, 2005 at 09:25 PM.
Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Car: 1983 Z28
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by forums_suck
http://kb-silvolite.com/calc.php
http://kb-silvolite.com/calc.php
Just curious on that calculator, the last option where it asks
Intake Closing Point (degrees)
ABDC @ 0.050 lift plus 15 degrees
do I put in the intake lift duration at .050
say im looking at a cam that puts out 260 degrees at .050 and at 15 degrees so put into that box 275?
If i did it all right the top part I chose out said it would put me to 11.017 with a 76cc head, 4cc piston, .039 head gasket, 4.180 gasket bore, 4.155 cylinder bore (.030), .025 deck height (is that standard on 400 blocks as well just curious?) and a 3.75" stroke. Now thats where i want to be at now after i did a lil reseraching. Sounds good right?
For the bottom part like i saidi put a 6" rod and put the degrees in at 275 did i do that right? Says dynamic effective compression ratio of 7.243
If this all sounds good lemme know lil help would be appreciated
Thanks fellas
Intake Closing Point (degrees)
ABDC @ 0.050 lift plus 15 degrees
do I put in the intake lift duration at .050
say im looking at a cam that puts out 260 degrees at .050 and at 15 degrees so put into that box 275?
If i did it all right the top part I chose out said it would put me to 11.017 with a 76cc head, 4cc piston, .039 head gasket, 4.180 gasket bore, 4.155 cylinder bore (.030), .025 deck height (is that standard on 400 blocks as well just curious?) and a 3.75" stroke. Now thats where i want to be at now after i did a lil reseraching. Sounds good right?
For the bottom part like i saidi put a 6" rod and put the degrees in at 275 did i do that right? Says dynamic effective compression ratio of 7.243
If this all sounds good lemme know lil help would be appreciated
Thanks fellas Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Car: 1983 Z28
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
your cam card has the info,check the company's websight of the cam you interested in.It'll tell you what it is than like it says just add 15 to it
Its not the full duration Meleigh is just pulling your cam

Its not the full duration Meleigh is just pulling your cam
Last edited by forums_suck; Jan 8, 2005 at 11:09 AM.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,852
Likes: 1
From: Valley of the Sun
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: Al LT1 headed LG4 305
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi with spacer
Originally posted by forums_suck
your cam card has the info,check the company's websight of the cam you interested in.It'll tell you what it is than like it says just add 15 to it
Its not the full duration Meleigh is just pulling your cam
your cam card has the info,check the company's websight of the cam you interested in.It'll tell you what it is than like it says just add 15 to it

Its not the full duration Meleigh is just pulling your cam
Sorry
Always follow the direction, instructions and the manufacturers sugggestions.
Originally posted by ME Leigh
Wow i was wrong it is timing at .050" lift, thats what i get for not checking the site out first. I have never used any of the crappy online calculator where you +15* duration, that is not even close to being approximate. I always you the real software calculators that use full duration, or the entire time the the valves are open.
Sorry
Always follow the direction, instructions and the manufacturers sugggestions.
Wow i was wrong it is timing at .050" lift, thats what i get for not checking the site out first. I have never used any of the crappy online calculator where you +15* duration, that is not even close to being approximate. I always you the real software calculators that use full duration, or the entire time the the valves are open.
Sorry
Always follow the direction, instructions and the manufacturers sugggestions.
Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Car: 1983 Z28
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by brutalform
Thanks for the address forums_suck. I added it to my favorites.
Thanks for the address forums_suck. I added it to my favorites.
its great for throwing around different combinations specially when ya start playing with the 383 and bigger engines,i noticed ive saved my self from having too much compression or too small a cam.I dont know if its as good as the software ones you buy but if your on a budget like i always am it works great
I like this one:
http://members.uia.net/pkelley2/DynamicCR.html
grumpyvette provides some good info
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...ic+compression
Others:
http://www.rehermorrison.com/techTalk/08.htm
http://www.rbracing-rsr.com/comprAdvHD.htm
http://www.wallaceracing.com/dynamic-cr.php
http://users.erols.com/srweiss/
http://www.performancetrends.com/cr12.htm
http://not2fast.wryday.com/turbo/com...pression.shtml
http://members.uia.net/pkelley2/DynamicCR.html
grumpyvette provides some good info
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...ic+compression
Others:
http://www.rehermorrison.com/techTalk/08.htm
http://www.rbracing-rsr.com/comprAdvHD.htm
http://www.wallaceracing.com/dynamic-cr.php
http://users.erols.com/srweiss/
http://www.performancetrends.com/cr12.htm
http://not2fast.wryday.com/turbo/com...pression.shtml
Hey guys i got my cam commin
here are teh specs
264/272 duration @.050 lift
.692/.692 Lift with 1.6RR
107LSA
Valve timeing
29btdc 55abdc
67bbdc 25atdc
Put it into one of those calculators, says my dynamic compression ratio should be at about 9.62:1 compression with a 3.75" stroke. Might go with a 3.8" stroke and then it would be 9.64 which isnt really a difference. So what do yawll think a go or a no go on 91 octane?
here are teh specs
264/272 duration @.050 lift
.692/.692 Lift with 1.6RR
107LSA
Valve timeing
29btdc 55abdc
67bbdc 25atdc
Put it into one of those calculators, says my dynamic compression ratio should be at about 9.62:1 compression with a 3.75" stroke. Might go with a 3.8" stroke and then it would be 9.64 which isnt really a difference. So what do yawll think a go or a no go on 91 octane?



