Emissions Help
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: COLORADO SPRINGS
Car: 1987 IROC-Z Camaro
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Emissions Help
I live in Colorado and they will soon be removing emissions testing. What emissions equipment can I remove that will add HP and not affect how well it runs. Any info will be helpful.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Really? Where did you hear that? Some counties don't have it, but the front range metro area (Fort Collins to Colorado Springs) is pretty much stuck with it from what I hear.
There isn't much you can remove. A.I.R. and cat are about it. And, A.I.R. removal may affect PROM calibration (not sure if that affects an '87 MAF system).
There isn't much you can remove. A.I.R. and cat are about it. And, A.I.R. removal may affect PROM calibration (not sure if that affects an '87 MAF system).
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
If you can find an on-line version of that article, post a link here.
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Winter park, FL
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: TH700?
emissions
I've never really liked emissions hardware, having said that however, a point to remember is that the engine was built or "tuned" with the emissions in mind. So removing some components may have an adverse effect even though you may gain a slight increase in HP. A better route may be to install compatible after market gear. The only thing I could think of to remove without adversly affecting other engine systems (fuel, ignition, etc.) would be the cat. conv. But I would look elsewhere first to increase HP.
Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: Valparaiso, IN
Car: 91firebird, 2000 camaro
Engine: 305 tbi,K&N, edelbrock intake & 3.8
Transmission: 700R4
you also take off your smog pump...i have emissions where i live only three counties in Indiana have em and i live one darn it.
Trending Topics
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Stoughton
Car: one with wheels
Engine: one with pistons
Transmission: one with gears
I never understood the reasoning behind removing that stuff. Really isn't costing you horsepower, and some of it actually helps the longevity (sp?) of the engine.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: COLORADO SPRINGS
Car: 1987 IROC-Z Camaro
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Based on everything I've heard the more emissions equipment you take off the more HP you gain. Cats, smogpumps and all the air filtration tubing that is on there is robbing Hp I thought. I guess thats why I started this thread to get all the info possible.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
There's very little truth to that. In the 2000 racing season, I started off with a basically stock LG4 (larger L98 cat-back about the only mod). After I fixed a bad fuel pump, I was able to start collecting data on what changes improved performance and what didn't. Emptying the trunk made a difference, removing the non-functional AC equipment made a difference - both of those because of weight. An open element air cleaner helped, because the stock single-snorkel LG4 air cleaner is very restrictive - that's an emissions item because of the thermovac. The open element actually ran worse on the street, especially when the engine was cold or hot.
One week I thought I'd take the belt off the A.I.R. pump and see what happened. No difference in times (run to run variation greater than w/ or w/o the pump). Well, there was one difference - when I went to put the belt back on a couple of weeks later, the pump was seized up. Removing all of the A.I.R. equipment will save a few pounds, but not make as much difference as a 10 degree air temp swing.
Removing the cat doesn't make much difference, because the real restrictions are before and after the cat (on a stock exhaust).
All in all, the real differences come when you make real changes: Exhaust upgrades (headers, especially), cam upgrade, head porting, cool air inlet, converter stall increase, gear ratio change, traction improvements, etc.
One week I thought I'd take the belt off the A.I.R. pump and see what happened. No difference in times (run to run variation greater than w/ or w/o the pump). Well, there was one difference - when I went to put the belt back on a couple of weeks later, the pump was seized up. Removing all of the A.I.R. equipment will save a few pounds, but not make as much difference as a 10 degree air temp swing.
Removing the cat doesn't make much difference, because the real restrictions are before and after the cat (on a stock exhaust).
All in all, the real differences come when you make real changes: Exhaust upgrades (headers, especially), cam upgrade, head porting, cool air inlet, converter stall increase, gear ratio change, traction improvements, etc.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: COLORADO SPRINGS
Car: 1987 IROC-Z Camaro
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Very helpful info, thanks to all that replied. I guess I have another question as far at the cat goes. Even if removing it doesnt make much difference performance wise, does taking it off make it sound better?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
3
Dec 10, 2019 07:07 PM






