305 vortec heads
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Car: 1987 C10
Engine: 5.7L TBI
Transmission: 700R4
305 vortec heads
I have a set of 305 vortec heads they have 58cc chambers but they have a smaller intake valve than the L31s. Do you guys think if after some porting will they flow close to some untouched L31s? I want to port and polish them for my truck because I'm thinking that they will work way better than the stock swirl ports and I don't want to live heads just sitting there. Another question, What will my compression be on the original 350?
Welcome Aboard!
You should be able to safely enlarge the valve seats as long as you pay attention to valve rim shrouding. You may have to cut the chambers around the valves to accomodate them and allow perimeter flow. If the Vortec castings are prepared as the LT1 iron castings (as is reported) there should be more than adequate hardened depth of the exhaust seats to allow 1.60 valves.
Of course they'll flow better than swirlie heads. And the compression will depend largely upon the pistons installed. Are they flat or dished?
You should be able to safely enlarge the valve seats as long as you pay attention to valve rim shrouding. You may have to cut the chambers around the valves to accomodate them and allow perimeter flow. If the Vortec castings are prepared as the LT1 iron castings (as is reported) there should be more than adequate hardened depth of the exhaust seats to allow 1.60 valves.
Of course they'll flow better than swirlie heads. And the compression will depend largely upon the pistons installed. Are they flat or dished?
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
From: Carson City Nevada
Car: 86 coupe
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.27 posi
hate to burst your bubble,but vortec heads never came on a 305,nor did they come in 58cc chamber size.you have 305 centerbolt heads.vortec heads only have 8 intake bolts and have a taller than normal intake port.get a casting # from under the valve cover and post it here,and i'll tell you exactly what they are.
Eric B
Eric B
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,403
Likes: 492
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Vortec heads did come on the 305s. Think 1996-2002 express with the 5.0 vortec. They are 58 cc chamber, 1.84" intake valves, 1.5" exhaust and flow like 229 cfm intake and roughly the same as the 350 vortecs on the exhaust.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Car: 1987 C10
Engine: 5.7L TBI
Transmission: 700R4
But would the intake flow well with some porting? It doesn't bother me if it flows less as long there isn't much difference from an unported L31. What the compression be? I'm thinking about 9.8:1 it is the original L05 and yes the heads are vortec.
Last edited by A. Tellez; Apr 25, 2005 at 01:00 AM.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,852
Likes: 1
From: Valley of the Sun
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: Al LT1 headed LG4 305
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi with spacer
The 305 Vortec head are nothing close to the 350 vortec (906, 062) heads. The have smaller valves, a different runner shape, and a much different combustion chamber design. They don't really share much with the 350 vortec heads except the reaised runners. They are really just the old style 305 heads with raised runners.
The good news though, is that they can be made to flow close to vortec heads just like all other SBC heads with porting.
Essentially all the 305 Vortec heads are, are raised runner standard 305 heads.
The good news though, is that they can be made to flow close to vortec heads just like all other SBC heads with porting.
Essentially all the 305 Vortec heads are, are raised runner standard 305 heads.
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 849
Likes: 2
From: MA
Car: 93 GM300 platforms
Engine: LO3, LO5
Transmission: MD8 x2
Vortec heads were used on the L31 engine (350, 5.7 liter) and used on the L30 engine (305, 5.0 liter).
A flow bench comparison of the two appears here. Keep in mind that there were two similar L31 Vortec heads, one with a 062 casting number suffix and the other with a 906 suffix. I don't know if the L30 heads also had two versions.
In any event the web site shows the 305/5.0 L30 casting number 2332520 vs the 350/5.7 062 heads. For each lift and cfm block in the table, the 350 flow data appears above, and the 305 data appear below. It also appears that the 305 heads were altered to have 2.02/1.60 inch valves (based on what's in the table). The valve didn't seem to help much -- the 305 heads can't keep up with the intake of the 350, but are about the same as the exhaust on the 350. The 350 heads, meanwhile, flow very well and on-par with other flow data elsewhere on the web.
It's also not clear if the heads, either of the two listed, were ported in any way. So the data is helpful but not conclusive.
A flow bench comparison of the two appears here. Keep in mind that there were two similar L31 Vortec heads, one with a 062 casting number suffix and the other with a 906 suffix. I don't know if the L30 heads also had two versions.
In any event the web site shows the 305/5.0 L30 casting number 2332520 vs the 350/5.7 062 heads. For each lift and cfm block in the table, the 350 flow data appears above, and the 305 data appear below. It also appears that the 305 heads were altered to have 2.02/1.60 inch valves (based on what's in the table). The valve didn't seem to help much -- the 305 heads can't keep up with the intake of the 350, but are about the same as the exhaust on the 350. The 350 heads, meanwhile, flow very well and on-par with other flow data elsewhere on the web.
It's also not clear if the heads, either of the two listed, were ported in any way. So the data is helpful but not conclusive.
Last edited by kdrolt; Apr 25, 2005 at 02:29 PM.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,671
Likes: 1
From: Waterloo, Iowa
Car: 86 firebird with 98 firebird interi
Engine: pump gas 427sbc Dart Lil M 13.5:1
Transmission: Oldani TH400 w/ BTE 9" convertor
Axle/Gears: 31 spline Moser/full spool/4.11Rich
Originally posted by kdrolt
It's also not clear if the heads, either of the two listed, were ported in any way. So the data is helpful but not conclusive.
It's also not clear if the heads, either of the two listed, were ported in any way. So the data is helpful but not conclusive.
As noted, the 305's are nowhere near the flow capability of the famious 350 vortecs due to runner and chamber design. Will they be as good as the LO3, I have'nt seen any flow sheet on those so I have no idea. Just from looking at flow numbers would not recommend the 305 "vortec" castings since they leave ALOT to be desired.
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 849
Likes: 2
From: MA
Car: 93 GM300 platforms
Engine: LO3, LO5
Transmission: MD8 x2
Thanks for the detail on those flow data.
Fast355 sent me the flow data on stock unported 187 casting number swirl port heads used on the E-code LO3 305 engine. The L30 Vortec 305 heads still flow better across the board, stock vs stock... which shouldn't be a surprise. At 0.500" lift the L30 heads went 199.4 cfm intake while the LO3 heads could only flow 165 cfm; at the same lift on the exhaust side the L30 heads went 177 cfm, while the LO3 heads went 140 cfm. Of course that's comparing a mid 90s head (with oversized valves added) to a mid 80s head (with stock valves).
A better comparison on other head flow data, 305 and 350, is summarized elsewhere on another thread by reading (or skipping) about 2/3rd into the thread.
Here's the 187 flow data from Fast335 PM'd to me::
---
(All flow data in cfm)
Fast355 sent me the flow data on stock unported 187 casting number swirl port heads used on the E-code LO3 305 engine. The L30 Vortec 305 heads still flow better across the board, stock vs stock... which shouldn't be a surprise. At 0.500" lift the L30 heads went 199.4 cfm intake while the LO3 heads could only flow 165 cfm; at the same lift on the exhaust side the L30 heads went 177 cfm, while the LO3 heads went 140 cfm. Of course that's comparing a mid 90s head (with oversized valves added) to a mid 80s head (with stock valves).
A better comparison on other head flow data, 305 and 350, is summarized elsewhere on another thread by reading (or skipping) about 2/3rd into the thread.
Here's the 187 flow data from Fast335 PM'd to me::
---
I've got some data from some stock 187s. It was collected at 28 in/h20 pressure drop.
lift_in-----I-------E
.050-----35-----27
.100-----65-----54
.200-----90----113
.300----135----120
.400----158----133
.500----165----140
lift_in-----I-------E
.050-----35-----27
.100-----65-----54
.200-----90----113
.300----135----120
.400----158----133
.500----165----140
Last edited by kdrolt; Apr 26, 2005 at 10:40 AM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
From: Cypress,Tx
Car: 89 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 carbed now
Transmission: World Class T5
Axle/Gears: Peg Leg w/ 3.73's
Originally posted by kdrolt
Thanks for the detail on those flow data.
Fast355 sent me the flow data on stock unported 187 casting number swirl port heads used on the E-code LO3 305 engine. The L30 Vortec 305 heads still flow better across the board, stock vs stock... which shouldn't be a surprise. At 0.500" lift the L30 heads went 199.4 cfm intake while the LO3 heads could only flow 165 cfm; at the same lift on the exhaust side the L30 heads went 177 cfm, while the LO3 heads went 140 cfm. Of course that's comparing a mid 90s head (with oversized valves added) to a mid 80s head (with stock valves).
A better comparison on other head flow data, 305 and 350, is summarized elsewhere on another thread by reading (or skipping) about 2/3rd into the thread.
Here's the 187 flow data from Fast335 PM'd to me::
---
(All flow data in cfm)
Thanks for the detail on those flow data.
Fast355 sent me the flow data on stock unported 187 casting number swirl port heads used on the E-code LO3 305 engine. The L30 Vortec 305 heads still flow better across the board, stock vs stock... which shouldn't be a surprise. At 0.500" lift the L30 heads went 199.4 cfm intake while the LO3 heads could only flow 165 cfm; at the same lift on the exhaust side the L30 heads went 177 cfm, while the LO3 heads went 140 cfm. Of course that's comparing a mid 90s head (with oversized valves added) to a mid 80s head (with stock valves).
A better comparison on other head flow data, 305 and 350, is summarized elsewhere on another thread by reading (or skipping) about 2/3rd into the thread.
Here's the 187 flow data from Fast335 PM'd to me::
---
(All flow data in cfm)
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
FWIW:
Member SSC posted a few months back about his Vortec 305-headed 305. He seemed pleased with the results.
Any chance not all Vortec 305 heads are created equal?
Member SSC posted a few months back about his Vortec 305-headed 305. He seemed pleased with the results.
Any chance not all Vortec 305 heads are created equal?
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Oh, it is also possible to hurt flow with simple things like larger valves.
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 849
Likes: 2
From: MA
Car: 93 GM300 platforms
Engine: LO3, LO5
Transmission: MD8 x2
Originally posted by IROCaholic
416 heads flow 195@ .500 bone stock
416 heads flow 195@ .500 bone stock
Question for discussion:
Is it better to have heads that flow 195/110 cfm i/e with minimal swirl like the 081/416 castings, or, is it better to have heads that flow 165/140 cfm i/e (187 castings) with a lot of swirl?
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 849
Likes: 2
From: MA
Car: 93 GM300 platforms
Engine: LO3, LO5
Transmission: MD8 x2
Originally posted by five7kid
FWIW:
Member SSC posted a few months back about his Vortec 305-headed 305. He seemed pleased with the results.
FWIW:
Member SSC posted a few months back about his Vortec 305-headed 305. He seemed pleased with the results.
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 813
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, Tx
Car: 86 Camaro Z28/ 87 Camaro IROC Z28
Engine: 5.0L TPI LB9 / 5.0 TPI LB9 w/cam
Transmission: Built 700R4 with Transgo shift kit
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 bolt Posi/ 2.73 10 bolt Posi
Can you mill the 350 Vortecs to fit the smaller bore 305? I read in an article somewhere, one of the chevy magazines that they did this, but they didnt say how or give details.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,740
Likes: 551
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Lucid
Can you mill the 350 Vortecs to fit the smaller bore 305? I read in an article somewhere, one of the chevy magazines that they did this, but they didnt say how or give details.
Can you mill the 350 Vortecs to fit the smaller bore 305? I read in an article somewhere, one of the chevy magazines that they did this, but they didnt say how or give details.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,304
Likes: 0
From: West Des Moines, IA
Car: 2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3 GT
Engine: 2.3 DISI Turbo
Transmission: 6 speed MT
Originally posted by Lucid
Can you mill the 350 Vortecs to fit the smaller bore 305? I read in an article somewhere, one of the chevy magazines that they did this, but they didnt say how or give details.
Can you mill the 350 Vortecs to fit the smaller bore 305? I read in an article somewhere, one of the chevy magazines that they did this, but they didnt say how or give details.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
84z96L31vortec
Tech / General Engine
7
Aug 20, 2017 12:16 AM
L98GTA87
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Wanted
1
Aug 11, 2015 06:55 PM
84z96L31vortec
North East Region
1
Aug 10, 2015 08:27 PM









