Stroking a 307
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
From: Chouteau, OK
Car: Bitchin' 92 RS
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Stroking a 307
Yea, You heard right, a 3-0-SEVEN
I'm gonna be putting a 350 crank in it and it will be bored out .60 over. Hoping to find some one to calculate my displacement. thanks!
Kyle
I'm gonna be putting a 350 crank in it and it will be bored out .60 over. Hoping to find some one to calculate my displacement. thanks!
Kyle
TGO Supporter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
Bore (IN) X Bore (IN) X Stroke (IN) X #Cylinders X .768 = CI displacement
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,576
Likes: 30
From: Harford County, MD
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
Ross will make you a set for $750ish. just buy a 350...skip all this small bore nonsense.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
From: Chouteau, OK
Car: Bitchin' 92 RS
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
well, when you get the engine and crank handed to you, its called working with what you have.
another thing, i just read it can be bored .80 over, that would make a 4 inch bore, right?
if thats true, i can just get a set of 327 pistons, and it'll all work out.
and to nova, don't worry, I got a bigger-bore build up in the process right now, just looking at my options with this 307 I got gave to me.
another thing, i just read it can be bored .80 over, that would make a 4 inch bore, right?
if thats true, i can just get a set of 327 pistons, and it'll all work out.
and to nova, don't worry, I got a bigger-bore build up in the process right now, just looking at my options with this 307 I got gave to me.
Last edited by RebelRacer; May 13, 2005 at 07:45 AM.
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 231
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
A lot of the 3-7/8" bore blocks can be bored out to 4". If the one you have can be then do it and make the 327 (as you mentioned). Just make sure to have the block checked for bore thickness first. The casting number may also help in this area.
RBob.
RBob.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
So help me understand this....
You've got a "free" block; you're going to spend however many hundreds of dollars on machine work and custom pistons and whatever else, in order to use it.
Or, you could go to the junkyard and get a $50 block; and then you'll be spending ALOT less on machine work, because it will all be nice normal stuff; and ALOT less on parts, because they'll all be off-the-shelf noraml stuff; and it'll go at least as fast and most likely faster in the end, because it'll be more cubic inches.
I'm really struggling with the idea that using that combination of "free" stuff is actually going to cost less than buying the right block in the first place.
Sounds to me like you're using a $20 bill to buy a dime.
A 307 block is 3.875" bore. That means it would have to go to .125" over to make it to 4.000". It won't happen. It's highly unlikely that it'll go past .060", like most every other 307 block. That means, if you want to run ANY OTHER STROKE besides 3.25" (307 stroke), you'll be buying custom pistons.
If you just want to be "different", and spend more money to go slower, then go ahead and do what you're doing. If you want to build a motor for the least money, get a 307 crank and forget the 3.48" stroke. If you want the most motor for the least money, forget the 307 block and get a 4" bore one.
The block is THE SINGLE CHEAPEST PART of the whole short block. It's beyond stupid to allow yourself to be handicapped by that, just because it's "free". You'll run up probably 5-10 times the cost of a block, in custom pistons and machine work.
You've got a "free" block; you're going to spend however many hundreds of dollars on machine work and custom pistons and whatever else, in order to use it.
Or, you could go to the junkyard and get a $50 block; and then you'll be spending ALOT less on machine work, because it will all be nice normal stuff; and ALOT less on parts, because they'll all be off-the-shelf noraml stuff; and it'll go at least as fast and most likely faster in the end, because it'll be more cubic inches.
I'm really struggling with the idea that using that combination of "free" stuff is actually going to cost less than buying the right block in the first place.
Sounds to me like you're using a $20 bill to buy a dime.
A 307 block is 3.875" bore. That means it would have to go to .125" over to make it to 4.000". It won't happen. It's highly unlikely that it'll go past .060", like most every other 307 block. That means, if you want to run ANY OTHER STROKE besides 3.25" (307 stroke), you'll be buying custom pistons.
If you just want to be "different", and spend more money to go slower, then go ahead and do what you're doing. If you want to build a motor for the least money, get a 307 crank and forget the 3.48" stroke. If you want the most motor for the least money, forget the 307 block and get a 4" bore one.
The block is THE SINGLE CHEAPEST PART of the whole short block. It's beyond stupid to allow yourself to be handicapped by that, just because it's "free". You'll run up probably 5-10 times the cost of a block, in custom pistons and machine work.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Re: Stroking a 307
Originally posted by RebelRacer
... it will be bored out .60 over.
... it will be bored out .60 over.
Originally posted by RebelRacer
... i just read it can be bored .80 over...
... i just read it can be bored .80 over...
It's "0.0xx over". For the numbers you used, 0.060" or 0.080" over.
It makes a difference. Before you take any factory casting block over .030" over (with the possible exception of 454 blocks), you need to sonic test it to ensure it has adequate wall thickness to go out as much as you're planning. As RB said, to get to a 350 size bore, it would have to be bored out .125", which is extremely rare in factory blocks. Some very early 283 blocks had enough meat to do that, but of course the factory figured out it wasn't necessary and started reducing wall thickness to match the intended bore only - long before they started making 307's.
Now, building a 307 isn't all that bad. It has a better bore/stroke ratio than a 305 does for breathing purposes, but you still want to use 305-type heads on it. However, if you don't have a 307 (or '68/'69 327) crank, then forget the 307 block and go find a 350 builder.
Like somebody already said...
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 231
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by RebelRacer
so basically the 307 with a 4 inch bore and 3.48 ince stroke is getting pretty close to 350, right
so basically the 307 with a 4 inch bore and 3.48 ince stroke is getting pretty close to 350, right
RBob.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
getting pretty close to 350
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, Ne
Car: It was a 90' firebird formula
Engine: It had 357 tbi
Transmission: Was 700r4 auto
Axle/Gears: Was 2.73
Bore (IN) X Bore (IN) X Stroke (IN) X #Cylinders X .768 = CI displacement
sorry but that formula doesnt work at all.
also you dont need to sonic test every block to bore it .040 or .060 unless your gonna use a turbo or blower. any older casting 350 will go .040 no problem, and you can go .060 as long as your not making a heavy duty or race motor.
sorry but that formula doesnt work at all.
also you dont need to sonic test every block to bore it .040 or .060 unless your gonna use a turbo or blower. any older casting 350 will go .040 no problem, and you can go .060 as long as your not making a heavy duty or race motor.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 0
From: B'ville, WV
Car: 2002 Formula Firebird
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Originally posted by ede
nothing like spending your own money on the bullets to shoot yourself in the foot with.
nothing like spending your own money on the bullets to shoot yourself in the foot with.
I would stay away from the 307. If you have it and need an engine ASAP I would throw it in and drive it. But save up/look for a 350. It will serve you better.
Junior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Cazenovia, WI
Car: 83 Z28
Engine: Mild 383 Stroker
Transmission: B&M TH400 with shift kit
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Limited Slip
correct formula for displacement is (bore divided by 2)squared x 3.1416(PI) x stroke x #of cylinders = C.I.D.... for instance.... 4.030 divided by 2 = 2.015, and squared = 4.06, x 3.1416(PI) = 12.76, x 3.75 = 47.83, x 8 cylinders = 382.67 cubic inches....
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
From: Chouteau, OK
Car: Bitchin' 92 RS
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
ok, ok, i did some more research.
You guys were right, the biggest bore you can get is 3.925.
but you guys were full of crap about custom pistons, heres the summit part number STL-295AP60 15 bucks a piece. not bad.
building a 307 isn't retarded, its just different, and I still have the 307 crank.
You guys were right, the biggest bore you can get is 3.925.
but you guys were full of crap about custom pistons, heres the summit part number STL-295AP60 15 bucks a piece. not bad.
building a 307 isn't retarded, its just different, and I still have the 307 crank.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
I'm gonna be putting a 350 crank in it
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Originally posted by RebelRacer
but you guys were full of crap about custom pistons, heres the summit part number STL-295AP60 15 bucks a piece. not bad.
but you guys were full of crap about custom pistons, heres the summit part number STL-295AP60 15 bucks a piece. not bad.
They'll work with a 350 crank too, if you don't mind the piston coming out of the block to smack into the head at the top of the stroke and then catching the top ring on the return stroke and tearing the lands out. Or you could pour more money into custom 5.47" rods to make them fit.
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,111
Likes: 53
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
Give you head a shake, will ya!!!
The fact that this motor will have to be $balanced$ throws the whole thing out the window. Get a 350 block and a 350crank and 8 350 rods and rebuild it.
Put the money you saved, into a set of good cylinder heads.
Sell the 307 parts to someone else and start from there.
The fact that this motor will have to be $balanced$ throws the whole thing out the window. Get a 350 block and a 350crank and 8 350 rods and rebuild it.
Put the money you saved, into a set of good cylinder heads.
Sell the 307 parts to someone else and start from there.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
Originally posted by theMachinist
Bore (IN) X Bore (IN) X Stroke (IN) X #Cylinders X .768 = CI displacement
sorry but that formula doesnt work at all.
also you dont need to sonic test every block to bore it .040 or .060 unless your gonna use a turbo or blower. any older casting 350 will go .040 no problem, and you can go .060 as long as your not making a heavy duty or race motor.
Bore (IN) X Bore (IN) X Stroke (IN) X #Cylinders X .768 = CI displacement
sorry but that formula doesnt work at all.
also you dont need to sonic test every block to bore it .040 or .060 unless your gonna use a turbo or blower. any older casting 350 will go .040 no problem, and you can go .060 as long as your not making a heavy duty or race motor.
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,770
Likes: 1
From: Pacific Northwest
Car: '85 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700 R4
Actually, if you were determined to go through with this project, a set of 5.56" rods from a 400 would put you in the ballpark for the right deck height with some 307 pistons and a 350 crank. You'd have lots of deck clearance to work with, but it could be milled down .030" or so to tighten it up if you wanted to. I'm not sure about the piston to crank clearance though.
That's IF you were to decide to do it.
I can't advocate it though... Politicts, you know...
That's IF you were to decide to do it.
I can't advocate it though... Politicts, you know...
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Car: 92 Camaro
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Yep, nothing wrong with a 307 as long as it has good heads on it, 307's got a bad rap because they ALL came with 2 bbl carbs, low compression, crappy smog heads, retarded cam timing and emissions that choked them badly. I'd take a well built 307 over a similar built 305 any day if they were a good price and I needed an engine.
Originally posted by AsphaltAssalter
Yep, nothing wrong with a 307 as long as it has good heads on it, 307's got a bad rap because they ALL came with 2 bbl carbs, low compression, crappy smog heads, retarded cam timing and emissions that choked them badly. I'd take a well built 307 over a similar built 305 any day if they were a good price and I needed an engine.
Yep, nothing wrong with a 307 as long as it has good heads on it, 307's got a bad rap because they ALL came with 2 bbl carbs, low compression, crappy smog heads, retarded cam timing and emissions that choked them badly. I'd take a well built 307 over a similar built 305 any day if they were a good price and I needed an engine.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post







