Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

What Are your Carb and EFI pros/cons????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 2, 2005 | 11:17 PM
  #1  
CamarosRUS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,155
Likes: 2
From: Louisville, Ky
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 383
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.08 10 Bolt
What Are your Carb and EFI pros/cons????

well what are the pros and cons to going carb or efi.

carb=simplicity

efi=easy starting, usually better fuel economy, more ability to tune deeper
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2005 | 01:25 AM
  #2  
AJ_92RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: yy wife, crazy.
Engine: 350, Vortecs, 650DP
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: 8.5", 3.42
Carb
Pros... Cheap to repair, replace and modify. Requires no more than hand tools and a bit of mechanical aptitude.

Cons... Not as forgiving in climates that swing from one extreme to another. (E.G., 20* F one day and 75* F the next day).

EFI
Pros... More forgiving (as well as accurate) in climates that swing.... blah blah blah.

Cons... Not so cheap to repair, replace and modify. Requires both hand tools as well as a computer (which is not cheap) and also mechanical aptitude.

The HP debate is still up in the air IMO, but from what I’ve seen the HP/$$ war is won by a carb 9 times out of 10 IF you don’t already have one or the other (i.e. dropping in a new engine).
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2005 | 07:42 AM
  #3  
AlkyIROC's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,262
Likes: 168
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
I don't agree on the better fuel economy of EFI. A properly tuned carb can get just as good fuel economy. EFI can usually maintain better emissions easier than a carb.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2005 | 08:18 AM
  #4  
contact's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: North Texas
Engine: sbc 350
carb - pro,
generally, more freedom to chose intake manifold
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2005 | 01:05 PM
  #5  
Fast355's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,404
Likes: 492
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
EFI and CCC carbs have the fuel economy hands down. It has to do with computerized timing controls and keeping the air/fuel mixture relatively constant at cruise.

Don't believe me look at the fuel economy of a 1987 non-feedback carbed chevy van vs. a 1988 TBI one. Same gearing, same trans, same engine, the difference was the EFI. Made a difference in the mileage and much better driveability.

Last edited by Fast355; Jun 3, 2005 at 01:07 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2005 | 01:18 PM
  #6  
Lo-tec's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 2
From: Gambrills, Md
Car: clapped out 84Z
Engine: 355 efi roller
Transmission: tremec TKO
EFI pro:

More vacuum at idle, better idle quality, and better driveability when using a large cam.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2005 | 07:39 PM
  #7  
AlkyIROC's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,262
Likes: 168
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
My old 79 carbed 350 pickup got the same mileage as my current 91 TBI pickup.

As I mentioned above "a properly tuned carb". Not many people fine tune carbs for the street. They just buy what they think works good and bolt it on. Even a 750 Holley. There's a handful of 750 Holley and they'll all perform differently out of the box.

There's also a lot of poorly tuned Q-jets running around that should have been rebuild and retuned many years ago.

Last edited by AlkyIROC; Jun 3, 2005 at 07:43 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2005 | 10:43 PM
  #8  
ckeene502's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: Elkmont, AL
i have done both
i ll stay with a carb....
but if its a daily driver just to from point a to b,c,d,e,f,g,...efi
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2005 | 11:48 PM
  #9  
Fast355's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,404
Likes: 492
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
It may be true that your 91 gets the same mileage as your 79 but the 91 will do it MUCH cleaner. IF GM had tuned the injection for better MPG at the expense of added NOx emissions the picture would change drastically. Try 17-19 mpg from a 355 in a full size G-series van. My 305 is going to do even better.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2005 | 12:05 AM
  #10  
CamarosRUS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,155
Likes: 2
From: Louisville, Ky
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 383
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.08 10 Bolt
i wish i would have went carb with this 383 im building. efi is cool and you can take it much further and fine tune it much more precise but carbs are so simple and that makes up for it all. since i did decide to go stealthram however, it just makes it that much easier to turbo down the road
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
2012sergen11
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Wanted
6
Oct 13, 2015 07:38 PM
efiguy
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
Sep 27, 2015 01:30 PM
Damon
Tech / General Engine
8
Sep 26, 2015 04:29 PM
lanceflame44
Tech / General Engine
0
Sep 25, 2015 12:28 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:33 PM.