Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Desktop Dyno

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 31, 2001 | 11:43 PM
  #1  
Dauntless's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: Hoover, AL
Desktop Dyno

anybody have this? how accurate/effective is it? i'm kinda interested in getting it. it'd seem to give me more information at ease than anything else. of course, i'm still in the researching phase of my modding. and i'm kinda in the "getting money for modding" phase as well. probly gonna be here for a while. hehe.

------------------
1984 Z-28, 305HO 4bbl, t-tops, K&N, Flowmaster 80 Series with 3" tips. Planning a massive modfest. It's gonna be one gangsta of a street demon.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2001 | 12:13 AM
  #2  
BadSS's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 81
From: USA
Check this link out to see what David Vizard thinks of it.

http://www.motortecmag.com/current/products/index.html

I've been using a version of performance trend's software and prefer it myself. It seems to be a lot closer to real dyno pulls either I or customers have had done in the past.

edit - Performance Trends seem to reflect the entire rpm scale better,, especially at low rpm. Both versions do a good job at estimating peak power.

[This message has been edited by BadSS (edited November 01, 2001).]
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2001 | 12:36 AM
  #3  
SoCo80p's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
i use it all the time and is about the most usefull tool i've ever used, i use it mostly for cam selections, and the cams i come up with on the D.D. i've run and had fantasic results. one guy i know put in every exact spec of his new engine into the DD (head flow, all cam specs,...etc) and then built the engine and dynoed it and it was within 3 HP from the dyno to the desktop dyno, that sold me on it and i really like this program
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2001 | 12:58 AM
  #4  
Sitting Bull's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,238
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, Alberta, Republic of Western Canada
Car: 1986 Sport Coupé
Engine: 305-4v
Transmission: 700R4 and TransGo2
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by BadSS:
Check this link out to see what David Vizard thinks of it.

http://www.motortecmag.com/current/products/index.html

I've been using a version of performance trend's software and prefer it myself. It seems to be a lot closer to real dyno pulls either I or customers have had done in the past.
</font>

Almost every dyno estimation I've ever seen DesktopDyno 2000 do has been within 5% of actual numbers, so it is very useful, in my opinion. In one of the latest Muscle Car Review mags they did an estimate of an Olds W30 engine and came up with 310 hp. On the actual dyno it gave them 310 hp. Pretty hard to beat that, eh?

I fyou just keep in mind that it can run 5% either way, you won't be disappointed.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2001 | 02:02 AM
  #5  
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,111
Likes: 53
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
The accuracy depends on how accurate
your input is. If you tell it lies It'll
lie right back to ya....lol
I find it very accurate when used properly but, by its very nature tends to over estimate bottom end torque. The program always assumes perfect air/fuel ratios and a perfect exhaust design (header). Neither of which happen in the real world. Also a lot more accurate if you use the actual "running seat duration" of a cam instead of the advertized duration or .050" specs. Read the instructions carefully and have fun...

[This message has been edited by F-BIRD'88 (edited November 01, 2001).]
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2001 | 11:57 AM
  #6  
92Camaro305TBI's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
From: Jax, FL
And where does one order this software?

I looked at the link, But I relized it was a MAG! I didn't see anything with desktopdyno.com

Thanks

------------------
92 Camaro 305 TBI Automatic
https://www.thirdgen.org/rides/index...ew&rideid=6100
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2001 | 12:19 PM
  #7  
jcb999's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,443
Likes: 0
From: College Station, Tex USA
Car: 89rs
Engine: 400Sb
Transmission: Tremec 3550
best thing to do is get it from jegs.com or summit. Lowest prices.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2001 | 04:43 PM
  #8  
92Camaro305TBI's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
From: Jax, FL
720-3616 Catalog Item - DESKTOP DYNO SE $ 24.99


That right?

Thanks
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2001 | 04:57 PM
  #9  
SoCo80p's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
you want to get dyno 2000, autozone locations have it also/.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2001 | 05:03 PM
  #10  
jcb999's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,443
Likes: 0
From: College Station, Tex USA
Car: 89rs
Engine: 400Sb
Transmission: Tremec 3550
720-3616
yep
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2001 | 08:03 PM
  #11  
Kevin91Z's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,950
Likes: 26
From: Orange, SoCal
Car: 1990 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 TPI siamesed runners
Transmission: Tremec T56
Axle/Gears: 12-Bolt 3.73
Yes, you want to get Desktop Dyno 2000, its Windows based and a LOT better than the older DOS version. Here is their website: http://www.motionsoftware.com/ You can get it from Jegs or Summit for about $40. I think its worth the price.

I've put both my engine combinations into it, and both times it was within 10 HP. However it way underestimates TPI's torque. Both times, the number it showed as being flywheel torque is what I made at the rear wheels.

Do a search on this board, you'll find other people's opinions as this has been posted many times before.


------------------
1991 Camaro Z28
5.7L 5-Speed (originally 305)
317 RWHP, 418 RWTQ
13.23 @ 107.62 MPH
Southern California
Member: SoCal 3rd Gen F-Bodies
Member: SoCal F-Bodies
-=ICON Motorsports=-
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2001 | 05:08 AM
  #12  
jag's Avatar
jag
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 69
Likes: 1
From: Henderson,KY,USA
I have it, and it is as accurate as you can get without actually doing a dyno. You can input everything from actual flow results of your heads to custom cam profiles, gasket thicknesses, etc.. The more accurate information you enter, the more accurate it will be. I have built engines I've seen in several Chevy magazines that had actual dyno results, and it seems to be right in line with the actual results within a few HP or FT/LBS. I recommend it for use in changing where your powerband will be with different cams or setups especially. Order it, you won't be disappointed. It's fun to play with.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hectre13
Car Audio
26
Mar 3, 2022 05:38 PM
Cam-aro
Camaros Wanted
2
Nov 12, 2015 03:35 PM
darwinprice
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
17
Oct 11, 2015 11:51 PM
Nervous2
Firebirds for Sale
2
Oct 8, 2015 10:53 PM
LT1Formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
7
Oct 8, 2015 08:34 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:34 AM.