Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

416 heads, 1.50 vs 1.60 ex valves

Old Oct 27, 2005 | 05:33 PM
  #1  
88_Import_Slaye's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
From: Grand Terrace, CA
Car: 88 Camaro
Engine: 310 LG4
Transmission: 700R4 w/2200 stall
Axle/Gears: 3.42
416 heads, 1.50 vs 1.60 ex valves

I see a lot of people not going to 1.60 valves on the 416 heads, they are staying with the 1.50. By going to a 1.60, what is the difference going to be vs a 1.50 valve? Is it even a question worth asking?
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2005 | 05:42 PM
  #2  
Stekman's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,803
Likes: 2
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Car: Z28
Engine: Sb2.2 406
Transmission: Jerico 4 speed
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" 3.60
In a nutshell, more valve = more area to flow through = better. Factory heads from this era needs all the exhaust help they can get.

1.94/1.6 valves are what I used in my P/P'd 416's.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2005 | 01:18 AM
  #3  
REALPOWER's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Car: 1984 Camaro on steroids/ 1987 iroc-z28 5 speed.
Engine: 383 nitrous motor / poindexter 305
Transmission: Th350
Especially for a high exhaust breathing motor such as a nitrous or blower motor.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2005 | 10:31 AM
  #4  
88_Import_Slaye's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
From: Grand Terrace, CA
Car: 88 Camaro
Engine: 310 LG4
Transmission: 700R4 w/2200 stall
Axle/Gears: 3.42
what about port velocity? someone else said they used smaller valve for port velocity
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2005 | 10:45 AM
  #5  
Stekman's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,803
Likes: 2
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Car: Z28
Engine: Sb2.2 406
Transmission: Jerico 4 speed
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" 3.60
You worry about port velocity a lot more on the intake side than the exhaust. Factory exhaust ports need all the help they can get.

The exhaust side is more or less shoved past the valve. Rather than the intake, where if there is too much oprt volume, the incoming air charge can "deaden" (lose velocity) because the port volume is too large. Exhaust exits the past the valve first. There's really nothing to lose velocity over.

Last edited by Stekman; Oct 29, 2005 at 10:47 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2005 | 06:01 PM
  #6  
Vader's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 19,675
Likes: 314
As long as you can squeeze them in without shrouding or clearance issues, go bigger.

I've generally been an advocate (check the archives) of using larger valves and less lift to achieve flow. You can always open the larger valve wider if you want. More valve face perimeter area will generally provide more flow than opening the same valve wider.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2005 | 03:16 AM
  #7  
Sitting Bull's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,238
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, Alberta, Republic of Western Canada
Car: 1986 Sport Coupé
Engine: 305-4v
Transmission: 700R4 and TransGo2
And choose a dual profile cam with extra lift and duration on the exhaust eccentric.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gta90
TPI
40
Sep 15, 2015 04:00 PM
SLNTSCPE
Tech / General Engine
3
Aug 22, 2015 09:15 PM
89mulletbird
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Aug 12, 2015 07:08 PM
89mulletbird
Southern California Area
0
Aug 10, 2015 10:16 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:27 PM.