Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

what do u think of these crankshaft photos?

Old Dec 29, 2005 | 12:28 AM
  #1  
TraviZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 3
From: Woodland, CA
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
what do u think of these crankshaft photos?

can u see the difference between the eagle, and the stock gm? nice huh?


Reply
Old Dec 29, 2005 | 08:50 AM
  #2  
84 Z-28 350's Avatar
Senior Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 702
Likes: 1
From: Houston TX
Car: 84 Z-28 Camaro, 2022 2500 silverado
Engine: 383
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: richmond 3.73, eaton posi
holly ballanceing holes batman ...wow for some reason I woulden't feel safe using that GM crank with all those holes in it, it's a good thing you got that eagle crank, it looks good
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2005 | 10:54 AM
  #3  
flaming-ford's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 1
From: Ohio, near columbus
Car: 89 iroc-z
Engine: 305tpi
Transmission: wc-t5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08 posi (4 now)
looks very nice!
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2005 | 07:21 PM
  #4  
305sbc's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,428
Likes: 2
From: Fairview Heights Illinois
Car: 1986 Irocz
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.25:1
Makes me hungry for a subway #6 with Swiss.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2005 | 10:18 PM
  #5  
8Mike9's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,183
Likes: 42
From: Oakdale, Ca
Car: 89 IrocZ
Engine: L98-ish
Transmission: 700R4
I don't think I'd be blaming the General on that...the .010 grind on the crank would lead me to belive it was done during the last rebuild on the engine.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2005 | 12:17 AM
  #6  
TraviZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 3
From: Woodland, CA
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
im not blaming the G' in general, but more just the looks of iron vs steel , and the casting difference around the half moons.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2005 | 11:12 AM
  #7  
Streetiron85's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,770
Likes: 1
From: Pacific Northwest
Car: '85 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700 R4
That crank definitely has a history.
So that is the crank that came in a used block from the junkyard?
It looks like maybe it's been welded on the journals.
If you wanted to do a bunch of detective work, you could prolly figure out how it got to be the way it is.
But why bother.
I'll have to admit it makes me scratch my head tho.

Did those rods and pistons come out of the old one, or are they your new ones.

Last edited by Streetiron85; Dec 30, 2005 at 11:14 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2005 | 12:32 PM
  #8  
TraviZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 3
From: Woodland, CA
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
the rods and pistons came out of the same block as that pos crank. it was purchased as a complete rotating assembly 383. everything except the crank looked fine.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2005 | 03:30 PM
  #9  
Streetiron85's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,770
Likes: 1
From: Pacific Northwest
Car: '85 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700 R4
Those might even be 6" rods with a forged piston. In which case the pistons would be a lot lighter than the factory parts that the GM 4-3/4" stroke crank was originally balanced for.
Even if they're 5.7" rods the 4" bore forged pistons would still be considerably lighter.
That would explain all the balancing holes.

Compare the weight diff of a 4" bore forged piston to a stock 4.125" cast piston. You'll see why a lot of rebalancing would be needed to make it right, with a factory stroker crank.

They're definitely aftermarket rods.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2005 | 06:32 PM
  #10  
8Mike9's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,183
Likes: 42
From: Oakdale, Ca
Car: 89 IrocZ
Engine: L98-ish
Transmission: 700R4
The pic's I saw are either 6inch rods or longer (maybe Ford l6rods?) as evident by the wristpin location to the oil control ring.

Was that the "modified" crank from the block you bought, or waht was in your car that you grenaded?
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2005 | 07:15 PM
  #11  
Streetiron85's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,770
Likes: 1
From: Pacific Northwest
Car: '85 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700 R4
I've been getting that he bought a stroker from the junkyard.
The more I look at it, the more it looks like the block has been clearanced for a stroker crank. That is, if the orange block is the one that the "holey" crank came out of.
And it's hard to tell for sure but that crank has some grinding done to it on the crank throws, and it sort of looks like there's some welding bead showing there.
It would be interesting to find out what the actual stroke of the crank is.
Is it a 1pc seal crank?
Maybe it's a 3.5" stroke crank that's been welded to increase the stroke.
Or maybe a 3.75" stroke crank that's been welded for a longer stroke???

It seems like something NOT to throw in the trash.
If there are no spun bearings, it could be used again, mebbe.
And if the pistons were replaced with some that are equal weight, it would be balanced as well as it was originally.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2005 | 07:38 PM
  #12  
8Mike9's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,183
Likes: 42
From: Oakdale, Ca
Car: 89 IrocZ
Engine: L98-ish
Transmission: 700R4
Ya, on the West Coast Board, IIRC, he mentioned buying a 383, but said carnk was modified for the stroke, could have had the journals moved (lotsa work) or offsett ground like they used to do back in the day...who knows. I was just curious if it was the crank from his motor, or the one he bought.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2005 | 09:21 PM
  #13  
Streetiron85's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,770
Likes: 1
From: Pacific Northwest
Car: '85 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700 R4
It looks like a 1pc seal.
Possibly someone welded it up and offcenter ground it for a longer stroke, back in the 80s before 1pc stroker cranks were available as cheap as they are today.
It seems reasonable for a project back then.
It would have been one of the few hyd roller 383s back then.
A lot of work, but if the builder worked in a machine shop, it would have been a nice after hours project.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2005 | 11:52 PM
  #14  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Interesting... it does look offset ground.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2006 | 11:15 AM
  #15  
TraviZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 3
From: Woodland, CA
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
it was a crank that came in the motor i bought. on top of the crank they had this written on it "4.766" 10/10

so it probably does have alonger stroke then stock?

also, those are 6" forged rods that came with the block, and those are kb hyp pistons.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 12:26 PM
  #16  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Looks that way. Spacing around those rod journals doesnt look like stock to me but sure way is to measure it. 10/10 would be rods+mains .010 undersized, not sure what the 4.766 is. Vaguely familiar but I cant recall. Maybe part of the casting number.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 04:56 PM
  #17  
305sbc's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,428
Likes: 2
From: Fairview Heights Illinois
Car: 1986 Irocz
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.25:1
Could they have meant 3.766 and the increased stroke?

If this started as a factory 400 crank then offset grinding would produce a stroke right around that number.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 05:23 PM
  #18  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Look close (3rd pic), thats a one piece rear main crank. Pretty sure there wasnt a way to turn a two piece into a one piece.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 05:35 PM
  #19  
TraviZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 3
From: Woodland, CA
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
correct so i dont know how they got a stroker crank out of a gm crank?
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 05:40 PM
  #20  
305sbc's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,428
Likes: 2
From: Fairview Heights Illinois
Car: 1986 Irocz
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.25:1
Maybe it's not a GM crank. Why not just measure the stroke on it.
Lay it back in the block and use a digital caliper.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 05:43 PM
  #21  
TraviZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 3
From: Woodland, CA
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
i dont care enough

thier is a big square with GM printed inside. im pretty confident its a gm product.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
db057
TBI
14
Apr 28, 2019 07:45 AM
LC2 TECH
History / Originality
3
Oct 13, 2015 11:53 PM
gord327
Transmissions and Drivetrain
19
Oct 3, 2015 01:25 PM
bschmale66853
Signature Pictures and PhotoShop Requests
0
Sep 30, 2015 08:11 PM
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
26
Sep 21, 2015 01:08 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:54 PM.