305 to 350 to 383 to 400
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23s
305 to 350 to 383 to 400
I just want some clarification. Why is it that the most common suggestion for a 305 owner for performance is to swap for a 350? Why isn't it the same for the 350 owner to swap for a 383, or for a 400? Hell why don't we all just swap for 455s.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23s
Originally posted by Air_Adam
What was your barley-pop count when you when you decided to post this?
What was your barley-pop count when you when you decided to post this?
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, MI
Car: 1991 Firebird
Engine: 350,Dart Heads,Weiand In,Roller Cam
Transmission: 2400-Stall, 700R4 w/ Kit
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 3.42 disc (I wish)
There is a difference between a big block and a small block. A 305 sucks. A 350 is cheap for what you get. A 383 is a simple way to get more power (torque) from a 350 block. A 400 has a bigger bore to run bigger valves and is light.
A big block is big; bore, stroke, block, gas mileage sucks, and you'll go broke building one.
A big block is big; bore, stroke, block, gas mileage sucks, and you'll go broke building one.
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,028
Likes: 78
From: Desert
Car: 1991 Z28 Vert
Engine: 383 single plane efi
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 8.8 with 3.73s
If the 400 sbc was a one piece rear main seal and a roller block and were easier to find, everyone probably would say to go with a 400.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23s
I guess this post is just aimed at the frustration I'm having with the fact that Ford used a 305 in its Mustangs there were faster than the sbc 305s and almost as fast as the 350s, in stock for stock terms. What is it about the Ford 305 that makes is faster than the equivalent sbc 305?
Originally posted by Tenom
I guess this post is just aimed at the frustration I'm having with the fact that Ford used a 305 in its Mustangs there were faster than the sbc 305s and almost as fast as the 350s, in stock for stock terms. What is it about the Ford 305 that makes is faster than the equivalent sbc 305?
I guess this post is just aimed at the frustration I'm having with the fact that Ford used a 305 in its Mustangs there were faster than the sbc 305s and almost as fast as the 350s, in stock for stock terms. What is it about the Ford 305 that makes is faster than the equivalent sbc 305?
Trending Topics
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Originally posted by Tenom
I guess this post is just aimed at the frustration I'm having with the fact that Ford used a 305 in its Mustangs there were faster than the sbc 305s and almost as fast as the 350s, in stock for stock terms. What is it about the Ford 305 that makes is faster than the equivalent sbc 305?
I guess this post is just aimed at the frustration I'm having with the fact that Ford used a 305 in its Mustangs there were faster than the sbc 305s and almost as fast as the 350s, in stock for stock terms. What is it about the Ford 305 that makes is faster than the equivalent sbc 305?
Another factor for the popularity of the 350 is that they're more common than dirt, and cost about the same. 400 blocks are much less common. A 383 is a relatively inexpensive way to put the 400's longer stroke into the more common 350 block.
Last edited by Apeiron; Feb 6, 2006 at 09:54 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,192
Likes: 19
From: Cary, North Carolina
Car: 1992 RS
Engine: Carbed 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
I've always wondered myself - why a Ford 302 is such a performance monster in comparison to a Chevy 305.
My guess would be the heads for one - maybe Ford didn't make such terrible heads. My second guess would be that a Mustang is much lighter in comparison - I was amazed how much a Camaro weighed! Maybe something to do with "spinning up" faster - like everyone used to say about the Chevy 327?
I dunno - I'm guessing - anyone with a REAL answer please chime in, as I too am curious!
My guess would be the heads for one - maybe Ford didn't make such terrible heads. My second guess would be that a Mustang is much lighter in comparison - I was amazed how much a Camaro weighed! Maybe something to do with "spinning up" faster - like everyone used to say about the Chevy 327?
I dunno - I'm guessing - anyone with a REAL answer please chime in, as I too am curious!
Originally posted by camaronewbie
I've always wondered myself - why a Ford 302 is such a performance monster in comparison to a Chevy 305.
My guess would be the heads for one - maybe Ford didn't make such terrible heads. My second guess would be that a Mustang is much lighter in comparison - I was amazed how much a Camaro weighed! Maybe something to do with "spinning up" faster - like everyone used to say about the Chevy 327?
I dunno - I'm guessing - anyone with a REAL answer please chime in, as I too am curious!
I've always wondered myself - why a Ford 302 is such a performance monster in comparison to a Chevy 305.
My guess would be the heads for one - maybe Ford didn't make such terrible heads. My second guess would be that a Mustang is much lighter in comparison - I was amazed how much a Camaro weighed! Maybe something to do with "spinning up" faster - like everyone used to say about the Chevy 327?
I dunno - I'm guessing - anyone with a REAL answer please chime in, as I too am curious!
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23s
Originally posted by ljnowell
The ford 302 has a bigger bore. Plain and simple. It makes a real difference.
The ford 302 has a bigger bore. Plain and simple. It makes a real difference.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23s
Originally posted by Apeiron
You'd be so far into the water jackets there'd be no material left to support a sleeve.
You'd be so far into the water jackets there'd be no material left to support a sleeve.
Aside from the 305, 350, 383, 400, 455 BS I posted the whole predicament I have is getting a 305 vs a 350 for a 87-89 f-body car. The car when I get it (whenever that will be) will be stock so i'de either be getting a 305 with a 5 speed manual or a 350 with a 4 speed auto. I'de really prefer getting a manual but they only mated it to 305s, which it seems like on this forum is not the greatest engine ever made. When I get the car i'de be aiming for low 14s i'm really not out to build a true strip car, I just want some decent power on the streets...for now. In terms of cost and labor what do you guys think would be the better route? Getting a 305 with the 5 speed and just sticking with that while doing a small build up on it for awhile until I decide to drop a 350 in it OR should I aim for a 350 and do a trans swap? I think doing a trans swap would be more difficult but i've never done something like that before so opinions are welcome.
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Swapping a 305 for a 350 is a whole lot easier than swapping a 700R4 for a manual. The 350 and 305 are externally identical.
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 420
Likes: 2
From: In Hoxie Arkansas Posts: 12,547
Car: 91 firebird
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
If I had known then what I know now, I would have held out for a 5 speed, but someday I will be performing a 5 speed swap in my auto. I have already done the 305 to 350 swap. Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
What was your barley-pop count when you when you decided to post this?
You have an '82 TA now right? then what are you talking about with the other car? go to your favorite machine shop of choice, and talk about getting a 350 built there for you. I'm just waiting for mine to finish
Then find yourself a trans of choice, and swap them both in at the same time...
Or just stick with your current trans, despite it being an auto, it's strong enough for the time being.
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,192
Likes: 19
From: Cary, North Carolina
Car: 1992 RS
Engine: Carbed 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
If you have an '82 now, why not use it? My current weekly local car and parts rag has an LT1 and T56 (6 speed baby!) in it for $1000 - BOTH FOR A GRAND! Wiring harness/ECM included! That would give you everything short of a few hundred in odds and ends to mount it in place (ie crossmember for the T56).
Come to think of it, I should buy the LT1/T56 and resell it for a buck! Hey - you got $1500 cash + shipping? LOL
Swap stuff is easy enough to come across, just takes patience, and the cash ready when it goes up for sale!
Come to think of it, I should buy the LT1/T56 and resell it for a buck! Hey - you got $1500 cash + shipping? LOL
Swap stuff is easy enough to come across, just takes patience, and the cash ready when it goes up for sale!
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23s
Originally posted by Sonix
You have an '82 TA now right? then what are you talking about with the other car? go to your favorite machine shop of choice, and talk about getting a 350 built there for you. I'm just waiting for mine to finish
Then find yourself a trans of choice, and swap them both in at the same time...
Or just stick with your current trans, despite it being an auto, it's strong enough for the time being.
You have an '82 TA now right? then what are you talking about with the other car? go to your favorite machine shop of choice, and talk about getting a 350 built there for you. I'm just waiting for mine to finish
Then find yourself a trans of choice, and swap them both in at the same time...
Or just stick with your current trans, despite it being an auto, it's strong enough for the time being.
I would rather just have a car with the transmission I want and just swap the engine out at a later time, like an LB9 to a L98 because I know everything externally on the two engines is identical.
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 83
Likes: 3
From: Southern IN
Car: 89 Camaro, 00Xtreme s-10, 89 Buick "Party Ave"
Engine: 305tbi
Transmission: 700r
if you plan on buying a 305 car....then swaping to a 350 block....will the computer/ecm function like before or do you need the prom out of a 350 car......
Originally posted by ryan77
if you plan on buying a 305 car....then swaping to a 350 block....will the computer/ecm function like before or do you need the prom out of a 350 car......
if you plan on buying a 305 car....then swaping to a 350 block....will the computer/ecm function like before or do you need the prom out of a 350 car......
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 2
From: Lower Salford, PA
Car: 1987 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.3L Victor EFI
Transmission: Tremec TKO 600
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"/4.11 Trac-Lok
Originally posted by ryan77
if you plan on buying a 305 car....then swaping to a 350 block....will the computer/ecm function like before or do you need the prom out of a 350 car......
if you plan on buying a 305 car....then swaping to a 350 block....will the computer/ecm function like before or do you need the prom out of a 350 car......
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 83
Likes: 3
From: Southern IN
Car: 89 Camaro, 00Xtreme s-10, 89 Buick "Party Ave"
Engine: 305tbi
Transmission: 700r
ok......but,....if you just had the 350 block(short block)....and used the 305 intake/injectors.....and 305 ecm/computer.......would that be just as bad as running the 305????are the 350/305 intakes the same
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 2
From: Lower Salford, PA
Car: 1987 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.3L Victor EFI
Transmission: Tremec TKO 600
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"/4.11 Trac-Lok
Originally posted by brutalform
Ricktpi, where exactly is Lower Salford Pa?
Ricktpi, where exactly is Lower Salford Pa?
Seriously, It's 25 miles north of Philly.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
From: western ny
Car: '82 formula clone, 95 saab 900se
Engine: 350 vortec'd tbi, 2.0L turbo
Transmission: 700r4, 5 spd
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 2.77 open
prom?
that's just for the tpi and all that fuel injection stuff right?
if you were to have the engine carb'd would you have to mess with the computer stuff?
that's just for the tpi and all that fuel injection stuff right?
if you were to have the engine carb'd would you have to mess with the computer stuff?
Originally posted by johnnyboy
prom?
that's just for the tpi and all that fuel injection stuff right?
if you were to have the engine carb'd would you have to mess with the computer stuff?
prom?
that's just for the tpi and all that fuel injection stuff right?
if you were to have the engine carb'd would you have to mess with the computer stuff?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post






