Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Need advice ---1st engine build: Ring failure at 4K

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 07:09 PM
  #1  
3kelvin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Lilburn
Car: Modified 91 RS
Engine: 350 (1977 4 bolt main casting)
Transmission: 700R4 salvaged from an 84
Need advice ---1st engine build: Ring failure at 4K

Well, this was my first engine build. The basic objective was to swap a 305 TBI setup for a 350 TBI ... basically just wanted more street guts.

The engine is a frankenstein. The block came from a 77 Corvette (4 bolt main). Pistons and rods are GM. Clevite 77 bearings. I ripped the heads off a junkyard caprice and that seemed to work well. Had to fiddle with my Edelbrock Performer manifold but that bolts on well now.

The engine was running great ... did Comp cams recommended break in procedure and ran it for a couple of months ... then I took it on a long trip. I seemed to be going through some oil. A couple of days after my return, a weird thing happened ... the alternator/power steering bracket broke! I throw the serpetine belt, of course, and the temp guage was pegged before I notice I had an issue. I pulled over immediately and popped the hood. No steam or bad noises during this event.

Back to the junkyard. Get bracket. Install. Step son buys me a performance distributor for my birthday so we install that, too. Engine is now smoking. Smells sweet. Coolant. Bad. Replace intake manifold and head gaskets. Still smoking but no longer sweet. Get a pressure tester ... cooling system holds pressure for 60 minutes without losing a poind. Do a compression check and every cylinder is coming in at 150-160 psi except for #2 ... that one is coming in at 60. Bad. Plug wet with oil. Compression tester oily after test. More bad. Drain some oil. No coolant but reeks of gasoline.

So I pop the passenger side head ... valves on #2 look like they have been steam cleaned. No visible sign of any crack in the block or head ... so my conclusion is that the rings are fried.

Now ... why would the rings be fried? I used Speed Pro plasma moly rings. Should I have been more picky about ring gap placement? (I basically just made sure I had good angular seperation between all the gaps.) I had honed the cylinder walls ... they now feel pretty smooth. Is that normal after 4K? Did my coolant leak fry the rings? What did I do wrong?

Any comments or advice would be much appreciated. I'm planning on pulling the engine tomorrow.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 08:03 PM
  #2  
SSC's Avatar
SSC
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
From: Pueblo Co
Car: 1989 C4
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 307
Sounds like when the engine got hot the piston expanded and took out the rings on that one hole. It also could have cracked the piston around the ring lands.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 08:14 PM
  #3  
SpitotRs305's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 vortec
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: not the best not the worst
are all the cylinders smooth or just the one? when you honed the cylinders you used lots of oil on the stones right? what did you set the ring endgap to? what about the rings on #2?
-

Last edited by SpitotRs305; Mar 3, 2007 at 08:17 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 08:16 PM
  #4  
3kelvin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Lilburn
Car: Modified 91 RS
Engine: 350 (1977 4 bolt main casting)
Transmission: 700R4 salvaged from an 84
Thanks for the response! Makes sense. I figure the entire short block is suspect at this point. **heavy sigh**. I'll pull the engine out tomorrow and tear it down. Yikes.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 08:22 PM
  #5  
3kelvin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Lilburn
Car: Modified 91 RS
Engine: 350 (1977 4 bolt main casting)
Transmission: 700R4 salvaged from an 84
Hi SpitotRs305 ... thanks for the reply.

Right now I have the passenger side head off. All four cylinders are (to me) surprisingly smooth. I used lots of oil when I honed the cylinders. While I'm sure the over heating incident accelerated the problem, I suspect I was headed for trouble with the rings anyway. No leaks on this engine, but I was adding a quart of oil every 200-300 mi or so on my long trip. BTW I used regular oil during break in but then went to synthetic.

Judging from the valve appearance I think the problem is beginning to emerge on cylinder 4. Cylinders 6 and 8's valves look normal.

** On edit: Hmmm ... ring end gap ... didn't think I had to mess with that. Sounds like I might need to discover something on that subject. The book I used as a guide didn't mention anything about that. Got any hints?

Last edited by 3kelvin; Mar 3, 2007 at 08:34 PM. Reason: Added question re: ring end gap
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 08:32 PM
  #6  
SpitotRs305's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 vortec
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: not the best not the worst
sounds like the ring gap might not have been set correctly how did you set them? or they never sat but a quart every 200-300 isnt bad considering i have a guy at work adding a quart every couple of days and changing plugs just as fast
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 08:38 PM
  #7  
3kelvin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Lilburn
Car: Modified 91 RS
Engine: 350 (1977 4 bolt main casting)
Transmission: 700R4 salvaged from an 84
Uh ... I didn't actually do anything to set the end gap. Silly me presumed that would be correctly established by the manufacturer. I think I need to do some research on that subject. Can you give me a quick over view of the subject?
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 08:52 PM
  #8  
SpitotRs305's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 vortec
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: not the best not the worst
well the rings you bought from speed pro are called FILE-Fit which means the ring endgap needs to be set or at least checked this is done by placing the ring in the cylinder it will reside in and squaring it with a piston then inserting a feeler gauge between the ends of the ring i would set the ring gap to .022 for the top ring and .024 for the 2nd


but for the best gaps for your rings in your engine call speed pro they can give you the exact measurements
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 09:33 PM
  #9  
firstfirebird's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,413
Likes: 2
From: South FL
Originally Posted by SpitotRs305
sounds like the ring gap might not have been set correctly how did you set them? or they never sat but a quart every 200-300 isnt bad considering i have a guy at work adding a quart every couple of days and changing plugs just as fast
A quart every 300 miles is extremely bad on a fresh rebuild. I've got 180k on my truck and it doesn't leak or burn oil. I however agree with you on the ring gap.
3kelvin, what book was that from? Every engine should have the end gap checked even on pre-gapped rings that you expected these to be.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 09:43 PM
  #10  
3kelvin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Lilburn
Car: Modified 91 RS
Engine: 350 (1977 4 bolt main casting)
Transmission: 700R4 salvaged from an 84
Thanks guys. I really appreciate the help.

It was a Haynes manual ... maybe I missed that part? I pretty much read it cover to cover.

There is NO WAY the gap was only 0.022. I'm pretty convinced it was larger than that. Clearly I need to learn a thing or two before I re-install any new piston rings.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 09:53 PM
  #11  
firstfirebird's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,413
Likes: 2
From: South FL
Originally Posted by 3kelvin
Thanks guys. I really appreciate the help.

It was a Haynes manual ... maybe I missed that part? I pretty much read it cover to cover.

There is NO WAY the gap was only 0.022. I'm pretty convinced it was larger than that. Clearly I need to learn a thing or two before I re-install any new piston rings.
Not really, it's an honest mistake made by a mis-informed mechanic . The Haynes manual is great for a stock rebuild using stock parts, or for a first timer. Get some good literature, and learn from your mistake. In fact if you use the search function, I'm confident that ring gap has been covered (if not here then somewhere).
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 10:36 PM
  #12  
3kelvin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Lilburn
Car: Modified 91 RS
Engine: 350 (1977 4 bolt main casting)
Transmission: 700R4 salvaged from an 84
Hey firstfirebird ... Feeling a little embarassed at the moment. Had been so proud of that engine. Been cranking up the search engine on this site ... yeah, this topic has been discussed a bit.

Well, good thing I don't mind gettin' greasy 'cause that engine is coming out in the morning.

Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 11:13 PM
  #13  
firstfirebird's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,413
Likes: 2
From: South FL
Please update this thread, I would like to know how it goes.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2007 | 01:46 AM
  #14  
Sonix's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Whoa! Am I the only one concerned that your valves were steam cleaned on that cylinder? Only on the one cylinder that now has bad rings? :hmm:

I guess pull the pistons, get new basic moly iron rings, and hone all the cylinders. Use ATF, and go at it until you see a nice crosshatch. Then squirt some oil on it, and re-assemble and go.
Be sure to work really hard at seating the rings. Heavy throttle blasts, and engine braking, during the first 50 miles.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2007 | 05:22 AM
  #15  
ede's Avatar
ede
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 14,811
Likes: 1
From: Jackson County
think i'd have the heads tested and checked for flatness before i went too far into the short block
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2007 | 09:39 AM
  #16  
SpitotRs305's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 vortec
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: not the best not the worst
well i thought about that be he replaced the head gasket and the cooling system now holds pressure if there was still a leak on #2 it wouldnt have so it seems like there where 2 problems rings and a headgasket but i would look at the heads and block for flatness as it only happened on one cylinder
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2007 | 11:57 AM
  #17  
3kelvin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Lilburn
Car: Modified 91 RS
Engine: 350 (1977 4 bolt main casting)
Transmission: 700R4 salvaged from an 84
Updating as you suggested, firstfirebird. First, I want to thank you and the other guys for helping me out. (Embarassing admission time ... I went back to that book and checked and sure enough there is a little blurb in there about checking end gap and filing rings.)

We pulled the engine and checked the block and heads for flatness as ede recommended. That looked good. Then we popped the pistons out and checked the crank and rod bearings. No problems there, but I replaced the bearings on GP and rechecked bearing clearance with plastigage. Then I checked the ring end gap ... sure enough #2, #4 and #5 had too small a gap by .002-.004 in. The rest were accidentally within recommendations. Heh.

We saw lots of evidence of a massive oil control problem in #2 and the rings were clearly AFU. But the cylinder bore itself was fine.

We went with basic moly rings, honed carefully and used QuickSet, set end gap between .022 and 0.024 per manufacturer's recommendations and re-installed. Despite our best efforts to clean out the exhaust, there must have been a lot of crap in there because she smoked for a long time. I took one good run down the road and that was the last time we got smoke from the engine.

Been following Sonix' break in recommendations ... and having lots of fun doing it. The engine is running pretty well now. We'll just have to see how it lasts.

Thanks again, people.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2007 | 12:39 PM
  #18  
firstfirebird's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,413
Likes: 2
From: South FL
Right on !!!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jhawkeye
Engine Swap
5
May 25, 2022 06:33 PM
theshackle
Tech / General Engine
4
Mar 5, 2017 06:37 PM
dutch930
Engine Swap
5
Sep 11, 2015 06:58 AM
E Rod
LTX and LSX
5
Aug 28, 2015 05:17 AM
bradleydeanuhl
DFI and ECM
4
Aug 12, 2015 11:48 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:32 AM.