Real Horsepower figures please on 5.7
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, Az.
Car: 1989 IROC
Engine: L98 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.45 posi 1LE
Real Horsepower figures please on 5.7
Hi Folks,
I bought a 1989 IROC with a stock 5.7 350 motor. I have read Stock Horsepower ratings of 230, 240, and 245. Now, which is the real rating?
Thanks!
I bought a 1989 IROC with a stock 5.7 350 motor. I have read Stock Horsepower ratings of 230, 240, and 245. Now, which is the real rating?
Thanks!
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 3
From: Woodland, CA
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
Re: Real Horsepower figures please on 5.7
Depends on the combo. and the year and a few other minor things, your 89 should be 230. the dual cat option boosted it to 240 and I believe the 91-92 years got 245. Due to better computer.
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,950
Likes: 26
From: Orange, SoCal
Car: 1990 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 TPI siamesed runners
Transmission: Tremec T56
Axle/Gears: 12-Bolt 3.73
Re: Real Horsepower figures please on 5.7
Your '89 IROC with the 2.77 gears and single cat is rated at 230 HP.
The 90-92 5 HP increase is mostly due to the bump in compression from 9.3:1 to 9.7:1, in my opinion. We *could* say its because the speed density computer is better than the maf computer, but that might make some people upset.
The 90-92 5 HP increase is mostly due to the bump in compression from 9.3:1 to 9.7:1, in my opinion. We *could* say its because the speed density computer is better than the maf computer, but that might make some people upset.
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: Real Horsepower figures please on 5.7
i dont believe the ratings... these cars have put down 220 at the wheels bone stock... thats a solid 250-260 hp on motor
but the dual cats are said to increase power 10% somehow.... which makes no sense to me... why have 2 restrictors than one?
and 90-92 cars i believe had a slightly different cam profile (narrower LSA and possible duration differences) and lighter pistons i believe.
but the dual cats are said to increase power 10% somehow.... which makes no sense to me... why have 2 restrictors than one?
and 90-92 cars i believe had a slightly different cam profile (narrower LSA and possible duration differences) and lighter pistons i believe.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 3
From: Woodland, CA
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
Re: Real Horsepower figures please on 5.7
lots of little differences for the hp change over the last few years of the thirdgen. to orrs comment, think of it this way, have all 8 cylinders breathe through one cat or give 4 cylinders each, there own cat. does that help make sense?
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,950
Likes: 26
From: Orange, SoCal
Car: 1990 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 TPI siamesed runners
Transmission: Tremec T56
Axle/Gears: 12-Bolt 3.73
Re: Real Horsepower figures please on 5.7
The tech data is wrong then. I have visually seen for myself the difference in pistons between 87-89 350's and 90-92 350's. The 90-92 350 pistons have a smaller dish, and the circumference is flat instead of stepped. This means the piston has a smaller area and so the compression goes up. I wish I had pics to show the differences.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 1
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L EFI LTR setup
Transmission: T-5 World Class
Re: Real Horsepower figures please on 5.7
I thought the L-98's had 9:1 C/R and it was the 305 LB9 that had the 9.3 C/R ( 58 cc vs 64 cc head on the 350)
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,462
Likes: 4
From: N. Illinois
Car: 92 GTA/ 00 TA
Engine: 383/350
Transmission: 700R4/T-56
Re: Real Horsepower figures please on 5.7
My 92 350 pistons are Mahle flat tops, not dished, with 4 valve reliefs.
My 92 Helm's manual states compression to be 9.75:1.
My 92 Helm's manual states compression to be 9.75:1.
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,004
Likes: 4
From: Yellowknife, NWT, Canada
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 357
Transmission: TH-350C
Axle/Gears: 3.43
Re: Real Horsepower figures please on 5.7
Compression stayed at 9.3:1. https://www.thirdgen.org/1991-chevy-camaro
Not everything you read on the internet is true

Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post










